The vision of technocracy

An understanding of globalism. Easy to read and follow.
Simplified, but a good starting point for those not quite sure what is going on in this Orwellian world.
Knowing that this is reality is helpful for greater understanding.

Jon Rappoport's Blog

The vision of technocracy

by Jon Rappoport

May 24, 2017

“Well, boys, we’ve got this strange thing called THE INDIVIDUAL. Could somebody tell me what he is? He’s not conforming to our algorithms. He’s all over the place. And while we’re at it, what the hell is this IMAGINATION? It keeps slipping out of our grasp, it doesn’t fit the plan…”


—Technocrats say they want to wipe out poverty, war, and inequality. But in order to achieve these lofty goals (or pretend to), they need to re-program humans—

Technocracy is the basic agenda and plan for ruling global society from above, so we need to understand it from several angles.

Consider a group of enthusiastic forward-looking engineers in the early 20th century. They work for a company that has a contract to manufacture a locomotive.

This is a highly complex piece of equipment.

On one level, workers are…

View original post 1,328 more words

Posted in Uncategorized | 4 Comments

Study: Brainwash the Next Generation to Promote Climate Action

” We know humans are causing climate change. That is a fact that has been known for well over 100 years. ”
This says it all – a blatant lie!
Educate yourself.

Watts Up With That?

Guest essay by Eric Worrall

Greens have finally worked out how to promote climate action: Create more greens, by “ingraining” children with their worldview.

Study: inspiring action on climate change is more complex than you might think

People have to grasp how climate change impacts them, and we need to value environmentally sound behavior

John Abraham
Friday 19 May 2017 20.00 AEST

We know humans are causing climate change. That is a fact that has been known for well over 100 years. We also know that there will be significant social and economic costs from the effects. In fact, the effects are already appearing in the form of more extreme weather, rising sea levels, ocean acidification, and so on.

So why haven’t humans done much about the problem? Answering that question may be more challenging than the basic science of a changing climate. Fortunately, a new review just out in…

View original post 506 more words

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Two Competing Narratives on Carbon Dioxide

Worth reading, and thinking about!
“So is carbon dioxide our friend or our foe? As set out above, in some ways it is (or could be) the one and in some ways it is (or could be) the other. The vast majority of the public not only do not understand these scientific differences, they positively don’t want to have to understand these scientific differences. As Richard Lindzen has said, ‘Most arguments about global warming boil down to science versus authority. For much of the public authority will generally win since they do not wish to deal with the science.’ Instead they will form their view on the climate change debate almost exclusively on how they feel about it based primarily on the narrative spun in the media (a narrative that is utterly dominated by the propaganda of the climate change alarmists). As Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf, ‘The most brilliant propagandist technique will yield no success unless one fundamental principle is borne in mind constantly and with unflagging attention. It must confine itself to a few points and repeat them over and over.’ This is why endlessly repeated simplistic soundbites like ‘climate change is man-made and dangerous’ and ‘the science is settled’ and ‘97% of scientists agree’ have been so powerful. Is there any real truth in these statements? It doesn’t matter – just keep repeating them.”

Watts Up With That?

Is carbon dioxide our friend or our foe?

Guest essay by Iain Aitken

Here is a dossier of key facts about carbon dioxide (and its role in global warming):

· It is an incombustible, colourless, odourless, tasteless and non-toxic gas

· It is a plant nutrient and, as the ‘fuel’ of photosynthesis and the creation of oxygen, it is absolutely essential to the existence of life on Earth

· Its fertilisation effect has meant that, thanks to our anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions increasing concentrations in the atmosphere, crop yields have improved dramatically to date and will continue to improve in the future

· It is a weak greenhouse gas

· Global warming precedes, and then causes, increases in carbon dioxide emissions

· Most global warming experienced since 1950 can be attributed to natural climate variability, rather than enhanced greenhouse gas warming from anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions. Furthermore the rate of…

View original post 1,485 more words

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Politics Disguised as Science: When to Doubt a Scientific ‘Consensus’

Makes a lot of sense.

When we see public marches supporting some scientific issue, it suggests a degree of desperation. One wonders what could possibly be wrong with the “science” if it does not stand proudly on its own merits?

