Nature abhors a positive feedback

The IPCC “science” relies on ASSUMING a positive feedback relationship between global temperature and CO2.
There is, in fact, no valid evidence to support the assumption.
Therefore, their computer modelling exaggerates the influence of CO2.

In practice, it is shown to be invalid by the accepted computed average global temperature trend being far less than they predicted.

Fairly straightforward clear-thinking process, one would assume.

Here, we learn the scientific explanation of the relative processes.

Watts Up With That?

positive_feedback This is a positive feedback loop. The input is increased carbon dioxide, which begins this positive feedback loop. Image courtesy of NASA Earth Observatory

Negative Feedback Prevents Harmful Temperatures from Carbon Dioxide

Guest essay by Bryce Johnson

The purpose of the article is to contribute to refuting the false alarm that has been generated worldwide about excess global warming caused by atmospheric carbon dioxide, primarily by mischaracterizing its inherently negative feedback.

Feedback is the effect that the result of a process has on itself. Positive feedback augments the result and negative feedback diminishes it. A negative feedback does not preclude an increase in the results of a process but it does limit the ultimate magnitude of the increase. Most feedbacks in nature are negative or soon become negative. Otherwise we would have been destroyed by nature some time ago. Positive feedbacks can cause runaway effects. Nature abhors a positive feedback.

View original post 8,497 more words

About Ken McMurtrie

Retired Electronics Engineer, most recently installing and maintaining medical X-Ray equipment. A mature age "student" of Life and Nature, an advocate of Truth, Justice and Humanity, promoting awareness of the injustices in the world.
This entry was posted in AGW, carbon tax, climate change, ENVIRONMENT and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Nature abhors a positive feedback

  1. omanuel says:

    JoNova and David Evans may confirm [1] Earth’s climate is driven by the Sun’s deep-seated magnetic fields (and the X Force) from the Sun’s compact innards (Fe-mantle and/or pulsar core).

    1. “Super-fluidity in the solar interior: Implications for solar eruptions and climate”, Journal of Fusion Energy 21, 193-198 (2002)]: or

  2. omanuel says:

    Thanks, Ken, the strange behavior of mainstream scientists and politicians as the AGW skeptics won the global climate debate cannot be understood without grasping the implication of largely unreported events in August 1945 that scared world leaders into taking totalitarian control of society:

    Click to access CHAOS_and_FEAR_August_1945.pdf

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s