Thoughts relating to the much promoted and strongly supported “Climate Change” ‘danger to civilization’ movement:

It is entirely logical to consider this global attack on our well-being as an aberration of scientific principles and political agenda.

A few of the vast number of relevant articles to give cause to think about what it all really means:

Threat of ANAO Audit means Australia’s BOM throws out temperature set,

Leading questions on the Paris climate treaty

“Right. A path toward less plant fertilizing carbon dioxide, to prevent “unprecedented disasters” that aren’t happening (except in SimPlanet computer models), by stabilizing a perpetually changing climate that is driven by powerful natural forces over which humans have no control – under a 2015 Paris treaty that will inflict global governance by unelected activists and bureaucrats, bring lower living standards to billions, and initiate wealth redistribution of at least $100 billion a year to ruling elites in poor countries.”

Global Warming Hoax Spiraling Into Radical Tyrannical Beast

“Unfortunately for the global warming alarmists who are completely immune to logic and reason or any natural laws of science, the atmosphere, sunlight or any other laws of nature that interferes with their personal tyrannical global government agenda, not everyone is indulging in this heavily funded blind climate change lunacy dogma that is seemingly sweeping the globe leading up the U.N. conference in Paris.”

• Is the planet warming because of carbon dioxide influences?
• Is it actually warming because of man’s influences, other than our physical presence, urban infrastructure development and deforestation?
• Is it apparently warming because of temperature measurement siting, selection and creative computing?
• Is it warming at all?
• If it is warming, is it causing current climatic events, and will it do so into the future?
• IF warming was causing potentially destructive issues, is there anything currently adopted or proposed by the UN authorities which will actually, significantly affect the warming?

All these questions remain without official, scientifically based answers. The integrity of the science currently supporting drastic carbon controls, and financial and political upheavals being forced onto our population, is justifiably being questioned and must be addressed if we are to have justice in this world.