A COMING COVID CATASTROPHE


channel image
The HighWire with Del Bigtree
Published 6 days ago |

World renown vaccine specialist, Geert Vanden Bossche, gave a groundbreaking interview this week risking his reputation and his career by bravely speaking out against administration of #Covid19 vaccines. In what may be one of the most important stories ever covered by The Highwire, the vaccine developer shared his extreme concerns about these vaccines in particular and why we may be on track to creating a global immunity catastrophe.

#GeertVandenBoosche #VaccineDisaster #ImmunityCatastrophe #GAVI #GatesFoundation #TheHighwire #DelBigtree

https://www.brighteon.com/257797f0-06fa-4596-be69-af71bb3adc21

I can see no reason to question the validity of this information.
Geert Vanden Bossche’s status and reputation are self-evident.
His scientific explanation is clear, his motivation comes across as honest and genuine.
Interesting that he doesn’t touch on the political agenda that is obvious to many, but that would certainly bring upon him personal suicide.
Please at least keep this in mind, as the future reveals, most unfortunately, the accuracy of this prediction, as there seems no stopping this “armageddon”.

Related information:

https://t.me/qresearchnotableschannel/390
Covid-19 treatment .pdf

https://t.me/qresearchnotableschannel/422
Origin of the Coronavirus.

 

Posted in Covid-19, HEALTH, Science, Vaccination Dangers, WHO, World Issues | Tagged , | 1 Comment

COVID – Bioethics, Eugenics and “Death Panels”: “A Warning”


Courtesy: By Peter Koenig Global Research, March 17, 2021

A very complete, educational presentation!
Reference: https://www.globalresearch.ca/covid-bioethics-eugenics-death-panels-warning/5740095

“There is a plot in this country to enslave every man, woman and child. Before I leave this high and noble office, I intend to expose this plot.” – John F. Kennedy

On March 11, 2020, a year ago, the worldwide lockdown went into effect. 193 UN member countries, in unison and lockstep, closed their borders, economies and live-societies. It marked the beginning of the planet’s economic and societal destruction – all for an invisible enemy, a corona virus that could never have hit the entire globe at the same time.

So, what’s the plot?

In 1935, 86 years ago, Dr. Arthur Guett, Nazi Director of Public Health, said:

“The ill-conceived `love of thy neighbor’ has to disappear, especially in relation to inferior or asocial creatures. It is the supreme duty of a national state to grant life and livelihood only to the healthy and hereditarily sound portion of the people in order to secure the maintenance of a hereditarily sound and racially pure folk for all eternity….”

These words spoken almost a century ago by Dr. Guett, Adolf Hitler’s Director of Public Health, are sending shivers down the spine. Yet, they are ringing true and right down the alley of today’s Eugenists. Such thinking should be scary for the public at large – except, the public at large is being kept in the dark of what the Globalist Cabal’s real plan is behind the covid fraud.

It is three-fold – taking over total control of humanity, as in One World Order; shifting assets and resources from the middle and the bottom of society to the top few; and – drastically reducing world population.

The Video entitled Bioethics and the New Eugenics (39 min video – 8 March 2021, click below) produced by James Corbett illustrates best what the world’s eugenists have in mind, when they talk about Bioethics, Eugenics and – Death Panels.

Yes – Death Panels would decide who is to live and who is to die. The elderly, who do no longer contribute to civilization, but are rather a (cost) burden on society, should go first.

For the Corbett Report Transcript including sources and references click here 

The eugenics people are talking freely about forced “euthanasia” and after-birth abortions, nothing else but infanticide, meaning killing infants, whom doctors or the “Death Panel” decide their life has no future, is not worth living, will not be contributing to society, but is rather a burden for humanity.

The age of 75 is mentioned as a possible “deadline” for people having to die. Whether those who decided this “deadline” included themselves is not known.

To come to grips with the pandemic, better called Plandemic, a massive worldwide vaccination program has been set in motion. According to Bill Gates, the world will not return to “somewhat normal” before at least 7 billion people have been vaccinated. And we are not talking about a normal or traditional vaccination. The predominant inoculations that are being promoted in the west, are mRNA-type injections.

mRNA stands for messenger ribonucleic acid. They’re single-stranded molecules that carry genetic code from DNA in a cell’s nucleus to ribosomes, which make protein in the cells. These molecules are called messenger RNA because they carry instructions for producing proteins from one part of the cell to anotherwww.nature.comNov 19, 2020

These mRNA vaxxes are experimental.

