This is a significant post.
If you don’t understand statistics fully, and I don’t, you should still understand what is spelt out here.
How inappropriate use of statistics has lead to many people believing incorrect conclusions and therefore, to incorrect decision-making.
A very significant element in the serious errors that relate to the “global warming” acceptance without justification.
Guest essay by Dr Tim Ball
Never try to walk across a river just because it has an average depth of four feet. Martin Friedman
“Statistics: The only science that enables different experts using the same figures to draw different conclusions.“ Evan Esar
I am not a statistician. I took university level statistics because I knew, as a climatologist, I needed to know enough to ask statisticians the right questions and understand the answers. I was mindful of what the Wegman Committee later identified as a failure of those working on the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) paleoclimate reconstructions.
It is important to note the isolation of the paleoclimate community; even though they rely heavily on statistical methods they do not seem to be interacting with the statistical community.
View original post 1,324 more words
The GOLDEN RULE 