Nature abhors a positive feedback


The IPCC “science” relies on ASSUMING a positive feedback relationship between global temperature and CO2.
There is, in fact, no valid evidence to support the assumption.
Therefore, their computer modelling exaggerates the influence of CO2.

In practice, it is shown to be invalid by the accepted computed average global temperature trend being far less than they predicted.

Fairly straightforward clear-thinking process, one would assume.

Here, we learn the scientific explanation of the relative processes.

About Ken McMurtrie

Retired Electronics Engineer, most recently installing and maintaining medical X-Ray equipment. A mature age "student" of Life and Nature, an advocate of Truth, Justice and Humanity, promoting awareness of the injustices in the world.
This entry was posted in AGW, carbon tax, climate change, ENVIRONMENT and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Nature abhors a positive feedback

  1. omanuel says:

    JoNova and David Evans may confirm [1] Earth’s climate is driven by the Sun’s deep-seated magnetic fields (and the X Force) from the Sun’s compact innards (Fe-mantle and/or pulsar core).

    http://joannenova.com.au/2014/06/big-news-part-iv-a-huge-leap-understanding-the-mysterious-11-year-solar-delay/

    1. “Super-fluidity in the solar interior: Implications for solar eruptions and climate”, Journal of Fusion Energy 21, 193-198 (2002)]: http://www.springerlink.com/content/r2352635vv166363/ or http://www.omatumr.com/abstracts2003/jfe-superfluidity.pdf

  2. omanuel says:

    Thanks, Ken, the strange behavior of mainstream scientists and politicians as the AGW skeptics won the global climate debate cannot be understood without grasping the implication of largely unreported events in August 1945 that scared world leaders into taking totalitarian control of society:

    Click to access CHAOS_and_FEAR_August_1945.pdf

Leave a comment