The discussion attempts to balance the prolific media support for climate alarmist claims, with the negligible amount of exposure to claims of opposing scientific evidence available to the public.
I suggest that it failed to achieve any measurable impact because it failed to correct errors of scientific observations and conclusions.
The comments on the WUWT blog revealed much, one of which an opinion that supports my conclusion.
““It was not an evenly balanced show. The alarmists were not corrected for their constant exaggerations and flat out lies.”
I intend to say more, but will first action the reblog and later come back with my own comments.