There are so many factors relevant to the current global revolution sweeping unchecked, destroying so many aspects of our lives. These factors include questions of credibility, logic, truth, origins, degrees of health and safety, methodologies, political influences, freedoms, coersions, agendas, public behaviour, police behaviour, mass media, social media, government behaviour and censorship.

Detailed aspects concern the ‘virus’, its ‘variants’, potency (danger), transmissibility, shedding, origin (‘natural’ or man-made), life and chemical structure. “Transmissibility” leads us to the human responses being introduced in order to limit the spreading, – masks, hygiene, isolation, lock-downs, curfews, group numbers, and VACCINATIONS.

‘Vaccinations’ presents its own mountain of variables, questions and imponderables. Enough to create a ‘book’of its own!  Necessity, applicability, safety, efficacy, duration, transmission, recording, statistics and adverse effects.

All of these issues are ‘faithfully’ and persistently presented to the public via our TV and newspaper networks, but are they accurate? Another realm of serious questions and debate! A huge expanse of social media and activism raises an ever-expanding source of alternative claims, theories and factual data.

Are the infection tests reliable?

Are the death, hospitalization and ICU statistics correct?
Do masks and lock-downs achieve anything and to what degree?

Two main questions, even on the social media, remain unclear.

The source of the virus and the suspicion of intent rather than accidental escape.

Many people and authorities seem to now accept that the Covid virus is not a natural chemical evolution, but is a deliberate laboratory creation. How did it become free from the laboratory and have such a rapid worldwide spread?

The following information quite credibly answers these questions, we can only hope that it becomes known to those who need to know and can act upon it, before the censorship machine ‘shreds’ it.
{ Bold Emphasis in the text is added}

First Clue:

The Director-General of the World Health Organization (WHO), Tedros Adanom Ghebreyesus, called on countries to prepare for a new pandemic in the next three months. He said this during a briefing in Geneva, the broadcast of which was published on the organization’s Twitter page.                                                

    

Additional evidence, revealed below, is not currently accessible, thank goodness one person was able to publish the details.

Click to access GPMB_annualreport_2019.pdf

Annual report on global preparedness for health emergencies Global Preparedness Monitoring Board

Acknowledgements We extend our deep appreciation and thanks to the Director-General of the World Health Organization and to the President, World Bank Group for having co-convened the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board (GPMB).

The United Nations must strengthen coordination mechanisms.
The Secretary General of the United Nations, with WHO and United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA), must strengthen coordination in different country, health and humanitarian emergency contexts, by ensuring clear United Nations systemwide roles and responsibilities; rapidly resetting preparedness and response strategies during health emergencies; and, enhancing United Nations system leadership for preparedness, including through routine simulation exercises.
WHO should introduce an approach to mobilize the wider national, regional and international community at earlier stages of an outbreak, prior to a declaration of an IHR (2005) Public Health Emergency of International Concern. Progress indicator(s) by September 2020
• The Secretary-General of the United Nations, with the Director-General of WHO and Under-Secretary-General for Humanitarian Affairs strengthens coordination and identifies clear roles and responsibilities and timely triggers for a coordinated United Nations systemwide response for health emergencies in different countries and different health and humanitarian emergency contexts.
• The United Nations (including WHO) conducts at least two system-wide training and simulation exercises, including one for covering the deliberate release of a lethal respiratory pathogen.
 • WHO develops intermediate triggers to mobilize national, international and multilateral action early in outbreaks, to complement existing mechanisms for later and more advanced stages of an outbreak under the IHR (2005).
• The Secretary General of the United Nations convenes a high-level dialogue with health, security and foreign affairs officials to determine how the world can address the threat of a lethal respiratory pathogen pandemic, as well as for managing preparedness for disease outbreaks in complex, insecure contexts.

Evidence of the first mentioned training excercises taking place:

Planned Simulation:

 “Before COVID, Gates Planned Social Media Censorship of Vaccine Safety Advocates With Pharma, CDC, Media, China and CIA”
[ So weird, it is difficult to grasp the concept of a “rehearsal” and its depth of detail!   NOTE – October 2019, a week or two before COVID began circulating.]

https://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/covid-gates-planned-social-media-censorship-vaccine-safety-advocates-pharma-cdc-m1
Written By: Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.
The attached document shows that a cabal of powerful individuals did indeed begin planning the mass eviction of vaccine skeptics from social media in October 2019, a week or two before COVID began circulating. That month, Microsoft founder Bill Gates organized an exercise of four “table-top” simulations of a worldwide coronavirus pandemic with other high-ranking “Deep State” panjandrums. The exercise was referred to as Event 201.

