One comment on this original post makes a good argument.
“Who cares Big Pharma has corrupted public opinion yet again. If people would bother to research the dangers of vaccines, the fact that the pharma industry has immunity from prosecution in the US, the true history of the disastrous first vaccine for smallpox and the statistical evidence that vaccinated children also get the diseases they have been vaccinated against as well as the sometimes crippling or deadly side effects then they would refuse vaccination. It is a parent’s responsibility to find out the surprising truth. Don’t believe the BS about herd immunity and vaccine safety.”
Bottom line is that very few persons require special protection from diseases but cannot be vaccinated because of their specific health problems. (Perhaps ironic that it is admitted that vaccines can damage them, but not healthier people?)
There are, however, many persons who have some adverse reactions, yet they are not eligible for exemption for medical reasons.
It is also ironic that vaccinated children, can, for a short while, actually create a source of contamination themselves.
Why not allow healthy people to make a choice about their children and themselves? They are not jeopardizing anyone else except possibly those who choose to live free from contaminated and documented dangerous vaccines.
Why are the vaccinated so scared about unvaccinated persons? Is that because they have no confidence in the vaccines?
Many lies and much misinformation, are being told in order to support mass vaccinations.
A healthy community with safe water and sanitary services can not be statistically compared to under-developed countries where the seriousness of diseases is real.
Australia has a healthy environment and infrastructure, its statistics do not support mandatory vaccinations! If we are concerned about travellers visiting or migrants moving to Australia bringing in diseases, the health department should ensure that their health is certified, voluntarily vaccinated or quarantined.
Similarly, our people travelling overseas would appear to be genuine candidates for vaccines, but that raises other issues.
Finally, if you believe that there is no evidence linking autism to vaccines, you are certainly lacking in knowledge from readily available, genuine documentation. Unfortunately this situation also applies to practitioners in the medical profession, right to the AMA director.
[Reference http://www.getcancercure.com/fda-announce-that-dtap-vaccine-causes-autism/ “The FDA have published conclusive proof on their website that the DTap vaccine causes autism.”
” Here’s an excerpt from approved vaccines by the FDA and their adverse events.
” – Adverse events reported during post-approval use of Tripedia vaccine include idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura, SIDS, anaphylactic reaction, cellulitis, autism, convulsion/grand mal convulsion, encephalopathy, hypotonia, neuropathy, somnolence and apnea. “ ” ]
There exist copious references adding real support to this unbiassed assessment, all of which is denied unscientifically or ignored by the vaccine pushers. Meanwhile steadfastly refusing to encourage independent scientific studies.
The Australian government wants to ban unvaccinated children from nursery schools across the country.
Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull has written to state and territory leaders to push for nationally consistent laws to protect young children from disease.
Under his new proposal, the immunisation rates of all preschools and daycare centres would be made publicly available to parents, and the right to make a formal objection to vaccination would end.’