“[mRNA vaccines] prospects have swung billions of dollars on the stock market, made and imperiled scientific careers, and fueled hopes that it could be a breakthrough that allows society to return to normalcy after months living in fear” (See this).

The mRNA vaxxes have numerous serious side effects and have caused premature death, at the rate of a multiple higher than the traditional vaccines. See here and here.

This is not taking into account the potential long-term negative effects, of which there is today no experience available, but disturbing scientific predictions abound. See here Dr. Lee Merritt and more below.

Let it be clear. The push for mRNA-type vaccines only comes from the West. Russia, China, India, Iran and others have distanced themselves from this type of vaccines, which officially are not even allowed to be called vaccines, but were admitted under a special “Emergency Law” on a trial or “experimental” basis only (see this), making humans into guinea pigs.

Russia and China have developed their own tradition-based vaccines, i. e. injection of a weakened virus that will produce antibodies and trigger the immune system when it gets in contact with the real virus. Science has decades of experience with this type of preventive inoculation, but zero experience with the mRNA-type jabs.

They tell us that people in nursing homes or in hospitals with co-morbidities are the most vulnerable ones to catch covid. Therefore, they are given priority to get the jab. Is it a coincidence that these people are also the most vulnerable ones to become victims of serious “side effects” – and disproportionately many die – from the mRNA injections?

The ongoing vaccination programs everywhere in the west focus on the elderly – and the immediate death rate among vaxxed nursing home inmates, is indeed high, as shown in England, Spain and elsewhere. See this and this. It so happens that people in nursing homes are also the least “productive” in term of contributing to societal well-being. They are a cost for society.  Hence, they typically enter the attention of the eugenists.

Doesn’t this look like it’s all planned? Administering so-called vaccines (a misnomer and outright lie used by western governments) that potentially kill in the short and long-run, and that have been observed as including sterilizing and infertility agents – vaxx-injections for which western governments, US, Europe, including Switzerland – literally refuse to offer their population non-RNA alternatives, like the Russian Sputnik V and the Chinese Sinovac and Sinopharm?

One of the most flagrant cases is Switzerland. At the beginning of the “vaccination” campaign, when Switzerland like many other countries claimed a “shortage” of vaccines, Russia offered them Sputnik V. Switzerland apparently did not even have the curtesy to reply. In a recent press conference, the Swiss Health Minister was asked why they would not import Sputnik V. In a slightly arrogant tone, he replied, “we never even considered it.” – One cannot, but wonder why.

By the way, “shortages” are artificially induced. What is in short supply is wanted by the people. In this case, a vaccine in short supply, incites people to want it. Its mind manipulation 101. A method to increase the relatively low willingness to vaccinate.

In Germany, where the public pressure is high, and as a consequence, in the EU Commission and Parliament, the debate about approving Sputnik V has started. This all the while Sputnik V has passed WHO’s litmus test and has been permitted and is currently being used in more than two dozen countries.

The plan, as we know, is to “Reset” the world – according to the World Economic Forum’s (WEF) founder and CEO, Klaus Schwab, “Covid-19 – The Great Reset”. The caveat is, resetting the world in line with the methods and objectives of a super-rich financial and Big-Tech platform’s objectives – which include a massive population reduction.

This has been a little-veiled dream of Bill GatesRockefeller and a whole bunch of UK and US-American eugenists, who are actively at work – and the instrument to fulfill their diabolical project is the massive covid-vaccination campaign, imposed to various degrees by every one of the 193 UN member countries and by the UN body itself. Those on top of the UN and at the head of these 193 UN member governments know exactly what they are doing and why they are doing it.

See this: “Shocking: Former FEMA/HDS Celeste Solum w/David Icke: #Covid Magnetic Tagging; Vaccines for Mass Depopulation & More.

In the meantime, several medical doctors, virologist and immunologists have broken their silence, exited the matrix and are expressing their conscience to the people, the potential victims of this massive vaccination crime.

One of them is Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche, PhD. He is a vaccine research expert. He has a long list of companies and organizations he’s worked with on vaccine discovery and preclinical research, including GSK, Novartis, Solvay Biologicals, and Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

Dr Vanden Bossche also coordinated the Ebola vaccine program at GAVI (Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization) in Geneva, with office buildings just next to WHO. – A coincidence?