Too many people are able to see when science is being adulterated and used for a  political agenda and it is apparently hoped that public marches will counter their influence.

Science has its logical basis and departures from logic cannot be ignored.

From ‘The Stream

Anyone who has studied the history of science knows that scientists are not immune to the non-rational dynamics of the herd.

This week’s March for Science is odd. Marches are usually held to defend something that’s in peril. Does anyone really think big science is in danger? The mere fact that the March was scheduled for Earth Day betrays what the event is really about: politics. The organizers admitted as much early on, though they’re now busy trying to cover the event in sciencey camouflage.

If past is prologue, expect to hear a lot about the supposed “consensus” on catastrophic climate change this week. The purpose of this claim is to shut up skeptical non-scientists.

How should non-scientists respond when told about this consensus? We can’t all study climate science. But since politics often masquerades as science, we need a way to tell one from the other.

“Consensus,” according to Merriam-Webster, means both “general agreement” and “group solidarity in sentiment and belief.” That sums up the problem. Is this consensus based on solid evidence and sound logic, or social pressure and groupthink?

When can you doubt a consensus? Your best bet is to look at the process that produced, defends and transmits the supposed consensus.

Anyone who has studied the history of science knows that scientists are prone to herd instincts. Many false ideas once enjoyed consensus. Indeed, the “power of the paradigm” often blinds scientists to alternatives to their view. Question the paradigm, and some respond with anger.

We shouldn’t, of course, forget the other side of the coin. There are cranks and conspiracy theorists. No matter how well founded a scientific consensus, there’s someone who thinks it’s all hokum. Sometimes these folks turn out to be right. But often, they’re just cranks whose counsel is best ignored.

So how do we distinguish, as Andrew Coyne puts it, “between genuine authority and mere received wisdom? And how do we tell crankish imperviousness to evidence from legitimate skepticism?” Do we have to trust whatever we’re told is based on a scientific consensus unless we can study the science ourselves? When can you doubt a consensus? When should you doubt it?

Your best bet is to look at the process that produced, defends and transmits the supposed consensus. I don’t know of any complete list of signs of suspicion. But here’s a checklist to decide when you can, even should, doubt a scientific “consensus,” whatever the subject. One of these signs may be enough to give pause. If they start to pile up, then it’s wise to be leery.

Read the whole article here. It is most educational.

Posted in AGENDA 21, AGW, Conspiracies, ENVIRONMENT, Human Behaviour, Science | Tagged , , | 7 Comments

CO2 ≠ Pollutant

Some impressive facts for alarmists to think about.
Perhaps the eugenics enthusiasts have got it right, if humans are in fact the biggest CO2 sources of all?
But only if CO2 is in fact a pollutant, which it is scientifically proven not to be.
At last the facts are becoming clearer for the public to understand.
Soon the whole truth will be understood.

Science Matters

My university degree is a Bachelors in Organic Chemistry from Stanford. For that and other reasons, it always annoyed me that some lawyers decided CO2 can be called a “pollutant”, all the while exhaling the toxic gas themselves.

This nonsense forms the root of all the ridiculous regulations that POTUS ordered reviewed and rescinded yesterday. Thus I agree completely with this Wall Street Journal article by Paul Tice Trump’s Next Step on Climate Change. Full text below.

Reconsider the EPA’s labeling of carbon dioxide as a pollutant, based on now-outdated science.

March 28, 2017 6:41 p.m. ET

The executive orders on climate change President Trump signed this week represent a step in the right direction for U.S. energy policy and, importantly, deliver on Mr. Trump’s campaign promise to roll back burdensome regulations affecting American companies. But it will take more than the stroke of a…

View original post 810 more words

Posted in Uncategorized | 3 Comments

Microwave Ovens – Safety Issues

From ‘Healthy Food House‘ information that should be available to all households.

You Know Microwaves Are Bad For You But This Is What You Didn’t Know

An extract from the article,

Dr. Hans Hertel, a Swiss biologist, and food scientist conducted a study to examine the effects of microwaved food. Participants lived in a controlled environment and intermittently ate raw foods, conventionally cooked foods, and microwaved foods for 8 weeks.

After meals, researchers tested the blood samples of participants, and tests showed that the blood chemistry has been drastically changed due to the microwaved food.

Hans Hertel states:

“There are no atoms, molecules or cells of any organic system able to withstand such a violent, destructive power for any extended period of time, not even in the low energy range of milliwatts…

This is how microwave cooking heat is generated – friction from this violence in water molecules. Structures of molecules are torn apart, molecules are forcefully deformed (called structural isomerism) and thus become impaired in quality.”

Microwaves work with all water molecules they can come across, and due to this, the food is often unevenly heated, as some foods contain higher water amounts.

Researchers at Stanford University examined the effects of microwaves on breast milk. According to one of the head scientist,

“Microwaving human milk, even at a low setting, can destroy some of its important disease-fighting capabilities.”

They state that microwaving causes numerous alter changes in the milk besides heating.

In 1991, the Oklahoma hospital was sued after the death of a patient after receiving blood that was heated in a microwave oven.

As a result of the negative effects of microwave ovens on the health, they have been banned in Russia since 1976.

These are the detrimental effects of these ovens:

Read the complete article here.

Here we have the potential food-related dangers, part of the total risk scenario.

Leakages from the equipment, claimed to be safely constrained and tested to be so on new equipment, could be a problem on any slightly damaged door sealing instance. There are no obvious requirements to have microwave ovens officially tested for leakages so this is surely a “grey area”.

Of course, the claims by the manufacturers and its supporters strongly counter what is in this post, so there is a need to research it all to reach some sensible conclusion. Not so easy as there is a great deal of available information, most of it technical.

One website revealed by internet searching seems to be comprehensive and unbiassed,” offers several related documents:

Microwave Oven Radiations Hazards & Standards

My personal, suspicious inclination, favours safety first and puts vested-interest viewpoints second.

The fact that Russia has investigated and has banned microwave ovens is significant, along with their opposition to GMO foods which may be partly political but only partly. Russia has a keen eye on its citizen’s well-being with promotion of organic products and awareness of potential vaccine dangers.

To accentuate the danger side of this issue, and to reveal one source of influence on my decision making, the above reference contains the following “cherry-picked” section in the form of a ‘TGR’ page.

The Proven Dangers of Microwaves  ( )

Posted in HEALTH, radiation | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

New climate skeptic book will set the record straight

It is not easy to counter the blatant propaganda of the global warming alarmists and their willing promoters and followers. The power and presence of their marketing expertise has created something of a juggernaut. Why should it be accepted at face value?
This book is part of a substantial amount of valid scientific and related information establishing the “settled science” and “95% scientists agree” claims to be simply lies.
The ‘climate change’ movement, supported by so many people and organizations, believed by so many with religious fanaticism because they are unwilling to allow doubts into their thought processes.
Doubts that are in fact, essential to rational decision making. The warmists are concerned for the future of the planet because of their fears of global warming. Fears of pollution in general are well founded but including CO2 in that category is wrong.
People will one day realize that they actually needed to fear the administration processes promoting and implementing the ‘climate change’ program.
This post, the reviewed informative book and the WUWT blog, all provide convincing information and guidance.

Watts Up With That?

CLIMATE CHANGE: THE FACTS 2017 is to be published in June 2017. I’m happy to say that I’m an author of a chapter.

This work is dedicated to the late Professor Bob Carter, who dedicated his life to truth and openness in the climate debate. This is the second volume of this book, the first being published in 2015 and available here.

The Institute of Public Affairs in Australia is bringing together some of the leading experts in the field including:


Editor: Dr. Jennifer MAROHASY.

Advance notices will go out when it is available, to register your interest go to and provide your email address, and you’ll be notified when available.

View original post

Posted in AGW, climate change, ENVIRONMENT, Science | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

We Shot an Israeli Jet Down, Sent Others Fleeing | Syrian Army

Keeping tabs on Syria.

Arguably the most critical current global issue, on which hinges the greatest threat to world peace. Well, that is a bit misleading, as there is no current world peace.

Action in the Middle East is ongoing and showing no signs of being resolved.

Other potential issues threatening further global warfare include North Korea and the China Sea territorial rights.

Away from the warmongering theatre, there includes the Fukushima catastrophic environmental devastation, not yet  getting mainstream media attention.

While global collective awareness is diverted from these real issues, by such misleading issues such as global warming, sporting scenarios, gambling diversions, inane entertainment media and mind-boggling commercials and station promotions, a few responsible and knowledgeable alternative media sources provide a much more realistic revelation.


Covert Geopolitics

The covert WW3 that’s being fought in the Middle East has just gotten nastier. Earlier in the day, the Israeli military underwent a preempted propaganda denial by saying that the Syrian armed forces shot missiles at their jetfighters, but failed to hit any of them.

View original post 546 more words

Posted in 'WAR on(of) TERROR', MIDDLE EAST, Warfare, WW III concerns | Tagged , , , | 10 Comments

Australia vaccine fascism – now childcare ban on unvaccinated children ‘considered’

One comment on this original post makes a good argument.
“Who cares Big Pharma has corrupted public opinion yet again. If people would bother to research the dangers of vaccines, the fact that the pharma industry has immunity from prosecution in the US, the true history of the disastrous first vaccine for smallpox and the statistical evidence that vaccinated children also get the diseases they have been vaccinated against as well as the sometimes crippling or deadly side effects then they would refuse vaccination. It is a parent’s responsibility to find out the surprising truth. Don’t believe the BS about herd immunity and vaccine safety.”
Bottom line is that very few persons require special protection from diseases but cannot be vaccinated because of their specific health problems. (Perhaps ironic that it is admitted that vaccines can damage them, but not healthier people?)
There are, however, many persons who have some adverse reactions, yet they are not eligible for exemption for medical reasons.
It is also ironic that vaccinated children, can, for a short while, actually create a source of contamination themselves.
Why not allow healthy people to make a choice about their children and themselves? They are not jeopardizing anyone else except possibly those who choose to live free from contaminated and documented dangerous vaccines.
Why are the vaccinated so scared about unvaccinated persons? Is that because they have no confidence in the vaccines?
Many lies and much misinformation, are being told in order to support mass vaccinations.
A healthy community with safe water and sanitary services can not be statistically compared to under-developed countries where the seriousness of diseases is real.
Australia has a healthy environment and infrastructure, its statistics do not support mandatory vaccinations! If we are concerned about travellers visiting or migrants moving to Australia bringing in diseases, the health department should ensure that their health is certified, voluntarily vaccinated or quarantined.
Similarly, our people travelling overseas would appear to be genuine candidates for vaccines, but that raises other issues.
Finally, if you believe that there is no evidence linking autism to vaccines, you are certainly lacking in knowledge from readily available, genuine documentation. Unfortunately this situation also applies to practitioners in the medical profession, right to the AMA director.
[Reference “The FDA have published conclusive proof on their website that the DTap vaccine causes autism.”
” Here’s an excerpt from approved vaccines by the FDA and their adverse events.
” – Adverse events reported during post-approval use of Tripedia vaccine include idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura, SIDS, anaphylactic reaction, cellulitis, autism, convulsion/grand mal convulsion, encephalopathy, hypotonia, neuropathy, somnolence and apnea. “ ” ]
There exist copious references adding real support to this unbiassed assessment, all of which is denied unscientifically or ignored by the vaccine pushers. Meanwhile steadfastly refusing to encourage independent scientific studies.


The Australian government wants to ban unvaccinated children from nursery schools across the country.

Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull has written to state and territory leaders to push for nationally consistent laws to protect young children from disease.

Under his new proposal, the immunisation rates of all preschools and daycare centres would be made publicly available to parents, and the right to make a formal objection to vaccination would end.’

Read more: Australia vaccine fascism – now childcare ban on unvaccinated children ‘considered’

View original post

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Assad Condemns US, Turkey Invasion; Looking forward to Chinese Reconstruction

Forthright and meaningful reporting.
The real situation in Syria is discussed here.
Believable and significant.

Covert Geopolitics

Just as the Zionist-Wahhabist funded Daesh terror is ending in Syria, with the able armed assistance of Russia, Iran, Kurdish and Hezbollah, the US military decided to openly send hundreds of troops into the region, as its puppet Turkish military has done so in advance.

View original post 1,120 more words

Posted in 'WAR on(of) TERROR', Russia, Syria, united states | Tagged | Leave a comment