Vaccine Injuries Ratio: One for Every 39 Vaccines Administered

The “Children’s Health Defense” organization, and website present the following information to support the title claim of serious frequencies of vaccine damage and unfounded contrary claims by the medical industry.

By Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Chairman, Children’s Health Defense

During our September 18 debate, Spectrum TV host Renee Eng asked Kaiser’s, Dr. Robert Riewerts, how many vaccine injuries he had seen during his 30 years as a Pediatrician. His answer: “None, not a single one.”

Slide 1. A 2010 HHS pilot study by the AHCR.

Slide 1 shows a 2010 U.S. Health and Human Services (HHS) pilot study by the Federal Agency for Health Care Research (AHCR) to test the efficiency of a state-of-the-art machine counting (AI) system on data records from the Harvard Pilgrim HMO. Those government researchers found that 2.6% of vaccination resulted in injuries—a ratio one for every 39 vaccines administered. The same study found that typical clinicians see 1.3 vaccine injuries per month.



Slide 2. A table from HHS’s 2016 Neiss-Cades survey published in JAMA

Slide 2 is a table from HHS’s 2016 Neiss-Cades survey published in JAMA reporting an astonishing 19.5% of children under five who are admitted to emergency rooms for drug reactions are suffering vaccine injuries. This finding certainly represents an undercount since pediatric hospitals, which treat most serious injuries, were badly underrepresented in the database, (Only six of 63 hospitals surveyed).



How is it then that Dr. Riewerts has given thousands of vaccines and never seen an injury?

Medical schools—largely funded by Pharma, do not teach doctors to recognize vaccine injuries, and indoctrinate pediatricians to believe such injuries don’t exist. CDC tells doctors that vaccine injury is vanishingly rare. Therefore, Pediatricians like Dr. Riewerts whose patients suffer vaccine injury like seizures, epilepsy, allergies, autoimmune and neurological injuries, or SIDS, are likely to dismiss those incidents as “sad coincidences” unrelated to vaccines and never report them to VAERS.

Slide 3. AHCR confirmed these assessments, finding that “fewer than 1% of vaccine injuries were reported.

Indeed,  HHS commissioned the AHCR pilot study in response to criticism that vaccine injuries were horribly underreported. AHCR confirmed these assessments, finding that “fewer than 1% of vaccine injuries were reported.”



Slide 4. CDC terminated the system-wide roll-out and stopped returning phone calls from their sister agency.

Slide 4 shows that CDC officially were so panicked by AHRC’s revelations that they killed the AI system-wide roll-out and stopped returning phone calls from their sister agency. Today, CDC purposefully continues to use a surveillance system designed to under-count vaccine injuries by over 99%!


There is more than enough evidence to support the truth of this claim.
Claims of “false news” can easily be ignored, even easily disputed.
There is plenty of “false news” about but reading this will help readers better discern which sources are reliable, and which sources have such enormous power to brainwash the public.


About Ken McMurtrie

Retired Electronics Engineer, most recently installing and maintaining medical X-Ray equipment. A mature age "student" of Life and Nature, an advocate of Truth, Justice and Humanity, promoting awareness of the injustices in the world.
This entry was posted in HEALTH, Vaccination Dangers, vaccines and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Vaccine Injuries Ratio: One for Every 39 Vaccines Administered

  1. ajfloyd says:

    Pentagon Study: Flu Shot Increases Risk of Coronavirus by 36% –Many other studies suggest the increased risk of viral respiratory infections from the flu shot.

    | 16 April 2020 | On March 12, 2020,

    Anderson Cooper and Dr. Sanjay Gupta held a global town hall on “Corona Facts and Fears.” During the discussion, Anderson said to the viewing audience, “And, again, if you are concerned about coronavirus, and you haven’t gotten a flu shot…you should get a flu shot.” …The results of many peer-reviewed, published studies prove that Cooper’s recommendation may have been the worst advice he could have given the public. In searching the literature, the only study we have been able to find assessing flu shots and coronavirus is a 2020 US Pentagon study that found that the flu shot INCREASES the risks from coronavirus by 36%. “Receiving influenza vaccination may increase the risk of other respiratory viruses, a phenomenon known as virus interference…’vaccine derived’ virus interference was significantly associated with coronavirus…” Here are the findings: 2020 Pentagon study: Flu vaccines increase risk of coronavirus by 36% – Examining non-influenza viruses specifically, the odds of coronavirus in vaccinated individuals were significantly higher when compared to unvaccinated individuals with an odds ratio (association between an exposure and an outcome) of 1.36. In other words, the vaccinated were 36% more likely to get coronavirus.

  2. ggita32 says:

    The Covid vaccine: simple facts staring us in the face

    Public health agencies readily admit that people with weakened immune systems should not be vaccinated.

    But the language they use is dodgy and incomplete. The CDC states: “A vaccine should not be administered when a contraindication is present; for example, MMR vaccine should not be administered to severely immunocompromised persons…Severely immunocompromised persons generally should not receive live vaccines…”

    No word about killed-virus vaccines. No word about the dangers of vaccine components, such as aluminum and formaldehyde.

  3. ggita32 says:

    A month or so ago, a reader made a crucial point: researchers and writers should make it clear whether they are operating from WITHIN the official paradigm of the epidemic, in order to reveal gross inconsistencies and internal contradictions; or whether they are standing OUTSIDE that paradigm and attacking its basic foundations.

    Going further, we need to drill down to the roots of the poisonous tree.

    Some people make this calculation: “I don’t want my view to appear too radical. That would drive the audience away. So I’ll cut myself off at a certain point and try to give the audience pieces of the puzzle they can digest…”

    For example, they would assert: “I’m not against vaccines. I just want to make them safer.”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s