Dr. Vanden Bossche, gave a stunning interview on 6 March 2021 on the Benefits versus Risks of mRNA-type injections.
https://youtu.be/ZJZxiNxYLpc

Dr. Geert Vandem Bossche essentially says that the individual adverse effects and even deaths from the vaccines, do not provide a clue of the far bigger impending Global Catastrophe.

He said that the mRNA-type vaccines are destroying people’s immune system, and they will be utterly unable to cope with the more virulent versions of the virus that will emerge due to the vaccines. The result could result in significant levels of mortality a few months to a few years down the road after vaccination. He also said he could morally no longer remain silent.

This plays exactly into the eugenists agenda.

On March 7, 2021, Dr. Vandem Bossche, also wrote an Open Letter to WHO, calling for an immediate stop of the worldwide vaccination campaign, here. He warns, “We’re Risking Creating a Global, “Uncontrollable Monster.”

In the meantime, western countries are jumping from one wave to the next, from one lockdown to the next. Many European countries have already announced that a third wave may be not far off. Italy just announced their third-wave lockdown, covering at least the period over Easter 2021. Germany and Switzerland also warned their people of a third wave, if restrictions, aka repression, is not obeyed.

What most people do not know is that a virus infection, as is covid, doesn’t come in waves. It starts slow, then peaks, and finally it ebbs off – and is over. Call it herd immunity. This is being witnessed currently in India, whose approach of dealing with covid was and is very different from the west. It is not based on coercion into vaccination, but on treatment of the virus by traditional, inexpensive medication that has a long history of positive results of dealing with viral infections, such as Ivermectin and hydrochloroquine, and others. China also mastered their covid epidemic by medication, not by vaccination.

This is the typical graph of covid-19 in India. It peaks and then declines – and the disease is over. This is also a typical flu curve.

Below is the covid curve in Spain and is representative for many other European countries, as well as for the United States.

It is clear that the figures in the west are very much manipulated with the purpose of coercing people into accepting the vaccine.

People have a hard time understanding and accepting to what extent our western governments are “evil”, deceiving their electorate, those who pay their salaries and benefits. Once people grasp what is going on and accept the treacherous, deceptive and corrupt character of those they believed to be their leaders, the awakening may happen, and, with it, massive civil disobedience may put an end to this diabolical plan.

What has been prepared decades ago and is being played out in full sight since the beginning of 2020, looks like the world’s largest blackmail, coercion, corruption, and outright threats campaign of all times in the history of mankind.

And so far, none of the 193 UN member countries’ so-called leaders (sic) have come forward, have had the courage to follow their conscience – if they have one – and divulge to the globe’s 7.8 billion population what is going on, what is being planned by the Eugenists who raise the issue of “who is destined to die and who may live” – and why. – And who is behind it all? – Why are these heads of state following “Higher Orders” that may lead to a worldwide genocide, unknown in recent history?

*

Note to readers: please click the share buttons above or below. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc.

Peter Koenig is a geopolitical analyst and a former Senior Economist at the World Bank and the World Health Organization (WHO), where he has worked for over 30 years on water and environment around the world. He lectures at universities in the US, Europe and South America. He writes regularly for online journals and is the author of Implosion – An Economic Thriller about War, Environmental Destruction and Corporate Greed; and  co-author of Cynthia McKinney’s book “When China Sneezes: From the Coronavirus Lockdown to the Global Politico-Economic Crisis” (Clarity Press – November 1, 2020).

He is a Research Associate of the Centre for Research on Globalization.

Featured image is from InfoBrics

Posted in AGENDA 2030, Covid-19, New World Order, Population Control, Vaccination Dangers, WHO, World Issues | Tagged , , , | 3 Comments

Covid-19 Vaccines Are Weapons of Mass Destruction


A claim made by Dr Vernon Coleman – 13 Mar 2021, associated with his extraordinary video:
“Covid-19 Vaccines Are Weapons of Mass Destruction – and Could Wipe out the Human Race”


Ignoring it invites lack of understanding reality. Disbelieving it will only delay your eventual awareness of the truth.

Not sharing it, as he implores, means fewer people have the opportunity to be aware of the frightening perils in store, and the opportunity to avoid them.