Gates’ co-conspirators included representatives from the World Bank, the World Economic Forum (Great Reset), Bloomberg/Johns Hopkins University Populations Center, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, various media powerhouses, the Chinese government, a former Central Intelligence Agency/National Security Agency director (there is no such thing as a former CIA officer), vaccine maker Johnson & Johnson, the finance and biosecurity industries and Edelman, the world’s leading corporate PR firm.

At Gates’ direction, these eminences role-played members of a Pandemic Control Council, wargaming government strategies for controlling the pandemic, the narrative and the population. Needless to say, there was little talk of building immune systems, off-the-shelf remedies or off-patent therapeutic drugs and vitamins, but lots of chatter about promoting uptake of new patentable antiviral drugs and vaccines.

But the participants primarily focused on planning industry-centric, fear-mongering, police-state strategies for managing an imaginary global coronavirus contagion culminating in mass censorship of social media.

Oddly, Gates now claims that the simulation didn’t occur. On April 12, 2020, Gates told BBC, “Now here we are. We didn’t simulate this, we didn’t practice, so both the health policies and economic policies, we find ourselves in uncharted territory.”

Unfortunately for that whopper, the videos of the event are still available across the internet. They show that Gates and team did indeed simulate health and economic policies. It’s hard to swallow that Gates has forgotten.

Gates’s Event 201 simulated COVID epidemic caused 65 million deaths at the 18-month endpoint and global economic collapse lasting up to a decade. Compared to the Gates simulation, therefore, the actual COVID-19 crisis is a bit of a dud, having imposed a mere 2.5 million deaths “attributed to COVID” over the past 13 months.

The deaths “attributed to COVID” in the real-life situation are highly questionable, and must be seen in the context of a global population of 7.8 billion, with about 59 million deaths expected annually. The predictions of decade-long economic collapse will probably prove more accurate — but only because of the draconian lockdown promoted by Gates.

Gates’ Event 201 script imagines vast anti-vaccine riots triggered by internet posts. The universal and single-minded presumption among its participants was that such a crisis would prove an opportunity of convenience to promote new vaccines, and tighten controls by a surveillance and censorship state.

Segment four of the script — on manipulation and control of public opinion — is most revealing. It uncannily predicted democracy’s current crisis:

• The participants discussed mechanisms for controlling “disinformation” and “misinformation,” by “flooding” the media with propaganda (“good information”), imposing penalties for spreading falsehoods and discrediting the anti-vaccination movement.
• Jane Halton, of Australia’s ANZ Bank, one of the authors of Australia’s oppressive “no jab, no pay” policy, assured the participants that Gates Foundation is creating algorithms “to sift through information on these social media platforms” to protect the public from dangerous thoughts and information.
• George Gao, the prescient director of the Chinese Center for Disease Control, worries about how to suppress “rumors” that the virus is laboratory generated: “People believe, ‘This is a manmade’… [and that] some pharmaceutical company made the virus.”
• Chen Huang, an Apple research scientist, Google scholar and the world’s leading expert on tracking and tracing and facial recognition technology, role-plays the newscaster reporting on government countermeasures. He blames riots on anti-vaccine activists and predicts that Twitter and Facebook will cooperate in “identify[ing] and delete[ing] a disturbing number of accounts dedicated to spreading misinformation about the outbreak” and to implement “internet shutdowns … to quell panic.”

Dr. Tara Kirk Sell, a senior scholar at Bloomberg School of Health’s Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, worries that pharmaceutical companies are being accused of introducing the virus so they can make money on drugs and vaccines: “[We] have seen public faith in their products plummet.” She notes with alarm that “Unrest, due to false rumors and divisive messaging, is rising and is exacerbating spread of the disease as levels of trust fall and people stop cooperating with response efforts. This is a massive problem, one that threatens governments and trusted institutions.”
Sell reminds her fellow collaborators that “We know that social media is now the primary way that many people get their news, so interruptions to these platforms could curb the spread of misinformation.” There are many ways, Sell advises, for government and industry allies to accomplish this objective: “Some governments have taken control of national access to the Internet. Others are censoring websites and social media content and a small number have shut down Internet access completely to prevent the spread of misinformation. Penalties have been put in place for spreading harmful falsehoods, including arrests.”

