Satellite sourced global temperature data, previously considered as the most accurate method, and which tended to bring official surface temperature into question is now being challenged as having errors, by Dr Carl Mears and Frank Wentz. They suggest that existing results have not included corrections for diurnal variations.

(Readers do not have to understand the technical aspects in order to understand the bigger picture).  The point is that existing results do in fact include diurnal effects and there is no reason to doubt them.

The other day we saw their supposedly ‘smoking gun’ type claims publicly reported as “Climate change sceptics suffer blow as satellite data correction shows 140% faster global warming ” by the ‘INDEPENDENT‘.

The following video reveals all the shenanigans involved in this issue and is offered as clarification of the truth!  H/T Barry James for his comment on Facebook group  ” Watts Up With That?

(Further Reference: http://www.drroyspencer.com/…/version-6-0-of-the-uah…/)

A bit to absorb, especially if you tend to believe in the validity of the ‘Climate Change’ alarmism. But the facts are that data manipulation exists, is used to support the alarmists, and it is used to brainwash the public.