The Big Lie on Ivermectin and HCQ

Global Research Newsletter

The Triumph of Evil? The Suppression of Ivermectin and HCQ in Support of the COVID Vaccination Catastrophe

By Dr. Paul Craig Roberts, September 02, 2021

The corrupt public health authorities protecting Big Pharma profits use the excuse that people desperate for Ivermectin but unable to get Ivermectin for humans are harming themselves by taking large doses in formulations for animals.  This, of course, is not a justification for banning the use of doses formulated for people. Read more…

The Battle to Suppress Hydroxychloroquine as a Cheap and Effective Drug for the Treatment of Covid-19

ByProf Michel Chossudovsky, August 01, 2021 The campaign against HCQ is carried out through slanderous political statements, media smears, not to mention an authoritative peer reviewed “evaluation” published on May 22nd by The Lancet, which was based on fake figures and test trials.Read more…

The Campaign against Ivermectin: WHO’s Chief Scientist Served with Legal Notice for Disinformation and Suppression of Evidence

ByColin Todhunter, June 17, 2021 The notice is based on the research and clinical trials carried out by the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance’ (FLCCC) and the British Ivermectin Recommendation Development (BIRD) Panel. These organisations have presented an enormous amount of data that strengthen the case for recommending Ivermectin for the prevention and treatment of COVID-19. Read more…

Why Are Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin Being Officially Suppressed? ByDr. Gary Null and Richard Gale, May 11, 2021   Had the FDA and Anthony Fauci’s National Institute for Allergies and Infectious Disease (NIAID) started approving existing clinically-proven and inexpensive drugs for treating malaria, parasites and other pathogens at the start of the pandemic, millions of people would have been saved from experiencing serious infections or dying from the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Read more…

COVID, Ivermectin and the Crime of the Century

ByDr. Joseph Mercola, June 16, 2021 Data clearly show ivermectin can prevent COVID-19 and when used early can keep patients from progressing to the hyper-inflammatory phase of the disease. It can even help critically ill patients recover. Read more…

First Country Bans Ivermectin, a Lifesaver for COVID — Will the US be Next?

By Dr. Meryl Nass, January 07, 2021

Ivermectin, a cheap generic drug used for hookworm, heartworm and scabies, with a half life causing it to remain in your system for months, is used as a “worming” medicine in children, dogs, horses. Due to its tremendous value as a highly safe and effective drug, a Nobel Prize was awarded to its developers in 2015. Read more…

Ivermectin’s Success in Battling COVID-19

By David Heller, June 30, 2021

A recently published study in this month’s American Journal of Therapeutics, took an in-depth look at 18 randomized controlled studies on the use of Ivermectin to control COVID-19. The study concludes that the use of Ivermectin “significantly reduced risks of contracting COVID-19” and “found large, statistically significant reductions in mortality, time to clinical recovery, and time to viral clearance.” Read more…

India’s Ivermectin Blackout. Censorship of Peer-reviewed Analysis

By Dr. Justus R. Hope, August 16, 2021

News of India’s defeat of the Delta variant should be common knowledge. It is just about as obvious as the nose on one’s face. It is so clear when one looks at the graphs that no one can deny it. Read more…

Hydroxychloroquine is a Cheap and Effective Remedy for COVID-19: Anthony Fauci’s “Big Lie”

ByJoel S. Hirschhorn, September 30, 2020 Mounting COVID-19 cases and deaths result from limitations on physicians using a safe, effective and low-cost treatment medicine. This, despite many studies and data from other countries showing that HCQ really works to lower death rates and keep affected people from needing hospitalizations and expensive care.Read more…

Acknowledging “Global Research” as an outstanding source of factual information presented by credible experts with extensive knowledge.

The globalist agenda is clearly to hoodwink the public and try to “get away with virtual murder”. To overcome the damage being done by the World Health Organization, the Pharmaceutical Industry, governments all over the world, aided and abetted by the mainstream media and the community participants, is difficult but we keep on trying!

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | 6 Comments

CDC withdraws fraudulent PCR testing protocol that was used to falsify covid “positives” to push the plandemic

By Mike Adams, Natural News

“(Natural News) After more than a year of committing scientific fraud to push false “positives” via PCR testing, the CDC has announced it is withdrawing the RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel on December 31st of this year:

After December 31, 2021, CDC will withdraw the request to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) of the CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel, the assay first introduced in February 2020 for detection of SARS-CoV-2 only. CDC is providing this advance notice for clinical laboratories to have adequate time to select and implement one of the many FDA-authorized alternatives.

The use of PCR tests for covid illness diagnosis is a global scientific fraud, since no PCR instrument can produce quantitative results that might indicate a specific viral load. Yet this CDC-approved testing protocol was relied on to fabricate the “casedemic” illusion which pretended that hundreds of millions of people around the world were infected with covid.

The entire thing was an elaborate quack science hoax, and anyone familiar with PCR technology (see below) has known this from the very start.

The PCR testing approved by the CDC to diagnose covid was fraudulent from the very first day

PCR instruments are not quantitative instruments. They cannot tell you how much of something is present in a given sample. Every lab scientist familiar with PCR instruments knows this. Yet they continue to go along with the global fraud of diagnosing “positive” cases via PCR testing.

The entire covid “plandemic” has been based on fraudulent PCR testing, and now the CDC is announcing it is pulling the most frequently used test, perhaps in an effort to replace the test with yet another fraudulent protocol that can be controlled by health authorities to worsen the “pandemic” on demand (or, perhaps, claim covid has been eliminated and declare victory).

From the very start, the entire pandemic has been nothing but a globally coordinated PCR testing fraud. As Thermo-Fischer sales representatives told me in face-to-face meetings, PCR instruments cannot determine quantitative results. They do not use quantitative instrument calibration curves or quantitative external covid standards. This means PCR instruments have no legitimate role in diagnosing any person with illness or covid infections. The mere presence of a single viral fragment, multiplied trillions of times through PCR cycling, does not indicate anything of scientific or diagnostic value.

