WHO Is Responsible For The Global Covid Juggernaut?


There are so many factors relevant to the current global revolution sweeping unchecked, destroying so many aspects of our lives. These factors include questions of credibility, logic, truth, origins, degrees of health and safety, methodologies, political influences, freedoms, coersions, agendas, public behaviour, police behaviour, mass media, social media, government behaviour and censorship.

Detailed aspects concern the ‘virus’, its ‘variants’, potency (danger), transmissibility, shedding, origin (‘natural’ or man-made), life and chemical structure. “Transmissibility” leads us to the human responses being introduced in order to limit the spreading, – masks, hygiene, isolation, lock-downs, curfews, group numbers, and VACCINATIONS.

‘Vaccinations’ presents its own mountain of variables, questions and imponderables. Enough to create a ‘book’of its own!  Necessity, applicability, safety, efficacy, duration, transmission, recording, statistics and adverse effects.

All of these issues are ‘faithfully’ and persistently presented to the public via our TV and newspaper networks, but are they accurate? Another realm of serious questions and debate! A huge expanse of social media and activism raises an ever-expanding source of alternative claims, theories and factual data.

Are the infection tests reliable?

Are the death, hospitalization and ICU statistics correct?
Do masks and lock-downs achieve anything and to what degree?

Two main questions, even on the social media, remain unclear.

The source of the virus and the suspicion of intent rather than accidental escape.

Many people and authorities seem to now accept that the Covid virus is not a natural chemical evolution, but is a deliberate laboratory creation. How did it become free from the laboratory and have such a rapid worldwide spread?

The following information quite credibly answers these questions, we can only hope that it becomes known to those who need to know and can act upon it, before the censorship machine ‘shreds’ it.
{ Bold Emphasis in the text is added}

First Clue:                                                                                                                                                                                           The Director-General of the World Health Organization (WHO), Tedros Adanom Ghebreyesus, called on countries to prepare for a new pandemic in the next three months. He said this during a briefing in Geneva, the broadcast of which was published on the organization’s Twitter page.                                                

   https://t.me/WorldAwakeningTrueNews/7833

    

Additional evidence, revealed below, is not currently accessible, thank goodness one person was able to publish the details.

Annual report on global preparedness for health emergencies Global Preparedness Monitoring Board

Acknowledgements We extend our deep appreciation and thanks to the Director-General of the World Health Organization and to the President, World Bank Group for having co-convened the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board (GPMB).

The United Nations must strengthen coordination mechanisms.
The Secretary General of the United Nations, with WHO and United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA), must strengthen coordination in different country, health and humanitarian emergency contexts, by ensuring clear United Nations systemwide roles and responsibilities; rapidly resetting preparedness and response strategies during health emergencies; and, enhancing United Nations system leadership for preparedness, including through routine simulation exercises.
WHO should introduce an approach to mobilize the wider national, regional and international community at earlier stages of an outbreak, prior to a declaration of an IHR (2005) Public Health Emergency of International Concern. Progress indicator(s) by September 2020
• The Secretary-General of the United Nations, with the Director-General of WHO and Under-Secretary-General for Humanitarian Affairs strengthens coordination and identifies clear roles and responsibilities and timely triggers for a coordinated United Nations systemwide response for health emergencies in different countries and different health and humanitarian emergency contexts.
The United Nations (including WHO) conducts at least two system-wide training and simulation exercises, including one for covering the deliberate release of a lethal respiratory pathogen.
 • WHO develops intermediate triggers to mobilize national, international and multilateral action early in outbreaks, to complement existing mechanisms for later and more advanced stages of an outbreak under the IHR (2005).
• The Secretary General of the United Nations convenes a high-level dialogue with health, security and foreign affairs officials to determine how the world can address the threat of a lethal respiratory pathogen pandemic, as well as for managing preparedness for disease outbreaks in complex, insecure contexts.

Evidence of the first mentioned training excercises taking place:


Planned Simulation:

 “Before COVID, Gates Planned Social Media Censorship of Vaccine Safety Advocates With Pharma, CDC, Media, China and CIA”
[ So weird, it is difficult to grasp the concept of a “rehearsal” and its depth of detail!   NOTE – October 2019, a week or two before COVID began circulating.]

https://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/covid-gates-planned-social-media-censorship-vaccine-safety-advocates-pharma-cdc-m1
Written By: Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.
The attached document shows that a cabal of powerful individuals did indeed begin planning the mass eviction of vaccine skeptics from social media in October 2019, a week or two before COVID began circulating. That month, Microsoft founder Bill Gates organized an exercise of four “table-top” simulations of a worldwide coronavirus pandemic with other high-ranking “Deep State” panjandrums. The exercise was referred to as Event 201.

Gates’ co-conspirators included representatives from the World Bank, the World Economic Forum (Great Reset), Bloomberg/Johns Hopkins University Populations Center, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, various media powerhouses, the Chinese government, a former Central Intelligence Agency/National Security Agency director (there is no such thing as a former CIA officer), vaccine maker Johnson & Johnson, the finance and biosecurity industries and Edelman, the world’s leading corporate PR firm.

At Gates’ direction, these eminences role-played members of a Pandemic Control Council, wargaming government strategies for controlling the pandemic, the narrative and the population. Needless to say, there was little talk of building immune systems, off-the-shelf remedies or off-patent therapeutic drugs and vitamins, but lots of chatter about promoting uptake of new patentable antiviral drugs and vaccines.

But the participants primarily focused on planning industry-centric, fear-mongering, police-state strategies for managing an imaginary global coronavirus contagion culminating in mass censorship of social media.

Oddly, Gates now claims that the simulation didn’t occur. On April 12, 2020, Gates told BBC, “Now here we are. We didn’t simulate this, we didn’t practice, so both the health policies and economic policies, we find ourselves in uncharted territory.”

Unfortunately for that whopper, the videos of the event are still available across the internet. They show that Gates and team did indeed simulate health and economic policies. It’s hard to swallow that Gates has forgotten.

Gates’s Event 201 simulated COVID epidemic caused 65 million deaths at the 18-month endpoint and global economic collapse lasting up to a decade. Compared to the Gates simulation, therefore, the actual COVID-19 crisis is a bit of a dud, having imposed a mere 2.5 million deaths “attributed to COVID” over the past 13 months.

The deaths “attributed to COVID” in the real-life situation are highly questionable, and must be seen in the context of a global population of 7.8 billion, with about 59 million deaths expected annually. The predictions of decade-long economic collapse will probably prove more accurate — but only because of the draconian lockdown promoted by Gates.

Gates’ Event 201 script imagines vast anti-vaccine riots triggered by internet posts. The universal and single-minded presumption among its participants was that such a crisis would prove an opportunity of convenience to promote new vaccines, and tighten controls by a surveillance and censorship state.

Segment four of the script — on manipulation and control of public opinion — is most revealing. It uncannily predicted democracy’s current crisis:

  • The participants discussed mechanisms for controlling “disinformation” and “misinformation,” by “flooding” the media with propaganda (“good information”), imposing penalties for spreading falsehoods and discrediting the anti-vaccination movement.
  • Jane Halton, of Australia’s ANZ Bank, one of the authors of Australia’s oppressive “no jab, no pay” policy, assured the participants that Gates Foundation is creating algorithms “to sift through information on these social media platforms” to protect the public from dangerous thoughts and information.
  • George Gao, the prescient director of the Chinese Center for Disease Control, worries about how to suppress “rumors” that the virus is laboratory generated: “People believe, ‘This is a manmade’… [and that] some pharmaceutical company made the virus.”
  • Chen Huang, an Apple research scientist, Google scholar and the world’s leading expert on tracking and tracing and facial recognition technology, role-plays the newscaster reporting on government countermeasures. He blames riots on anti-vaccine activists and predicts that Twitter and Facebook will cooperate in “identify[ing] and delete[ing] a disturbing number of accounts dedicated to spreading misinformation about the outbreak” and to implement “internet shutdowns … to quell panic.”

Dr. Tara Kirk Sell, a senior scholar at Bloomberg School of Health’s Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, worries that pharmaceutical companies are being accused of introducing the virus so they can make money on drugs and vaccines: “[We] have seen public faith in their products plummet.” She notes with alarm that “Unrest, due to false rumors and divisive messaging, is rising and is exacerbating spread of the disease as levels of trust fall and people stop cooperating with response efforts. This is a massive problem, one that threatens governments and trusted institutions.”
Sell reminds her fellow collaborators that “We know that social media is now the primary way that many people get their news, so interruptions to these platforms could curb the spread of misinformation.” There are many ways, Sell advises, for government and industry allies to accomplish this objective: “Some governments have taken control of national access to the Internet. Others are censoring websites and social media content and a small number have shut down Internet access completely to prevent the spread of misinformation. Penalties have been put in place for spreading harmful falsehoods, including arrests.”

  • Matthew Harrington, CEO of Edelman Public Relations agrees that social media must fall in line to promote government policy: “I also think we’re at a moment where the social media platforms have to step forward and recognize the moment to assert that they’re a technology platform and not a broadcaster is over. They in fact have to be a participant in broadcasting accurate information and partnering with the scientific and health communities to counterweight, if not flood the zone, of accurate information. Because to try to put the genie back in the bottle of misinformation and disinformation is not possible.”
  • Stephen Redd, the Admiral of the Public Health Service, has the sinister notion that government should mine social media data to identify people with negative beliefs: “I think with the social media platforms, there’s an opportunity to understand who it is that’s susceptible … to misinformation, so I think there’s an opportunity to collect data from that communication mechanism.”
  • Adrian Thomas of Johnson & Johnson announces “some important news to share from some of “our member companies [Pharma]”: We are doing clinical trials in new antiretrovirals, and in fact, in vaccines!” He recommends a strategy to address the problems to these companies when “rumors were actually spreading” that their shoddily tested products “are causing deaths and so patients are not taking them anymore.” He suggests, “Maybe we’re making the mistake of reporting and counting all the fatalities and infections.”
  • Former CIA deputy director, Avril Haines unveiled a strategy to “flood the zone” with propaganda from “trusted sources,” including “influential community leaders, as well as health workers.” He warns about “false information that is starting to actually hamper our ability to address the pandemic, then we need to be able to respond quickly to it.”
  • Matthew Harrington (Edelman CEO) observes that the Internet — which once promised the decentralization and democratization of information — now needs to be centralized: “I think just to build a little bit on what Avril said, I think as in previous conversations where we’ve talked about centralization around management of information or public health needs, there needs to be a centralized response around the communications approach that then is cascaded to informed advocates, represented in the NGO communities, the medical professionals, et cetera.”
    Tom Inglesby (John Hopkins biosecurity expert advisor to the National Institutes of Health, the Pentagon and Homeland Security) agrees that centralized control is needed: “You mean centralized international?”
  • Matthew Harrington (Edelman) replies that information access should be: “Centralized on an international basis, because I think there needs to be a central repository of data facts and key messages.”
  • Hasti Taghi (Media Advisor) sums up: “The anti-vaccine movement was very strong and this is something specifically through social media that has spread. So as we do the research to come up with the right vaccines to help prevent the continuation of this, how do we get the right information out there? How do we communicate the right information to ensure that the public has trust in these vaccines that we’re creating?”
  • Kevin McAleese, communications officer for Gates-funded agricultural projects, observes that: “To me, it is clear countries need to make strong efforts to manage both mis- and disinformation. We know social media companies are working around the clock to combat these disinformation campaigns. The task of identifying every bad actor is immense. This is a huge problem that’s going to keep us from ending the pandemic and might even lead to the fall of governments, as we saw in the Arab Spring. If the solution means controlling and reducing access to information, I think it’s the right choice.”
  • Tom Inglesby, director of Bloomberg’s Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security concurs, asking if “In this case, do you think governments are at the point where they need to require social media companies to operate in a certain way?”
  • Lavan Thiru, Singapore’s Finance Minister suggests that the government might make examples of dissidents with “government or enforcement actions against fake news. Some of us, this new regulations are come in place about how we deal with fake news. Maybe this is a time for us to showcase some cases where we are able to bring forward some bad actors and leave it before the courts to decide whether they have actually spread some fake news.”

Read the attached transcript to see how Gates and his government, pharma and intelligence apparatus telegraphed their plans to censor and control the media during the pandemic. In yet another uncanny coincidence, COVID-19 began circulating among global populations within days of Gates’ meeting.

Now, connecting the planned virus pandemic to the one which commenced a week later!

It is now well established that the virus was a man-made creation and that took place in the Wuhan Laboratories, in China.

U.S. Cash Funded Controversial Wuhan Virus Lab Where Research to Make Diseases More Deadly Was Backed by Dr. Anthony Fauci, New Book Says

The Daily Mail reported:

The U.S. was funding China‘s controversial Wuhan laboratory as it embarked on a secretive project to identify deadly viruses with pandemic potential, a new book has claimed.

According to “What Really Happened in Wuhan: the Cover-Ups, the Conspiracies and the Classified Research,” by Sharri Markson, the Wuhan Institute of Virology was creating a database of potentially lethal viruses with the help of Shi Zhengli – aka ‘batwoman.’

Ms Zhengli, who earned her nickname sampling thousands of bats in remote caves, collected 19,000 samples while at Wuhan, with 2,481 of those containing coronaviruses.

> Newly Released Documents on Wuhan Lab Funding

William G.  September 7, 2021<
Rand Paul<
>Responds Following Newly Released Documents on Wuhan Lab Funding

On Tuesday, Senator Rand Paul (R-Ky.) accused Chief Medical Advisor to the President Anthony Fauci of lying to Congress, pointing to recently revealed documents outlining Fauci’s knowledge of gain-of-function research funded by the National Institute of Health and conducted in Wuhan, China.

Paul stated ” I will be sending a letter to the Department of Justice asking for a criminal referral because he has lied to Congress.”

“[Fauci] realizes that once the public realizes that the NIH funded the Wuhan Lab…once the public figures out that they were doing very, very dangerous research there, gain-of-function research, taking animal viruses and making them more transmissible to humans, once everybody puts this together, he realizes where the blame is going to attach,” Paul continued. “If this came from the lab he was funding, my goodness, can you imagine the moral culpability the man has?”

WHO/Fauci/Gates connections:

-2020. Gates states 7 billion people will need the vaccine
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/bill-gates-says-world-7-190044086.html

-2016. Kraus Schwab within 10 years chip everyone
“From a 2016 interview with Klaus Schwab, boss of the World Economic Forum in Davos, in which he says humans will have a chip implanted in their brain or skin within 10 years.”
{WEF a part of the UN!, As is the WHO!}
www.youtube.com/watch?v=UmQNA0HL1pw

An interesting back-step by the WHO on booster shots, and a great deal more:

https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-08-30-who-biden-at-odds-over-covid-booster.html

WHO, Biden administration at odds over COVID-19 vaccine boosters Monday, August 30, 2021 by: Nolan Barton badhealth , badmedicine , big government , Big Pharma , CDC , conspiracy , coronavirus , corruption , covid-19 , covid-19 vaccines , herd immunity , Joe Biden , pharmaceutical fraud , vaccine boosters , WHO Bypass censorship by sharing this link: https://www.afinalwarning.com/548604.html Copy URL – (Natural News ) The World Health Organization (WHO) …

(Natural News) The World Health Organization (WHO) has repeatedly rejected calls for coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccine boosters, but the Biden administration still insists on rolling out another dose for the fully vaccinated.

“We recently had an expert group meeting with scientists from around the world this included researchers, it included regulatory experts from different regulatory agencies, there was consensus that the data around the need for boosters is not conclusive,” WHO Chief Scientist Dr. Soumya Swaminathan said at a media briefing Wednesday, Aug. 25.

“We also don’t know about the safety of boosters. When we talk about vaccines, it’s not just the efficacy. What happens when you give a third dose of an mRNA vaccine or any other kind of vaccine? These need to be studied as well, so before we launch into full-scale booster programs for the whole population there are a number of questions that need to be answered.” (Related: Braveheart actor Michael Mitchell dies six days after getting third Pfizer “booster” shot for covid.)

But President Joe Biden didn’t budge. Instead, he suggested on Friday, Aug. 27, that the government could offer COVID-19 vaccine boosters to most vaccinated adults sooner than eight months after a second dose.

Just nine days earlier, the president announced that his administration would begin offering boosters the week of Sept. 20 to adults who had received their second dose of COVID-19 vaccines at least eight months ago.

Both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) said earlier this year that boosters would not be recommended for the virus. With the COVID-19 vaccines appearing to fail against COVID-19 variants, it remains unclear what benefits an additional dose would provide.

Boosters not a priority
More and more experts around the world are opposing the rollout of boosters. They are now recommending that the virus be allowed to circulate throughout the population, with precautions taken for vulnerable individuals.

“We really cannot do anything else but allow the virus to take its course in order for the population to achieve herd immunity,” said Porolfur Gudnason, chief epidemiologist of Iceland’s Directorate of Health. “We need to try to vaccinate and better protect those who are vulnerable, but let us tolerate the infection. It is not a priority now to vaccinate everyone with the third dose.”

Andrew Pollard, director of the Oxford Vaccine Group, told a parliamentary panel earlier this month that we don’t have anything to stop COVID-19 transmissions. “I think we are in a situation where herd immunity is not a possibility and I suspect the virus will throw up a new variant that is even better at infecting vaccinated individuals,” he said.

Infectious disease expert Paul Hunter told the same panel that vaccination would not bring about herd immunity.

“We need to start moving away from just reporting infections or just reporting positive cases admitted to hospital, to actually start reporting the number of people who are ill because of COVID,” said Hunter, who also advises the WHO on the virus. “Otherwise we are going to be frightening ourselves with very high numbers that actually don’t translate into disease burden.”

Relying on boosters is like digging yourself a hole
Some are asking whether catching COVID-19 now is better than more vaccines. It has become a serious question that has implications for whether children should ever be vaccinated, and whether we use the virus or booster shots to top up immunity in adults. (Related: COVID-19 natural immunity vs vaccine-induced immunity guide.)

“There are clearly sources of information to suggest that once we start vaccination and we get more than 25 percent of the population vaccinated, we will allow one of the variants that’s in the background to emerge because it’s resistant to the vaccine,” board-certified internist and cardiologist, Dr. Peter McCullough, said in a podcast earlier this month.

“Just like an antibiotic, once we get to a certain percentage of coverage with an antibiotic, we’ll allow resistant bacteria to move forward.”

Dr. Robert Malone, inventor of mRNA and DNA vaccines, recently tweeted: “I am reminded of the first rule of holes. When you are in one, stop digging.” He described booster shot strategies as “based on hope rather than data.”

We could be digging ourselves into a hole for a very long time if we think we can only keep COVID away by boosting every year,” said Eleanor Riley, an immunologist from the University of Edinburgh.

Humans generally get a broader immune response after being infected with the virus than vaccination. “That means if you had a real humdinger of an infection, you may have better immunity to any new variants that pop up as you have immunity to more than just spike [protein],” said Riley.

It’s all about the money
It’s easy to see why Big Pharma companies are pushing hard to get the green light for their boosters. Every extra dose means more money for them.

Adding booster doses to the equation would push the projected global spending on COVID-19 vaccines to a total of $157 billion through 2025, according to U.S. health data firm IQVIA Holdings. Pfizer has forecast sales of $26 billion from the vaccine in 2021 alone.

It could be a lot more as the projections were based on expectations that the booster doses would follow every two years following initial vaccinations.

IQVIA, which provides data and analytics for the healthcare industry, said it expects the first wave of COVID-19 vaccinations to reach about 70 percent of the world’s population by the end of 2022. Murray Aitken, a senior vice president at IQVIA, said that vaccine spending is expected to be highest this year at $54 billion with a global vaccination campaign underway. It is expected to decrease in succeeding years as tighter competition and vaccine volumes drive down prices.

REPORT:
WHO could have prevented COVID-19 catastrophe Tuesday, June 01, 2021 by: Divina Ramirez CCP , China , Chinese Communist Party , coronavirus origin , Coronavirus pandemic , covid-19 , global emergency , infections , outbreak , pandemic , Tedros Ghebreyesus , WHO , World Health Organization , Wuhan coronavirus

https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-06-01-report-details-failures-in-response-to-pandemic.html

[Bypass censorship by sharing this link: https://www.afinalwarning.com/518655.html Copy URL – (Natural News )]

(Natural News) The coronavirus pandemic could have been prevented, according to an independent review panel.
In a report released on May 12, the Independent Panel for Pandemic Preparedness and Response (IPPR) said the combined response of the World Health Organization (WHO) and of global governments was a “toxic cocktail” that allowed the pandemic to turn into a catastrophic humanitarian crisis.
The panel, which has spent the last eight months reviewing evidence on how an outbreak became a pandemic, also said in its report that the WHO should have declared a global emergency much sooner than it did.
In particular, the initial responses to the outbreak in Wuhan, China back in December 2019 lacked urgency. February 2020 also proved to be a costly “lost month” as many countries failed to heed the alarm. Without urgent change, the world would be vulnerable to another major disease outbreak, concluded the panel.
COVID-19 has infected at least 160 million people worldwide and killed more than 3.3 million.

WHO took too long to sound the alarm
The panel was co-chaired by Ellen Sirleaf, a Nobel laureate and the former president of Liberia, and Helen Clark, former prime minister of New Zealand. The panel included a total of 11 experts spanning a range of backgrounds and countries including China and the United States. Panel members were asked to represent their institutions rather than their countries.
The panel began its investigation last September and was asked to present a full report ahead of the World Health Assembly (WHA) meeting this May. The panel released their findings online as an 86-page report titled, “COVID-19: Make it the Last Pandemic.”
The report came with an evidence-based narrative that detailed 13 defining moments that have steered the course of the pandemic. In its report, the panel pointed out that the WHO took too long to declare a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC).
The WHO should have declared a PHEIC at its first meeting on Jan. 22 last year instead of on Jan. 30. For most countries, the declaration was “lost” as they failed to take timely measures to curb the outbreak.
The WHO was then hindered by its own regulations and its insistence that travel restrictions should be a last resort. Meanwhile, European countries and the U.S. wasted the entire month of February and only acted when their hospitals began filling up, the panel said.

A “Lancet” connection:
https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-09-13-conspiracy-lancet-scientists-denied-covid-theory-wuhan-ties.html#

Covid is a bioweapon that was developed to unleash a new world order

The reason why this is all still important now is because this letter in The Lancet played a critical role early on in the suppression of all inquiry into the true origins of the Chinese Flu, which is still being debated to this very day.

There have been efforts from the very beginning to distance China from carrying any of the blame. The powers that be also want to distance Tony Fauci from the Chinese Virus as well, even though we now know for a fact that Fauci sent American taxpayer dollars to Wuhan to develop it.

Several of the letter’s Wuhan-tied signers also hail from Britain’s Wellcome Trust, which was exposed for also sending cash to the WIV to develop genetically modified (GMO) coronaviruses capable of infecting humans.

VACCINES – The way to eradicate the virus, variants and all?
Or the way to make people sick and die?
It has been suggested that the virus itself was always intended as the trigger for the vaccine introduction, the real intended method of mass destruction!

The vaccines are a demonstrably far higher risk, with initial death numbers already becoming significant, even from officially published government department statistics. Statistics that are widely accepted as being no more than 10%, some suggest even 1%, of actual numbers.

Far more worrying is the projected mortality in the forthcoming years from slower acting attacks on our bodies, from spike proteins and graphene oxide nano particles.

HYPOTHESIS – The Covid program, the “virus”, the “vaccines”, the agenda, the propaganda, the government actions, the media, the pharma involvement, and the behaviour of the hospitals and doctors, all the deaths and injuries, so far, and into the future, are all the result of a deliberate global exercise planned and executed by the World Health Organization, under direction from the United Nations.

Why? Because of the globalist agenda to decimate the global population!

GLOBALIST AGENDA

This aspect resolves not only the reason for the deliberate creation and release of the global disaster, but also for the incredible behaviour of the authorities and all the ‘players’ in promoting and extending the damage being done!

The extensive application of several types of vaccines, gaining emergency use approval on a “trial basis” for what has turned out to be a greater health and mortality threat than the virus itself, and virtually mandating their use across the whole age range, reeks of an agenda to depopulate the world!

Hospitals have become “killing fields” according to nurses and others in the know.
“Forced vaccinations, murder, miscarriages, the dead tested for covid, nurse quits after 11yrs.”

[Links obviously censored, but accessible on “Telegram” if you join and search!]

Too much evidence to show here but this should be taken seriously!

Meaningful Evidence!

   Reference – https://thetvtraveler.com/visiting-the-georgia-guidestones/

Georgia Guidestones 

Georgia Guidestones Text

Here is what is written on the Georgia Guidestones:

1. Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature.
2. Guide reproduction wisely — improving fitness and diversity.
3. Unite humanity with a living new language.
4. Rule passion — faith — tradition — and all things with tempered reason.
5. Protect people and nations with fair laws and just courts.
6. Let all nations rule internally resolving external disputes in a world court.
7. Avoid petty laws and useless officials.
8. Balance personal rights with social duties.
9. Prize truth — beauty — love — seeking harmony with the infinite.
10. Be not a cancer on the earth — Leave room for nature — Leave room for nature.