• Matthew Harrington, CEO of Edelman Public Relations agrees that social media must fall in line to promote government policy: “I also think we’re at a moment where the social media platforms have to step forward and recognize the moment to assert that they’re a technology platform and not a broadcaster is over. They in fact have to be a participant in broadcasting accurate information and partnering with the scientific and health communities to counterweight, if not flood the zone, of accurate information. Because to try to put the genie back in the bottle of misinformation and disinformation is not possible.”
• Stephen Redd, the Admiral of the Public Health Service, has the sinister notion that government should mine social media data to identify people with negative beliefs: “I think with the social media platforms, there’s an opportunity to understand who it is that’s susceptible … to misinformation, so I think there’s an opportunity to collect data from that communication mechanism.”
• Adrian Thomas of Johnson & Johnson announces “some important news to share from some of “our member companies [Pharma]”: We are doing clinical trials in new antiretrovirals, and in fact, in vaccines!” He recommends a strategy to address the problems to these companies when “rumors were actually spreading” that their shoddily tested products “are causing deaths and so patients are not taking them anymore.” He suggests, “Maybe we’re making the mistake of reporting and counting all the fatalities and infections.”
• Former CIA deputy director, Avril Haines unveiled a strategy to “flood the zone” with propaganda from “trusted sources,” including “influential community leaders, as well as health workers.” He warns about “false information that is starting to actually hamper our ability to address the pandemic, then we need to be able to respond quickly to it.”
• Matthew Harrington (Edelman CEO) observes that the Internet — which once promised the decentralization and democratization of information — now needs to be centralized: “I think just to build a little bit on what Avril said, I think as in previous conversations where we’ve talked about centralization around management of information or public health needs, there needs to be a centralized response around the communications approach that then is cascaded to informed advocates, represented in the NGO communities, the medical professionals, et cetera.”
  Tom Inglesby (John Hopkins biosecurity expert advisor to the National Institutes of Health, the Pentagon and Homeland Security) agrees that centralized control is needed: “You mean centralized international?”
• Matthew Harrington (Edelman) replies that information access should be: “Centralized on an international basis, because I think there needs to be a central repository of data facts and key messages.”
• Hasti Taghi (Media Advisor) sums up: “The anti-vaccine movement was very strong and this is something specifically through social media that has spread. So as we do the research to come up with the right vaccines to help prevent the continuation of this, how do we get the right information out there? How do we communicate the right information to ensure that the public has trust in these vaccines that we’re creating?”
• Kevin McAleese, communications officer for Gates-funded agricultural projects, observes that: “To me, it is clear countries need to make strong efforts to manage both mis- and disinformation. We know social media companies are working around the clock to combat these disinformation campaigns. The task of identifying every bad actor is immense. This is a huge problem that’s going to keep us from ending the pandemic and might even lead to the fall of governments, as we saw in the Arab Spring. If the solution means controlling and reducing access to information, I think it’s the right choice.”
• Tom Inglesby, director of Bloomberg’s Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security concurs, asking if “In this case, do you think governments are at the point where they need to require social media companies to operate in a certain way?”
• Lavan Thiru, Singapore’s Finance Minister suggests that the government might make examples of dissidents with “government or enforcement actions against fake news. Some of us, this new regulations are come in place about how we deal with fake news. Maybe this is a time for us to showcase some cases where we are able to bring forward some bad actors and leave it before the courts to decide whether they have actually spread some fake news.”

Read the attached transcript to see how Gates and his government, pharma and intelligence apparatus telegraphed their plans to censor and control the media during the pandemic. In yet another uncanny coincidence, COVID-19 began circulating among global populations within days of Gates’ meeting.

Now, connecting the planned virus pandemic to the one which commenced a week later!

It is now well established that the virus was a man-made creation and that took place in the Wuhan Laboratories, in China.

U.S. Cash Funded Controversial Wuhan Virus Lab Where Research to Make Diseases More Deadly Was Backed by Dr. Anthony Fauci, New Book Says

The Daily Mail reported:

The U.S. was funding China‘s controversial Wuhan laboratory as it embarked on a secretive project to identify deadly viruses with pandemic potential, a new book has claimed.

According to “What Really Happened in Wuhan: the Cover-Ups, the Conspiracies and the Classified Research,” by Sharri Markson, the Wuhan Institute of Virology was creating a database of potentially lethal viruses with the help of Shi Zhengli – aka ‘batwoman.’

