Getting tired with demonstrating the IPCC alarmists and supporters unsupportable “science”. It falls on deaf ears, blind eyes and dysfunctional brain receptors.
Nevertheless here is another try.
Alarmist claims: inference from incomplete, inadequate and ambiguous observations
Climate scientist Dr. Judith Curry has recently posted a number of sharply worded essays providing stinging critical rebukes of assertions of climate harm by alarmists derived from biased and highly selective reading of the UN IPCC AR5 reports.
In an April 21 posting she says the following regarding the so called ‘facts’ cited by climate alarmists to try to make a case for man made climate harm:
View original post 839 more words