For reasons beyond me, this video does not automatically play, but requires the usual “Left Button” click!

https://www.brighteon.com/0df28628-3b9b-42a3-a4c9-5bec480e8335

Related video:
A Brief History of Vaccines: A Story of Multigenerational Indoctrination – Dr. Sherri Tenpenny

 

 

 

Posted in Covid-19, Education, HEALTH, New World Order, Vaccination Dangers, WHO | 3 Comments

Almost All US-UK Accusations Against Strategic Targets Are Lies


Courtesy – Australian CEC Media Release Monday, 15 March 2021
Learn from recent history: almost all US-UK accusations against strategic targets are lies

Australian Senators should demand real proof before supporting Mike Pompeo’s “genocide” accusation against China.

In one of the most shameful acts in Australian history, on 20 March 2003 then-Prime Minister John Howard gave a televised address to the nation announcing his decision to commit Australian troops to the invasion of Iraq. The reasons Howard gave in that speech for supporting the war proved to be lies, including the main pretext of weapons of mass destruction, which Iraq didn’t have (as proved later but which weapons inspectors had already insisted). He also made this claim: “This week the Times of London detailed the use of a human shredding machine as a vehicle for putting to death critics of Saddam Hussein. This is the man, this is the apparatus of terror we are dealing with”, he said. “The removal of Saddam Hussein will lift this immense burden of terror from the Iraqi people.”

We now know—after launching a war that would kill a million Iraqis and set in train the events that unleashed the ISIS terror monsters on Iraq and Syria—the human shredding machine didn’t exist either. Yet we had been assured this claim came from a “witness”.

Senators should consider this recent history before voting for Senator Rex Patrick’s motion this week, which seeks to copy the United States in accusing China of committing “genocide” against the Uyghur Muslims in Xinjiang. Senator Patrick’s motion reads:

That the Senate (a) notes:

(i) the finding of the United States Government on 19 January 2021 that the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has committed and continues to commit genocide against the Uyghur people in Xinjiang,

(ii) that official determination continues under the new United States Administration of President Joe Biden, …

(b) agrees that the PRC’s treatment of the Uyghurs in Xinjiang constitutes the crime of genocide …

The motion goes on to allege “torture and abuse” in “mass internment camps”, “forced labour” and “coercive population control measures”, and ends with a call for Australia to boycott the 2022 Winter Olympics in Beijing.

The Citizens Party has repeatedly investigated the specific claims about Xinjiang since 2018, and found them to be lacking actual proof. They are based entirely on “research” from organisations that are paid by the US and UK governments to wage information warfare against their strategic rivals, and from so-called “East Turkistan” separatists who are enemies of China—neither of which are reliable sources of evidence. Recent history bears out how willing US and British intelligence agencies, politicians and media are to invent lies against their latest strategic targets.

First Gulf War

The 11 October 1990 LA Times headline blared: “Witnesses Tell of Iraqi Atrocities in Kuwait: Congress: Members are shaken by what they hear. Kuwait’s ambassador warns that ‘time is running out.’” It reported testimony given to the US Congress by a 15-year-old eyewitness that “Iraqi soldiers with guns” had removed Kuwaiti “babies from the incubators … leaving the babies to die on the cold floor”. It was entirely made up—the 15-year-old “witness” hadn’t even been in Kuwait; she was the daughter of Kuwait’s ambassador to Washington.

Iraq invasion

As is now proven, the lead-up to the 2003 invasion of Iraq saw lie after lie repeated in media headlines, most attributed to “witnesses”:

2001 New York Times: “Iraqi Tells of Renovations at Sites For Chemical and Nuclear Arms”;
2002 CNN: “Experts: Iraq has tons of chemical weapons”;
2002 The Star: “Mad Saddam ready to attack: 45 minutes from a chemical war”;
2002 The Sun: “Brits 45 mins from doom”;
2002 New York Times: “US Scoffs at Iraq Claim of No Weapons of Mass Destruction”;
2003 Baltimore Sun: “CIA said Iraq had nuclear program”.

Worldwide, thousands of media headlines faithfully repeated the same lies. The British and American liars got the war, destroyed the country and the region—and got away with it.

Libya ‘intervention’

The world witnessed a repeat in Libya in 2011, when Qaddafi was accused of mass-rape and planning genocide against the rebels based in Benghazi:

The Guardian: “Gaddafi ‘supplies troops with Viagra to encourage mass rape’, claims diplomat”;
Washington Times: “Rebels say Gadhafi uses rape as fear tactic in war”;
CNN: “Libyan rebels say captured cell phone videos show rape, torture”.

