US Department of Defence Spending – Should be of interest to All Americans.


This post from”Boiling Frogs Post” highlights the massive expenditure by the US government on warfare and related, (sometimes not), projects inside and out of the US.

Hardly an example of responsible government, you might agree?

BFP Exclusive Report- A Distillation of DOD Funding Priorities for February 2014,   by Christian Sorensen

DOD spent $32,625,578,305+ on 181 individual contracts in February 2014The Pentagon issues a jumbled list of contracts every business day around 5:00PM local time. Our project distills an entire month of these contracts into an accessible form. The Department of Defense (DOD) spent at least $32,625,578,305 on 181 individual contracts during February 2014.

– See more at: http://www.boilingfrogspost.com/2014/03/14/bfp-exclusive-report-a-distillation-of-dod-funding-priorities-for-february-2014/#sthash.Kl4I5TZq.dpuf

The Pentagon issues a jumbled list of contracts every business day around 5:00PM local time. Our project distills an entire month of these contracts into an accessible form.

The Department of Defense (DOD) spent at least $32,625,578,305 on 181 individual contracts during February 2014.

Read all about it here.

BFP Exclusive Report- A Distillation of DOD Funding Priorities for February 2014

– See more at: http://www.boilingfrogspost.com/2014/03/14/bfp-exclusive-report-a-distillation-of-dod-funding-priorities-for-february-2014/#sthash.Kl4I5TZq.dpuf

About Ken McMurtrie

Retired Electronics Engineer, most recently installing and maintaining medical X-Ray equipment. A mature age "student" of Life and Nature, an advocate of Truth, Justice and Humanity, promoting awareness of the injustices in the world.
This entry was posted in Financial Crisis, Globalism, Human Behaviour, Justice, Politics, united states and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to US Department of Defence Spending – Should be of interest to All Americans.

    • omanuel says:

      Survival of the human species was threatened by two FALSEHOODS inserted into textbooks of astronomy and nuclear physics after 1945, without discussion or debate:

      1. Cores of ordinary stars are NEUTRONS, not hydrogen.

      2. Aston’s “nuclear packing fraction” correctly indicates NUCLEAR STABILITY; Weizsacker’s “average nuclear binding energy” does NOT tell NUCLEAR STABILITY.

      See: “A Journey to the Core of the Sun” Chapter 2: Acceptance of Reality

  1. kristalklear says:

    Reblogged this on THE INTERNET POST.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s