One person’s research and slant on the negative issues in the medical industry. It can be reasonably argued that it is realistic and true.
By Eleanor McBean 1957
CHAPTER I THE POISONED NEEDLE
WHERE HAVE THE “GREAT STRIDES OF MEDICAL SCIENCE” TAKEN US?
THE INSIDE STORY
VACCINATION IS BASED ON A FALSE PREMISE
VACCINATION LOWERS RESISTANCE AND INVITES DISEASE
SUMMARIZING THE CASE AGAINST VACCINATION
A taste of the contents:
This medical strangle hold did not just happen with the passing of time; it was a planned conspiracy against the American people, with an “eye” to the financial gains of the doctors. A sample of this strategy may be seen in the following speech of Dr. W. A. Evans, one of the top medical “bosses,” and Health Commissioner for the city of Chicago, who gave these instructions to the doctors in their annual convention of the American Medical Association in 1911:
“The thing for the medical profession to do, is to get right into, and man every important health movement; man health departments, tuberculosis societies, housing societies, child care and infant societies, etc. The future of the profession depends on it. . . The profession cannot afford to have these places occupied by other than medical men.”
This pronouncement was published in the journal of the A. M. A., September 16, 1911. Just how whole-heartedly this decree was carried out is clearly shown by how completely all the non-medical schools of healing such as chiropractic, naturopathic, religious science, hygienics, etc., have been excluded from such tax supported institutions as health boards, public hospitals, army camps, state prisons, workman’s compensation bureaus, asylums, etc.
Annie Riley Hale, in her MEDICAL VOODOO has this to say of the Dr. Evans resolutions:
That ‘the future of his profession depended’ on getting the whip-hand in Public Health Service, and that ‘the profession could not afford’ to forego the political advantage accruing from such monopoly will be interpreted by some as a virtual confession on the part of regular medicine that it either realized it had nothing of therapeutic value to offer the sick world, or that it had despaired of winning the sick patronage by fair means, and must therefore have recourse to political intrigue.
“However it may be interpreted, here we have recorded evidence of a deliberate plan by organized official medicine, openly declared in convention assembled, to monopolize a great public agency like the Public Health Service —affecting all the people and paid for by all the people — to the utter exclusion of other healing professions legalized under existing laws.
The effect of the adoption and vigorous prosecution of the Evans resolution has been to (1) enhance the political power of organized medicine under the official name of American Medical Association, and (2) to enable the medical trust to hamper, harass, and where possible, suppress their therapeutic rivals — in order to destroy competition. . . Destroying competition and crushing smaller businesses for monetary gain is precisely what the SHERMAN ANTI-TRUST LAW was designed to prevent. Thus, the A. M. A. in carrying out the Evans program has taken on all the offensive features and oppressive overlordism of a swollen commercial ‘trust’.”
There may be some independent medical practitioners who do not belong to or support the A. M. A. and these would not be held accountable for the damage done by the “outlaw” practices of the “association.”