Ms Zhengli, who earned her nickname sampling thousands of bats in remote caves, collected 19,000 samples while at Wuhan, with 2,481 of those containing coronaviruses.

> Newly Released Documents on Wuhan Lab Funding

William G.  September 7, 2021<
Rand Paul<
>Responds Following Newly Released Documents on Wuhan Lab Funding

On Tuesday, Senator Rand Paul (R-Ky.) accused Chief Medical Advisor to the President Anthony Fauci of lying to Congress, pointing to recently revealed documents outlining Fauci’s knowledge of gain-of-function research funded by the National Institute of Health and conducted in Wuhan, China.

Paul stated ” I will be sending a letter to the Department of Justice asking for a criminal referral because he has lied to Congress.”

“[Fauci] realizes that once the public realizes that the NIH funded the Wuhan Lab…once the public figures out that they were doing very, very dangerous research there, gain-of-function research, taking animal viruses and making them more transmissible to humans, once everybody puts this together, he realizes where the blame is going to attach,” Paul continued. “If this came from the lab he was funding, my goodness, can you imagine the moral culpability the man has?”

WHO/Fauci/Gates connections:

-2020. Gates states 7 billion people will need the vaccine
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/bill-gates-says-world-7-190044086.html

-2016. Kraus Schwab within 10 years chip everyone
“From a 2016 interview with Klaus Schwab, boss of the World Economic Forum in Davos, in which he says humans will have a chip implanted in their brain or skin within 10 years.”
{WEF a part of the UN!, As is the WHO!}
www.youtube.com/watch?v=UmQNA0HL1pw

An interesting back-step by the WHO on booster shots, and a great deal more:

https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-08-30-who-biden-at-odds-over-covid-booster.html

WHO, Biden administration at odds over COVID-19 vaccine boosters Monday, August 30, 2021 by: Nolan Barton badhealth , badmedicine , big government , Big Pharma , CDC , conspiracy , coronavirus , corruption , covid-19 , covid-19 vaccines , herd immunity , Joe Biden , pharmaceutical fraud , vaccine boosters , WHO Bypass censorship by sharing this link: https://www.afinalwarning.com/548604.html Copy URL – (Natural News ) The World Health Organization (WHO) …

(Natural News) The World Health Organization (WHO) has repeatedly rejected calls for coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccine boosters, but the Biden administration still insists on rolling out another dose for the fully vaccinated.

“We recently had an expert group meeting with scientists from around the world this included researchers, it included regulatory experts from different regulatory agencies, there was consensus that the data around the need for boosters is not conclusive,” WHO Chief Scientist Dr. Soumya Swaminathan said at a media briefing Wednesday, Aug. 25.

“We also don’t know about the safety of boosters. When we talk about vaccines, it’s not just the efficacy. What happens when you give a third dose of an mRNA vaccine or any other kind of vaccine? These need to be studied as well, so before we launch into full-scale booster programs for the whole population there are a number of questions that need to be answered.” (Related: Braveheart actor Michael Mitchell dies six days after getting third Pfizer “booster” shot for covid.)

But President Joe Biden didn’t budge. Instead, he suggested on Friday, Aug. 27, that the government could offer COVID-19 vaccine boosters to most vaccinated adults sooner than eight months after a second dose.

Just nine days earlier, the president announced that his administration would begin offering boosters the week of Sept. 20 to adults who had received their second dose of COVID-19 vaccines at least eight months ago.

Both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) said earlier this year that boosters would not be recommended for the virus. With the COVID-19 vaccines appearing to fail against COVID-19 variants, it remains unclear what benefits an additional dose would provide.

Boosters not a priority
More and more experts around the world are opposing the rollout of boosters. They are now recommending that the virus be allowed to circulate throughout the population, with precautions taken for vulnerable individuals.

“We really cannot do anything else but allow the virus to take its course in order for the population to achieve herd immunity,” said Porolfur Gudnason, chief epidemiologist of Iceland’s Directorate of Health. “We need to try to vaccinate and better protect those who are vulnerable, but let us tolerate the infection. It is not a priority now to vaccinate everyone with the third dose.”

Andrew Pollard, director of the Oxford Vaccine Group, told a parliamentary panel earlier this month that we don’t have anything to stop COVID-19 transmissions. “I think we are in a situation where herd immunity is not a possibility and I suspect the virus will throw up a new variant that is even better at infecting vaccinated individuals,” he said.

Infectious disease expert Paul Hunter told the same panel that vaccination would not bring about herd immunity.

