A clear, comprehensive, convincing article that discusses the political agenda associated with the “climate change” movement.
“People who knew, didn’t think to question what was going on for a variety of reasons. This situation makes the statement by German meteorologist and physicist Klaus-Eckert Puls even more important.
“Ten years ago I simply parroted what the IPCC told us. One day I started checking the facts and data – first I started with a sense of doubt but then I became outraged when I discovered that much of what the IPCC and the media were telling us was sheer nonsense and was not even supported by any scientific facts and measurements. To this day I still feel shame that as a scientist I made presentations of their science without first checking it.”
Guest Opinion: Dr.Tim Ball
Skeptics have done a reasonable job of explaining what and how the IPCC created bad climate science. Now, as more people understand what the skeptics are saying, the question that most skeptics have not, or do not want to address is being asked – why? What is the motive behind corrupting science to such an extent? Some skeptics seem to believe it is just poor quality scientists, who don’t understand physics, but that doesn’t explain the amount, and obviously deliberate nature, of what has been presented to the public. What motive would you give, when asked?
The first step in understanding, is knowledge about how easily large-scale deceptions are achieved. Here is an explanation from one of the best proponents in history.
“All this was inspired by the principle – which is quite true in itself – that in the big lie there is always…
View original post 1,784 more words
We are living in a matrix of deceit that was designed in OCT 1945 to save the world from nuclear annihilation by:
1. Forming the UN on 24 OCT 1945
2. Promoting false consensus models of cores of atoms, stars and galaxies
3. Exaggerating the danger of nuclear radiation from nuclear reactors [Galen Winson, “The Nuclear Scare Scam”]
The survival of humanity depends on our success in escaping this matrix of deceit that began sixty-nine years ago and George Orwell started to describe sixty-eight years ago in “Nineteen Eighty-Four.”
Exaggerating the danger of radiation from nuclear reactors is one thing but the dangers are real and long lived. To claim that radiation dangers are to be ignored is as foolish as exaggerating them.
Radiation dangers do not need to be ignored. They need to be explained, honestly.
“Sunburn” is, for example, one well-known symptom from exposure to ultraviolet radiation.
Do you have any personal knowledge of radiation safety?
Galen Winson worked in that field for many years.