In 2016, the UK House of Commons Libya Report acknowledged the 2011 intervention by the USA, UK, and France to “protect” Libyan civilians from “genocide”—which had resulted in the brutal murder of Qaddafi and the collapse of Libya into a failed state and haven for slave-traders and terrorists—had been a mistake: “This policy was not informed by accurate intelligence”, it stated. “In particular, the Government failed to identify that the threat to civilians was overstated and that the rebels included a significant Islamist element. … The result was … widespread human rights violations … and the growth of ISIL in North Africa.” (Emphasis added.)

The accusations about Xinjiang should be suspicious to anyone with a memory of these lies. They are contradicted by the high population growth rate of the Uyghur Muslim population, who were always exempted from China’s One Child policy when it was in effect, and the endorsement of many majority Muslim countries of China’s policy of deradicalisation and poverty reduction programs in Xinjiang. As with anything, there may be grounds to criticise some aspects of the policy, but it is in no way comparable to genocide (a gross insult to victims of the Holocaust).

China’s accusers virtually never acknowledge the wave of Islamist terrorism China endured before 2017, which claimed around 800 lives in a decade, mostly in Xinjiang, including both Han Chinese and Uyghur Muslims. Even though the perpetrators of the terrorist attacks in Xinjiang, the separatist East Turkistan Islamic Movement (a.k.a. Turkistan Islamic Party), has as many as 20,000 members in Syria fighting alongside ISIS and vowing to return to wage jihad in China, in January outgoing US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo removed the ETIM from the US State Department’s list of terrorist organisations—just before he designated China’s Xinjiang policy as genocide.

It’s time Australian politicians asserted independence instead of following extremist US and UK politicians into yet another conflict and possible war.

Click here to watch “Citizens Insight: Is China committing genocide against Uyghur Muslims?”, an interview with former British and Australian policeman and security consultant Jerry Grey, who now lives in China and has travelled extensively through Xinjiang.

 

So, do we learn from our mistakes?
Apparently not!

China is, in several ways an adversary, however, commonsense is required for our 26 million populated country to establish a reasonable “working” relationship with this 1.4 billion populated giant.
We have, in so many ways fallen into submissive processes and continue to so do! It is difficult to see how we can ever return from these existing agreements and situations because it is simply too late!
To naively and blindly continue to succumb to US and British warmongering ventures, especially when it relates to China, is unbelievably absurd and brainless!
Australian politicians are still at Kindergarten level compared to those of the real world. Are they a mirror of our own people’s intelligence?
The creation of any military conflict situation is beyond belief and reason!

 

Posted in AUSTRALIA, China, Warfare, World Issues | Leave a comment

Conspiracy Theories – Covid-19 -True or False?


A bit lengthy and verbose, BUT, an education that is so important!
As usual, the messengers will be branded as false experts, however the messages are authentic and verifiable.

How difficult is it to get factual messages publicly posted?

How easy is it for the mass media to brainwash the whole world?

Our children’s future is seriously bleak if the current medical and political practices are not understood and controlled.

(Sorry, this needs to be clicked to activate.)

https://www.brighteon.com/536a6dd8-3d23-41d4-b21d-98da24535dd3

thumbnail

 

Posted in Conspiracies, Corruption, Population Control, WHO, World Issues | Leave a comment

Artistry in the Motoring World.


There is in absolute need, in my case, and in my opinion, to escape from the unreality of the “Covid normal”.

This is  my contribution, courtesy of a cousin of mine.  Thanks Mike!

Enjoy the show starting with one click! 🙂

When Autos Were Art

 

 

Posted in Art | 2 Comments

Pathologist: FDA ‘Misled the Public’ on Pfizer Vaccine Efficacy


Same old argument – “The science is settled”
And of course it is not!  True science can never be accepted as absolute and without question.
Arguments, even scientifically constructed, abound on both sides of
“Vaccines are safe and effective!”
Challenged statements must not be accepted as a basis for major decision and policy making!

From ” https://www.globalresearch.ca/pathologist-fda-misled-the-public-on-pfizer-vaccine-efficacy/5737739 “, this revealing report on the question of vaccine testing and safety.

