3 Responses to AGW – A Peer-Reviewed Deception – The “Sky is Not Falling”

1. omanuel says:

   April 30, 2013 at 21:16

   Fear and loathing of humans – with knowledge of the source of energy that destroyed Hiroshima and Nagasaki on 6 and 9 Aug 1945 – convinced world leaders to form the United Nations on 24 Oct 1945 and to deceive the public in 1946 [1] about the source of energy that makes elements and sustains our lives.

   This review [2] show experimental data that were ignored over the past half century to promote the Standard Solar Model of H-filled stars and an initial Big Bang that explosively made Hydrogen from nothing at the imaginary start of the universe when time, t = 0.

   With kind regards,
   Oliver K. Manuel
   Former NASA Principal
   Investigator for Apollo

   [1] Fred Hoyle, “The chemical composition of the stars,” Monthly Notices Royal Astronomical Society 106, 255-259 (1946); “The synthesis of elements from hydrogen,” ibid., 343-383 (1946)

   [2] Oliver K. Manuel, “Neutron repulsion,” The Apeiron Journal 19, 123-150 (2012): http://redshift.vif.com/JournalFiles/V19NO2pdf/V19N2MAN.pdf

   Reply
2. Ken McMurtrie says:

   May 11, 2013 at 11:30

   [Moved from smart meter stream]
   omanuel says:
   May 11, 2013 at 03:53 (Edit)

   Ken,

   I just received this announcement that astronomers and nuclear physicists from around the world are completing a five day symposium on neutron stars:

   http://www.astron.nl/about-astron/press-public/news/neutron-stars-laboratory/neutron-stars-laboratory

   Peter Jonker chaired the scientific committee.

   The announcement includes this “artist impression”>/i> of the source of energy in the Sun [1] and the Crab Nebula [2].

   

   This explains why climate scientists couldn’t find a link between CO2 and global climate changes.

   With kind regards,
   – Oliver K. Manuel
   Former NASA Principal
   Investigator for Apollo

   [1] I. G. Usoskin, et al., “The AD775 cosmic event revisited: The Sun is to blame,” A&A Letters 552, L3 (2013): http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201321080;

   Reply
   • omanuel says:

     May 11, 2013 at 12:25

     Thanks, Ken. Here is the second reference:

     [2] A.A. Abdo et al., “Gamma-ray flares from the Crab Nebula,” Science 331, 739-742 (2011): https://www.sciencemag.org/content/331/6018/739.abstract

     “A young and energetic pulsar powers the well-known Crab Nebula” [2]. When neutron repulsion was discovered in 2000, it was widely believed that neutron stars were but “dead nuclear embers” of stars formerly heated by fusion [3].

     [3] H. Heiselberg, “Neutron star masses, radii and equation of state,” In: R. Ouyed
     and F. Sannion, Eds., Proceedings of the Conference on Compact Stars in the
     QCD Phase Diagram, eConf C010815, Copenhagen, Denmark, Nordic Institute for Theoretical Physics (2002) pp. 3-16
     http://www.arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/?0201465

     Reply