All my life I have wondered, as have many others surely, representing scientifically educated persons not trained in Space. Astronomy and Relativity Sciences, the impossibility of understanding the current science concerning Black Holes.
The article on which I venture to comment here, shows that the experts themselves, perhaps starting with Einstein and including Hawking, are not able to offer anything but solutions based on their incredibly calculated scientific mathematics. After all, that is all they have, no laboratory or obviously physical contact with which to work.

It is encouraging to me, to venture such an uneducated article, because the above experts do actually admit to the impossibilities of knowing that they are in fact making incontrovertible conclusions.

This is the main incentive from the post I wish to publish here,

“The field has, for some reason, largely ignored the elephant in the room and hasn’t yet stopped to question the singularity. Until now, at least. The problem is the singularity itself, this idea that a black hole is just infinity and that’s the end of it. But if a collapsing star creates an infinity, that calls the whole picture into question. Is it really geometry folding neatly into an infinite point? Look at the word we use often. Collapse. Einstein used that word. So did Penrose and Hawking. But they were describing matter contracting to a singularity, not a full geometric failure of spacetime itself. Matter falls inward, geodesics run out, and they called that the end. What they did not say is that the geometry carrying all of it has a breaking point of its own. Geometry does not fold into a point. It fails. It breaks apart. And what is left in its wake, the empty void we call a black hole, is what remains after the break. Or at least, that is what newly published theories are talking about in 2026. “

An attempt at applying what I consider ‘commonsense’, my education taught me that a black hole was certainly not a “hole”, but it appeared as such, because you could not “see it”. Because it was in fact a physical body with sufficient gravitational force to attract even light photons!

Can it be argued that if it was a hole. you would actually see through it? Is it being suggested that photons actually disappear into it ?? Similarly atoms of matter ?? Or, actually are they really there, contributing to the enormous gravitational mass?

“Gravitational Collapse and Space-Time Singularities”, and “matter contracting to a singularity” are terms used in the presented article, apparently based on human created mathematics, that bear no resemblances to anything that can be envisaged as reality!

Just “saying”😊

Rethinking the Black Hole Singularity