Pfizer’s announcement in November 2020 that clinical trials showed its COVID-19 vaccine was “95% effective” prompted Dr. Sin Hang Lee, a Connecticut pathologist, to question Pfizer’s methodology and petition the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to require accurate counts of COVID-19 cases in the Pfizer/BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA vaccine trial before granting the vaccine Emergency Use Authorization (EAU).

As The Defender reported in November, Lee, who is director of Milford Molecular Diagnostics, said:

“Until an accurate count of COVID-19 cases in the vaccinated and placebo groups has been determined for vaccine efficacy evaluation, we are asking the FDA to stay its decision regarding the emergency use authorization for this vaccine.”

Lee’s request was rejected by the FDA on Dec. 11, the same day the agency approved Pfizer’s vaccine for emergency use. On Feb. 8, Lee filed an amended reply.

Here’s the sequence of events as they unfolded:

On Nov. 23, 2020, Lee, along with Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN) and its counsel, submitted a Citizen Petition and petition for administrative stay of action to the FDA relating to the phase 3 trial of the BNT162b/Pfizer vaccine to prevent the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2.

In the petition and stay, Lee requested the FDA amend the study design for the late-stage trial of Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine. Specifically, Lee requests:

“Before an EUA or unrestricted license is issued for the Pfizer vaccine, or for other vaccines for which PCR results are the primary evidence of infection, all “endpoints” or COVID-19 cases used to determine vaccine efficacy in the Phase 3 or 2/3 trials should have their infection status confirmed by Sanger sequencing, given the high cycle thresholds used in some trials. High cycle thresholds, or Ct values, in RT-qPCR test results have been widely acknowledged to lead to false positives … All RT-qPCR-positive test results used to categorize patient as “COVID-19 cases” and used to qualify the trial’s endpoints should be verified by Sanger sequencing to confirm that the tested samples in fact contain a unique SARS-CoV-2 genomic RNA.”

The petition makes these requests because the phase 2/3 clinical trial of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine uses a presumptive RT-qPCR (“PCR”) diagnostic test, which is known to generate high rates of false-positive results.

In addition, the Pfizer vaccine trial primarily uses a PCR test that employs cycle thresholds up to 44.9 to identify COVID-19 “cases” despite the fact that “positive” results that require cycle thresholds greater than 30 to 35 are usually false positives, according to Lee.

Lee offered to re-test the residues of tested samples in his laboratory if Pfizer is unable to do so in order to confirm Pfizer’s stated vaccine efficacy rate of 95%.

Lee’s Sanger sequencing-based method for molecular diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 was published in International Journal of Geriatrics and Rehabilitation.

On Dec. 11, 2020, the same day the FDA granted Pfizer Emergency Use Authorization for its COVID-19 vaccine, the FDA responded to Lee’s petition and request for stay.  The agency “conclude[d] that the petitions do not contain facts demonstrating any reasonable grounds for the requested action” and denied the petitions.

The FDA, among other things, stated that “PCR testing does not need to be followed by Sanger or other sequencing for purposes of clinical diagnosis. Currently, reverse real-time PCR (RT-PCR) tests can both amplify and confirm the identity of viral genetic material in a single reaction, without a separate sequencing step.”

On Feb. 8, Lee, through ICAN’s counsel, submitted a detailed and thoroughly cited reply to the FDA’s denial of his petition and stay. This reply points out the inaccuracies, contradictions and omissions in the FDA’s denial of the petition.

Lee wrote that the FDA’s letter denying the petition and stay “shows that the FDA has not conducted an adequate evaluation of the Pfizer vaccine’s efficacy, especially concerning issues about the accuracy of RT-qPCR testing of SARS-CoV-2 in clinical specimens.”

Lee’s detailed response, which can be read in full here, goes on to say:

“The FDA has misled the public. The key misleading statements are analyzed below point-by-point according to the sequence of their presentation in the Letter but under the following four categories for the convenience of the readers:

“A. Cherry-picking to eviscerate the guidance for issuance of an EUA for a COVID-19 vaccine.

B. Knowingly promoting inaccurate PCR tests for SARS-CoV-2.

C. Finding excuses for using PCR tests with high false-positive rates for this vaccine trial.

D. Glossing over potential risks of an mRNA vaccine while concealing its true efficacy.”

Lee, ICAN and others are weighing possible future actions.

Posted in AGENDA 2030, Covid-19, HEALTH, New World Order, NO safety testing for most vaccines, Vaccine Dangers | Tagged , | Leave a comment

An Old Man in a Chair speaks about Vaccines


Could the Covid-19 Jabs Kill More than Covid-19?

