This post is provocative in that it discusses what would, or should be, classified as immoral, unethical and illegal. In the US and in any free country, it would be contrary to its Constitution and civil liberties standards.
We are talking about compulsory sterilization. Occasionally in the best interests of the person and society but here the idea is taken much further. In extreme implementation it amounts to genocide. It has been suggested that it is a method of population control associated with the globalist desire to drastically reduce the drain on our planet’s resources in order to maintain high living standards for the higher echelon.
There are definite activities in place that provide justification for such suspicions, if not certainties. Because I lean in that direction I see this ‘foodfreedom’ article by William Davies and posted by ‘coto2admin’ as a genuine, relevant discussion. As the article suggests “the question should be asked”.
Wikipedia mistakenly defines Compulsory Sterilization as “Compulsory sterilization (or sterilisation), also known as forced sterilization (or sterilisation), programs are government policies which attempt to force people to undergo surgical sterilization.
But surgery is not necessary to sterilize. During WWII, the Nazis experimented on people at Auschwitz to develop vaccines that sterilize at routine doctor’s appointments under the guise of medical treatment.“In July 1942 Lieutenant General Rudolf Brandt, Himmler’s personal advisor (Strzelecka 1996), contacted Clauberg, asking on behalf of Himmler, [how long it would take] to sterilize 1000 Jewesses. The Jewesses themselves should not know anything about it. As the SS Reich Leader [Himmler] understands it, you could give the appropriate injection during a general examination.”
This use of vaccines to sterilize continued beyond WWII, including under the aegis of WHO, where the intent was hidden. Wiliam Engdahl reports that:“… since the 1920’s the Rockefeller Foundation had funded the eugenics research in Germany through the Kaiser-Wilhelm Institutes in Berlin and Munich, including well into the Third Reich. They praised the forced sterilization of people by Hitler Germany, and the Nazi ideas on race “purity.” It was John D. Rockefeller III, a life-long advocate of eugenics, who used his “tax free” foundation money to initiate the population reduction neo-Malthusian movement through his private Population Council in New York beginning in the 1950’s.
Some chronology of government involvement in eugenics after WWII, dates highlighted:
“California led the nation, performing nearly all sterilization procedures with little or no due process. In its first 25 years of eugenics legislation, California sterilized 9,782 individuals, mostly women. Many were classified as “bad girls,” diagnosed as “passionate,” “oversexed” or “sexually wayward.” At the Sonoma State Home, some women were sterilized because of what was deemed an abnormally large clitoris or labia.
“In 1933 alone, at least 1,278 coercive sterilizations were performed, 700 on women. The state’s two leading sterilization mills in 1933 were Sonoma State Home with 388 operations and Patton State Hospital with 363 operations. Other sterilization centers included Agnews, Mendocino, Napa, Norwalk, Stockton and Pacific Colony state hospitals.
“Even the U.S. Supreme Court endorsed aspects of eugenics. In its infamous 1927 decision, Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes wrote, “It is better for all the world, if instead of waiting to execute degenerate offspring for crime, or to let them starve for their imbecility, society can prevent those who are manifestly unfit from continuing their kind . . . Three generations of imbeciles are enough.” This decision opened the floodgates for thousands to be coercively sterilized or otherwise persecuted as subhuman.
“In 1967 the American Public Health Association and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists conducted a study and found that 54 percent of the teaching hospitals nation-wide “… made sterilization a requirement for winning approval for an abortion” (Weisbord, 1975: 155). A Look at the Indian Health Service Policy of Sterilization, 1972-1976 by Charles R. England
In 1970, George H W Bush authored the Family Planning Act which funded the sterilization of Native American women.
Engdahl continues about Bill Gates and the WHO and sterilization by vaccine:
“The idea of using vaccines to covertly reduce births in the Third World is also not new. Bill Gates’ good friend, David Rockefeller and his Rockefeller Foundation were involved as early as 1972 in a major project together with WHO and others to perfect another “new vaccine.”
“The results of the WHO-Rockefeller project were put into mass application on human guinea pigs in the early 1990′s. The WHO oversaw massive vaccination campaigns against tetanus in Nicaragua, Mexico and the Philippines. Comite Pro Vida de Mexico, a Roman Catholic lay organization, became suspicious of the motives behind the WHO program and decided to test numerous vials of the vaccine and found them to contain human Chorionic Gonadotrophin, or hCG. That was a curious component for a vaccine designed to protect people against lock-jaw arising from infection with rusty nail wounds or other contact with certain bacteria found in soil. The tetanus disease was indeed, also rather rare. It was also curious because hCG was a natural hormone needed to maintain a pregnancy. However, when combined with a tetanus toxoid carrier, it stimulated formation of antibodies against hCG, rendering a woman incapable of maintaining a pregnancy, a form of concealed abortion. Similar reports of vaccines laced with hCG hormones came from the Philippines and Nicaragua.”
