It is not just that the science supporting man-made CO2 catastrophic warming or even climate changes, is inadequate. It is indeed very weak, almost missing-in-action in some areas, and substantially unsupported by actual evidence.
Here, it is revealed that the IPCC ignore all that and make politically motivated claims which they expect the rest of the world to accept as mandatory.
Nothing is so burdensome as a secret.
French proverb
Guest essay by Dr. Tim Ball
Attempts to get critical information from agents of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) meet with little success. Why? They claim immediate response to their work is mandatory for planetary survival and time is running out. Here is what Slate reported on March 30 2014.
View original post 1,926 more words
The GOLDEN RULE 
The continued refusal by members of UN’s IPCC, the National Academies of Sciences of the US, UK, USSR, Sweden, Norway, EU, etc. to publicly address nine pages of precise experimental data (pages 19-27) that falsify their post-1945 models of the atomic nucleus, the Sun and the cosmos shows that their deceit is intentional.
“A Journey to the Core of the Sun – Chapter 2: Acceptance of Reality“
Click to access Chapter_2.pdf
Thank you, hirundine608, for this video. We are invisibly connected to the Sun’s pulsar – the Creator and Sustainer of every atom, life and world in the solar system – through visible disruptions in the solar photosphere.
Can you supply a shorter link to the video than this one?
https://tgrule.com/2014/05/05/the-ipcc-and-proprietary-rights-does-the-law-trump-justice/#comment-27668
When I re-read the original post, I am inspired to make my own comment.
These “scientists” provide information to the IPCC to be used as a basis for modifying the whole world’s industrial and financial structures. Fairly important stuff, yes?
Extremely important stuff actually, major, really major, life-changes concerning all the world’s population, no less! [ This might just be justified IF their science is valid ].
Yet they are fighting to hide related information because they do not wish it to be public.
Why is this so?
Because they have something to hide.
Why do they wish this “something” to remain hidden?
Because their “science” is not valid and that fact will become obvious to all.
Two “rules” of science are being broken – that the hypothesis cannot be falsified, ie., no part of it can be shown to be incorrect, and, that the hypothesis is openly displayed and opportunities for falsification are welcomed.
Their position is clearly untenable and they are hiding from public exposure. Not surprising under the circumstances, but either way, they have jeopardized their integrity as scientists.
Notice the term “hide behind” used so openly. (Well, sort of openly, in internal emails they didn’t realize would be seen outside their little cliche). Here, an example from Phil Jones.
[My bold emphasis]
Thank you, Ken, for helping to expose this great climate swindle. By a strange coincidence, my research mentor (the late Dr. Kazuo Kuroda) personally experienced the FEAR and CHAOS in the closing days of WWII that forged an unholy alliance of politicians and scientists in August 1945 to hide neutron repulsion as the source of energy in the cores of heavy elements and the Sun – an alliance that would finally be revealed sixty-four years later in Climategate e-mails (November 2009):
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/2170881.stm