International best-selling author, Dr Vernon Coleman MB ChB DSc FRSA, explains that despite the lies being told by politicians and journalists, there are very real dangers with the covid-19 jabs. Those telling the truth are being censored, bullied and lied about but the evidence that the vaccines are dangerous is overwhelming.
For more unbiased information about other important matters, please visit https://www.vernoncoleman.com

Listen to his informative video and learn!

https://brandnewtube.com/watch/could-the-covid-19-jabs-kill-more-than-covid-19_LBNSBbS1XqERM5x.html

 

Posted in AGENDA 2030, Covid-19, HEALTH, New World Order | Tagged , | 2 Comments

COVID-19 mRNA Shots Are Legally Not Vaccines


There’s a provocative statement!  It is an Analysis by Dr. Joseph Mercola.

It is supported by the following information and a video that is linked further down and it makes very interesting reading.

The significance of this is “earth-shattering” and it will likely be difficult to spread it very widely, but here it is:

Story at-a-glance

  • By referring to COVID-19 vaccines as “vaccines” rather than gene therapies, the U.S. government is violating its 15 U.S. Code Section 41, which regulates deceptive practices in medical claims

  • The mRNA injections are gene therapies that do not fulfill a single criteria or definition of a vaccine

  • COVID-19 “vaccines” do not impart immunity or inhibit transmissibility of the disease. They only are designed to lessen your infection symptoms if or when you get infected. As such, these products do not meet the legal or medical definition of a vaccine

  • Since a vast majority of people who test positive for SARS-CoV-2 have no symptoms at all, they’ve not even been able to establish a causal link between the virus and the clinical disease

  • By calling this experimental gene therapy technology a “vaccine,” they are circumventing liability for damages that would otherwise apply

Did you know that mRNA COVID-19 vaccines aren’t vaccines in the medical and legal definition of a vaccine? They do not prevent you from getting the infection, nor do they prevent its spread. They’re really experimental gene therapies.

I discussed this troubling fact in a recent interview with molecular biologist Judy Mikovits, Ph.D. While the Moderna and Pfizer mRNA shots are labeled as “vaccines,” and news agencies and health policy leaders call them that, the actual patents for Pfizer’s and Moderna’s injections more truthfully describe them as “gene therapy,” not vaccines.

Definition of ‘Vaccine’

According to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,1 a vaccine is “a product that stimulates a person’s immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease, protecting the person from that disease.” Immunity, in turn, is defined as “Protection from an infectious disease,” meaning that “If you are immune to a disease, you can be exposed to it without becoming infected.”

Neither Moderna nor Pfizer claim this to be the case for their COVID-19 “vaccines.” In fact, in their clinical trials, they specify that they will not even test for immunity.

Unlike real vaccines, which use an antigen of the disease you’re trying to prevent, the COVID-19 injections contain synthetic RNA fragments encapsulated in a nanolipid carrier compound, the sole purpose of which is to lessen clinical symptoms associated with the S-1 spike protein, not the actual virus.

They do not actually impart immunity or inhibit transmissibility of the disease. In other words, they are not designed to keep you from getting sick with SARS-CoV-2; they only are supposed to lessen your infection symptoms if or when you do get infected.

As such, these products do not meet the legal or medical definition of a vaccine, and as noted by David Martin, Ph.D., in the video above, “The legal ramifications of this deception are immense.”

15 U.S. Code Section 41

As explained by Martin, 15 U.S. Code Section 41 of the Federal Trade Commission Act2 is the law that governs advertising of medical practices. This law, which dictates what you may and may not do in terms of promotion, has for many years been routinely used to shut down alternative health practitioners and companies.

“If this law can be used to shut down people of good will, who are trying to help others,” Martin says, “it certainly should be equally applied when we know deceptive medical practices are being done in the name of public health.”

Per this law, it is unlawful to advertise:

“… that a product or service can prevent, treat, or cure human disease unless you possess competent and reliable scientific evidence, including, when appropriate, well-controlled human clinical studies, substantiating that the claims are true at the time they are made.”3What Constitutes ‘The Greater Good’?

Martin points to the 1905 Supreme Court ruling in Jacobson vs. Massachusetts,4 which essentially established that collective benefit supersedes individual benefit. To put it bluntly, it argued that it’s acceptable for individuals to be harmed by public health directives provided it benefits the collective.