In 1974, Henry Kissinger wrote “National Security Council Document 20506: Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for U.S. Security and Overseas Interests”This 1974 memorandum drafted by Henry Kissinger led directly to the unleashing of experimental vaccines on the unsuspecting public. It sighted countries as targets for “initial population reduction experimentation to be implemented around the year 2000″. They identified India, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Nigeria, Mexico, Indonesia, Brazil, Philippines, Thailand, Egypt, Turkey, Ethiopia & Columbia for study. 3 million Filipinos ages 12-48 were given a test vaccine that ruined their health. North American Black & Native American Women were each given the same vaccine resulting in sterility rates of 25% & 35% respectively. The directive came from the WHO and was directly tied to Kissinger’s report. [Emphasis added.]
George Bush between 2000 and 2008 politicized and undermined the US science agencies, including the CDC which is closely tied to the vaccine manufacturers. Robert Kennedy Jr. wrote about the Junk Science created because of Bush.“As a favor to utility and coal industries, America’s largest mercury dischargers, the EPA sat for nine months on a report exposing the catastrophic impact on children’s health of mercury, finally releasing it in February 2003. Among the findings of the report: The bloodstream of one in twelve US women is saturated with enough mercury to cause neurological damage, permanent IQ loss and a grim inventory of other diseases in their unborn children.”
The CDC has been lying since 2001 about the relation between mercury and autism, “reporting” that mercury in vaccines has no impact on children. There is mercury in the flu vaccines and some of the mandated vaccines for American children (who get 2-3 times more vaccines than any other children in the world). The CDC has known for over a decade that there was a connection between mercury and autism and FOIAs show that the CDC colluded in covering up the link between autism and mercury.“The Coalition for Mercury-free Drugs (CoMeD) exposes communications between Centers for Disease Control (CDC) personnel and vaccine researchers revealing U.S. officials apparently colluded in covering-up the decline in Denmark’s autism rates following the removal of mercury from vaccines. ….“In the final draft version of the publication submitted to Pediatrics, the data from 2001 showing a decline in autism was not mentioned. Ignoring this omission, the CDC continued to endorse the article and, in a December 10, 2002 recommendation letter to the editor of Pediatrics, encouraged expedited review and publication of the article. The misleading Danish article was published by Pediatrics in 2003.“Dr. Poul Thorsen, one of the co-authors and “scientist in residence” at the CDC 2000-2002, subsequently was terminated by Aarhus University and indicted in Atlanta for embezzlement this year in relation to his $11 million grant from the CDC.”
Though it must legally respond to within 20 days to FOIA (Freedom of Information Act) requests, the CDC – after almost 7 years of not responding requests concerning vaccines from a doctor with an autistic son – was ordered on September 30, 2011 by federal judge to release FOIA documents concerning vaccines. Within less than a month, the Obama administration was criticized by the Denver Post wrotean editorial not realizing the order the CDC had just gotten.
“It’s profoundly disappointing to see the Obama administration proposing changes to FOIA that would allow federal agencies to lie about the very existence of information being sought.
“That’s not progress, and it’s certainly not transparency, a principle the president has repeatedly and publicly pledged allegiance to.
“The worst among [the proposed changes], in our estimation, is the proposed change that would allow the government to tell those requesting information under FOIA that the material does not exist when, in fact, it does. ….
“Moving from a Glomar denial to outright deceit would have even broader ramifications if the person denied information were to decide to take the matter to court.
“In that case, would the government be in a position of lying to the court about the existence of information? ….
“If agencies are exercising legally allowable exceptions to the law and withholding certain records, they can just continue to do as they do today: neither confirm nor deny the information’s existence” …..
This is all the more relevant since FOIAs in the UK, released in March of this year, reveal a 30 year cover-up the government’s knowledge that vaccines don’t work, cause the diseases they are claimed to prevent, and that the government had done all possible to block safety studies and colluded in lying to the public about vaccines’ safety and efficacy. http://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com/2012/03/14/government-experts-cover-up-vaccine-hazards/
Part I of this article offers an abbreviated look at
- compulsory sterilization in the US,
- GHW Bush’s involvement in a law to sterilize Native Americans.,
- Henry Kissinger’s report to the US government suggesting vaccines for sterilization,
- the CDC’s illegally withholding FOIA documents concerning vaccines, and
- the Obama administration immediately after the CDC was ordered to produce the vaccine documents, using its DOJ to suggest changes to FOIA that would allow agencies (including the CDC) to declare the documents non-existent.
While there are trillions wrapped up in the sale of vaccines, is there an even more compelling reason for Obama to propose something as drastic as the non-existence of documents?
