Today, another impressive climate realist post,  thanks to ‘Casual Infamy‘, by John.

Unsure about the source of the image, but it is more likely to be closer to the truth than any climate alarmist claims, which we know to be wrong! No doubt about the ‘hoax’ but the scientist number needs validating.

A collection of the most mind-boggling and fraudulent claims regarding the climate change hoax echoed by a compliant, brain-dead media.

To keep the climate change money train from derailing, climate charlatans are now saying that global warming will be felt in ten years. Add this to the long list of excuses for the no-global-warming-for-nineteen-years haitus. In other words, what we emit today will be felt ten years on. This, is based on computer models. You have to appreciate the temerity and desperation of these reports. It’s time someone modelled how long a career in climate modelling will last. How about an incentive plan. If you’re right, you keep your job, if you’re wrong you go and flip hamburgers at McDonalds.

On November 2, the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) sent out it’s assessment of the state of the world’s climate. Reading between the lines, it said, “Give us $trillions or you will fry! There will be storms, floods, droughts, winds and pestilence. We really mean it this time.” In 2007, IPCC chairman Pachauri was quoted in the New York Times as saying, “If there’s no action before 2012, that’s too late. What we do in the next two to three years will determine our very future. This is the defining moment.” 2012 came and went, with no new emissions agreement being finalised. But like an old time preacher, the IPCC continues to threaten us with hellfire and damnation.

What will it take to convince the true believers of global warming that they have simply been led up a garden path? A garden path paved in gold for the scammers of the UN, the IPCC and all those set for a windfall in carbon credit trading. Ban Ki-moon is throwing everything he has at the failing global warming hoax in one last ditch stand to try to justify his tenure as Secretary General which ends soon. The IPCC is not in any way a scientific body, it’s no more than a publicity arm of warming lobbyists stacked with well-paid misfits who are set for a windfall if they can pull this one off. The IPCC’s job is to collate, and present as fact, papers of the pro-warming nutters holed up in universities and the far Left and Greens who dream of a UN dominated world financed by a carbon scam worth trillions a year. The UN receives 10 per cent of all receipts from countries running global warming carbon schemes.

The Bureau of Meteorology has been accused of manipulating the historic temperature records to fit a predetermined view of global warming. Science researcher Dr Jennifer Marohasy has analysed the raw data from dozens of locations across Australia, matching it against the new data used by BOM showing that temperatures were progressively warming. In many cases, Dr Marohasy said, temperature trends had changed from a slight cooling to dramatic warming over 100 years. BOM said that data from a big selection of weather stations underwent a process known as “homogenisation” to correct for anomalies. BOM is accused of “rounding up” temperatures in the past so how much can we rely on data adjustments by people convinced that trends should show a warming?

More evidence of the Bureau of Meteorology’s temperature coverup comes from Bourke, where on January 3, 1909, an extremely hot 51.7C (125F) was recorded at Bourke. But the BOM has removed it as a clerical error. In fact, the BOM has also removed the 40 years of weather recorded before 1910. Ian Cole lives in Bourke and runs the local radio station. He says, “The BOM won’t supply any historic record data before the year 2000 to the official Weatherzone service provider. We keep on being told about records that are not actually records and averages that are not quite right. As a result the “hottest day on record” doesn’t really mean what it seems”.

Further proof that the Bureau Of Meteorology has massaged temperatures shows up in the analysis of the 100-year ­record at the Rutherglen weather station. It shows a cooling of 0.35C in the raw data had become a 1.73C warming after “homogenisation”. BOM now says the discrepancy was caused by the thermometer site moving from a farm building on a small hill to its current location on flat ground. However, the official catalogue of all stations used to make up the national temperature record clearly says the Rutherglen thermometer has not moved since being established in 1913.

 The conclusion: –

The climate scam is dead scientifically. There is nothing left but fraud, lies, corruption, censorship and extortion.

Read it all here.