This article is by far the best supporting information I have seen, justifying my being critical about vaccination programs, in particular the HPV case, where the factors encouraging doubts are much clearer. As the article mentions in referring to the book author, Dr. Bernhard Dalbergue,

“For the first time a person within the system describes the methods which are used including cheating, embezzlement and brainwashing.“

From ‘Sane Vax‘, By Sandy Lunoe, Guest Author.

The temperature of the heated controversy concerning Gardasil was recently raised even more when Dr. Bernhard Dalbergue (France), former pharmaceutical industry physician with Merck, recently predicted that the vaccine will become the greatest medical scandal of all times.

In an interview in the April 2014 issue (no. 66) of the magazine Principes de Santé (Health Principles), Dr. Dalbergue, who has worked for over twenty years with the industry, describes the widespread corruption and his concern that the health of patients is sacrificed on the altar of profitability.

Dr. Dalbergue stated:

I predict that Gardasil will become the greatest medical scandal of all times because at some point in time, the evidence will add up to prove that this vaccine has absolutely no effect on cervical cancer and that all the very many adverse effects which destroy lives and even kill, serve no other purpose than to generate profit for the manufacturers.

According to Dr. Dalbergue the pharmaceutical industry has hardened considerably during the last decade, as shown by increased violations of ethics, manipulation of clinical trial data, widespread corruption, gross conflicts of interest and generally less emphasis on pharmacovigilance.

The anti-inflammatory drug Vioxx, where Merck hid evidence for years about the dangers, is but one example of the industry’s ethical degradation. Tens of thousands of deaths due to cardiovascular complications were caused by Vioxx before it was removed from the market. Merck then made a change in the molecule of the active substance in Vioxx and produced a replacement drug, Arcoxia which is widely marketed and is suspected of possibly being as dangerous as Vioxx.

When Gardasil first appeared on the market it was said by many that the vaccine was “Merck’s new Vioxx”. Some interpreted this as implying that the vaccine would be a new blockbuster. Others suspected that it meant that Gardasil would, like Vioxx, be a scandal involving tens of thousands of injuries and many deaths across the world.

Tragically, there are signals that Dr.Dalbergue’s prediction may become true.

Dr. Dalbergue went on to explain:

The full extent of the Gardasil scandal needs to be assessed: decision makers and many others knew when this vaccine was released on the American market that it would prove to be useless – and it costs a fortune!

Diane Harper, a major opinion leader in the United States, was one of the first to question several aspects regarding this vaccine.

When asked why Gardasil is not being withdrawn from the market Dr. Dalbergue replied:

“There is far too much financial interest for these medicines to be withdrawn.”

Regarding vaccines in general, Dr. Dalbergue stated:

Cases of Guillain-Barré syndrome, paralysis of the lower limbs, vaccine-induced MS and vaccine-induced encephalitis may be induced, whatever the vaccine…

Dr. Dalbergue compared the price which vaccine injured patients may be forced to pay to the way dissidents are dealt with in China, saying: 

In China, dissidents are executed with a single shot of a bullet to the neck and executions are broadcast on television.  Worse still, the victim’s families are made to pay for the bullet used.  In my opinion, 18,000 to 30,000 deaths in France caused by medicines are the same: the patients are made to pay for the bullet which kills them.

Dr. Dalbergue is author of the newly published book “Omerta Dans Les Labos Pharmaceutiques” (Omerta in pharmaceutical labs). For the first time a person within the system describes the methods which are used including cheating, embezzlement and brainwashing.

I have taken the liberty of reproducing basically the whole article and apologize if doing the wrong thing by either the author(s) or ‘Sane Vax‘.

The source article is linked here, where a link to the original French is provided.

‘Sane Vax’ has this mission statement “The Sane Vax Mission is to promote only Safe, Affordable, Necessary & Effective vaccines and vaccination practices through education and information.” So they have a very commonsense approach to these issues and are not “condemning” vaccinations in general.

They appear to mirror my suspicion of areas which include unproven efficacy, unproven safety, inadequate field reporting, unbalanced information to doctors, unacceptable influence in/over regulatory bodies including government departments, excessive zeal in making profits, and what appears at times, to be a lesser priority over patient welfare than is expected by consumers. In the extreme, it is difficult to completely discount a possible association with a suspected population control agenda.

The article’s author is very provocative in referring to China’s method of dealing with dissidents and France’s degree of medical industry “collateral damage”. If a reader wishes to challenge those statements, or any other aspects of this post, please do not hesitate to comment on this blog.

Related Articles:

The Hate Debate – (http://www.livingwhole.org), highly recommended.

“The “science” of vaccination attempts to secure immunity without going through the natural disease process. The vaccine-induced process, although not resembling a natural disease, is nevertheless still a disease process with its own risks. And it is not immunity we gain via vaccination but a puny surrogate of immunity. For this reason vaccination is neither a safe nor effective method of disease prevention.” – Dr. Tetyana Obukhanych PhD in immunology and author of “Vaccine Illusion.”

“This high percentage of individuals having long-term immunity [to natural chicken pox] has been compromised by mass vaccination of children which provides at best 70 to 90% immunity that is temporary and of unknown duration—shifting chickenpox to a more vulnerable adult population where chickenpox carries 20 times more risk of death and 15 times more risk of hospitalization compared to children. Add to this the adverse effects of both the chickenpox and shingles vaccines as well as the potential for increased risk of shingles for an estimated 30 to 50 years among adults.” – Dr. Goldberg Ph.D also confirmed by a study in the New England Journal of Medicine. “