George W. Bush had pandemic laws put in place that are essentially martial. If a pandemic is declared, the Constitution could be suspended. The belief that vaccines are the means to save us from life-threatening diseases are the central ground upon which the pandemic laws rest. If it were known that vaccines do not only not work but actually cause diseases, the right of the government to force vaccines containing unknown materials into people against their will, collapses. With it goes the pandemic laws and martial law itself.
As it stands now, Bush pandemic laws would force untested, unknown vaccines on the entire country if CDC merely declares an emergency. And yet the CDC seems unaware of the bogusness of pandemics, still promoting the exposed myth that there was a killer influenza in 1918-19. The CDC is still treating avian flu as though it were real (it is not), and the CDC put out grossly exaggerated data to create the false impression of an H1N1 pandemic. In all cases the CDC’s ignorance or complicity in pandemics have been the basis of promoting vaccines.
Since it was aspirin that killed millions in 1918-19 due to its immunosuppressive impact and toxicity, it is worrisome that vaccines being promoting by the CDC as the means to prevent “another pandemic like 1918″ – that never happened – are extremely immunosuppressive, in addition to containing mercury and many other neurotoxins. The CDC is in fact part of setting up a situation worse than 1918 in terms of potential deaths.
In 2009, the CDC put pregnant women first in line for the H1N1 vaccines. In doing this, it violated its own previous contraindications against vaccinating pregnant women. It also didn’t inform doctors or pregnant women that the H1N1 vaccines contain polysorbate 80, the preferred ingredient in a patent to impair fertility, or that it contains mercury, directly linked to autism. And after urging the H1N1 vaccine on pregnant women without that vital information for the life of their fetus, thus removing any semblance of “informed” consent, the CDC has covered up the 700% increase in miscarriages which occurred.
[From private conversation: A young black woman who was 5 months pregnant during a healthy, normal pregnancy, was told by her doctor to follow CDC advice and get the H1N1 vaccine. She did and aborted a dead baby two weeks later. The pediatrician said the baby had died two weeks before. This scenario was common for many of the women who lost babies.]
According to [this] report,
” ….the rate of miscarriage among pregnant women during the 2009 H1N1 / swine flu pandemic soared by over 700 percent compared to previous years, pointing directly to the vaccine as the culprit — but the CDC denies the truth and continues to insist nobody has been harmed. ….
“This upcoming 2010/11 flu vaccine contains the same elements that are implicated in the killing of these fetuses, the H1N1 viral component and the neurotoxin mercury (Thimerosal). Additionally, it contains two other viral strains — a three-in-one shot for all people.”
“Overall, the number of vaccine-related “fetal demise” reports increased by 2,440 percent in 2009 compared to previous years, which is even more shocking than the miscarriage statistic.” [Emphasis added.]
Of special relevance to compulsory sterilization, HHS is working with Novartis (infamous for animal abuse) to produce a mixture of polysorbate 80 and squalene, fulfilling the patent on a “Fertility Impairing Vaccine.” Squalene is a adjuvant that boosts the power of what is in a vaccine. It is banned in the US because of its relationship to Gulf War Syndrome.
From Dr. Anders Bruun Laursen, reporting on the H1N1 vaccines:
“Prof Garry was the man to discover the connection between the Gulf War syndrome and squalene.”According to his findings, the Gulf War syndrome was caused by squalene, which was banned by a Federal Court Judge in 2004 from the Pentagon´s use. (6)” …. the Pandremix vaccine contains 10,68 mg of squalene per 0,5 ml. This corresponds to 2.136.0000 microgrammes pr. billion microgrammes of water, i.e. one million times more squalene per dose than in (4). There is any reason to believe that this will make people sick to a much higher extent than in 1990/91. This appears murderous to me.” [Emphasis added.]
WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION checklist for influenza pandemic preparedness planning: Section 1.5.1 Legal and ethical issues –
“During a pandemic, it may be necessary to overrule existing legislation or (individual) human rights. Examples are the enforcement of quarantine (overruling individual freedom of movement), use of privately owned buildings for hospitals, off-license use of drugs, compulsory vaccination or implementation of emergency shifts in essential services. These decisions need a legal framework to ensure transparent assessment and justification of the measures that are being considered, and to ensure coherence with international legislation (International Health Regulations).” http://www.who.int/csr/resources/publications/influenza/FluCheck6web.pdf
Bush provided the pandemics laws that intersect with the WHO’s health regulations. Obama just signed an executive order putting the US into alignment with international laws. The WHO has been the driver of covert sterilizing campaigns with vaccines around the world, and just threatened Pakistan for attempting to suspend Gates, WHO, World Bank polio vaccines until the Pakistani government was sure the vaccines were safe and effective. The vaccines are causing mass paralysis there.
