The truth seeps out about the AGW warmist exaggerations and worse. Even though the CSIRO have been shown up as “agents” for the IPCC et al, the Australian government still persist in using their data to support the government drive for the carbon tax.
It is hard to believe that the government personnel can be so ignorant of the truth. It is easy to believe that they are in fact well aware, and that they are fully engaged with the UN attempts to control individual governments and countries. There are too many factors supporting the world government scheme, some of them openly admitted, for it to be anything other than a reality.
- Gillard, Labour, Independents & Greens. Gillard(Quote) : “There will be no carbon tax under my Government”. Lying cunt ! Gillard(Quote) : “They [voters] got used to the G.S.T ?” The GST – WAS a fucking rip-off. The carbon tax – IS a fucking rip-off. You r (heavycalibre.me)
- India rakes up carbon tax issue with Australia (thehindu.com)
- The Carbon Tax. Why I Hate It (phillthedill.com)
Guest post by Cliff Ollier
The Australian (March 24) reports that Port Macquarie Hastings Council is recommending the enforcement of a “planned retreat” because of an alleged danger from sea level rise in the distant future. The controversy about moving people from near-shore sites raises two questions: is the alarming rise in sea level projected by CSIRO reliable, and is moving people the correct response?
The CSIRO projection is in fact extreme. Before explaining why, I should like to note that the world’s main source of alarmism is the IPCC. This is not really a scientific body, but one that adjusts data and subjects it to mathematical modelling before passing its ‘projections’ on to politicians. The IPCC is followed by the CSIRO and Bureau of Meteorology, who further adjust data and produce more models with even more extreme scenarios.
View original post 776 more words