From Great Game India:
A Portuguese appeals court has ruled that PCR tests are unreliable and that it is unlawful to quarantine people based solely on a PCR test.
The court stated, the test’s reliability depends on the number of cycles used and the viral load present. Citing Jaafar et al. 2020, the court concludes that:
“if someone is tested by PCR as positive when a threshold of 35 cycles or higher is used (as is the rule in most laboratories in Europe and the US), the probability that said person is infected is less than 3%, and the probability that said result is a false positive is 97%.”
Similarly, the Austrian court has ruled that PCR tests are not suitable for COVID-19 diagnosis and that lockdowns has no legal or scientific basis.
The court pointed out that “a PCR test is not suitable for diagnosis and therefore does not in itself say anything about the disease or infection of a person”.

PCR analysts and lab science technicians are complicit in the global covid testing fraud

The entire covid pandemic is a farce, and it was all based on fraudulent PCR testing. Amazingly, even the PCR technicians and analysts all know this. They are taking part in a global scheme to destroy human lives and crush global economies, and they are fully aware that the limitations of their own instruments mean diagnoses of “positive” covid status based on PCR are meaningless.

I run multiple mass spec instruments in my private lab, including QQQ and ICP-MS instruments. I am the co-developer of two quantitative methods that were painstakingly developed for quantitating glyphosate molecules in food, and for cannabinoid concentrations in hemp extracts. I am intimately familiar with instrument calibration, external standards, curve fit equations and quantitative analysis. PCR instruments are not capable of any of this. They are useless for diagnosing infectious disease, as they cannot produce viral load concentration results from a given sample.

If you want to know how much of something is present in a given sample, you have to use far more complex instruments such as mass spec triple quad instruments (which is what I use to test foods for glyphosate contamination, among other things).

As Zero Hedge reports, even Dr. Fauci admits PCR testing is essentially a fraud when it comes to diagnosing covid illness:

Dr. Fauci, mid-November, 2020: “What is now sort of evolving into a bit of a standard… if you get a cycle threshold of 35 or more … the chances of it being replication-confident are minuscule… It’s very frustrating for the patients as well as for the physicians, somebody comes in, and they repeat their PCR, and it’s like [a] 37 cycle threshold, but you almost never can culture virus from a 37 threshold cycle. …So, I think if somebody does come in with 37, 38, even 36, you got to say, you know, it’s just dead nucleotides, period.”

Just as doctors, nurses and pharmacists are taking part in the global criminal covid con, PCR lab technicians and owners are gleefully participating in the same fraud, likely because they are earning huge profits from running fraudulent PCR tests that would never pass the scrutiny of any legitimate scientific test for accuracy or precision.

In fact, PCR tests are neither accurate nor precise. The concept of “precision” — which is of utmost importance in quantitative lab analysis involving pesticides, heavy metals, and so on — does not exist in PCR equipment. There is no such thing as precision when you’re multiplying genetic material in the sample itself. This process, by definition, destroys any meaningful knowledge of the mass or concentration in the original sample.

If the same approach were used in breathalyzer tests for possible drunk drivers, every living person would be arrested for a DUI, since there is at least one molecule of alcohol circulating in the blood of everyone.

The CDC is withdrawing this PCR method most likely because they know the test cannot withstand reasonable scientific scrutiny. They’re trying to cover their tracks and memory hole the fraudulent test that was used to drive the fake covid plandemic in the first place. But we already know the CDC is a criminal front for the vaccine industry, and that the CDC has no scientific credibility or authority whatsoever when it comes to legitimate infectious disease testing.

The CDC, just like the PCR test, is a complete fraud.  “

Why has this not always been obvious to all educated persons? The amount of evidence has been overwhelming from the beginning, yet ignored or censored.


, , , ,
Posted in drugs & medication, HEALTH, New World Order, United Nations, WHO | Tagged , | 3 Comments

Covid – Hundreds of Medical Practitioners Critical of ‘Official’ Procedures.


In publishing a complete outside sourced document without thorough screening, several shortcomings exist.
Firstly, much of this is old information, mostly about vaccine issues before Covid.
Not superseded in it’s accuracy, nor it’s relevance to vaccine dangers still extant, it’s far away from the very serious current Covid vaccine issues.
Secondly, the website links in the original and first edit are compromised by “no longer available”, read “censored”! These have now been noted.
Because of the number of doctors revealing their awareness of the dangers the post is still relevant even if not up to date. Therefore, appropriate to maintain the edited update, but will create a new, specifically Covid related post.

Edit #2


Politnew – Truth about Politics and Economy ( )”
WhipLash347, [04.07.21 03:15]
[Forwarded from Virtue Ascends (Virtue Ascends)]

Doctors who explain clearly why vaccines aren’t safe or effective

  1. Dr. Nancy Banks –
  2. Dr. Russell Blaylock –
  3. Dr. Shiv Chopra – censored
  4. Dr. Sherri Tenpenny –
  5. Dr. Suzanne Humphries –
  6. Dr. Larry Palevsky –
  7. Dr. Toni Bark – censored
  8. Dr. Andrew Wakefield – censored
  9. Dr. Meryl Nass –
  10. Dr. Raymond Obomsawin –
  11. Dr. Ghislaine Lanctot – censored
  12. Dr. Robert Rowen –
  13. Dr. David Ayoub –
  14. Dr. Boyd Haley PhD –
  15. Dr. Rashid Buttar – censored
  16. Dr. Roby Mitchell – censored
  17. Dr. Ken Stoller –
  18. Dr. Mayer Eisenstein – censored
  19. Dr. Frank Engley, PhD – censored
  20. Dr. David Davis –
  21. Dr Tetyana Obukhanych –
  22. Dr. Harold E Buttram –
  23. Dr. Kelly Brogan – censored
  24. Dr. RC Tent –
  25. Dr. Rebecca Carley –
  26. Dr. Andrew Moulden –
  27. Dr. Jack Wolfson – censored
  28. Dr. Michael Elice –
  29. Dr. Terry Wahls –
  30. Dr. Stephanie Seneff – (requires signing in)
  31. Dr. Paul Thomas –
  32. Many doctors talking at once – censored
  33. Dr. Richard Moskowitz – censored
  34. Dr. Jane Orient – censored
  35. Dr. Richard Deth –
  36. Dr. Lucija Tomljenovic –
  37. Dr Chris Shaw –
  38. Dr. Susan McCreadie –
  39. Dr. Mary Ann Block –
  40. Dr. David Brownstein – censored
  41. Dr. Jayne Donegan –
  42. Dr. Troy Ross – censored
  43. Dr. Philip Incao –
  44. Dr. Joseph Mercola –
  45. Dr. Jeff Bradstreet –
  46. Dr. Robert Mendelson –
  47. Dr Theresa Deisher –
  48. Dr. Sam Eggertsen –

Hundreds more doctors testifying that vaccines aren’t safe or effective, in these documentaries….

  1. Vaccination – The Silent Epidemic –
  2. Shots In The Dark –
  3. Vaccination The Hidden Truth –
  4. Vaccine Nation –
  5. Lethal Injection –
  6. Bought –
  7. Deadly Immunity –
  8. Beyond Treason –
  9. Trace Amounts –

9 hour court case

Other Doctors:

  1. “Dr. Peter McCullough with Lawyer Reiner Fuelmich” 
  2. “Dr. Byram Bridle Speaks For 100 Colleagues Afraid To Share Science About COVID Vaccine Concerns”

Posted in AGENDA 2030, Covid-19, HEALTH, Population Control, Public Health, Vaccine Dangers, WHO | Tagged | 1 Comment

“A Crime Against Humanity of Epic Proportions”

Here’s why people are magnetized after they get the vaccine.

Its magnetic field is a forced gene delivery system. It pushes the mRNA into your cells. The woman gives a lot of details.

I can find a hundred mainstream news articles stating there is no magnetic field and people are lying. The liars are calling people liars. What that tells me is the people who haven’t died yet haven’t had their sh#t pushed in far enough yet.

A presentation by “45th Division” on ‘Telegram’ of a “Stew Peters Show” interview.

It’s technical, but fairly clearly explained by a qualified doctor.
It’s also horrific in its revelation of the deliberately harmful agenda of the UN per the W.H.O., utilizing “vaccines” to achieve their long-standing aim of depopulating our planet. There is no theory in this conspiracy, no false news, it is quite true and real.

Also relevant:

Posted in 5G Radiation Dangers, AGENDA 2030, Covid-19, HEALTH, New World Order, Population Control, United Nations, Vaccination Dangers | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Waking up to Wuhan: Eight reasons why this Physician no longer trusts Dr. Fauci, the CDC or the FDA

Trust the Science. Follow the Guidelines. Let’s get a few things straight. As doctors we know that scientists don’t “trust the science”. Scientists are the most skeptical of “the science”. Scientists know that their conclusions will, at some point, be qualified or overturned. That is how scientific understanding moves forward and evolves. They expect to be proven wrong at some point. That is why we trust their opinion. They trust the scientific method, which is an entirely different thing. In order to do the systematic measurement, experimentation, observation and reformulation of hypotheses, the scientific method demands that we approach what is happening with an open mind, so that all possibilities are on the table to begin with.

We as physicians follow guidelines until the scientists (and physicians that do clinical research) give us new ones to follow. How do we know when new guidelines are necessary? It happens when a new discovery is made or when the guidelines don’t make sense anymore. I believe we are at that point right now.

The idea that the CDC, the NIAID, the FDA and the vaccine manufacturers are all working together, using ethical and rigorous scientific methods to improve our health and safety is a hypothesis; it is not a law or unassailable tenet. It is and always has been up for debate. How does it hold up to the scientific method and open-minded investigation?

I believe we are being misled deliberately. I understand that this is a serious accusation. Here are eight reasons why I believe this to be the case.

#1: SARS-COV2 is most likely the product of our own design and Dr. Fauci as director of the NIAID helped to fund it.

Who would have thought a month ago that Dr. Anthony Fauci, the diminutive doctor with big credentials, the spokesperson of science and a shoo-in for the Presidential Medal of Freedom would be grilled by another physician at a Senate hearing about his role in manufacturing and funding the development of a pernicious pathogen that has taken the lives of over 3.5 million people world wide? Surely many have had to rub their eyes and do a double take on this startling exchange. Was Kentucky Senator Rand Paul, MD implying that Dr. Fauci was not only aware of gain of function research being done on a strain of coronavirus in a Wuhan Virology Lab but actually funded the activity through a third party, EcoHealth Alliance using taxpayer money? Yes he was. This is an enormous accusation. It is true that the few million dollars that was paid to EcoHealth Alliance is just a fraction of the billion dollar budget Dr. Fauci controls, however if what Senator Paul is suggesting is true this places Dr. Fauci in a very hot seat. There could be no way that he would not have known that this pandemic most likely started in a laboratory from the very beginning. His year-long ridicule and public disdain of those who had been suggesting this connection speaks volumes about his character and integrity.

Let’s follow the timeline. This line of questioning was likely the direct result of a groundbreaking piece on the Tucker Carlson show early last month (May, 2021). Foxnews picked up a remarkable essay by Nicholas Wade who unleashed a precise and well informed attack on the natural origins theory of the SARS-COV2 virus on the self-publishing site, Medium. Hopefully we as physicians can put aside the political posturing that often results when Libertarian Senators or FoxNews are mentioned. Mr. Wade, author of the piece “Origin of Covid — Following the Clues”, is a journalist who has covered scientific topics for Science and Nature magazines as well as the NYT for decades. In this scintillating essay he told the story that researchers like Dr. Alina Chan and a group of unaffiliated scientists and journalists going by the name of DRASTIC(Decentralized Radical Autonomous Search Team Investigating COVID-19) have been screaming about since March 2020. Why are we assuming that a virus leapt from another mammalian species into a human host in a wet market in Wuhan province and resulted in a global pandemic within a few weeks when one of the most advanced virology labs in China was also at ground zero?

The reason is in large part due to a seminal article written in Nature Medicine on March 17 2020 by KG Anderson et al that concluded that the virus most certainly could not have come from a laboratory. A closer examination into their reasoning reveals a peculiar set of arguments that are, at the very least, grossly unscientific if not deliberately misleading. This had been pointed out repeatedly for months prior but got little attention as paper after paper continued to cite the Nature Medicine article as the irrefutable last word on the matter, thereby manufacturing a wall of scientific consensus that could never be breached by alternative media and their bands of “conspiracy theorist” followers.

But why would a researcher like Kristian Anderson, professor of Immunology and Microbiology at the Scripps institute make such unscientific arguments and assertions about the certainty of zoonotic origins in a scientific publication? Why did his co-authors go along with it? I do not have his background or credentials. I am a clinical anesthesiologist but even I could see the ‘bunk’ in his debunking article as I explained nearly three months ago in this essay. Surely co-author W. Ian Lipkin, professor of epidemiology, neurology and pathology at Columbia should have dissuaded him from making such unsubstantiated claims based in specious logic. Was there an unseen hand impelling them to make such claims?

Interestingly, some clues may have emerged quite recently in the developing story around the “Fauci emails” that were released under the FOIA this week. First we have this:

As of January 31, 2020, Dr. Anderson is letting Dr. Fauci know that one has to look “really closely at all of the sequences to see that some of the features (potentially) look engineered”. He is not admitting that they were engineered, only that one has to examine the virus closely to see that it might have been. In the next paragraph he seems to be arriving at a consensus that the virus’ genome is “inconsistent with expectations from evolutionary theory”. It would be fair to say that at this point, he seemed to believe that the virus had been engineered while admitting more analysis was required.

Approximately five weeks later, Anderson addresses Dr. Fauci, Dr. Francis Collins (head of the NIH) and Sir Jeremy Farrar, a British medical researcher but perhaps more importantly, director of the Wellcome Trust, a charitable foundation in the UK focused on mental health, climate and infectious diseases with a 26 billion dollar endowment. Anderson is expressing his gratitude for their advice and “leadership” around the infamous paper in Nature Medicine that was soon to be published:

{Sorry, for illegibility, see original source material. }

There is no smoking gun here however it seems that the experts on the topic seemed to agree that lab origins was the most plausible theory at the end of January. Five weeks later, with “leadership” from Fauci, Collins and Farrar they changed their tune and proceeded to publish a paper that definitively concluded the opposite position: the virus did not come from a lab. What kind of “advice” would three physician administrators have to offer a team of researchers that were attempting to unravel an extremely complicated molecular puzzle that was, for all intents and purposes, a forensic analysis? Yes, it is an accusation veiled as a question. But let’s take a moment to try to answer the question before dismissing it…

As stated previously, this paper was the subject of extensive blogging since the beginning of the pandemic by experts and unaffiliated doctors including Dr. Meryl Nass, a board certified internist and biological warfare epidemiologist and anthrax expert. How did this self-published piece by Nicholas Wade finally penetrate the wall of denial? Before we grant too much credit to Tucker Carlson and FoxNews, let us not forget that they were over a year late to a story that should have been in plain sight to any investigative journalist on the planet. Did someone give them the okay to finally cover the biggest twist in this massive story? We may never know the answer to such a question. In any case, we are well advised to consider what it means when we must rely on independent journalists and non-academic physicians to bring light to pivotal information that corporate funded media doesn’t.

Things are starting to twist again. Work on this virus began in the USA at the UNC Chapel Hill under the direction of virologist Dr. Ralph Baric until 2014 when eyebrows were raised about the questionable necessity and obvious danger of such “gain of function” studies. The work disappeared from our shores and reappeared in Wuhan China through an organization called EcoHealth Alliance that directly received funding from the National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases. This is the organization that has been run by Anthony Fauci, MD for over five decades. If one uses the “follow the money” approach it becomes quite clear who is ultimately responsible for this global tragedy. However, in the days since the grilling Dr. Fauci received, there has been a shift back to the “Wuhan virus” and the CCP. Perhaps the Communist Party of China is partially responsible, but there is little doubt that this experiment has American resources and ingenuity behind it as well.

The importance of this fact cannot be overstated. In the United States there has been an inexorable march towards a “vaccine mandate”. We have toyed with the idea of vaccine passports, different restrictions for the unvaccinated and vaccine requirements for employees and students. Because nearly 170 million Americans are at least partially vaccinated this doesn’t seem to result in much consternation from the majority. However for those in the vaccine cautionary sphere, this is a monumental attack on personal sovereignty, health freedom and privacy that have resulted in public demonstrations and rallies.

Mandating a vaccine is justified by the “greater good” of public safety, however this argument is ultimately based on consensus regarding the vaccine’s efficacy and safety — two vital parameters that cannot be validated until the completion of Phase III trials in 2022–2023. Until then we are expected to trust the “experts”. How easy is that to do if our governing medical institutions themselves could very well be responsible for the creation of this pathogen and if so, the deliberate suppression of this information? Are we expected to trust the very leaders that are in the crosshairs of what could be the most important investigation of public policy this decade? Remaining innocent until proven guilty is one of the foundations of jurisprudence in our country. However it is illogical for an entity under suspicion to retain their authority until a determination about their culpability can be made.

#2 The 95% efficacy of the vaccines is difficult to accept.

Although there is no definitive proof that SARS-COV2 originated in a laboratory, it is becoming more clear that that should be our working theory until further evidence emerges. The truth around viral origins is not the only blow to public confidence in our medical institutions. Emergency Use Authorization was first granted to Pfizer and Moderna based on their remarkably positive results in preliminary observations. In historical context a 95% efficacy is no less than astounding.

Upon closer examination, Pfizer was not being completely forthcoming in the public reports of the data nor in their findings published in the New England Journal of Medicine. They failed to mention a much larger group of participants (3,410) that were “suspected” of having COVID after four weeks of observation but tested negative by PCR. Pfizer reported that two of these participants suffered severe Covid-19 symptoms requiring hospitalization. These two were tested repeatedly using PCR and remained negative. We do not know if Pfizer retested the other 3,408 participants “suspected” of having Covid-19 with PCR or antibody titers which would have been more than reasonable if they were truly interested in getting to the bottom of things. The existence of this cohort was only made known to the FDA’s Vaccines and Related Biologic Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) that apparently thought little of this matter.

We cannot make any claims as to how further testing would have altered their efficacy conclusions, however we do know that the ratio between the placebo and vaccine group in the 170 participants that tested positive for Covid was 20:1. This is how a 95% efficacy was established. In the much larger group of “Covid suspected” participants (3,410 in total), the ratio of placebo to vaccine recipients was 9:8. If, say, 10% of the PCR tests were wrong (i.e. false negatives) the power of Pfizer’s results would have tripled (there would have been three times as much data to back their conclusions). Then again, their 95% efficacy result might have been significantly less if most or even half of this hypothetical 10% had received the vaccine and not the placebo. This is why establishing or ruling out a Covid-19 diagnosis in this group should have been vitally important to any institution tasked with oversight of this trial. The FDA, the body holding this very responsibility, didn’t seem to have any concern with Pfizer’s decision not to retest this group or even disclose this subgroup of participants in their public report or NEJM paper.

With no request for clarification made by the FDA we are left having to accept that the negative PCR result was accurate in every single one of these 3,410 Covid-19 “suspected” individuals. This is particularly difficult to do given the high clinical suspicion of disease in these participants.

#3: The CDC has ignored cheap, readily available, proven effective Covid Prophylaxis and treatment alternatives

Early in December 2020, before EUA had been granted to vaccine manufacturers, the CDC continued to ignore pleas from the Front Line Covid-19 Critical Care Alliance to revise their guidelines to include the use of Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine in the treatment and prevention of Covid-19. Ivermectin had been proven to decrease the relative rate of infection by a factor of seven, or about an 80–85% efficacy in multiple randomized controlled trials and case series. This was more than what would be required for their emergency use under EUA (50% efficacious or greater). In fact, emergency use authorization would not have been required for Ivermectin because its efficacy and safety had already been established. However, had the CDC acknowledged the existence of this medicine there would be no means to authorize Covid vaccinations for emergency use. EUA requires that no alternative be available. These therapies were ignored, paving the way for the one and only solution: a vaccine that had yet to have been formulated or tested.

#4: The danger of Hydroxychloroquine has been debunked but physicians face repercussions for recommending their use

Throughout this entire period the CDC remained bafflingly silent with regard to outpatient treatment of Covid-19 patients. Determined to help her community, Dr. Simone Gold, ER physician and graduate of Stanford Law school began to prescribe Hydroxychloroquine with great success. She was warned to not use this proven, readily available medicine not because it was unsafe but because the hospital was not being compensated by medical insurance carriers. Having no better alternative, she continued and was fired by her program director. She is the founder of an organization of independent physicians called America’s Frontline Doctors that continue to prescribe safe, effective and proven therapies for the prevention and treatment of Covid-19 earning endless attack from mainstream media for inexplicable reasons. Physicians are being attacked for prescribing a medicine proven safe and effective. Let that sink in.

The early dismissal of HCQ as a viable treatment for Covid is suspicious. Although HCQ had been known to be effective in the treatment of other SARS viruses and was being used in China for SARS-COV2 the CDC’s position on it was based on two studies that demonstrated greater morbidity and mortality in patients who received it as part of their treatment regimen. However they received doses twice as high as what was previously recommended and used successfully, effectively overdosing them. The CDC’s position seemed to be vindicated when an enormous study based on multicenter trials was published in the Lancet in May, 2020. In yet another enormous revelatory twist, this study was eventually retracted when it was discovered that the data and medical records could not be substantiated. Note, this paper was peer-reviewed prior to publication — this is the ultimate stamp of validation in science. Do scientists need to be policed too? If so, who would do the policing? This scientific embarrassment was even covered in the New York Times. Nonetheless HCQ remained off of the CDC guidelines for treatment recommendations, effectively handcuffing physicians’ ability to treat patients who were suffering from this dangerous disease.

#5: The CDC is making claims that they cannot back up. Why?

The CDC doubled down on their single solution to CV when they made the unprecedented and unsupported recommendation that people who have recovered from Covid-19 are eligible for the vaccine. There may in fact be certain infectious diseases where vaccine mediated immunity exceeds natural immunity, but these are the exceptions to the rule. How could the CDC make this determination prior to the completion of efficacy trials? This study, partially funded by the NIAID, indeed found enduring immunity in people after natural exposure to the virus. What would be the harm in vaccinating a person who has already acquired natural immunity? This is a difficult question to answer without close observation of a large group of such people who have received the same vaccine.

There may in fact be little or no harm in vaccinating everyone, however we can assert that by vaccinating all individuals we are eliminating an important piece of information regarding the safety of the vaccine in the long run. In the US there are over thirty three million people who have already had Covid-19. These individuals represent the “control” group with regard to vaccine safety in this enormous experiment we are conducting in this country. Although much attention is given to the incidence of adverse reactions immediately following vaccinations, we should also be interested in the long-term effects of these vaccines on our general health. If there isn’t a large pool of unvaccinated individuals that can be observed and tracked it will be very difficult or impossible to determine the potential adverse impact the vaccine may have over time. This fact is undeniable.

Putting potential long term adverse effects of Covid vaccinations aside, the medical community seems to be in denial of the very real danger of acute reactions immediately following inoculation. Vaccinations are intended to stimulate an acute inflammatory response, so how can we know whether these vaccines fall within acceptable limits of safety? This is a difficult question to answer. The primary mechanism for reporting adverse events is ineffectual. The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) is passive, requiring patients or their providers to file a report. This is not always done and the CDC themselves have previously stated that adverse events are likely underreported by a factor of 10 to 100. Moreover, how are we to tell if a response fell within the clinical window of an expected inflammatory response, or “reactogenicity”?

One way is to look at the incidence of anaphylaxis following injection. This is a life-threatening allergic response typically involving cardiovascular collapse and respiratory compromise. This is not mere reactogenicity. This is not “normal” and can happen with many medical interventions, including vaccines. Flu vaccines carry a risk of anaphylaxis of about 1.3 per million. The VAERS system indicates that the reported rate of anaphylaxis following Covid vaccines are significantly greater than that, on the order of 2 to 11 per million administrations. Though a matter of some concern, few are alarmed about this statistic. Perhaps it is due to the perceived threat of Covid itself or the lack of reliability in reporting. However the most reliable measurement of this phenomenon was reported by one of the largest health systems in the country, Massachusetts General and Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston who surveyed their own employee responses to the Covid vaccines. Their results were published in JAMA in March 2021. Over 52,000 responses were collected. Of those, 2% had acute allergic responses and 16 had confirmed anaphylaxis. This amounts to an incidence of 247 per million doses or 190 times greater than the flu vaccine.

I do not know what measures need to be taken at this point. As an anesthesiologist I have attended to patients in anaphylaxis and it isn’t something to be trifled with. Can we at least look at this issue objectively? The mortality rate of Covid-19 is on order with influenza yet our means of prophylaxis carries nearly a 200 times greater risk of a life-threatening response. The fact that this rarely gets acknowledged is disquieting. At what point are we going to start listening to people who voluntarily accepted a vaccine and warned us of its very real risk and not dismiss them as “antivaxxers” intent on derailing public health policy?

Throughout the pandemic the CDC did little or nothing to guide or support health care providers treat people with Covid. Vaccines were developed at “warp speed”. Their efficacy is yet to be determined but their risk is significantly greater than we anticipated. Now with Pfizer, Moderna and J&J holding EUA for their products the pressure on the unvaccinated to accept the jab is mounting. And so is the pushback.

#6: The CDC has no oversight and has offered unscientific conclusions based on shoddy methodology.

Depending on your perspective, the CDC’s Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR) from March 5, 2021 that stated there was an association between mask mandates and fall in the daily growth rate of cases may have merely confirmed what you knew all along. This study, offered as more proof that mask wearing was effective, indirectly justified the threat of asymptomatic spread, the need to social distance and the importance of isolation. Mask mandates and the practical and psychological burdens that come with them are slowly being lifted in the US, often conditionally depending, once again, on vaccination status.

The widespread use of masks in this country was a particularly troubling aspect to our approach to this pandemic for me personally. I have been an anesthesiologist for nearly two decades and am intimately familiar with the benefits and limitations of mask use in the operating room and other critical care arenas. Properly fitted N-95 respirators do indeed confer protection to the wearer in these environments. However the widespread use of cloth or surgical masks in public or outside by asymptomatic individuals was clearly ineffectual. Although we could excuse this extreme approach initially when little was known about the virus and its transmissibility, I was certain that mandates would be rescinded once disease incidence was compared in counties and states with and without restrictions. Months passed. The data was available and supported decades long research that demonstrated no measurable benefit from this practice as well as the very real danger of prolonged mask wearing on our health. When the CDC released their report in March I was dumbfounded. Taking matters into our own hands, I and Josh Mitteldorf, PhD, offered a critique of the CDC position here.

In reality the CDC report did not prove any causation between mask mandates and “decrease in daily growth rate of cases”. In our critique of their report we pointed out the inexcusably poor reasoning behind their methodology, lack of rigor and apparently arbitrary (or perhaps strategic?) choice of length of observation that contributed to their conclusion. Daily Growth Rate of Covid-19 cases in mask mandated counties were never compared to non-mandated counties. Their time frame of observation was largely limited to the summer and early fall of 2020 when daily growth rate in Covid-19 cases counts were declining across the country. The study and its claims were disingenuous if not intentionally misleading. Nevertheless, mainstream media sources were quick to relay their spurious conclusions as proof that these measures were justified.

#7 The CDC doesn’t want to help people, they want to vaccinate them

None of these actions and inactions of the CDC or the FDA can stand as proof that these institutions are plotting to harm the population. However are they engendering trust? It seems that there is a clear agenda to vaccinate as many people as possible and as quickly as possible.

We are enduring a disease that is likely the product of human ingenuity and being led to a single solution by the institutions that have abandoned their own mission to control and prevent disease by willfully ignoring alternatives, failing to do their due diligence and misrepresenting data.

Over and over I have listened to my colleagues resort to the same argument whenever I raise questions about our approach to this pandemic: “If you keep asking questions people will refuse to get vaccinated!” Let’s stop and consider this. First of all, the statement is absolutely true. But what exactly are our intentions as health care providers? To vaccinate people or to help people? I say it is the latter. If you believe that vaccinating and helping people are not just synonymous but equivalent, why then didn’t the CDC care about helping people when there were no vaccines available?

