Vaccinations – No Unchallenged Justification for Mandatory Enforcement.

One more post on this topic and I will give it a rest. Basically an offering of my own viewpoints and conclusions.

An issue of immense ramifications, an endless number of information sources and interested parties, of major health consequences, of enormous financial outcomes and of much political significance.
There are many reasons to question many aspects of the vaccine industry and associated authorities and practices. Reasons provided by medical experts whose qualifications and experience validate their opinions. Persons without financial or political agendas, who are capable of clear thinking and logical reasoning.

A situation of “reasonable doubt” exists. Ignoring this fact is contrary to commonsense; acting in ignorance of, or in conflict with this fact, is unscientific, uncivilized and potentially dangerous to humanity.

It is suggested that there is sufficient evidence to seriously question and also to oppose the global program of enforced mandatory vaccinations, in particular the removal of logical exemptions.

From the website of CDC, ‘Centers of Disease Control and Prevention’:

Additional Facts:

Additives used in the production of vaccines may include suspending fluid (e.g. sterile water, saline, or fluids containing protein); preservatives and stabilizers to help the vaccine remain unchanged (e.g. albumin, phenols, and glycine); and adjuvants or enhancers to help the vaccine to be more effective.

Common substances found in vaccines include:

Aluminum gels or salts of aluminum which are added as adjuvants to help the vaccine stimulate a better response. Adjuvants help promote an earlier, more potent response, and more persistent immune response to the vaccine.
Antibiotics which are added to some vaccines to prevent the growth of germs (bacteria) during production and storage of the vaccine. No vaccine produced in the United States contains penicillin.
Egg protein is found in influenza and yellow fever vaccines, which are prepared using chicken eggs. Ordinarily, persons who are able to eat eggs or egg products safely can receive these vaccines.
Formaldehyde is used to inactivate bacterial products for toxoid vaccines, (these are vaccines that use an inactive bacterial toxin to produce immunity.) It is also used to kill unwanted viruses and bacteria that might contaminate the vaccine during production. Most formaldehyde is removed from the vaccine before it is packaged.
Monosodium glutamate (MSG) and 2-phenoxy-ethanol which are used as stabilizers in a few vaccines to help the vaccine remain unchanged when the vaccine is exposed to heat, light, acidity, or humidity.
Thimerosal is a mercury-containing preservative that is added to vials of vaccine that contain more than one dose to prevent contamination and growth of potentially harmful bacteria.

For children with a prior history of allergic reactions to any of these substances in vaccines, parents should consult their child’s healthcare provider before vaccination.

Bold emphases are mine and highlight the items that should particularly concern parents.  Even ‘antibiotics’ are questionable considering that we are trying to minimize their use because antibiotics resistance is becoming a real problem. Adding multiple doses to babies and children’s bodies has potential negative ramifications.

Insufficient or inadequate testing precludes a statistically valid basis for the industry to claim “vaccines are safe and effective”. Perhaps they may be “safe”? most of the time, “effective” most of the time, but therefore can only be correctly termed relatively “safe and effective”.

But there are genuine reasons for asking if the ‘price’ paid by some, is morally and ethically acceptable in order to achieve the “greater good”?

The claim of known recognized toxic elements contained in vaccines being only a small and insignificant risk to babies and children because they are “trace amounts” is unproven. In fact, there are substantial proofs that they are causing harm.
Harm admitted by the manufacturers and overseeing authorities, harm officially recognized in legal court dealings, harm experienced by a small but important number of families. Harm which is readily seen in the case of the HPV vaccines, harm which is scientifically challengable in both multi-vaccine doses, and administering more than one vaccine in a session.

Are the numbers of harmed individuals relatively small? Even 1 in a million is too many for that 1 case to feel justice. But there are in fact many! Many more than the official statistics take into account. It is reasonably estimated that non-recognition and non-reporting of cases make the official figures less than 10% (at best) of real cases.

Regarding the “greater good”, numerous compelling arguments dispute the necessity for vaccines in many cases, the effectiveness of the vaccines in several cases and the justification for mandatory application of vaccines in general.

Regarding the “trace amount” argument, as mentioned above, there are no authentic trial results to prove a “safe” conclusion. For some inexplicable reason(s), doses of vaccines are not regulated for babies and children in step with their body weight and they in fact receive the same as young adults. Yet doses of any oral medicines are regulated for children. Why is that so?

Also re “trace amounts”, besides being basically untested and therefore an unknown risk, scientists (some), authorities and people in general are quite happy to accept a strong “scientific” conclusion that 400 parts per million, a 0.04% trace amount, of CO2 in our atmosphere, regulates our planetary global temperature.

There is no justification for the public to be coerced into a compulsory health program without due consideration for adverse reactions, allergies, state of health or personal or religious beliefs. Any considerations of such matters are to unjustly ignore the significance of the criticisms and to discard them.

If the medical justifications are not sufficiently compelling for the vast majority of members of the public to voluntarily accept vaccinations, the reasons for the doubts must be dealt with.
Not by denial, but by data and authentic scientific studies which are above criticism. Such proofs do not exist to the degree that ethically and morally justify mandatory vaccinations.

Without any guarantee of safety (there is none!), should we accept authoritarian laws that take away parent’s rights to care for their own children?

It is mooted that adults may soon be targeted with similar mandatory vaccination requirements. That would be even greater extraordinary authoritarian behaviour from our leaders. Even less justification and even more invasive of our civil liberties!

There you have my opinions.  (Substantially supported by industry whistle-blowers and recognized professionals).

Vaccine Truth
Vaccine xchange
Natural News:
Natural Society
Australian Vaccination-skeptics Network (AVN)
Silent Epidemic; The Untold Story of Vaccines

About Ken McMurtrie

Retired Electronics Engineer, most recently installing and maintaining medical X-Ray equipment. A mature age "student" of Life and Nature, an advocate of Truth, Justice and Humanity, promoting awareness of the injustices in the world.
This entry was posted in AGENDA 21, AUSTRALIA, drugs & medication, HEALTH, vaccines and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to Vaccinations – No Unchallenged Justification for Mandatory Enforcement.

  1. Pingback: Vaccinations – No Unchallenged Justification for Mandatory Enforcement. | THE INTERNET POST

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s