From ‘nsnbc’, an article by  Christof Lehmann.

It is not difficult to see the big picture if one looks in depth into actions and responses concerning terrorism in Australia. It is pointed out that Australia has basically “dug its own grave” in getting involved with the US based global so-called ‘War on Terror’. A process of world-wide destruction better described as a ‘War OF Terror’, based on proven lies,  already previously planned on the US drawing board, that has developed into a global hegemony involving regime changes by force (when other means of enforcing compliance failed), by the creation and use of armed terrorist groups (Al Qaeda and ISIL for example).

So, how is it possible to maintain public support, primarily in the US but flowing on to Australia and other US allies, for the funding and manpower to be available? By convincing the citizens that there are some moral grounds and necessity for illegal invasions and slaughtering of civilians.

Even with unwavering support from the media, (it isn’t difficult to see that they are controlled), people are starting to wonder about the obvious horrific consequences of the US and allied military global interference, and apparently require further incentives to maintain their enthusiastic support for global destruction and dominance.

Thus, the introduction and exploitation of individual terrorist attacks to ‘justify’ militant presence and unlimited power over citizens. Achieving government cooperation in countries like Australia is an easy way to further their power ambitions without, or with minimal violence.

This post details the processes involved, and is essential reading for critical thinkers. [Apparently Moriarty didn’t die at Victoria Falls 🙂 ]

Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull asked counter-terrorism coordinator Greg Moriarty for advise on reviewing the threat of alleged lone wolf terrorist attacks. The initiative follows recent attacks in Orlando, USA, and Nice, incidents where authorities failed to provide evidence that links the violence to Islamic State, as alleged. Disturbingly, the initiative also includes psychiatric elements, reminiscent of the political abuse of psychiatry in the Soviet Union.

Turnbull asked Moriarty for advise on the threat from local, suddenly and rapidly radicalized lone wolves as part of a report that aims at assessing the recent, allegedly Islamic State related incidents in Nice, France and Germany.

Moriarty has been tasked with cooperating with agencies to examine all persons of interest being watched in relation to terrorism investigations.

The “examination” shall determine if there is “a significant connection with mental health concerns”, or if there are other significant patterns of criminal behavior.

It has been claimed that the recent attacks on the Pulse night club in Orlando, Florida, USA, the truck attack in Nice, France, and the axe attack in a train in Germany show the evolution of a new terrorist.

In all three cases, authorities alleged links to the self-proclaimed Islamic State, a.k.a. ISIL, ISIS and Daesh, even though no evidence that would substantiate these allegations was made accessible to the public or independent media.

Police in Orlando, for example, claimed that the Pulse night club shooter Omar Mir Seddique Mateen had made 911 calls, pledging allegiance to the Islamic State. nsnbc contacted both the Orlando Police Department and the FBI. Neither of them would release the audio from the alleged 911 calls.

French police did not present any evidence that would  be admissible in a court of law that would substantiate that Nice road rage killer Mohamed Lahouaiej Bouhlel had links to Islamic State, as alleged. Bouhlel had a record of petty crimes.

The axe attack in Germany was carried out by an Afghan refugee. No Islamic State links were positively proven and the “terrorist” may as well have been “inspired” by the treatment of asylum seekers, or the destruction of Afghanistan in an illegal war.

One common denominator in most alleged lone wolf attacks and many of the other recent “terrorism-related incidents” is that the allegedly rapidly radicalized perpetrators are being killed.

No trial will be held, no conclusive evidence will ever be tested before a court of law, no eventual motive will be established beyond a reasonable doubt.

No other than a post-mortem “psychiatric evaluation” will be possible. An evaluation that will be biased by the “alleged” sudden, terrorism-linked radicalization of the deceased.

Read it all here.  About the unjustified over-reaction, the lack of ethics and justice, the underlying agenda, the subservience of the Australian government and its people.