“We need to start moving away from just reporting infections or just reporting positive cases admitted to hospital, to actually start reporting the number of people who are ill because of COVID,” said Hunter, who also advises the WHO on the virus. “Otherwise we are going to be frightening ourselves with very high numbers that actually don’t translate into disease burden.”

Relying on boosters is like digging yourself a hole
Some are asking whether catching COVID-19 now is better than more vaccines. It has become a serious question that has implications for whether children should ever be vaccinated, and whether we use the virus or booster shots to top up immunity in adults. (Related: COVID-19 natural immunity vs vaccine-induced immunity guide.)

“There are clearly sources of information to suggest that once we start vaccination and we get more than 25 percent of the population vaccinated, we will allow one of the variants that’s in the background to emerge because it’s resistant to the vaccine,” board-certified internist and cardiologist, Dr. Peter McCullough, said in a podcast earlier this month.

“Just like an antibiotic, once we get to a certain percentage of coverage with an antibiotic, we’ll allow resistant bacteria to move forward.”

Dr. Robert Malone, inventor of mRNA and DNA vaccines, recently tweeted: “I am reminded of the first rule of holes. When you are in one, stop digging.” He described booster shot strategies as “based on hope rather than data.”

“We could be digging ourselves into a hole for a very long time if we think we can only keep COVID away by boosting every year,” said Eleanor Riley, an immunologist from the University of Edinburgh.

Humans generally get a broader immune response after being infected with the virus than vaccination. “That means if you had a real humdinger of an infection, you may have better immunity to any new variants that pop up as you have immunity to more than just spike [protein],” said Riley.

It’s all about the money
It’s easy to see why Big Pharma companies are pushing hard to get the green light for their boosters. Every extra dose means more money for them.

Adding booster doses to the equation would push the projected global spending on COVID-19 vaccines to a total of $157 billion through 2025, according to U.S. health data firm IQVIA Holdings. Pfizer has forecast sales of $26 billion from the vaccine in 2021 alone.

It could be a lot more as the projections were based on expectations that the booster doses would follow every two years following initial vaccinations.

IQVIA, which provides data and analytics for the healthcare industry, said it expects the first wave of COVID-19 vaccinations to reach about 70 percent of the world’s population by the end of 2022. Murray Aitken, a senior vice president at IQVIA, said that vaccine spending is expected to be highest this year at $54 billion with a global vaccination campaign underway. It is expected to decrease in succeeding years as tighter competition and vaccine volumes drive down prices.

REPORT:
WHO could have prevented COVID-19 catastrophe Tuesday, June 01, 2021 by: Divina Ramirez CCP , China , Chinese Communist Party , coronavirus origin , Coronavirus pandemic , covid-19 , global emergency , infections , outbreak , pandemic , Tedros Ghebreyesus , WHO , World Health Organization , Wuhan coronavirus

https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-06-01-report-details-failures-in-response-to-pandemic.html

[Bypass censorship by sharing this link: https://www.afinalwarning.com/518655.html Copy URL – (Natural News )]

(Natural News) The coronavirus pandemic could have been prevented, according to an independent review panel.
In a report released on May 12, the Independent Panel for Pandemic Preparedness and Response (IPPR) said the combined response of the World Health Organization (WHO) and of global governments was a “toxic cocktail” that allowed the pandemic to turn into a catastrophic humanitarian crisis.
The panel, which has spent the last eight months reviewing evidence on how an outbreak became a pandemic, also said in its report that the WHO should have declared a global emergency much sooner than it did.
In particular, the initial responses to the outbreak in Wuhan, China back in December 2019 lacked urgency. February 2020 also proved to be a costly “lost month” as many countries failed to heed the alarm. Without urgent change, the world would be vulnerable to another major disease outbreak, concluded the panel.
COVID-19 has infected at least 160 million people worldwide and killed more than 3.3 million.

WHO took too long to sound the alarm
The panel was co-chaired by Ellen Sirleaf, a Nobel laureate and the former president of Liberia, and Helen Clark, former prime minister of New Zealand. The panel included a total of 11 experts spanning a range of backgrounds and countries including China and the United States. Panel members were asked to represent their institutions rather than their countries.
The panel began its investigation last September and was asked to present a full report ahead of the World Health Assembly (WHA) meeting this May. The panel released their findings online as an 86-page report titled, “COVID-19: Make it the Last Pandemic.”
The report came with an evidence-based narrative that detailed 13 defining moments that have steered the course of the pandemic. In its report, the panel pointed out that the WHO took too long to declare a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC).
The WHO should have declared a PHEIC at its first meeting on Jan. 22 last year instead of on Jan. 30. For most countries, the declaration was “lost” as they failed to take timely measures to curb the outbreak.
The WHO was then hindered by its own regulations and its insistence that travel restrictions should be a last resort. Meanwhile, European countries and the U.S. wasted the entire month of February and only acted when their hospitals began filling up, the panel said.