The Georgia Guidestones are a granite monument erected in 1980 in Elbert County, Georgia, in the United States. A set of ten guidelines is inscribed on the structure in eight modern languages and a shorter message is inscribed at the top of the structure in four ancient language scripts.

A marker at the Guidestones states, “Let these be guidestones to an age of reason”

CONCLUSION – The reader gets to decide!

Comments welcome!

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | 7 Comments

Popular air fresheners can cause major HEALTH PROBLEMS for humans breathing them in, studies claim


What emanates in your home may be burning down your health, slowly and methodically, and many consumers don’t even realize it until it’s too late. Chemicals in candles, air fresheners (including plug-ins), deodorants, aerosols, and smell-fresh sprays can intoxicate the atmosphere, enter the lungs, and cause chronic damage throughout the body, over time, say new studies. For example, phthalates are a family of synthetic, industrial chemicals used to soften plastic, as solvents in cosmetics, and in scented sprays and air sanitizers to make them last longer. Problem is, they can make the lifetime shorter for those who inhale them on a regular basis. Here’s how. Recent studies in human populations confirm adverse impacts on humans from repeated phthalate exposure, including problems with neurodevelopment, IQ, attention, hyperactivity, and poorer social communication. Long term effects of phthalate intake include damage to the lungs, kidneys, liver, and reproductive system. Bottom line is that exposure adds up, and consumers end up overwhelming their cleansing organs to the point that cancer moves in and takes over the damaged tissue. In fact, hazardous phthalates are found in more than 70 percent of personal care products worldwide. They can disrupt hormones, cause reproductive harm, and increase risk of miscarriage.

Consumers should actively limit their exposure to the chemicals found in most ‘corporate-made’ air fresheners, candles, and sprays

Did you know that petroleum-based, scented candles can contain formaldehyde, the chemical used to embalm dead people? Are you slowly embalming yourself while still alive, in your home, automobile, and office? You might be sucking in parabens, phthalates, formaldehyde, and other known carcinogens with every breath you take, all day and sometimes all night. Start by checking the ingredients in every candle, spray, and air freshener you have right now, and throw them out if you find these chemicals. Do not buy any new ones. There are plenty of healthy choices for all of these, including buying essential oils and making your own air fresheners and linen sprays, using filtered water and a little rubbing alcohol. Many popular air fresheners have been found to contain phthalates, among other big ‘no-no’ ingredients to watch out for.

The air in many homes, offices, vehicles, and waiting rooms is often loaded with toxins that cause severe asthma, allergies, headaches, brain fog, and eventually cancer

Ever walk into a room or get in someone’s vehicle and all the sudden you can’t breathe right? It’s overwhelming, almost immediately, and that’s your lungs telling you ‘get out of there!’ Within minutes, many people, especially those with asthma and/or allergies to fragrances, flowers, and pollen, will suddenly become claustrophobic and a bit panicky. The chemicals in many fragrances and air fresheners are synthetic and overblown to sell consumers on the scent. Especially during the upcoming holidays, entire homes and offices will reek from pumpkin spice, pine scents, cookie smells, cloves, citrus, and the list goes on. Lung infections, including chemical pneumonia, can develop from inhaling toxins and poisons over time. The inflammation of lung tissue becomes chronic, and if not addressed by greatly reducing or eliminating the ingestion of those toxins, can become deadly. From liquids and gases to small particles and fumes, air fresheners and candles can easily contribute to lung infections that may be caused by viruses and/or bacteria. Signs and symptoms of lung infection include constant coughing, burning eyes, sneezing, wheezing, confusion, and anxiety attacks. Tune your internet dial to NaturalMedicine.news for tips on how to detoxify your body from the chemicals in certain candles and air fresheners that can cause cancer, diabetes, and dementia.

Sources for this article include: PippinBrothers.com HSPH.Harvard.edu NoHarm-UScanada.org NaturalNews.com WomansDay.com  

https://citizens.news/674094.html

Posted in HEALTH, health | Leave a comment

Confronting One World Order (OWO) Globalism. The Rise and Fall of the Beast


A comprehensive and clearly logical presentation for the world to grasp reality.
By Peter Koenig    Global Research  https://www.globalresearch.ca/rise-fall-beast/5789391
Here is the commencement:

Legend has it, that when things go wrong and everybody is hoping for better times, they first have to get worse, before a new era of peace and harmony may emerge.

We may now be at these crossroads. The Beast is Rising. But its Fall is in sight.

We have to understand, the Beast is Big. It’s Huge. It’s so extraordinarily big, humanity has never faced something like it in recorded history.

So, we better are properly prepared.

Imagine, a small handkerchief or a pocket-square (a tiny decorative lapel accessory) is sitting on a huge quintuple king-size bedsheet, aiming at controlling the bedsheet. That’s the globalist Cult Elite, aiming at converting the world population into a One World Order (OWO). It will not happen. It’s an image so absurd that could have only emerged form a megalomaniac – which is what the WEF and its Master, Klaus Schwab, and his behind the scene money masters are.

No matter, how powerful they think they are, tyrannizing the world at large into their slaves, We, the People, will make sure it will not happen. Fissures in the OWO ranks are already clearly visible.

The new motto is bye-bye OWO-Globalism and welcome to the new multipolar world.

Actually, a world that is gradually becoming an east-west polarization, with a west that is ever faster decaying in more ways than one – monetary-wise, in term of political ethics, as well as faltering support from western and hitherto western-leaning governments and, at least, by two thirds of western people, who vehemently oppose their governments.

Mind you, we are not quite there yet – at the point of western collapse.

However, the crack in the wall, where the light shines through [paraphrasing a famous Leonard Cohen song] gives enormous hope for the light to prevail.

The Big Picture – what is it?

The Big Picture has three major branches, three major objectives of the Beast to fulfill. Imagine the Beast as a multiple-tentacled Monster-Octopus. Listed not necessarily in order of priority, but rather as a simultaneous bulldozing approach, they include:

i) Massive depopulation, genocide, worldwide; an eugenist agenda on which the Gates and Rockefellers et al, have worked already for decades, and already their predecessor generations were obsessed with eugenics. Less people, less “useless eaters” – and consumers of scarce, unrenewable resources. So bluntly presents it Yuval Noah Hariri, Israeli “intellectual” and close adviser to Klaus Schwab, the WEF’s eternal CEO;

ii) Shifting assets from the lower and middle echelons to the top – the elite, billionaires, individuals, as well as corporate finance, such as BlackRock, Vanguard, State Street; others may include Fidelity, City Bank, Bank of America and many more.

The first three alone are interlinked as shareholders and can act as one, controlling an estimated 25 trillion dollars, worldwide, giving them a leverage power of way above US$ 100 trillion (compared to the world’s GDP of about US$ 90 trillion), thereby having virtual control over every country on the globe, and

iii) Digitization of everything, connecting everything with everything, eventually with the mega-powerful ultra-shortwaves 5G and soon to come 6G. Through these electromagnetic waves, they may access our brains. It’s Klaus Schwab’s pipedream. It includes digital worldwide unform vaxx-passes, managed through the infamous QR-code, or similar, with practically illimited info-storage capacity.

Currently it has a potential of storing more than 30,000 pieces of information about each one of us. Those who manage the QR-code, know you better than you know yourself. It is an updated version of Bill Gates’ Agenda ID2020.

Digitization may, as a first step, include an under-the-skin chip on every surviving citizen – currently being volunteer-practiced in some Nordic countries, like Sweden and Denmark, storing and monitoring every piece of info about you, incl. health records, bank accounts, with whom you talk, where you travel, where and what you shop — and-and-and – you got the picture.

Later, it will likely just be an electronic fingerprint in the form or capacity of a QR-code or its successor, that is engrained in our bodies through an electromagnetic field which is being injected into our bloodstream – graphene oxide, for example – under the pretext of covid vaxxes, or eventually any vaxxes invented and forced upon the population.

The next one may be the “new” flu-vaxx – already announced as a novelty, practically untested, but ready for the fall season. Be aware and beware!

Digital money, already largely dominating the Global North, will become the norm by the end of Agenda 2030, or sooner – if WE, the People, do not stop it. – And yes, we can. Digital money would make us to digital slaves; digital money could be blocked at will by the Cult Cabal, or outright stolen, depending on our behavior.

No worries, according to Klaus Schwabwe eventually will own nothing but will be happy – that’s the paraphrased ending of the Great Reset. Our mind will no longer think independently, but 5G and the graphene oxide injected by the covid and other vaxxes still to come, will make from humans so-called “transhumans” (expression used by Klaus Schwab in an interview in 2016 with the Swiss French TV), basically useless and dispensable slaves, since robots and Artificial Intelligence (AI) will have taken over human roles.

These goals are all addressed in one way or another in the WEF’s Great Reset. It may be worth your while to have a glance at it. Most libraries contacted, answered with a smile, they don’t carry the book; they’d rather not associate with this monster plan.

Here is the Amazon link for The Great Reset.

The globalist agenda is gradually disintegrating. See this on the anti-globalist trend of the WEF in Davos, May 2022.

Yet, the globalists keep fighting on. A hopeless game. But they may be able to extend their globalist drive for a while, with perpetual lies, untold riches of immorally and largely illegally acquired financial wealth, possibly bringing about millions of victims – and, God forbit – leading into WWIII, potentially meaning a hard-core nuclear war.

The Beast is still on the rise. That does not mean it is winning.

The full article:

Posted in AGENDA 2030, New World Order | Tagged , | 2 Comments

Great Barrier Reef Coral Cover Hits Record Levels For Second Year


Posted: August 5, 2022 | Author: Jamie Spry | Filed under: Climate ChangeGreat Barrier Reef | Tags: Climate ChangeClimatismGlobal WarmingGreat Barrier Reef |Leave a comment

Why is the great news that the Barrier Reef is in top condition, with record coral cover, being ignored by the MainstreamMedia™️?

With the daily and constant lecturing and hectoring about the supposed “climate catastrophe/crisis/emergency”, shouldn’t they be ringing the bells and dancing in the street?

The fact that they are not, and remain largely silent about Reef health, stands as more conclusive proof that ClimateChange™️ has absolutely nothing to do with the environment or “saving the planet” rather a wicked tool to justify complete power and control over every aspect of your life and lifestyle. Aka, global-communism.

Tallbloke’s Talkshop

 Great Barrier Reef, Australia [image credit: BBC]
Dr. Peter Ridd writes: ‘The three or four bleaching events since 2016, which have been widely reported in the media, could not have killed much coral, otherwise the 2022 statistics would not be so good.’
Time to dial down the tedious climate alarmism on this.

– – –
Official data released today reveals that Australia’s Great Barrier Reef is in excellent health, with coral cover reaching record levels for the second consecutive year, says Climate Change Dispatch.

The increase will be surprising to members of the public, who are regularly hit with scary stories about coral bleaching and false tales about a reef in long-term decline.

A new note, published today by the Global Warming Policy Foundation, explains that the data shows clearly how a handful of coral bleaching events that have affected the reef since 2016 have had a very limited…

Tagged , | Leave a comment

“The Courage to Face COVID-19”: Preventing Hospitalization and Death While Battling the Bio-Pharmaceutical Complex


It is extremely difficult to access truths about the “Covid catastrophe”, the associated LIES dominate the world’s media and have brainwashed probably billions. It is exciting for me to promote this book and its messages.
Reference: https://www.globalresearch.ca/courage-face-covid-19-preventing-hospitalization-death-while-battling-bio-pharmaceutical-complex/5788577

Review of the book authored by John Leake & Peter A McCullough, MD. MPH

John Leake is a best-selling an “experienced non-fiction, true crime author”. Having just read what must be described as an extraordinary ‘telling’ of the COVID-19 saga, this book is the narration of true crime on a scale that could top the list in the history of ‘man’s inhumanity to man’.

The book chronicles the unique role of national governments across the world and their health agencies, led by the USA and WHO, which followed an agenda that led to completely avoidable fatalities numbering several million. The question is why?

The usual culprits are money and power. But to ascribe cause to these two is woefully insufficient. The sheer magnitude of the ‘dark agenda’ –  coordinated and played out by governments, health agencies, the medical establishment (hospitals, doctors and chemists) and the massive and deliberate disinformation by the legacy media – defies such easy explanations. As one journalist on Leake’s team put it, “but this is evil”.

Dr. Peter McCullough says it will take a legion of investigators and investigative journalists to “untangle and delineate what would ultimately be revealed as a massive crime against humanity”.

This book is in part that investigation, zeroing in on why treatment protocols (especially early treatment) were side-lined, leading to disastrous consequences. The book is an impressive, accurate and lucid telling of this crime on a global scale, with its lens on the USA.

John Leake could not have wished for a more authoritative voice than Peter McCullough, his co-author. McCullough, a practising board certified internist and cardiologist, is the most published author in history in the field of cardio-renal medicine.

By 2020, he had published over 60 peer reviewed academic medical papers. In addition to his medical doctorate, McCullough has been awarded eight medical certifications from various societies. He is now a published leading expert in treatment protocols, particularly early treatment for COVID-19.

The ‘McCullough Protocol’, which has evolved over 22 months, has helped treat millions of patients worldwide, saving countless numbers of people from hospitalisation and death. Because ‘the battle’ is being fought on the grounds of medical authority, only medical doctors of the unique calibre and expertise of someone like Dr. Peter McCullough are in a position to take up the cudgels.

McCullough also has the vital qualities of integrity and courage that allow him to take on this vastly unequal fight against the bio-pharmaceutical complex that includes the US government and its health agencies (the FDA, CDC, NIAID) and the WHO.

The book sets out the timeline of the ‘pandemic’. The WHO declared COVID-19 a pandemic on 11 March 2020, using a highly inaccurate and faulty RT-PCR at high CTs (cycle thresholds) above 40. Those who tested positive and had no symptoms were labelled ‘asymptomatic’, a new category of COVID patients that ratcheted-up the numbers required for declaring a pandemic.

Dr Fauci (assuming the mantle of the US’s chief public health officer) declared on 16 March 2020 that his institute the NIAID (National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases at the US National Institutes of Health – NIH), had developed a promising vaccine to combat SARS-COV-2 at a substantial investment. This was promoted as humanity’s only hope.

Fauci forgot to mention that the NIH co-owned the patent. This was ‘warp speed’ indeed.

Interestingly, during a simulation at Event 201 on 28 October 2019, it was stated that CEPI (the Coalition of Epidemic Preparedness Innovation) was already working on a corona virus vaccine, the first step of its business plan (BP) published in November 2016. CEPI was launched in January 2017 in Davos by the Gates Foundation, the WEF, the governments of Norway, Japan, and India and the Wellcome Trust.

The book notes that treating COVID-19 with existing drugs was not part of the BP. That is why there was no interest in re-purposed drugs like hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), which had been approved since 1955 by the FDA as a malaria prophylaxis. Billions of doses had been administered over the decades. The drug is safe, cheap and easy to manufacture.

Research teams in China were reporting favourable results for treating COVID-19. McCullough says, “the only thing in the literature is HCQ. We should take the Indian medical Council’s (ICMR) recommendation to use it”.

The other re-purposed drug that has been successful in treating COVID-19 as a prophylactic and at every stage of the disease is the anti-parasitic drug ivermectin. It would be hard to overstate the significance of the effectiveness of ivermectin: it is an inhibitor of SARS-COV-2 in vitro. A single treatment effected “approximately 5000-fold reduction in virus at 48 h in cell cull culture” (Study by Monash University of Australia).

Ivermectin is FDA approved and like HCQ is widely available, off-patent and inexpensive. It is on the WHO model list of essential medicines. Since its discovery in 1989, ivermectin has cured two great scourges (river blindness and elephantiasis) and has been widely prescribed.  Like HCQ, ivermectin is hugely effective at mitigating COVID-19 disease and death.

Both drugs are derived from natural sources. HCQ (natural ancestor, quinine) is derived from the cinchona bark (discovered by the Quechua of Peru) and ivermectin is a bioactive compound derived from a soil bacterium (Streptomyces avermectinius). Its discoverer Satoshi Omura and his colleague at the Merck Institute Dr William Campbell won the Nobel Prize in Medicine for ivermectin in 2015.

In 2017, the report from The Journal of Antibiotics reported: “enigmatic multifaceted ‘wonder drug’ continues to surprise and exceed expectations”. The journal presented ivermectin’s therapeutic properties against an array of pathogens, including viruses.

Both HCQ and ivermectin should be of star value for India because they fit in so well with her 5,000 year history of medicinal plant science in Ayurvedic healing traditions. Both were used to great effect for treating COVID-19, especially in UP (Uttar Pradesh). Unfortunately, despite the data, the Indian government and WHO withdrew support for it.

The authors note that the impressive evidence that both drugs were effective treatments for the virus was stonewalled by Fauci and the CDC and met with a wall of silence by the legacy media. Inexplicably, remdesivir was the only drug authorised and made available in US public hospitals; a drug without a safety profile and which could be fatally toxic, leading to kidney failure.

Furthermore, compared to the price at ‘pennies’ of HCQ and ivermectin, remdesivir was priced at over $3,000 per treatment, but took a mere $10 to produce! The message from Gates was: “there is no treatment apart from remdesivir. Stay home — wait for the vaccine”.  

Readers are informed that health agencies told the medical profession that nothing could be done to treat COVID-19, backed by the press that emblazoned this therapeutic nihilism. A panicked public was denied any form of treatment – wait till your lips are blue and then go to the hospital. Patients were isolated and alone, no relatives were allowed to visit.

When they reached the point where they could not breathe, they were put on mechanical ventilators, a death knell: 80% died. Ivermectin was resolutely and tyrannically denied – even when there was no hope that the patient would survive and against the pleading of husbands, wives, parents.

Incredibly, even court orders were flouted. In the few instances where hospital doctors were explicitly ordered to stand aside and let a protocol of ivermectin be administered, such patients recovered and fast. The others? They died.

In Texas alone, 45,000 died. Peter McCullough estimates around 70% of COVID-19 fatalities could have been prevented. By Christmas 2021, that figure was 610,000 preventable deaths. He said, “there is so much focus on the vaccine, where is the focus on people sick right now”. 

The proven solutions to the virus in HCQ, ivermectin and other drugs, (methylprednisolone, heparin, azithromycin, zinc and orthomolecular medicine, specifically high dose vitamin C), proved that this was a most treatable virus,  or as Prof Didier Raoult pronounced – game over!

Despite this, experimental (unapproved and untested) vaccines were rolled out at warp speed under Emergency Use Authorisation (EUA). The explicit legal, statutory requirement is that there must be no adequate, approved and available alternatives.

Herein lies the authors’ tale of horror and fraud, with profits of trillions of dollars for vaccine manufacturers, (who are also indemnified from causing harm), through an official policy of a needle in every arm.

At the same time, various monetary incentives came into play to boost COVID patient numbers via a hastily drafted CARES Act (Corona Virus Aid, Relief and Economic Security). Medicare has determined a COVID-19 admission to hospital will entitle the establishment a payment of $13,000. If that patient goes on a ventilator, the payment is threefold or $ 39,000!

It is also acceptable to report COVID-19 on a death certificate as “probable” or “presumed” where a definite diagnosis cannot be made. From November 2020, hospitals also got an additional 20% add-on payment when a prescribed government drug was used – remdesivir.

The book also sets out a conflict of interest so colossal that it defies credulity.

The Gates and Fauci partnership, (with the Wellcome Trust) controls around 57% of global bio-medical research funding. The Gates foundation is invested in virtually every vaccine and also controls much of the mass media. Excluding contractual payments to the news media, in 2020, the Gates Foundation grants were of the order of $250 million. The full scope of its funding is unknown. This explains the slander, the massive disinformation and fake news.

An intrepid battalion of medical warriors like Dr. Peter McCullough has refused to kowtow to the raging medical tyranny.  The pandemic has demonstrated that the light of consciousness has dimmed globally. Yet “we live in order to become conscious” (CG Jung).

Doctors and medical scientists of immeasurable stature were junked, their careers ‘cancelled’ for safeguarding our medical freedom. If we should lose our medical freedom, we lose every freedom. These scientists have prevailed, however, and have thrown a lifeline to millions through early treatment protocols. This book is about them.

In finishing, it is worth noting that we now have evidence – and it is growing – that EUA vaccines, which have been mandated by governments, the WHO and private industry, are associated with increased risk of disease and death from COVID-19. By July 2021, the CDC VAERS system recorded 6,207 deaths (quoted by Leake).  

Posted in AGENDA 2030, Public Health | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

The Crimes of the Pharmaceutical Industry


Rod Driver
The Daily Sceptic

© Unknown
Big Pharma Vaccine

Richard Horton, the Editor-in-Chief of the Lancet, once observed:

The history of medicine is littered with wonderful early results which over a period of time turn out to be not so wonderful – or in fact even adverse… there are a whole string of recent examples where preliminary data led to a lot of excitement and caused changes in clinical practice and then eventually we realised they had done more harm than good. Why is it we never learn these lessons?

The pharmaceutical industry makes drugs for medical purposes. The industry campaigns hard for stronger patents throughout the world, though many economists are highly critical of patents in medicine. In some cases, patented drugs sell for thousands of times as much as they would cost if there were no patents. The industry illustrates some of the worst aspects of corporate power, corporate crimes, and ‘free lunches‘ (or rents) that enrich executives and shareholders.

Social Costs, Private Profits

The early stages of drug research and development are often funded publicly, with universities and governments throughout the world paying much of the costs. Corporations often become involved only after early tests show promise. As one commentator pointed out:

The whole ecosystem in which innovation is housed – patents, copyright, finance, universities, research, knowledge transfer, ownership rules, regulation to ensure common standards – is co-created between the public and the private.

However, the companies that receive the patents keep the profits. Once they have a patent for a drug, companies can charge whatever will maximise their profits. In other words, whatever richer people can afford to pay.

In an extreme case, a drug called Cerezyme cost over $200,000 for a year’s treatment, even though almost all of the development had been funded publicly. Healthcare systems in rich countries end up rationing drugs because of their cost.

Under these circumstances, allowing private companies to keep all of the profits from patented drugs, the development of which has been largely publicly funded, makes no sense. It is an example of how the economy is rigged to transfer immense wealth into the hands of executives and shareholders of big companies, whilst causing harm to others.

To make matters worse, it’s estimated that up to a third a of new drugs are no more effective than existing drugs. The Canadian government published review of the 61 drugs patented in Canada in 2018. It concluded that only one was what is called a breakthrough, and 56 provided little or no improvement compared with existing medicines.

The U.S. National Institute of Health (NIH) carried out a large study published in 2002 to see if existing drugs for high blood pressure worked. Some of the drugs were among the world’s biggest sellers, yet the study found that old-fashioned diuretics worked as well or better than anything else. The diuretics cost $37 per year. The other drugs tested cost $230-$715 dollars per year, yet doctors were mostly prescribing the more expensive drugs.

Huge amounts of money have been spent on diabetes drugs, such as Avandia, that turned out to be ineffective. When they were first introduced, they were initially promoted as life-saving. The flu drug, Tamiflu, had minimal value, but massive stockpiles were purchased against H1N1 influenza in 2009 due to misleading research data and corporate lobbying. The manufacturer, Roche, withheld data to mislead everyone. This should be considered a serious crime, but is not actually illegal.

Fraud and Deception are Widespread

If a drug is really effective, it requires no marketing. Proper scientific studies demonstrate the benefits, and doctors and healthcare networks all over the world will use it. However, because most drugs are not very effective, companies need to spend huge amounts ‘persuading’ doctors to prescribe them. This includes gifts, holidays and other inducements (a euphemism for bribes). Many doctors are happy to go along with this. In some countries there is also a great deal of more general advertising. In total, more is spent on marketing than on research. This marketing is ultimately paid for by the people who buy the drugs, making them much more expensive.

Many new drugs are copycat drugs. In other words, variations of existing drugs. Good examples are Cialis and Levitra, which are variations of Viagra. The companies have an oligopoly, so they can control prices. Huge sums are spent on marketing these copycat drugs, but if they did not exist, nobody would miss them.

All big pharmaceutical companies have been convicted of selling harmful, sometimes fatal drugs. The industry has been fined over $50 billion during the last twenty years. In 2012, the pharmaceutical company Glaxo Smith Kline (GSK) was fined £3 billion in the U.S. for mis-selling drugs; for fraud, bribery and overcharging; for paying lavish inducements to doctors; for covering up negative research evidence; and for making false claims about medicines. GSK has also been fined in India, South Africa and the UK. Although these figures sound large, they are not enough to deter the companies from continuing to commit these crimes. The sales of a single drug can be worth many times these amounts, so as far as the companies are concerned, crime pays. No individual is prosecuted for criminal offences. In 1997 some pharmaceutical companies were fined for operating a global price-fixing cartel. One author has gone so far as to say that the official definition of organised crime closely describes the activities of the drug companies.

The industry has a long history of exaggerating the benefits of its drugs, understating the downsides and hiding negative results. A recent study showed that in the real world, medicines tend to be four times more harmful than the manufacturers claim. Adverse effects hospitalise a quarter of a million people in the U.K. and 2 million in the U.S. each year. There were 55,000 deaths from the pain-relief drug Vioxx, but the data were withheld by the manufacturer, Merck. Large numbers of heart attacks, strokes and deaths were caused by the diabetes drug, Avandia. One expert commentator stated that:

Until more meaningful penalties and the prospect of jail time for company heads who are responsible for such activity become commonplace, companies will continue defrauding the Government and putting patients’ lives in danger.

Numerous studies have found that when corporations foot the bill, research is more likely to come up with results that support new drugs. In other words, there is now overwhelming evidence that drug companies manipulate the research. Companies test their own medicines, so testing is cleverly designed to emphasise benefits and understate harms. Negative trials have not always been published. They can get away with this because of inadequate regulation.

The pharmaceutical industry spends more than any other industry on lobbying the U.S. Government, spending $280 million in 2018. The purpose of this is to keep regulation of the industry favourable to its interests. The U.S. regulator is called the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). It is underfunded, has shown little interest in safety and has no ongoing, long-term safety analysis. It also has serious conflicts of interest, with many staff connected to the industry. The former FDA chief went to work for the drug company, Pfizer. Many former members of the U.S. Congress have taken jobs as lobbyists for the pharmaceutical industry.

Astonishingly, the regulatory situation in Britain is even worse. The U.K. regulator (MHRA) has not successfully prosecuted a single firm, and the fines total just £73,300. The regulator boasted in 2012 of having given 467 warnings and 151 cautions, but these have no effect. Laws and regulations are not enforced, and conflicts of interest exist throughout the whole drug approval system.

All of these factors have been at work during Covid. There is increasing concern that the World Health Organisation (WHO) has been captured by pharmaceutical interests. There is also evidence that university research has been manipulated by funders. The profit motive in the hands of companies with immense power seems to corrupt everything it touches. The injections that are labelled ‘vaccines’ are described by governments and manufacturers as ‘safe and effective’, yet the evidence shows that the claimed effectiveness has been hugely exaggerated, the short term harms have been greater than claimed and the long term harms remain unknown. Governments have paid huge amounts to private companies, such as Pfizer, for these experimental drugs, giving shareholders and executives a free lunch beyond their wildest dreams. They have indemnified the companies against liability for any harms from the drugs, diminishing their incentive to ensure they are safe.

Within the pharmaceutical system, the focus on corporate profit, rather than medical need, tends to push in the wrong direction, creating perverse incentives. In other words, profit-seeking companies will always try to claim that their medicines are more effective and less harmful than is actually the case, and they can earn more profits by committing bribery and fraud. The pharmaceutical industry is a glaring example of an industry that is ‘not fit for purpose’. It fails the populations of both rich and poor countries.

Possible Solutions?

I should stress that in discussing solutions I have no strong ideological bias towards markets or state. All successful economies have been combinations of the two. The main goal with the pharmaceutical system should be to eliminate financial motives to manipulate drug trials and minimise the expenditure on marketing. This might require an organisation that is not profit-orientated being responsible for the large-scale testing of possible medicines. This would have to be much more transparent than existing research carried out by private companies. Pharmaceuticals might be one area where the elimination of patents would benefit society, so there would be no overpriced medicines or windfall profits. (I’ll write an article about more general problems with patents in the future.) All successful drugs, developed mainly via public means, would be available to every country to make as cheaply as possible. Private companies could still participate in other aspects of the process, such as early research or manufacturing drugs.

There have been debates for generations about whether the system should be partly nationalised and these have resurfaced recently. Proponents suggest that this could provide the same medicines for a fraction of the cost. There would be no financial incentive to commit fraud or bribery, no copycat drugs, no expensive marketing, no lobbying, no legal battles over patents and no depriving poor countries of medicines. But would there be perverse political and bureaucratic incentives in their place, to appear successful and hide failure? Would public bodies do a better job of developing the drugs we need?

If you have any thoughts on the best way to reform the pharmaceutical industry, let us know.

Posted in Public Health | Tagged | Leave a comment

Media touts ‘Sudden Adult Death Syndrome’ as cover story for vaccine deaths


  Media touts ‘Sudden Adult Death Syndrome’ as cover story for vaccine deaths The murderous medical regime knows that covid vaccines are killing healthy young people at an alarming rate, so they’ve suddenly assigned a medical label for the phenomenon in order to distract people from the truth. Now, healthy young people who suddenly die without any medical explanation are said to have died from Sudden Adult Death Syndrome (SADS) rather than from vaccines. The UK Daily Mail has published an article detailing this new so-called “syndrome” which is of course just a convenient label to mask the true underlying cause of these sudden deaths. The title of their article is, “Healthy young people are dying suddenly and unexpectedly from a mysterious syndrome – as doctors seek answers through a new national register,” and it says that everyone under the age of 40, “…may potentially be at risk of having Sudden Adult Death Syndrome (SADS).” All people under the age of 40 are now supposed to “get their hearts checked,” while oblivious doctors claim to be searching for the “genetic cause” behind SADS. You can’t make this up. The medical negligence, incompetence and even maliciousness behind all this is mind-boggling. Get the full story and shocking details in today’s feature podcast here.  

This reveals the type of cover ups and extreme methods used by the pharmaceutical industry to hide truths from the public! Avoidance of autopsies, generally legally required, has a history way back to the “SIDS” days where almost certain vaccine related deaths were covered up to protect the medical industry.
The “prostitution” of the mass media journalism is a disgrace to humanity!

Posted in AGENDA 2030 | Tagged | Leave a comment

Ukraine: Misunderstandings and misunderstandings


Thierry Meyssan
Voltairenet.org
Tue, 07 Jun 2022 00:00 UTC

The war in Ukraine is only taking place because of the ignorance of the Westerners of what was happening in Ukraine and because of a series of misunderstandings and misinterpretations. The Westerners, focused on themselves, unable to think like their interlocutors, kept making mistakes. Finally, when the military operations end and the Russians have achieved their publicly stated objectives from day one, they can even persuade themselves that they have won. In the end, the only thing that matters to the West is not saving human lives, but having the conviction that they are on the right side of history.

The war in Ukraine is interpreted very differently depending on whether one is Western or Russian. Each person’s previous experience conditions their interpretation of words and events. In fact, no one reacts to the same things and seeks the same information as the others. In the end, the two camps no longer have the same perception of reality. This succession of misunderstandings and misconceptions leads to a misunderstanding that can unintentionally lead to major conflict.

THE BANDERISTS

The two sides, who fought side-by-side against Nazism, had completely different experiences during this period and therefore have different memories of it.

The Russian press does not distinguish between Banderists and Nazis. It is a question of awakening the memory of the “Great Patriotic War” (known in the West as “World War II”). When Germany attacked Russia in June 1941, the latter was not at all ready. The shock was disastrous. Stalin only managed to unite his people by allying himself with the Orthodox Church, which he had previously fought, and by freeing his political opponents who had been sentenced to the Gulag. To evoke this period today is to commit oneself to recognizing the place of each person as long as he defends the Nation.

The Russians perceive the contemporary Banderists/Nazis as existential dangers to their people. In doing so, they are right because Ukrainian nationalists consider that they are “born to eradicate Muscovites”.

Therefore, all Western attacks on the person of Vladimir Putin are out of place and ineffective. For Russian opponents, this is no longer the issue. Whether they like him or not, Putin is their leader, just as Stalin was from June 1941.

The Western press also equated the Banderists with the Nazis, but this was to put its importance more easily into perspective. In the memory of the people of Western Europe, Nazism threatened only minorities. First the mentally ill, the terminally ill and the old, then the Jews and the gypsies were separated from the pack and disappeared. On the contrary, the Slavs remember armies advancing, razing one-by-one all the villages they took. No one could survive. Not only is Nazism less frightening to Western Europeans, but the Anglo-Saxons are quietly suppressing symbols that might revive this memory. For example, British communications advisers changed the Azov regiment’s crest at the end of May. They replaced the wolf’s hook (Wolfsangel) associated with the SS Das Reich division with three trident swords evoking the Ukrainian National Republic (1917-20). In doing so, they removed a Nazi insignia and replaced it with an anti-Bolshevik insignia. In the Western European imagination, however, the Soviet Union is equated with Russia, ignoring the fact that the majority of Soviet leaders were not Russian.

British communication advisors assure that the Ukrainian Banderists/Nazis are comparable to the present-day Western Nazis: fringe groups of rabid people. They do not deny their existence, but suggest that they are not important. So they make disappear both the traces of their parliamentary and governmental activity since independence in 1991 and the images of the monuments to them that have since then been erected all over the country.

From 1991 to 2014, the world’s newspapers ignored the slow reformation of the Banderists in Ukraine. However, in February 2014, during the overthrow of elected president Viktor Yanukovych, all journalists covering the “Revolution of Dignity” were struck by the central role of far-right militias in the protests. The world’s media reported on these strange “nationalists” with swastikas. But the Western press abruptly stopped investigating a month later when Crimea, refusing to allow these extremists to take power, declared its independence. To continue to report on the drift of Ukraine would have been to give reason to the Russian Federation which had accepted its attachment. From then on and for 8 years, no Western media investigated, for example, the accusations of kidnapping and torture on a large scale that were spread throughout the country. Because they deliberately ignored the Banderists during this period, they are no longer able to assess their political and military role today.

This blindness continues with the evolution of Ukrainian power during the war. The Western press ignores everything about the dictatorship that was put in place: confiscation by the state of all media, arrest of opposition figures, confiscation of property of people who mention the historical crimes of the Banderists and the Nazis, etc. On the contrary, the Russian press does not miss anything of this sudden development and is mourning for having closed its eyes for years.

For our part, we have written – belatedly – the history of the Banderists; a subject to which no book has been devoted, a sign that Ukraine from this angle did not fascinate anyone. Our work, translated into a dozen languages, has finally touched many Western military officials and diplomats. They are now putting pressure on their governments to stop supporting these enemies of humanity.

THE CREDIBILITY OF WESTERN AND RUSSIAN LEADERS

There are two ways to assess the credibility of a leader: one looks at his good intentions or his record. Western Europeans, who have placed themselves under the protection of the United States, are convinced that they are no longer making history, but rather undergoing it. They therefore no longer need political leaders as they did in the last century. In fact, they only elect managers who present themselves as having good intentions. On the contrary, the Russians, after the collapse of their country during the Yeltsin years, wanted to restore their independence and finally cut with the US liberalism they had believed in for a decade. To do this, they elected and re-elected Vladimir Putin, whose effectiveness they are checking. Their country has opened up to foreigners while becoming self-sufficient in many areas, including food. They interpret NATO sanctions not as punishment, but, given that the Atlantic Alliance represents only 12 per cent of the world’s population, as a closure of the West to the rest of the world.

Regardless of political regimes, civilian leaders who seek to unite their people as widely as possible refrain from lying to maintain the confidence of their fellow citizens, while those who serve a minority to exploit the majority are obliged to lie in order not to be overthrown. On the other hand, military leaders, if they tend to take their dreams for realities, and therefore to lie, in times of peace, are obliged to stick as close as possible to realities in times of war in order to win.

Westerners are marked by a very strong trauma experienced during the attacks of September 11, 2001 and the appearance of the US Secretary of State, General Colin Powell, before the United Nations Security Council on February 5, 2003. They shook their heads during the New York attacks, seeing people jumping out of windows and then towers collapsing, before realizing that the explanations they were being given did not hold waterA mistrust was created between them and the leaders who pretended to believe in this nonsense [1]. Then they believed what a general told them because a military man could not lie about a very serious security threat. Finally, they became depressed when they realized that all this staging was only an excuse to overthrow a government that was resisting the US and to seize the oil and financial wealth of its country. General Powell’s speech [2] was written by civilian politicians, the Straussians of the Office of Strategic Influence (OSI), as he shamefully admitted later. This misplaced trust cost the lives of more than a million people [3]. Since 2003, Westerners no longer trust the word of their leaders; a phenomenon that is somewhat less pronounced in France, which was the only country to publicly contradict General Powell.

On the contrary, the Russians make a distinction between those of their leaders who speak the same language as the others and those who defend the collective interest. In the 2000s, they initially believed in the Western discourse and hoped that they too would experience freedom and prosperity. But they experienced a terrible collapse while watching a few thugs take over their collective wealth. They then turned to safe values: fellow citizens concerned with the general interest and trained by the KGB. They live today hoping to be delivered from what remains of this period of misguidance: oligarchs installed abroad and a certain globalist bourgeoisie in Moscow and St. Petersburg. They see the former as thieves and are happy that their assets, already lost to the country, are being seized by Westerners. As for the latter, they know that they do not exist only in their country, but everywhere in the globalized world. They see some of them leaving without regret. For the Russians, President Putin and his team have managed to solve the food problem and put them back to work. They have restored their army and are protecting them from the resurgence of Nazism. Of course, everything is not rosy, but it is much better since they are in charge.

Read the whole article and be educated!
https://www.sott.net/article/468590-Ukraine-Misunderstandings-and-misunderstandings

Posted in AGENDA 2030 | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Coup d’Etat in Washington and “The Dollar Paper Tiger”, Fiery Dragon in Asia and the Pacific: André Gunder Frank


This essay consists of the following parts:

Coup d’ État in Washington

Paper Tiger – The United States and the World

Fiery Dragon: China in East Asia

Michel Chossudovsky, May 4,  2018, June 7, 2022

https://www.globalresearch.ca/coup-detat-in-washington-and-the-dollar-paper-tiger-fiery-dragon-in-asia-and-the-pacific/5599132

The Home of the Brave from 1984 to 2003

George Orwell would have to regard his dire predictions of Big Brother for 1984 as a benign Alice in a charming Wonderland version of Animal Farm. The latter is to be compared to the 2003 Bush and Ashcroft reality of double-think and new-speak in which, however, some are no longer equal than others, either at home or abroad, but still WAR IS PEACE – really – the President said so.

But the capacity of the United States to rule the world is more than questionable, especially after its 2003 debacle in Iraq.

Paper Tiger – The United States and the World

The US still has the world’s largest economy, which saw boom times during much of the 1990s, and it has unrivalled military power exceeding the total of the next dozen or more military powers combined. Moreover, the present Bush administration makes use of both of them in unilateral policies to impose its will on the rest of the world, friend and foe alike, to all of which Bush threw down the gauntlet of ‘’you are either with us or against us.”

With means you do as we say, and against means you are under threat to be destroyed economically and politically, as well as militarily if we wish.

Posted in AGENDA 2030, New World Order | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Global Research Enlightenment ( 6th June 2022)


Video: Pfizer’s “Secret” Report on the Covid Vaccine. Beyond Manslaughter. The Evidence is Overwhelming. The Vaccine Should Be Immediately Withdrawn Worldwide

Biggest Lie in World History: There Never Was A Pandemic. The Data Base is Flawed. The Covid Mandates including the Vaccine are Invalid

View All Articles

Posted in AGENDA 2030, Civil Liberties, Conspiracies | Tagged , | Leave a comment

The True Evil of the World Economic Forum


J.B. Shurk
American Thinker
2022-05-26 18:49:00 

Whenever I listen to Klaus Schwab and his Davos Death Cult buddies openly discuss their plans for world domination, I always think, “Are we really going to let another power-hungry German walk us into global conflagration?” For a while there, I believed that Western allies had endured enough death and slaughter from the first two world wars to forge an informal understanding among themselves that uncontrolled German megalomania invariably leads to malignant outcomes for all. Then came German reunification, and the nation’s inevitable economic dominance over all of Europe assured its status as the most powerful member of the European Union. All that effort to constrain the German empire’s influence went up in smoke. It turns out that it is far easier to conquer the European continent with flowery promises of “peace,” “economic integration,” and “international cooperation” than it is to send jackbooted shock troops marching past the Arc de Triomphe and down the Champs-Élysées.

Still, the Americans, Canadians, and Brits would never sit idly by while German powerbrokers remake the world in their image, right? Wrong! Just listen to Joe Biden, Justin Trudeau, and Boris Johnson all parroting that same Build Back Better Boobery in unison, as if they operated under the influence of some nefarious hive mind. At first, hearing world leaders squawk identical World Economic Forum talking points was disconcerting. Then it was nauseating. Now it just makes them sound like walking, talking robots all under the WEF’s control. Is it possible that Ol’ Klaus already lobotomized the West’s putative leadership and replaced their neural CPUs with state-of-the-art, German-made “Great Reset” implants? Curse you, German engineering!

That’s where we are today, as the world’s 1% of the 1% celebrate their own magnificence in Davos and plot mankind’s future without even the pretense of seeking mankind’s consultation, let alone permission. “The future is not just happening,” Schwab proclaimed to his SPECTRE-like cabal in Switzerland. “The future is built by us, by a powerful community such as you here in this room.” “Good German” Klaus and his merry band of global gentry have decided to take over the planet, and they’re so confident in their endeavors that they no longer deign to pretend otherwise. Yep, here are our New World Order master plans! Yes, we know we’ve called you guys “conspiracy theory nuts” for forty years, but you were right. In hindsight, wasn’t it obvious?

Information well worth considering as accurate!

Posted in New World Order | Tagged | 1 Comment