Much has been “said”, here and mostly elsewhere, about the vast vaccination topic.

Starting with whether it is true, or false, to claim “vaccines are ‘safe’ and ‘effective'”.

It is logical to label the claim as ‘false’ on the basis of indisputable evidence that vaccines are not always safe, a clear admission by pharmaceutical personnel and recorded awards for vaccine damages in court rulings. ‘Effectiveness’, is a little less definable, but professional vaccine promoters are usually honest enough to include covers such as “generally”, “mostly”, or similar language.

It is usually the likes of politicians and pedantic public supporters who are prepared to make bald, incorrect statements and expect the listener to accept their arguments.

Accepting that “vaccines are generally safe and usually effective”, then raises the questions “to what extent are they safe and effective”?  Answers are in the realm of  “how long is a piece of string”, because the variables are many and varied.

It is also reasonable to pose the questions, “How necessary are the vaccines, in what circumstances do they become justified and in what circumstances can mandatory, indiscriminate and forced applications be justified?”

These, and many other valid questions exist. In an intelligent community they deserve to be listened to, in a civilized community they deserve to be answered. Only in the social media are these issues addressed. There they are met with fierce opposition by authorities and thus their motivation becomes also questionable.

A number of motivations exist for this opposition. Public health, Company profits, Shareholder incomes, Practitioner benefits, Political lobbying rewards, cover most.

There is however, another possible reason which, although unbelievable in an ideal world, would explain the fervour of a), promoting questionable practices and b), opposing logical and commonsense responses. That is the theme of this post and video.

Readers comments are invited.