A “Lancet” connection:
https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-09-13-conspiracy-lancet-scientists-denied-covid-theory-wuhan-ties.html#

Covid is a bioweapon that was developed to unleash a new world order

The reason why this is all still important now is because this letter in The Lancet played a critical role early on in the suppression of all inquiry into the true origins of the Chinese Flu, which is still being debated to this very day.

There have been efforts from the very beginning to distance China from carrying any of the blame. The powers that be also want to distance Tony Fauci from the Chinese Virus as well, even though we now know for a fact that Fauci sent American taxpayer dollars to Wuhan to develop it.

Several of the letter’s Wuhan-tied signers also hail from Britain’s Wellcome Trust, which was exposed for also sending cash to the WIV to develop genetically modified (GMO) coronaviruses capable of infecting humans.

VACCINES – The way to eradicate the virus, variants and all?
Or the way to make people sick and die?
It has been suggested that the virus itself was always intended as the trigger for the vaccine introduction, the real intended method of mass destruction!

The vaccines are a demonstrably far higher risk, with initial death numbers already becoming significant, even from officially published government department statistics. Statistics that are widely accepted as being no more than 10%, some suggest even 1%, of actual numbers.

Far more worrying is the projected mortality in the forthcoming years from slower acting attacks on our bodies, from spike proteins and graphene oxide nano particles.

HYPOTHESIS – The Covid program, the “virus”, the “vaccines”, the agenda, the propaganda, the government actions, the media, the pharma involvement, and the behaviour of the hospitals and doctors, all the deaths and injuries, so far, and into the future, are all the result of a deliberate global exercise planned and executed by the World Health Organization, under direction from the United Nations.

Why? Because of the globalist agenda to decimate the global population!

GLOBALIST AGENDA

This aspect resolves not only the reason for the deliberate creation and release of the global disaster, but also for the incredible behaviour of the authorities and all the ‘players’ in promoting and extending the damage being done!

The extensive application of several types of vaccines, gaining emergency use approval on a “trial basis” for what has turned out to be a greater health and mortality threat than the virus itself, and virtually mandating their use across the whole age range, reeks of an agenda to depopulate the world!

Hospitals have become “killing fields” according to nurses and others in the know.
“Forced vaccinations, murder, miscarriages, the dead tested for covid, nurse quits after 11yrs.”

[Links obviously censored, but accessible on “Telegram” if you join and search!]

Too much evidence to show here but this should be taken seriously!

Meaningful Evidence!

   Reference – https://thetvtraveler.com/visiting-the-georgia-guidestones/

Georgia Guidestones Text

Here is what is written on the Georgia Guidestones:

1. Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature.
2. Guide reproduction wisely — improving fitness and diversity.
3. Unite humanity with a living new language.
4. Rule passion — faith — tradition — and all things with tempered reason.
5. Protect people and nations with fair laws and just courts.
6. Let all nations rule internally resolving external disputes in a world court.
7. Avoid petty laws and useless officials.
8. Balance personal rights with social duties.
9. Prize truth — beauty — love — seeking harmony with the infinite.
10. Be not a cancer on the earth — Leave room for nature — Leave room for nature.

The Georgia Guidestones are a granite monument erected in 1980 in Elbert County, Georgia, in the United States. A set of ten guidelines is inscribed on the structure in eight modern languages and a shorter message is inscribed at the top of the structure in four ancient language scripts.

A marker at the Guidestones states, “Let these be guidestones to an age of reason”

Although, these structures have since been vandalised, their message remain proof of the aims of the ungodly and proof of the validity of this post’s information. We are living in “an age of TREASON”!

CONCLUSION – So much verifiable evidence, yet so much ignorance, covering up, getting away with so large and important LIES!
2 years since this post was first presented, the situation has only worsened with no visible signs of the global United Nations rampage being thwarted!
This minor update, 13th September 2023, offers no joy or optimism to me or my faithfull readers.

Comments welcome!