Now, if vaccination is a public health measure that is supposed to protect and benefit the collective, then it would need to a) ensure that the individual who is vaccinated is rendered immune from the disease in question; and b) that the vaccine inhibits transmission of the disease.

Only if these two outcomes can be scientifically proven can you say that vaccination protects and benefits the collective — the population as a whole. This is where we run into problems with the mRNA “vaccines.”

What Constitutes ‘The Greater Good’?

Martin points to the 1905 Supreme Court ruling in Jacobson vs. Massachusetts,4 which essentially established that collective benefit supersedes individual benefit. To put it bluntly, it argued that it’s acceptable for individuals to be harmed by public health directives provided it benefits the collective.

Now, if vaccination is a public health measure that is supposed to protect and benefit the collective, then it would need to a) ensure that the individual who is vaccinated is rendered immune from the disease in question; and b) that the vaccine inhibits transmission of the disease.

Only if these two outcomes can be scientifically proven can you say that vaccination protects and benefits the collective — the population as a whole. This is where we run into problems with the mRNA “vaccines.”

Moderna’s SEC filings, which Martin claims to have carefully reviewed, specifies and stresses that its technology is a “gene therapy technology.” Originally, its technology was set up to be a cancer treatment, so more specifically, it’s a chemotherapy gene therapy technology.

As noted by Martin, who would raise their hand to receive prophylactic chemotherapy gene therapy for a cancer you do not have and may never be at risk for? In all likelihood, few would jump at such an offer, and for good reason.
Moreover, states and employers would not be able to mandate individuals to receive chemotherapy gene therapy for a cancer they do not have. It simply would not be legal. Yet, they’re proposing that all of humanity be forced to get gene therapy for COVID-19.

COVID-19 Vaccines — A Case of False Advertising

Now, if the COVID-19 vaccine really isn’t a vaccine, why are they calling it that? While the CDC provides a definition of “vaccine,” the CDC is not the actual law. It’s an agency empowered by the law, but it does not create law itself. Interestingly enough, it’s more difficult to find a legal definition of “vaccine,” but there have been a few cases. Martin provides the following examples:

Iowa code — “Vaccine means a specially prepared antigen administered to a person for the purpose of providing immunity.” Again, the COVID-19 vaccines make no claim of providing immunity. They are only designed to lessen symptoms if and when you get infected.

Washington state code — “Vaccine means a preparation of a killed or attenuated living microorganism, or fraction thereof …” Since Moderna and Pfizer are using synthetic RNA, they clearly do not meet this definition.

Being a manmade synthetic, the RNA used is not derived from anything that has at one point been alive, be it a whole microorganism or a fraction thereof. The statute continues to specify that a vaccine “upon immunization stimulates immunity that protects us against disease …”

So, in summary, “vaccine” and “immunity” are well-defined terms that do not match the end points specified in COVID-19 vaccine trials. The primary end point in these trials is: “Prevention of symptomatic COVID-19 disease.” Is that the same as “immunity”? No, it is not.

It is understood that “Prevention of the disease” is not actually claimed, but that “reduced symptoms” is the terminology used by the manufacturers.
It seems that the proffered “vaccines” are neither legally nor technically vaccines!

The complete article and video are linked here.

 

Posted in AGENDA 2030, Civil Liberties, Cover-ups, Covid-19, NO safety testing for most vaccines, Vaccinations, WHO, World Issues | Tagged , , , | 23 Comments

Are you rational? (About taking Covid-19 vaccine.)


Rationality and commonsense are far from current life’s factors.
In practice, deaths are occurring often. No causal relativity proven of course, purely coincidental!

budbromley

Keeping in mind that the very minimal clinical trial conducted so far on the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine was double blinded, (see link) this attached table is extracted from that paper. Various adverse effects are much higher (many times higher, hundreds of percent higher) in the blinded vaccine group than in the blinded placebo group.

And many of the most important population cohorts have not been tested at all, for example the effects on fertility of men or women have not been tested.

Most pharma companies are protected from all liability in this deal. No thanks to your members of Congress, taxpayers will bear the financial responsibility for all problems.

Meanwhile, there are viable treatments which work for Covid-19 which have been used safely by doctors for decades. Furthermore, the percentage of the population who become seriously ill from Covid-19 is low and the percentage of the patients who die from…

View original post 55 more words

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment