Image via Wikipedia

I am following an interesting thread in this part of the cyber-world. By ‘this part’ I am referring to the website networking associating this ‘Golden Rule’ site with sites of like interests. In this particular instance, health issues – failure of authorities to prioritise health above profits, failure to issue adequate information to the public and the undue, even corrupt, influence of pharma companies over/within the so-called watch-dog organizations.

This has lead to a site worthy of attention, now added to the ‘Health Issues’ links below right, “GreenMedInfo”.

To introduce them, here is an interesting post from their site, under the title as used above:

Over the course of the past few years we have been gathering studies from the US National Library of Medicine on the adverse, unintended health effects of vaccination, in an attempt to offset the one-sided propaganda foisted upon the public, namely, that all vaccines are unequivocally “safe” and “effective” a priori.

Along the way, we happened upon a 2010 study published in the Journal of Pediatric Infections & Diseases which has been shared more than any other article on our database, and which suggests that breastfeeding should be delayed in order to prevent immune factors within breast milk from inactivating vaccine-associated antibody titer elevations and “vaccine potency.” The concluded the study with the following statement:

“INTERPRETATION: The lower immunogenicity and efficacy of rotavirus vaccines in poor developing countries could be explained, in part, by higher titers of IgA and neutralizing activity in breast milk consumed by their infants at the time of immunization that could effectively reduce the potency of the vaccine. Strategies to overcome this negative effect, such as delaying breast-feeding at the time of immunization, should be evaluated.”

It is not difficult to comprehend what caused the flurry of interest in this study. Readers were  obviously disturbed by the suggestion that women in the underdeveloped world temporarily stop breast feeding (often the only source of infant nutrition) in order to increase the vaccine’s purported “efficacy.”  Are we to assume that these breast milk deprived infants should consume formula* in the interim?  And to what end? So that the vaccine can generate a temporary spike in antibody production, which is no measure of real-world effectiveness?

*Note: Infant formula has been linked to 48 adverse effects, including increased mortality.

Continue reading here.

Let’s see if I understand this – breast-feeding mothers are being asked to stop (even if temporarily), to enable vaccines to work better, because the breast milk has the natural properties of generating immunities which interfere with the vaccines.

Would it make sense to let the natural immunity system do its job and then after the breast-feeding phase is ended, PERHAPS vaccinate, IF it really can help further protect the baby. Given the likes of the following report, relying on the natural system to protect the baby’s health might be preferable?

From the Related Article : “New glycoconjugate vaccine prototype is 100 times better than traditional glycoconjugate vaccine “. “New glycoconjugate vaccine prototype is 100 times better than traditional glycoconjugate vaccine Brigham and Women’s Hospital (BWH) researchers have  created a vaccine that is more potent than traditional vaccines available today. The glycoconjugate vaccine prototype is 100 times more effective than traditional glycoconjugate vaccines.”

Think about it! IF the existing vaccine is 100 times less effective than something new, how can it possibly have been of any real use at all?

There are so many issues here, all of them potentially creating health outcomes worse rather than better, to various degrees. All of them lacking in sound scientific practices and of dubious motivations.

The aim is to raise the awareness of the reader to the many questions being legitimately raised about vaccinations. These websites provide genuine alternative viewpoints and information. You now have access to a few, in fact many. Good luck in sorting out the facts and probabilities, in your own particular cases.

Related articles

• Feds Support Native Breastfeeding (indiancountrytodaymedianetwork.com)
• Childhood Immunizations and Vaccinations | Special Edition | Education.com (education.com)
• Mothers who breastfeed for ‘at least six months have lower blood pressure’ (telegraph.co.uk)