This post re-appeared on FaceBook and in re-reading it myself, I became aware of how valuable this is in presenting the “other” side of the vaccination “debate”.
There are clearly two sides. A blanket statement or approach to arriving at the real picture “Vaccines are needed for the greater good”, “Vaccines are dangerous”, or “Vaccines are Safe” do not help in a proper understanding. BTW ” the U.S Supreme Court exempted physicians and pharmaceutical companies from vaccine liability in their infamous landmark case that declared vaccines to be “unavoidably unsafe.” ”
The detail must be included. No leaving out any relevant compromising information. All factors need to be considered, including vested interests and biassed reporting, such as the article instigating the ‘Living Whole’ response. That it is biassed, is well explained here.
Is this article also biassed? It is presented from the opposing viewpoint and concentrates on that theme, but is the information
incorrect correct? Perhaps not perfectly, but the substance is true, meaningful and convincing. Comments are invited!
We are invited to share this post, I hope the blatant copying below is an acceptable method.
It is copied complete except for normal post peripherals and all the comments. To gain a full understanding of the picture presented here, of peoples’ understanding of it, reading the comments and the original source article is recommended.