George Bush pushed through the pandemic laws in the US using the false fear that there would again be a pandemic like the 1918 flu pandemic. There was no flu pandemic in 1918. Millions died but they died because of the pharmaceutical industry’s “miracle drug,” aspirin, a highly toxic drug that can kill quickly when used in overdose and a potent immunosuppressive which allowed common upper respiratory infections to deteriorate into deadly pneumonias.
The millions of 1918-19 deaths are the result of pharmaceutical industry greed, and the collusion of government, medical authorities, military and corporations. These same groups have gone many steps further under the Bush pandemic laws:
- They have mandated a highly toxic, immunosuppressive “treatment” in advance.
- All liability has been removed, the vaccines themselves do not have to be tested in an emergency.
- Any emergency does not have to be proven which is how the CDC was able to create the impression of an H1N1 pandemic with exaggerated data.
Just as the CDC has blocked FOIA requests about vaccines up until today, the CDC during 2009 refused to respond to FOIA and even attempted to block a CBS investigation. When the false data was exposed by CBS, Obama put the country under a (false) emergency but an emergency which activated FEMA (which is central to larger plans to end the Constitution and declare martial law) and removed all requirements to test vaccines used for “an emergency.”
CDC was complicit in all this, which arranges to mandate untested vaccines for the country for any emergency the CDC may declare.
The CDC’s mandatory vaccine schedule for children includes an ingredient central to a patent to impair fertility and it is in every vaccine. No parent is “informed.” The H1N1 vaccine, proven deadly to fetuses, also contains this ingredient and is inside the seasonal flu vaccine.
More importantly, vaccines are not working and even killing.
The mass vaccine-induced paralysis of children in India and Pakistan should begin to break down the blind trust in vaccines as protecting children from diseases. The strain is twice as deadly as natural polio (in the Indian Journal of Medical Ethics Vol IX No 2 April – June 2012 Page 114-7, in an article entitled “Polio programme: let us declare victory and move on.”
But miscellaneous studies have shown the many dangers from vaccines for years. The CDC is aware that the vaccines are causing autism but acting to hide that data. They are also covering up that the vaccines are killing fetuses. And they must be aware that the UK government’s documents show that vaccines are ineffective and a health hazard.
Its own mandated vaccines in the US such as pertussis, measles, Hep B, and Hib [“Hib vaccine does not reduce the torment of disease …” Zubair Lone & Jacob Puliyel *] are not protecting children but actually giving them diseases.
Given the CDC’s behavior
- in hiding data of harm from vaccines that would be given to infants and children,
- in putting out false data that led to a phony pandemic it used to push an untested vaccine,
- in reversing years of its own caution and suddenly urging vaccines (untested) on pregnant women,
- in causing huge numbers of miscarriages and covering those up as well up,
and since the vaccines are not for health, then one must ask, what is going on with the CDC and vaccines?
What do the vaccines all have in common?
All the mandated vaccines for American children contain polysorbate 80.
Are vaccines with polysorbate 80, an ingredient known to damage fertility, and the preferred ingredient in a patent to do just that, going to destroy the fertility of American children through the 69 exposures they face with them? If so, could the country reasonably infer that such a mandated vaccine schedule is compulsory sterilization?
Those behind such policies no longer speak openly about their desire to get rid of “undesirables.” That became unacceptable after what the pharmaceutical industry did during the Holocaust. It is clear, though, that even after WWII, the Bushes and others have been actively involved in sterilizing people, in the US and elsewhere and it is clear that the wealthiest of the wealthy seek a severe reduction in population. William Engdahl reports on Bill Gates’ interest in vaccines to reduce population.
“Gates and Buffett are major funders of global population reduction programs, as is Turner, whose UN Foundation was created to funnel $1 billion of his tax-free stock option earnings in AOL-Time-Warner into various birth reduction programs in the developing world.19 The programs in Africa and elsewhere are masked as philanthropy and providing health services for poor Africans. In reality they involve involuntary population sterilization via vaccination and other medicines that make women of child-bearing age infertile. ….”Health experts point out that were the intent of Gates really to improve the health and well-being of black Africans, the same hundreds of millions of dollars the Gates Foundation has invested in untested and unsafe vaccines could be used in providing minimal sanitary water and sewage systems. Vaccinating a child who then goes to drink feces-polluted river water is hardly healthy in any respect. But of course cleaning up the water and sewage systems of Africa would revolutionize the health conditions of the Continent.” Gates’ TED2010 comments about having new vaccines to reduce global population were obviously no off-the-cuff remark. For those who doubt, the presentation Gates made at the TED2009 annual gathering said almost exactly the same thing about reducing population to cut global warming. For the mighty and powerful of the Good Club, human beings seem to be a form of pollution equal to CO2.”
Given all this information, one must ask:
Has compulsory sterilization returned to the US in the form of the CDC’s mandated vaccine schedule for all American children?
- Forced Sterilization: Courtesy of Your … Corn? (nowewont.ning.com)