Dr. Peter McCullough, cardiologist, Vice Chief of Medicine at Baylor University Medical Center in Dallas, TX expressed his shock and dismay at the CDC around their refusal to play any role in guiding physicians around outpatient COVID19 treatment. His insightful comments to the Texas State Senate Health and Human Services Committee, including those in support of a vaccine, reflect those of a dedicated doctor who has been forced to take matters into his own hands at a time when the institution that should be helping seems to be focused on doing just the opposite.

Why didn’t the CDC bring together a panel of experts to lay out the best possible treatments to keep people with symptomatic CV out of the hospital in the months prior to the vaccine roll out? Why was no information disseminated to doctors and health care providers on the front lines? We are talking about the Center for Disease Control and Prevention here.

#8 There is an enormous amount of conflict of interest between our governing institutions and vaccine manufacturers.

The pharmaceutical industry holds more sway over public policy than any other for-profit interest through their extensive and expensive lobbying and direct and indirect contributions to governmental medical institutions. The government decides which therapies get approved. Vaccine manufacturers make money when their therapies are sold. The idea that bias and self-interest will not enter the picture because we are dealing with the health and well being of human beings is hopelessly naive. This is about the interaction between multibillion dollar companies and big government; it is not about the sanctity of a patient-doctor relationship. Enough said.

As medical students we were trained to pay attention to every detail, every lab value and diagnostic result. As years went by we became more efficient, not just because we could process information faster but because we became better at recognizing what was important and what didn’t fit into our model of what was happening in our patients’ course of disease and recovery. At some point, whether we were aware of it at the time or not, we got very good at picking up on the subtle signs and cues that allowed us to take in the whole picture quickly and very often the details would serve to confirm what we had guessed.

Teaching a young physician in training how to develop a sense for the gestalt without overlooking the important details isn’t easy or even possible. Perhaps it requires a thousand patient encounters. Or maybe ten thousand.

There are too many things wrong with our approach to this pandemic and the guidance and information that we have been given. We may be able to excuse one or two errors or miscommunications from our governing institutions. In this last year there have been too many nonsensical edicts and advisory statements for me to accept.

This is an appeal to all my colleagues to fulfill our mission to act in the best interest of the health of our fellow human beings. We cannot expect the layperson to question edicts coming from such institutions as the CDC, FDA and physician administrators like Anthony Fauci. That responsibility falls upon us and no one else.

Continue reading

Posted in AGENDA 2030, drugs & medication, New World Order, vaccines, WHO | Tagged | 5 Comments

Covid-19 – Depopulation – Sterilization program


Please click on the link to activate.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

Covid-19 “Vaccines”  –  Who do you Trust for Reputable Information?

The general public, in general, trust the governments and the mainstream media to “educate” them about so many aspects of their lives. A trust, according to many educated, qualified and knowledgeable persons, that is seriously misplaced.


Of all relevant worldly issues, by far the most important is individual and public health. In this area, the need to question where trust can be placed confidently even extends to the established medical authorities, from the “big pharma” companies down to family GP’s.
In fact from the very TOP down, meaning the United Nations, the World Health Organization and related authorities.

If you question this claim, one of many sources of supporting evidence and information is herewith promoted, the ‘Natural News’ organization,

A selection of articles relating to the Covid Agenda. May 18, 2021 by: Mike Adams

Why all the concentration on Covid-19 and the associated “vaccines”?
In my opinion, based on information that abounds, published by reputable, reliable sources who are “experts in their field”, the Covid issue stands out as the most critical world-wide, public health issue ever! Termed by more than one as “the world’s most dangerous scam ever”.

Few of the public have any idea of the reality of this planned “pandemic” being an agenda for global depopulation. But the evidence is clear to thousands, including medical professionals, those that are prepared to risk their reputations and livelihoods to speak out.

A compelling piece of evidence tells the basic story:  {Courtesy the W.H.O}

The pandemic is clearly a deliberate, planned event. The reason they provided is somewhat nebulous, but fits neatly into the “Georgia Guide Stones” depopulation agenda.



Annual report on global preparedness for health emergencies Global Preparedness Monitoring Board

Acknowledgements We extend our deep appreciation and thanks to the Director-General of the World Health Organization and to the President, World Bank Group for having co-convened the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board (GPMB).

The United Nations must strengthen coordination mechanisms.
The Secretary General of the United Nations, with WHO and United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA), must strengthen coordination in different country, health and humanitarian emergency contexts, by ensuring clear United Nations systemwide roles and responsibilities; rapidly resetting preparedness and response strategies during health emergencies; and, enhancing United Nations system leadership for preparedness, including through routine simulation exercises.
WHO should introduce an approach to mobilize the wider national, regional and international community at earlier stages of an outbreak, prior to a declaration of an IHR (2005) Public Health Emergency of International Concern. Progress indicator(s) by September 2020
• The Secretary-General of the United Nations, with the Director-General of WHO and Under-Secretary-General for Humanitarian Affairs strengthens coordination and identifies clear roles and responsibilities and timely triggers for a coordinated United Nations systemwide response for health emergencies in different countries and different health and humanitarian emergency contexts.
The United Nations (including WHO) conducts at least two system-wide training and simulation exercises, including one for covering the deliberate release of a lethal respiratory pathogen.
 • WHO develops intermediate triggers to mobilize national, international and multilateral action early in outbreaks, to complement existing mechanisms for later and more advanced stages of an outbreak under the IHR (2005).
• The Secretary General of the United Nations convenes a high-level dialogue with health, security and foreign affairs officials to determine how the world can address the threat of a lethal respiratory pathogen pandemic, as well as for managing preparedness for disease outbreaks in complex, insecure contexts.



Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Covid-19 – An Impressive Assessment of the Agenda and Dangers.

A highly understandable presentation detailing the main aspects of the Covid “vaccine” program.  A program surely not in our/your best interests!

Featured Image -- 19404 Yes, trials even include children.

I believe, well worth the time (16 minutes) spent for an important education.

Please click on the link.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

Fauci and the NIH caught funding China’s covid bioweapons research

Is this what is referred as a “smoking gun”?

A revelation published by “Natural News“.  The whole frightening scenario becomes clear.
Bypass censorship by sharing this link:

(Natural News) In today’s Situation Update podcast, we cover the bombshell news that communist China’s militarized bioweapons industry was funded by the NIH under the control of Dr. Fauci. They deliberately funded bioweapons development “gain-of-function” research in China, which led to the deliberate release of the SARS-CoV-2 bioweapon that’s now being used to push weaponized depopulation vaccines around the world.

The entire scheme was planned years ago, and its goal was both the global decimation of human populations and to serve as a cover story for the planned economic reset / debt implosion scenario that’s already beginning to unfold.

This was all covered by The Weekend Australian, which reviewed a 265-page document from the Chinese government that claimed a bioweapon attack, “could cause the enemy’s medical system to collapse.”

That same document revealed that biological weapons developed in China could be, “artificially manipulated into an emerging human ­disease virus, then weaponized and unleashed in a way never seen before.”

From The Weekend Australian:

Ten of the authors are scientists and weapons experts affiliated with the Air Force Medical ­University in Xi’an, ranked “very high-risk” for its level of defence research, including its work on medical and psychological sciences, according to the Australian Strategic Policy Institute’s ­Defence Universities Tracker.

The study also examines the optimum conditions under which to release a bioweapon. “Bioweapon attacks are best conducted during dawn, dusk, night or cloudy weather because intense sunlight can damage the pathogens,” it states. “Biological agents should be released during dry weather. Rain or snow can cause the aerosol particles to precipitate.

“A stable wind direction is ­desirable so that the aerosol can float into the target area.”

Among the most bizarre claims by the military scientists is their theory that SARS-CoV-1, the virus that caused the SARS epidemic of 2003, was a man-made bioweapon, deliberately unleashed on China by “terrorists”.

It now seems obvious that Fauci, the NIH and the Obama administration knowingly conspired with communist China to build the bioweapon that was unleashed upon the world in 2019. This means Dr. Fauci is a war criminal (but we knew that already).

If you need more, including the complete video:

Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Former Pfizer Vice President Dr. Yeadon: Discusses Covid Vaccine Issues

Comments by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News

Like a fireman tasked with helping to get as many people as possible out of a burning building that is about to collapse, Dr. Michael Yeadon, Pfizer’s former Vice President and Chief Scientist for Allergy and Respiratory, has been granting interviews to as many people in the Alternative Media as possible in recent days to sound the alarm on the evil intentions behind the new COVID-19 experimental injections that have now preceded thousands of deaths and hundreds of thousands of injuries worldwide.

He was interviewed today by independent journalist Taylor Hudak and published by The Last American Vagabond.

Dr. Yeadon repeats some things in this interview that he has been saying for months now, including the fact that for people under the age of 70, the risk of getting sick from COVID-19 is less of a risk factor than getting sick from the annual flu virus.

As an avid motorcycle rider, Dr. Yeadon points out that his risk to harm from riding motorcycles is greater that his risk of being harmed by COVID-19 at age 60.

Dr. Yeadon vehemently warns against younger people getting the experimental COVID shots when they are almost at a ZERO risk of being harmed by COVID, but have a tremendous risk of being harmed by the new experimental “vaccines.” He is especially concerned about the push to vaccinate young pregnant women and children:

“Trying to persuade pregnant women in their 20s to be vaccinated: What kind of unethical monster does that?”

As he explained in his interview with Mordechai Sones, the News Director for America’s Frontline Doctor, all the “fear porn” the media is hyping over the “COVID variants” or mutations is unfounded, because all of these variants are less than .3% different than the original Wuhan COVID-19 virus.

He explains to Taylor Hudak that what “keeps him up at night” is thinking about all the vaccines that are now being rushed to be developed for these “variants,” and the evil intentions behind them.

The variants are what some people call “scary-iants”, that they’re being used as a psychological operation, and I think there is something in that.

I sarcastically call them the “staymiants” – because they’re really the same. All of the variants are so similar to the original, there’s no chance what-so-ever that you’re body will see them as anything new.

So with that as a back drop, isn’t it scary that politicians keep telling us about variants, and how we need to close borders and stop them moving around the world. And don’t worry, because we are going to make modified vaccines that will address these new variants.

And some of the pharmaceutical companies are actually now developing “top-up,” or variant vaccines.

But if Mike Yeadon is correct, and I am confident that I am, this is my strength, immunology, and what I have just told you is absolutely true.

They (variants) are so similar to the original, it is not just implausible, it is impossible, we would need new vaccines.

And yet we are being told they’re necessary, we’re being told they are manufacturing them.

I am quite furious because I have this open question. What is in these bottles of “variant vaccines”?

The world’s regulators have said they are so similar to the vaccines that are already being used, but they are forgetting to tell us that they are only emergency use authorized anyway.

But the regulators have said “we don’t need any clinical safety testing done on these variants.”

So if you combine my talk about vaccine passports, and how you’ll be compelled to or not to, whatever the operatives tell you, if you combine that with an opportunity to be told “go and get your variant vaccine,” and the pharmaceutical industry can go and make whatever the hell they want, put it in a vial, and you’ll go along and be injected with it.

My significant fear is, if somebody wanted to arrange a situation where mass depopulation could be accomplished, this would probably be a perfect way of doing it.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment