2018 Cracks In The Pro Vaxer Wall?


An extract: New Study: HepB vaccine “may have adverse implications for brain development and cognition”

I love J.B Handley and you should too. When we look back on the vaccination of one day old babies for HepB we will hang our heads in shame. And we did it to our own. Criminal. Like Gardasil, anyone involved in the decision to pseudo mandate this vaccine for one day old babies should be locked up. Enemy of the People.

Yet another study highlighting the criminality of adding aluminium to a vaccine product then expecting us to inject it in our children. Wanna learn the hard way? Keep listening to your government and Rupert Murdoch. Of course they have your best interests at heart. “

Septic Skeptics

By Unvaccinated Australia Admin team

I made a prediction, a few years back, that it would be 5-10 years before Pharma’s Vaccine House of Cards toppled over. That was in 2014 when Pharma/Murdoch corrupted governments all over Australia started down the mandatory vaccination pathway. Pharma front groups like the Australian Skeptics with the able assistance of Murdoch media stooges Jane Hanson became the emboldened attack dogs aided and abetted by Pharma Twitter doctors like John Cunningham, Rachael Dunlop, Brad McKay, & last but not least, Dave Gardasil Hawkes.

In the US, Pharma whores like Richard Pan, & online pharmaceutical trolls like Dorit Reiss, Paul Offit, & minions like Eve Switzer lead the attack on the mothers and families of vaccine killed/injured children. Paid by Pharma to disrupt an important online narrative. Think about the souls of these types of people. Smart enough to…

View original post 1,228 more words

Advertisements
Posted in AUSTRALIA, HEALTH, Vaccination Dangers, vaccines | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

‘97% Of Climate Scientists Agree’ Is 100% Wrong


Perhaps the majority, of “climate change” supporters base their beliefs on the oft used, ‘97% Of Climate Scientists Agree’ , therefore it is appropriate to post this particular information article for their edification.

Most of the so-called “deniers”, (a substantially misleading term), are capable of understanding at least some of the science on which climate change decisions are being made, whereas the opposite applies to most of the “supporters”.

This excellent article explains clearly the fallacy of the “97% scientists ……………..”.

An interesting, included comment  is

” it was a no-brainer according to the two University of Illinois researchers who conducted it: {my bold emphasis}

“To maximize the response rate, the survey was designed to take less than 2 minutes to complete, and it was administered by a professional online survey site ( www.questionpro.com  ) that allowed one-time participation by those who received the invitation.””

Published by ‘Forbes’ : ref – https://www.forbes.com/sites/alexepstein/2015/01/06/97-of-climate-scientists-agree-is-100-wrong/#2c2026863f9f

Energy & Environment

If you’ve ever expressed the least bit of skepticism about environmentalist calls for making the vast majority of fossil fuel use illegal, you’ve probably heard the smug response: “97% of climate scientists agree with climate change” — which always carries the implication: Who are you to challenge them?

The answer is: you are a thinking, independent individual–and you don’t go by polls, let alone second-hand accounts of polls; you go by facts, logic and explanation.

Here are two questions to ask anyone who pulls the 97% trick.

1. What exactly do the climate scientists agree on?

Usually, the person will have a very vague answer like “climate change is real.”

Which raises the question: What is that supposed to mean? That climate changes? That we have some impact? That we have a large impact? That we have a catastrophically large impact? That we have such a catastrophic impact that we shouldn’t use fossil fuels?

What you’ll find is that people don’t want to define what 97% agree on–because there is nothing remotely in the literature saying 97% agree we should ban most fossil fuel use.

It’s likely that 97% of people making the 97% claim have absolutely no idea where that number comes from.

If you look at the literature, the specific meaning of the 97% claim is: 97 percent of climate scientists agree that there is a global warming trend and that human beings are the main cause–that is, that we are over 50% responsible. The warming is a whopping 0.8 degrees over the past 150 years, a warming that has tapered off to essentially nothing in the last decade and a half.


Bottom line: What the 97% of climate scientists allegedly agree on is very mild and in no way justifies restricting the energy that billions need.

But it gets even worse. Because it turns out that 97% didn’t even say that.

Read it all here.

Also, more on this from WUWT which refers to another Forbes article, by Larry Bell.

About that overwhelming 97-98% number of scientists that say there is a climate consensus…

Larry Bell writes in his weekly Forbes column about that oft repeated but less than truthy “98% of all scientists” statistic. Supposedly, this was such an easy and quick to do survey, it was a no-brainer according to the two University of Illinois researchers who conducted it:

To maximize the response rate, the survey was designed to take less than 2 minutes to complete, and it was administered by a professional online survey site ( www.questionpro.com  ) that allowed one-time participation by those who received the invitation.

I think it is hilarious that so few people who cite this survey as “proof” of consensus actually look into the survey and the puny response numbers involved. So, I decided to graph the data to give some much needed perspective. Apparently, the majority of AGU members polled didn’t think this poll on climate change consensus was worth returning. – Anthony

So readers, and climate alarmists, please give this some serious thought.

Posted in climate change, Human Behaviour, Human Folly, World Issues | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments

The Great Global Warming Swindle – Full Documentary HD


Courtesy:

Wisdom Land

Published on Aug 19, 2018

The Great Global Warming Swindle caused controversy in the UK when it premiered March 8, 2007 on British Channel 4. A documentary, by British television producer Martin Durkin, which argues against the virtually unchallenged consensus that global warming is man-made. A statement from the makers of this film asserts that the scientific theory of anthropogenic global warming could very well be “the biggest scam of modern times.” According to Martin Durkin the chief cause of climate change is not human activity but changes in radiation from the sun. Some have called The Great Global Warming Swindle the definitive retort to Al Gore’s An Inconvenient Truth. Using a comprehensive range of evidence it’s claimed that warming over the past 300 years represents a natural recovery from a ‘little ice age’. According to the program humans do have an effect on climate but it’s infinitesimally small compared with the vast natural forces which are constantly pushing global temperatures this way and that. From melting glaciers and rising sea levels, The Great Global Warming Swindle debunks the myths, and exposes what may well prove to be the darkest chapter in the history of mankind. According to a group of leading scientists brought together by documentary maker Martin Durkin everything you’ve ever been told about global warming is probably untrue. Just as we’ve begun to take it for granted that climate change is a man-made phenomenon, Durkin’s documentary slays the whole premise of global warming. “Global warming has become a story of huge political significance; environmental activists using scare tactics to further their cause; scientists adding credence to secure billions of dollars in research money; politicians after headlines and a media happy to play along. No-one dares speak against it for risk of being unpopular, losing funds and jeopardizing careers.”
Contrary to the widely held beliefs that human contributions to increased atmospheric CO2 (Carbon Dioxide) are a serious threat to civilization, there exists an important number of qualified scientists who disagree. As this video reveals, there are meaningful reasons why this is so.
Both the scientific and political aspects of this issue are explained. They provide a basis for an education in understanding the greater picture. Rather than accepting the popular and sometimes forceful dogma that bombards the public, there is another way to learn the truth.

Posted in climate change, Education, ENVIRONMENT, Planet Earth, Science | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Melbourne has been this hot or hotter about 30, no, 50 times since 1855


See JoNova blog for this and more facts.

Melbourne, 200,000 houses blacked out, 10 companies curtailed, as 1-in-3-year hot day hits

An extract:

It’s being billed as wildly extreme, but Melbourne officially peaked at 42.8C. Bob Fernley-Jones looked back at the long Melbourne Regional Office data going back to 1855, and found around 30 corrected “50″ examples of a day of 42C or more. Days like this are one-in-3-year-event. This is summer in Melbourne. It’s not rare and any half-competent planner would plan accordingly.

As Bob points out the highest spikes in Jan ’39 and Feb 2009 are arguably outliers “resulting from freakish hot northerlies (and the most terrible Victorian bushfires).  If they are waived as outliers, then for the rest of the record from 1855 it’s all pretty dam flat?”

Temperatures above 42C in Melbourne

Temperatures recorded above 42C in Melbourne from 1855 to 2015.  (Regional Office)  Thanks to Bob Fernley-Jones.

Furthermore, this “42.8C” was recorded on an ultra sensitive electronic sensor which means it could well be a “one second record” that is artificially inflated compared to the same day as measured with a mercury thermometer which is slower to respond. The half hour observations in Melbourne peaked at 42.3C. The BOM could tell us exactly how long temperatures “peaked” for. Will they? They could tell us exactly how different the two thermometer types are, but Bill Johnston found they are destroying that data.

Seriously, officer, these two thermometers are exactly the same. Trust me.

Two different thermometers side by side. Photo. Bureau of Meteorology.

An example of different thermometers side-by-side in a Stevenson Screen.. Photo: Bill Johnston.

 How much did it all cost?

Who will add up the electricity bill, the RERT (emergency scheme), the FCAS charges and the compensation payments?

This [RERT scheme] means paying smelters, factories and other heavy power users to rapidly curtail their energy use to rein in demand, when the system is under strain.

Who will add up the lost wages, the lost opportunities, and the jobs that never came to Victoria?

Whatever the bill, we know who will pay.

Photo Loy Yang: Jo Nova

Posted in AUSTRALIA, climate change, Energy, ENVIRONMENT, Science | Tagged , , | 3 Comments

CO2 is not causing global warming


Very technical, but so much scientific information that comprehensively supports the so-called “deniers” criticisms of the unsupported “climate change” pseudo science built on a base of “sand”.
Happy to put my credibility on the line with this post!

budbromley

CO2, water, and CH4 (methane) and some other minor gases are so-called “greenhouse gases” because they absorb infrared energy.  However, be careful to avoid the common misunderstanding that the earth and its atmosphere behave like a garden greenhouse; that is not true.  Greenhouses are closed systems except to incoming energy.  Earth is an open system, open to receive energy, as well as gases and other matter from space and also open to transmit energy, gases and matter back into space.  A greenhouse is a poor analogy for earth’s climate.

Greenhouse gases also re-emit almost instantly the energy they absorbed, emitting that energy at a slightly lower energy than which it was absorbed.  Rarely is that emission mentioned in the news or by climate alarmists.  Proponents of global warming want you to believe that energy is stored and builds up in the atmosphere in a sort of hothouse or pressure cooker…

View original post 3,958 more words

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Both Arctic & Antarctic Sea Ice Now at Historic HIGH Levels


Source: “Ice Age NOW

Link: https://www.iceagenow.info/both-arctic-antarctic-sea-ice-now-at-historic-high-levels/?fbclid=IwAR24853zOFCaqvJJwypH0659lpGf5M5KaA4S06-A6y319piBZp0a9j1P3Dc

Contrary to claims that modern day sea ice changes are “unprecedented”, alarming, and well outside the range of natural variability, biomarker proxies used to reconstruct both Arctic and Antarctic sea ice conditions since the Early Holocene increasingly reveal that there is more extensive Arctic and Antarctic sea ice during recent decades than for nearly all of the last 10,000 years.

Click here to read all about it. (Alert! Could be unsettling 🙂 )

Posted in climate change, ENVIRONMENT, Science | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

WordPress domination. Cookies!


” Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy 

This announcement appears on my web site, with no input nor agreement from me.

My website does not use ‘cookies’. If they exist, they are being introduced by WordPress.

I always ignore this, on my and other blogs, and just continue on, but I have no idea of their influence.

Advice from an expert would be welcome.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Australian Bureau of Meteorology – How strong is its credibility?



A recent, large exposure to the public on our mass media outlets, firmly places “climate change” as the cause of current heat waves and “hottest year” claims, for Australia. Promoted, by the Australian BOM, it is a clear and blatant statement that the future is grim and requires immediate improvement in our drive for eliminating fossil fuel energy production and further investment in alternative solar and wind power sources.

Critical thinking regarding media information is in order to maintain a balanced viewpoint.

Refer to listing of media items below.

There is no attempt to be scientifically accurate by taking a number of other factors into account, like record cold temperatures, not just in winter but at more telling times.

Better than trying to clarify this further here, it is pertinent to introduce an article by  Jennifer Marohasy, about submissions from herself and other experts alleging the BOM’s  failure to be honest and to maintain acceptable scientific principles.

“Submissions to the Panel”

Typical entries are:

“Concerned that the Bureau of Meteorology has made many errors in its calculation of the mean Australian temperature specifically for 2013, Merrick Thomson, a retired accountant, asks a few questions in his submission including:”

“Roger Underwood was once the General Manager of the Western Australian Department of Conservation and Land Management (CALM), and for nine years was responsible for the operation of a Bureau of Meteorology (BOM) weather station.  He sent a letter to Bob Baldwin today with comment: “  I understand that you [Mr Baldwin] are overseeing the inquiry by an expert panel into the ‘homogenization’ of temperature records by the BOM.  My many scientific colleagues and I share serious concerns about the ‘homogenization’ issue.  ”

”  Ken Stewart  is a retired school principal with a deep-seated skepticism of anything produced by governments, political parties, religious organizations and big business.  Ken became interested in global warming some years ago, then decided to undertake his own audit of the then official Australian temperature record known as the ‘High Quality’ series.  This series has since been withdrawn and replaced with a new series known as ACORN-SAT.  ACORN-SAT stands for Australian Climate Observations Reference Network – Surface Air Temperature.   Ken has made a very detailed submission to the panel, which can be downloaded from his blog.  “

All of these submissions, in detail, are linked here.

Included is Jennifer’s own submission,

My submission (Jennifer Marohasy) focuses on Wilcannia, a hot and often dusty town in western New South Wales, and can be accessed by clicking here.

Further evidence of the BOM’s lack of credibility are pointed out in Jennifer’s post:

Temperatures

IN 2017, I published an article in the journal GeoResJ with John Abbot. This has been the subject of a misguided campaign, specifically to discredit our findings that much of the global warming through the 20th Century is natural. We recently responded to some of the criticism by way of a detailed report: ‘Historical Temperature Reconstructions and Estimating the Contribution of the Industrial Revolution to 20th Century Warming’. In due course, this will be developed into a publication.

Also, for some years I have been pointing-out that there is no consistency in the methods used by the Australian Bureau of Meteorology to measure surface temperatures, and that the routine remodeling of temperature series by the ACORN-SAT unit within the Bureau is not scientific.

top

Listing of media releases:

Aust baked in third-warmest year on record https://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/latest-news/aust-baked-in…

Last year was Australia’s third-warmest year on record, with every state and territory recording above average temperatures in 2018. The nation’s average temperature last year was 1.14C above the …

Australia experiences its third-hottest year on record … https://www.sbs.com.au/news/australia-experiences-its-third…

The warmest months of the year were March, July, August, October and December. They ranked in the top 10 warmest months on record, Dr Braganza said. “Australia has seen the five warmest years on …

Climate change, global warming: 2019 may be hottest year … https://www.news.com.au/technology/environment/climate-change/why…

A recent report in the Medical Journal of Australia highlighted how the climate was threatening Australian lives, with heat stress alone costing $616 per employed person per year.

2014 was Australia’s third-hottest year on record, says … theconversation.com/2014-was-australias-third-hottest-year-on…

The two-year period of 2012-2013 also smashed the previous 24-month record by 0.32C. 2014 on its own was the third-hottest year since Australia’s official records began in 1910, with …

Australia had third-hottest year ever in 2017, weather … https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2018/jan/10/australia…

The warmest two years were 2016 and 2015, records that were assisted by a strong El Niño, making 2017 the hottest year so far without the assistance of the weather pattern.

Earth’s hottest year in recorded history | The New Daily https://thenewdaily.com.au/news/world/2017/01/02/2016-hottestyear

With the second half also expected to have the same claim, this will mean 2016 will beat 2015 (which had also broken the record set in 2014) as Earth’s warmest year ever recorded.

BOM: 2018 was third hottest year on record – MacroBusiness https://www.macrobusiness.com.au/2019/01/2018-third-hottestyear

Aussie Aussie Aussie! Another record for the ages with the Bureau of Meteorology revealing that 2018 was the third hottest year on record, with global temperatures in 2018 to be the fourth-warmest

2013 confirmed as Australia’s hottest year on record https://www.smh.com.au/environment/climate-change/2013-confirmed…

The Bureau of Meteorology on Friday confirmed that last year was the hottest nationwide in more than a century of standardised records, with mean temperatures 1.2 degrees above the 1961-90 average …

BOM declares 2018 Australia’s third-hottest year on record … https://mobile.abc.net.au/news/2019-01-10/bom-2018-climate…

Don’t let recent rain cloud your memory. As a whole, 2018 was hot and dry, and the Bureau of Meteorology’s (BOM) annual climate statement has just made it official. 2018 was the third-hottest year on record Rainfall was down 11 per cent on average, and was the lowest since 2005 The low rainfall

2016 was the hottest year ever on Australia’s east coast … https://www.news.com.au/technology/environment/climate-change/2016…

The Annual Climate Statement is a snapshot of the Australian climate for the previous year including rainfall, temperature and significant events.

top

Posted in AGENDA 21, AUSTRALIA, climate change, ENVIRONMENT, Science | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Breaking: UN Staff Member says 5G Is War on Humanity


Posted in HEALTH, radiation, United Nations | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Infanrix Hexa – 65 Toxins Found. All Risk. No Benefit.


At last, some logical, commonsense, unbiassed information of great importance.
As is stated, amongst many other truths, anything with risks or valid questions attached, should not be mandatory.
There is a need to ask why this agenda is in existence.

Real News Australia

by Dr. Sherri Tenpenny, DO, AOBNMM, ABIHM
Originally Posted at Vaxxter.com

I’ve been saying for YEARS that we need to raise $50k to have every vaccine tested to see what is REALLY coming through that needle. This clearly came into focus for me in 2009, with the H1N1 “Swine flu” fiasco. So many people were injured and a big spike in miscarriages and stillbirths was reported. I started asking loudly: “What’s IN that stuff? We should test those vials”  

Well, it’s finally happening.

With the onset of government vaccine mandates, which suddenly required Italian children to be injected with 11 vaccines to attend school, the Italians are fighting back. First, they voted out the government that pushed for the mandates calling their movement #GovenmentofChange. Then on December 4, the new Italian health minister kicked out all 30 members of the health policy advisory board.

On December 13

View original post 304 more words

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment