Early season record cold temperatures stun residents of Alaska

Posted on November 20, 2011 by Ken McMurtrie

An ‘Extinction Protocol 2012 .. ‘ post worthy of publishing. 

In my opinion, all-time-records of low temperatures should have a lowering influence on the “average Global Temperature”.

Perhaps there may be a balance from some all-time high temperatures. Perhaps there is an earth rotational axis shift contributing to weather pattern changes.

No firm conclusion is to be made here, but the incident is noted for reference. Yet this may be food for thought for the ‘warmists’.

November 18, 2011 – FAIRBANKS – A mid-November cold snap seems to have caught even seasoned Fairbanksans off guard. “I don’t think anybody was really expecting this,” 43-year-old Shawn Ross, a lifelong Fairbanksan, said. “This came out of the blue.” For the second time in three days, Fairbanks set a new low temperature record on Thursday. A temperature of 41 degrees below zero — the first 40 below temperature of the season — was recorded at Fairbanks International Airport at 6:29 a.m., according to the National Weather Service in Fairbanks. That broke the old record of 39 below set in 1969. The cold air settling in the flatlands has concentrated air pollution. The Fairbanks North Star Borough issued air quality advisories on Wednesday and Thursday because particulate matter was above the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s standards and rated as unhealthy for sensitive groups. Fairbanks set a new record of 35 below on Tuesday and the temperature bottomed out at 39 below on Wednesday, two degrees shy of the record. Thursday’s record low of 41 below marked the sixth earliest 40-below temperature recorded by the National Weather Service in Fairbanks since 1904. The earliest it’s ever hit 40 below in Fairbanks was Nov. 5, 1907, when it hit 41 below. The last time Fairbanksans saw 40-below temperatures in November was in 1994, when temperatures of 45, 43 and 45 below were recorded on Nov. 24, 25 and 30, respectively. The bitter, early season cold had Interior residents wondering if somebody turned the calendar ahead a month or two. “This sort of thing is certainly more common in December and January than November,” meteorologist Dan Hancock at the National Weather Service in Fairbanks said. “We can go through an entire winter and not get this cold.”Ross, who has owned Badger Towing for 11 years, said even he wasn’t prepared for a cold snap this severe so early in the season. –News Miner excerpt
Related articles
Posted in climate change, ENVIRONMENT, Nature | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

IPCC scientists test the Exit doors

Posted on November 19, 2011 by Ken McMurtrie

FIASCO 2009: Copenhagen

Image by Pierre Marcel via Flickr

Have a look at ‘JoNova’s’ post titled as above.

[The sky may be falling after all – on the AGW scam.]

There are many current IPCC-issued statements that show that they are in damage control mode, but they can only repeat their existing propaganda and have no worthwhile science to contribute.

The most interesting information is in Jo’s update section at the bottom of the article – including “Carbon Tax not seen to be effective by IPCC.”

Congratulations Jo, for this post.

“This is another big tipping point on the slide out of the Great Global Scam. IPCC scientists — facing the travesty of predictions-gone-wrong — are trying to salvage some face, and plant some escape-clause seeds for later. But people are not stupid.

A conveniently leaked IPCC draft is testing the ground. What excuses can they get away with? Hidden underneath some pat lines about how anthropogenic global warming is “likely” to influence… ah cold days and warm days, is the get-out-of-jail clause that’s really a bombshell:

“Uncertainty in the sign of projected changes in climate extremes over the coming two to three decades is relatively large because climate change signals are expected to be relatively small compared to natural climate variability”.

Translated: The natural climate forces are stronger than we thought, and we give up, we can’t say whether it will get warmer or colder in the next twenty years.

This multipurpose prediction means that in the future, if it’s colder, they’re right; if it’s warmer, they’re right; and they have it covered for more or less storms, floods, droughts, blizzards and frost too.

And then there’s the perpetual-motion aspect of the threat. Greenhouse gases might not be dominant now (like they’ve been saying for the last 20 years) but they will be, they tell us. They will be! Look out! The storms are coming, we’re all doomed. (Well we definitely absolutely might be.) Got that?

If the century progresses without restraints on greenhouse gas emissions, their impacts will come to dominate, it forecasts:

  • “It is very likely that the length, frequency and/or intensity of warm spells, including heat waves, will continue to increase over most land areas…
  • “It is likely that the frequency of heavy precipitation or the proportion of total rainfall from heavy falls will increase in the 21st Century over many areas of the globe…
  • “Mean tropical cyclone maximum wind speed is likely to increase…
  • “There is medium confidence that droughts will intensify in the 21st Century in some seasons and areas…
  • “Low-probability high-impact changes associated with the crossing of poorly understood thresholds cannot be excluded, given the transient and complex nature of the climate system.”

Then look for the segue where the scientists and activist-journalists, quietly shift the goal-posts;

It’s impossible to read the draft without coming away with the impression that with or without anthropogenic climate change, extreme weather impacts are going to be felt more and more, simply because there are more and more people on planet Earth – particularly in the swelling “megacities” of the developing world that overwhelmingly lie on the coast or on big rivers close to the coast.

That’s an EXIT clause and it reads like this: We might have been wrong about CO2 causing the disasters, but disasters are still coming. More people are going to die from climate catastrophes because there are lots more people! See, “we were right all along to be concerned about the climate”. (Just not quite right about the cause).

This is a handy excuse. Al Gore tried a segue like this out a couple of years ago — pretending that he was just fine tuning his altruistic saintly concern by saying quietly that CO2 wasn’t as bad as he’d thought but Black Carbon (!) was awful pollution. In other words, he’ll never admit he made a bad call, or has been caught pushing a scam, he’ll just say he was right all along, “carbon is still the issue, it’s just a slightly different form”.

These IPCC scientists are using the same technique: Climate Disasters are still the issue — it’s just a slightly different reason.

Repeat after me: AGW is still bad, skeptics are still wrong, and look over here at this slightly new twist on the predictions of disaster.

(See below for the update)

We all know there won’t be a slew of headlines trumpeting:

New IPCC leaked report; Weather could get warmer or colder!

“Storms might be not quite as bad, but could be much worse!”

“IPCC underestimate  natural climate forces! Skeptics correct!”

Obviously this is an all-encompassing all-occasion document. For journalists fishing for disaster, there are ways to find it in the prophesies, and for scientists who want to be able to say “My predictions were right” in five years time, they can find just about any prediction under the sun somewhere in there and point to it to say “I told you so”.

Even Hulme is acknowledging that things are changing and the “climate” meme is receding.

As UK academic Mike Hulme and others have argued, such events will occur whether exacerbated by climate change or not; and vulnerable societies need protection irrespective of climate change.

He’s argued for a divorce, therefore, between the issues of adaptation, which he says could usefully be added into the overall process of overseas development assistance, and mitigation of emissions.

In other words, the money will still flow, it’s just being rebadged. But the developing nations don’t like that. They prefer the current arrangement when developed nations atone for carbon sins and “pay” the third world. The alternative is the same cash, but it’s called “aid” and that comes with more strings. Everyone wants to be paid their rightful due, and no one wants to be “indebted” in any sense.

It’s not proved to be a popular notion with developing world governments, which remain determined to tie the two together in the UN climate process.

Governments of vulnerable countries argue that as developed nations caused the climate change problem, they must compensate those that suffer its impacts with money above and beyond aid.

Developing countries like the fact that under the UN climate process, the rich are committed to funding adaptation for the poor.

That this is all a naked clamor for pork-barreling money and payments to patrons (and not about the poor or the environment) is not even hidden. Black points out that the aid is not getting out as fast as it should:

Yet as the brief prepared for the Dhaka meeting by the humanitarian charity Dara shows, it isn’t happening anywhere near as fast as it ought to be.

Only 8% of the “fast-start finance” pledged in Copenhagen, it says, has actually found its way to recipients.

Where is the outrage? Doesn’t this type of inefficiency or corruption completely undermine any pretense that there is a point in fighting to “solve” the climate problem (assuming there was one). The entire Copenhagen boondoggle was never about helping the world’s poor, because 92% of the money pledged went to “looking good” or funding bureaucrats or was a mythical promise, and hardly anyone cares.

Then, Wait! No. Seriously? You mean the IPCC is not about rigorous scientific analysis free of government influence?

It’s possible – no, it’s “very likely” – that the IPCC draft will be amended as the week progresses, and presumably the governments represented at the Climate Vulnerable Forum will be asking their delegates to inject a greater sense of urgency.

“Asking delegates to inject “urgency”? Wasn’t this supposed to be based on overwhelming evidence, all uncertainties acknowledged, no exaggeration, and the scientific integrity of thousands of the world’s top experts was a given? All along it’s just been a tool for Big-Government to use to suck the money from honest citizens. Even Black knows it.

Does Black realize that he needs an Exit Door too? “The skeptics were always wrong. I was just reporting the scientists who underestimated natural variability”.

No Richard, No. You switched off your brain, stopped investigating, and turned yourself willingly into a mouthpiece for government funded scientists against the unfunded independent scientists who turned out to have been right all along.

The shape-shifting here is entirely predictable. It means the machine adapts to reality, but hardly anyone one gets punished. A bit like the bailouts and fraud on Wall St — no one went to jail. (Occupy Climate anyone?) They just change the letterheads on the parasitic agencies that pretend to help the poor and care about lemurs, and all of them get away with the sloppy reasoning, wasteful practices, bullying, deceit, and corruption.

Unless of course, the internet foils that plan. May we always be free from the forces of censorship.

———————————————————————————————————-

UPDATE: WOW. The leaked IPCC report is making waves

The Australian reports the leaked document as if it is a statement from the IPCC. It’s a front page story. The political class in Australia can’t miss this. As I mentioned above I just heard it repeated on the radio as if the IPCC was not supporting any need for a carbon tax. The Guardian’s writer doesn’t seem to know about the leaked copy.

Review fails to support climate change link

WIDELY-HELD assumptions that climate change is responsible for an upsurge in extreme drought, flood and storm events are not supported by a landmark review of the science.

And a clear climate change signal would not be evident for decades because of natural weather variability.

This blows away many of their favorite propaganda lines. Will it stick? Will the final report really say this, and is there some weasel way out for the IPCC?

The full report will not be released for several months but a leaked copy of the draft summary, details of which have been published by the BBC and a French news agency, have provided a good indication of what it found.

While the human and financial toll of extreme weather events has certainly risen, the cause has been mostly due to increased human settlement rather than worse weather.

There is only “low confidence” that tropical cyclones have become more frequent, “limited to medium evidence available” to assess whether climatic factors have changed the frequency of floods, and “low confidence” on a global scale even on whether the frequency has risen or fallen.

Wait for it, in trying to control the damage from this, Prof Palutikof reveals a deeply unscientific, religious mindset. There is no signal yet of man made influence, but she “knows” it will emerge. A real scientist would wait for the observation.

Jean Palutikof, director of the National Climate Change Adaptation Research Facility at Griffith University, in Queensland, said the findings of the UN report would “not surprise anyone involved in climate science”. Professor Palutikof said it would take a while for the effects of climate change to become visible. But without action, she said, “gradually, over time, that signal will emerge with resounding clarity”.

Ditto for Will Steffen:

The federal government’s climate science adviser, Will Steffen, has acknowledged there is no statistically significant evidence that there has been a change in the behaviour of tropical cyclones.

However, Professor Steffen told the Ten Nework’s The Bolt Report at the weekend that most experts agreed we would see an increase in intensity in cyclones as the warming continued.

They are coming unstuck.

The only question is how the IPCC will try to do damage control.

Read the complete article.

Related articles
Posted in carbon tax, climate change, ENVIRONMENT, Human Behaviour, Justice | Tagged , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

I Blame The Australian Carbon Tax for Price Increases

Posted on November 18, 2011 by Ken McMurtrie

Wayne Swan and the Carbon Tax

Image by Leonard John Matthews via Flickr

This is a weird  situation.

Prices will increase because of the carbon tax. But price rises will be illegal if not verified by paperwork that the carbon tax is the reason. Carbon police will be afoot!

Lower income persons will be compensated for carbon tax increases, but the correct amount is almost impossible to compute. The Carbon Tax is forever, it seems, and may will probably increase, but the compensation will be at the whim of the government. (Which, of course, can be trusted).

The Carbon Tax is an absolute farce. It has no scientific basis. It has no effect on global pollution. It has been introduced on the basis of fraudulent claims. It removes power from our government and transfers it to outside authorities. It increases costs, will reduce employment, will further unbalance our overseas payments, and will put businesses out of business. Whatever employment may be created will be at the cost of uneconomical subsidisation.

Julia Gillard has made a deal and has had to force it through parliament by cheating on her fellow politicians and the Australian public.

This is all so stupid!

I give you a WUWT post, by Willis Eschenbach:

You likely didn’t realize that the First Rule for the Carbon Tax Club is … nobody talks about the Carbon Tax Club.

And not only that … it could cost the poor Aussies big bucks if they say what I just said about the Carbon Tax Club.

Gotta love totalitarianism in the service of national eco-themed suicide …

Read the full article:

Related articles
Posted in australian, carbon tax, Conspiracies, Human Folly, Justice, Politics | Tagged , , , , , | 3 Comments

Indictment against NATO military and political leaders.

Posted on November 18, 2011 by Ken McMurtrie

An enlargeable map of the Great Socialist Peop...

Image via Wikipedia

More proof of NATO war crimes. This additional NSNBC post details the legal/illegal aspects of the current NATO missions. Keep in mind that its activities are either permitted or condoned by the UN.

This will indeed show up the international legal system’s true colours, sort out the honest from the dishonest.

Courtesy NSNBC “Breaking the Embargo on Truth”

The law case of the century: Indictment against NATO military and political leaders (UPDATED)

NATO: Indictment for breach of international law in the Great Socialist People’s Libyan Arab Jamahiriya. The military and political leaders of NATO are hereby accused of the following crimes committed in the Libyan campaign of 2011, in which the systematic breaches of international law are underlined.

Understanding that international law exists and that it is systematically broken by certain powers with impunity, understanding that such a situation is unacceptable and that the same set of laws should apply to all, equally, with the same sets of weights and measures employed in upholding it, I hereby accuse NATO and the below-mentioned individuals, party to its acts in the Great Socialist People’s Libyan Arab Jamahiriya from February to September (ongoing) 2011, of breach of international law;

1. Accusation: NATO war crimes, crimes against humanity, breach of UN Charter, Breach of UNSC Resolutions, breach of Geneva Conventions, occasioning murder, attempted murder, actions occasioning grievous and actual bodily harm, destruction of private and public property.

2. Accused:

Anders Fogh Rasmussen (Denmark) NATO Secretary-General; Charles Bouchard (Canada), Commander of Operations; Nicolas Sarkozy, Édouard Guillaud (France); Rinaldo Veri, Commander Allied Maritime Command (Italy); David Cameron, Sir Stuart Peach (UK); Barack Obama, Carter Ham, Sam Locklear (USA); Harald Sunde (Norway), Abdullah II (Jordan); Hamad bin Khalifa al Thani (Qatar), Khalifa bin Zayed al Nahyan (UAE); Sverker Goranson (Sweden) and the Defence Ministers Pieter de Crem (Belgium), Anuy Angelov (Bulgaria), Gitte Lillelund Bech (Denmark); Panos Beglitis (Greece); Hans Hillen (Netherlands); Gabriel Oprea (Romania);Carme Chacón Piqueras (Spain); Ismet Yilmaz (Turkey), Liam Fox (UK), Ignazio La Russa (Italy), Gérard Longuet (France).

William Hague (UK), Hillary Clinton (USA) Italian Foreign Minister Franco Frattini

(?)

3. Law and breaches:

3.1 Proper procedure was not followed: Under the UN Charter, any military action which comes outside a UNSC Resolution in any theatre of conflict must necessarily come from a separate Resolution in the UNSC and any military action must come after the Military Council is convened. This was not the case under UNSC Resolutions 1970 and 1973 (2011) covering the Libyan conflict.

Why did NATO not convene the Military Staff Committee of the UNSC? Under the UN Charter, Chapter VII, Article 46: “Plans for the application of armed force shall be made by the Security Council with the assistance of the Military Staff Committee”. Such committee was never convened.

This is a violation of the UN Charter rendering Resolutions 1970 and 1973 (2011) void; There is also evidence that such Resolutions were passed on the evidence from a false flag event. The supposed crimes committed by the Libyan authorities have been hotly contested and must be investigated;

3.2 Intervention in domestic affairs of a sovereign state: UNSC Resolution 2131 (XX) of 21 December 1965, containing the Declaration on the Inadmissibility of Intervention in the Domestic Affairs of States was backed up by Resolutions 31/91 of 14 December 1976, 32/153 of 19 December 1977, 33/74 of 15 December 1978, 34/101 of 14 December 1979 and 35/159 of 12 December 1980 on non-interference in the internal affairs of States.

3.3 Bombardment of undefended buildings and structures: Article 3 of the Statute of The Hague International Penal Court which states clearly that one criterion for indictment for war crimes is:

“Attack or bombardment, by whatever means, against undefended cities, towns, villages, buildings or houses”.

Another clause of the same Article 3 could also be invoked:

“Massive destruction of cities, towns or villages or destruction not justified by military necessity”.

The attack on Libya’s water supply network on Friday July 22 and the attack on the factory making pipes for the supply system on Saturday July 23 in al-Brega were not covered under “military necessity” in which case, under Article 3, this was an act of wanton destruction of civilian structures with military hardware. This renders NATO liable for trial by its own court, the ICC at The Hague;

3.4 Support for outlawed organizations and individuals. Despite this admission:

http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/publications/counter-terrorism/ proscribed-terror-groups/proscribed-groups?view=Binary …

There is evidence that armed groups fighting inside Libya include the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG) which according to the British Government: “The LIFG seeks to replace the current Libyan regime with a hard-line Islamic state. The group is also part of the wider global Islamist extremist movement, as inspired by Al Qa’ida. The group has mounted several operations inside Libya, including a 1996 attempt to assassinate Mu’ammar Qadhafi” and for which reason is on the Home Office list of proscribed terrorist groups, despite this, the UK aided and abetted the said group;

3.5 Failure to apply international law: Under the UN Charter, Chapter VI, Article 33, member states must “seek a solution by negotiation, enquiry, mediation, conciliation, arbitration, judicial settlement, resort to regional agencies or arrangements, or other peaceful means of their own choice”.

3.6 The Jamahiriya Government of Libya had the right to defend itself without being attacked: Chapter VII, Article 51 refers to the right of States to defend themselves against armed insurgency:

“Nothing in the present Charter shall impair the inherent right of individual or collective self-defence if an armed attack occurs against a Member of the United Nations, until the Security Council has taken measures necessary to maintain international peace and security. Measures taken by Members in the exercise of this right of self-defence shall be immediately reported to the Security Council and shall not in any way affect the authority and responsibility of the Security Council under the present Charter to take at any time such action as it deems necessary in order to maintain or restore international peace and security”;

3.7 Mercenaries: UNSC Resolution 1973 (2011), in its Chapter on Protection of Civilians, in paragraph 4. states:

“4. Authorizes Member States that have notified the Secretary-General, acting nationally or through regional organizations or arrangements, and acting in cooperation with the Secretary-General, to take all necessary measures, notwithstanding paragraph 9 of resolution 1970 (2011), to protect civilians and civilian populated areas under threat of attack in the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, including Benghazi, while excluding a foreign occupation force of any form on any part of Libyan territory, and requests the Member States concerned to inform the Secretary-General immediately of the measures they take pursuant to the authorization conferred by this paragraph which shall be immediately reported to the Security Council;

There have been numerous reports of mercenaries being used by NATO and the rebels it supported; French Foreign Legion, Egyptians, Qataris, UAE forces, among others;

3.8 Boots on the ground: UNSC Resolution 1970 (2011) Paragraph 16:

“16. Deplores the continuing flows of mercenaries into the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya and calls upon all Member States to comply strictly with their obligations under paragraph 9 of resolution 1970 (2011) to prevent the provision of armed mercenary personnel to the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya;”.

If David Cameron has admitted that UK special services have assisted the terrorists on the ground, this is against the UN mandate which allowed NATO to intervene in Libya, and is a war crime.

A request has been sent (August 30) to the British FCO and Ministry of Defence to confirm or deny that troops have been used in the theatre of operations; no reply has been forthcoming;

3.9 Non-enforcement of UN Resolution, and violation of international law, by transporting rebel forces to enter the theatre of operations:

UNSC Resolution 1970 (2011):

In the Chapter on Enforcement of the arms embargo, Paragraph 13 of the same states:

“13. Decides that paragraph 11 of resolution 1970 (2011) shall be replaced by the following paragraph : “Calls upon all Member States, in particular States of the region, acting nationally or through regional organisations or arrangements, in order to ensure strict implementation of the arms embargo established by paragraphs 9 and 10 of resolution 1970 (2011), to inspect in their territory, including seaports and airports, and on the high seas, vessels and aircraft bound to or from the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, if the State concerned has information that provides reasonable grounds to believe that the cargo contains items the supply, sale, transfer or export of which is prohibited by paragraphs 9 or 10 of Resolution 1970 (2011) as modified by this resolution, including the provision of armed mercenary personnel, calls upon all flag States of such vessels and aircraft to cooperate with such inspections and authorises Member States to use all measures commensurate to the specific circumstances to carry out such inspections”;

In violation of this: supply of French Milan anti-tank missiles, Swedish Carl Gustav 84mm rifles, 68mm rockets and mortars and Maadi assault rifles from Egypt; this, in addition to the British, French and Italian military advisors helping the terrorists.

3.10 Violation of Geneva Conventions:  NATO and the Transitional National Council have given the people of Sirte ten days to surrender or face a full military onslaught. This is not a cease-fire. While they await their fate, they will still be subject to artillery fire and NATO bombing, and food, water and electricity have already been cut off.

These siege tactics have been outlawed by the Geneva Conventions. In particular, Article 14 of the second Protocol to the Geneva Conventions states, “Starvation of civilians as a method of combat is prohibited. It is therefore prohibited to attack, destroy, remove or render useless for that purpose objects indispensable to the survival of the civilian population such as food-stuffs, agricultural areas for the production of food-stuffs, crops, livestock, drinking water installations, and supplies and irrigation works.”

The 4th Geneva Convention prohibits all forms of attacks on civilians and the collective punishment of civilian populations, so virtually everything that the combined TNC-NATO forces are doing to the people of Sirte is strictly illegal and in fact criminal.

4. Sample Crimes:

21.03.2011. Tens of civilians killed on 31st of March in Gharyan city in western Libya (video). 07.04.2011. — NATO bombers killed 15 rebels and wounded 22 on the outskirts of Brega. 20.04.2011. TRIPOLI NATO Bombing The Libyan Arab Association For Human Rights (video). 27.04.2011. — NATO attacked the city of Misrata, killing 12 people and wounding 5 others. 30.04.2011. — The bombing of the Downs Syndrome School in Tripoli (video). 30.04.2011.— NATO killed inocent civilinas: The youngest son of our great leader Saif Al arab gaddafi was only 29 years old, grandchildren of our Great Leader, Saif Mohammed Muammar Gaddafi was one year and 3 months (born on 30 January 2010) , Carthage Hannibal Muammar Gaddafi was 2 years and 9 months old (born on 2 August 2008) and Mastura Humaid (daughter of Aisha) was 4 months and half (she was born on 15 December 2010) (video). 09.05.2011. — 600 civilians are reported dead after getting into trouble on thier boat. They send urgent SOS messages to NATO, but they were ignored (video). 13.05.2011. The 11 imams (spiritual leaders of Islam) that were killed. The imams were killed in a NATO bombing in the city of Brega (east), which also injured about 50 people. (video) 17.05.2011.—The NATO attack on Libya’s Anti-Corruption Agency on May 17 was extremely convenient for some Westrern politicians (video). 12.06.2011. — The bombing of the University of Tripoli. Death toll not yet established. (link) or photo evdence. 15.06.2011. — At least 12 people were killed and two injured when a NATO air strike hit a bus Wednesday evening in Libya’s Kikla city (video). 19.06.2011. — 9 civilians were killed by a NATO air strike on Tripoli (video). 19.06.2011. — Massacre of Al-Hamedi family 15 civilians, including 3 children, were killed by another NATO air strike on Sorman (link). 19.06.2011. — Firetracs was bombed (video). 22.06.2011. — The bombing of the Great Man made Waterway irrigation system, which supplies most Libyans with their drinking water. Water for 4,5 million INOCENT CIVILIANS IN LIBYA (video). 22.06.2011. — Zliten – many civilians were chopped into pieces. (link) 28.06. 2011. — NATO air strike killed 16 civilians (one whole family killed) and more than 20 injured in public market in Tawergha east of Misurata (video). 04.07.2011. — NATO bombing civilian checkpoint in ZWARA. (video) 15.07.2011. — At least 12 people were killed and 2 injured when a NATO. The air strike hit the bus with inocent civilians in Kikla City. (video) 17.07.2011. — Multiple urban areas were bombed simultaneously this morning. Anywhere from 60 to 75 bombs may have been dropped mostly in the areas of Tajura and Seraj, according to eyewitness reports. (video) 23.07.2011. — The bombing of the factory which makes the pipes for the water system, and the murder of 6 of its employees. 24.07.2011. NATO bombing cattle and poultry project in Torghae city (video). 24. 07.2011. Libya war: NATO Press Briefing, 15 civilians are dead in Tawergha (video). 24.07.2011. —The bombing of the Hospital at Zliten. Resulting in the murder of a minimum, of 50 civilians many of them children.(video). 25.07.2011. NATO bombed food storage in Zlitan.(video). 25.07.2011. — 20 civilians were killed by NATO air strikes in Bir al Ghanam. (video) 30.07.2011. — NATO warplanes also repeatedly bombed a Libyan television station, killing 3 and injuring 15. 02.08.2011. — Law School In Zlitan (Zliten) (video). 04. 08.2011. — Woman and two children (video). 07.08.2011. — NATO bombed today the vegetable market in Tripoli (link). 08.08.2011. — Libya: NATO MASSACRED 85 CIVILIANS: 33 CHILDREN, 32 WOMEN and 20 MEN (video)…

The persistent on-going bombing of the civilian population in Zliten, Sirte and Tripoli, death toll not yet established. All4Peace & LibyaSOS.

http://libyasos.blogspot.com/2011/11/operation-unified-protector-nato-in.html

5. Further documentary evidence of the crimes.

https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000524791925

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=49TOmo3CZOU&feature=share

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6qXRwBXK34o

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=25221

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MbR8FaBwPRw

http://rt.com/news/interview-libya-nato-intrusion-127/

http://libyasos.blogspot.com/2011/11/operation-unified-protector-nato-in.html

Drawn up by: Timothy Bancroft Hinchey

Pravda.Ru

Director and Chief Editor Portuguese Version

Sandra Barr, Nada Pejnovic and Tatjana Dimitrijevic

Christopher C. Black, Barrister, Canada

This is the most part of the article, for completeness. More, and the original article here. 

Related articles
Posted in 'WAR on(of) TERROR', Atrocities, Civil Liberties, Conspiracies, Human Behaviour, Human Folly, New World Order, War Crimes | Tagged , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

NATO´s Secret Terrorist Armies.

Posted on November 18, 2011 by Ken McMurtrie

Emblem of "Gladio", Italian branch o...

Image via Wikipedia

After reading this post from ‘NSBNC’, please ask yourselves “what is going on here?”

NATO have become War Criminals, no small country (that includes large countries with small populations, like Australia) is safe from outside take-over. Whether by violence, if opposed, or by controlled acquiesence by a leader devoid of morals and responsibility. Whether by financial indebtedness, subterfuge (eg., ‘climate change’), or incompetent leadership. The end result appears to be the same.

Individual countries are losing their sovereign status and their independence. Ironically, even the USA, a pawn in the game, provides much of the muscle and  ‘monopoly money’, not to mention the ‘cannon fodder’, yet it is being systematically destroyed by the world control movement.

Only China and Russia have the ability to dampen this madness. It is sincerely hoped that the ‘dampening’ does not require the insanity of a third world war.

World government take-over is in progress. Believe it or not!

As the post points out, NATO is the enemy, not the freedom fighter it may have once been.

For many decent citizens of NATO – member states it is difficult to believe that NATO would use secret armies and terrorist networks that would inflict terror attacks on innocent people of other nations. Human being being generally kindhearted, it is even more difficult to believe that these terrorist groups would be used against their own populations and if independent media publicize it, it is easily rejected as “conspiracy theory”.

Please do watch the BBC produced movie below, and keep in mind, that that which once was Operation Gladio is :

a) still existing today.

b) has been expanded with so called “Islamic Extremists” like Al Qaeda, the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group, now called Tripoli Military Counsel, insurgents inside Syria, so called Chechnyan Freedom Fighters, and secretly financed, armed trained and deployed terrorist armies throughout all continents.

c) that unless decent people like you rise and speak truth to power, you and others are likely to become one of mal-placed powers new victims. Worse than this, lack of speaking truth to power, and lack of taking action, in a situation where a global conflict has never been as imminent as it is today, may be failure to live up to your responsibility to save humanity from a war, which consequences no one dares to imagine. Think about the unimaginable consequences anyways. Then ask yourself, if you want to stand idly by, while people, who are criminally insane, deprive you, your children, your grandchildren, and humanity of their future.

Warmest regards.

Christof Lehmann

For the original article and its video, click here.

Related articles
Posted in 'WAR on(of) TERROR', Atrocities, Civil Liberties, Conspiracies, Human Behaviour, Human Folly, Inhumanity, Justice, New World Order, terrorism, War Crimes, World Issues | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Japan Radiation – ‘Alice in Wonderland’

Posted on November 18, 2011 by Ken McMurtrie

‘Fukushima Diaries’ is linked on the sidebar under ‘World Issues, Nuclear Disaster‘.

This post highlights one of their articles, one of many revealing what I believe to be true information relating to serious health risks from the Fukushima  NPP earthquake damage, explosions and  melt-downs. Their site also specifies information cover-up by the Government, TEPCO and the press.

Not only cover-up, but lies about the safety of the public from radiation and food contamination. It seems that the author is under surveillance from the authorities. Readers can judge for themselves whether that is because he is telling lies himself, or because he is exposing their lies!

Here is his post titled as above.

Today I appeared to somewhere official.

4 men interrogated me.

They wanted to make up a story that I was an international criminal or something.

It was a strange spectacle.

They tried to make me state I was involved in an international money laundering though I only bought an A-bike on eBay.

and I explained how risky the internal exposure of tritium is. lol

I told them to evacuate too ,but they were too busy at suspecting me.

It makes me feel like I’m alice in wonderland.

Nobody seems to care about radiation around in Tokyo.

Once you mention radiation,they’d call you ambulance.

Anyway,the result of today’s interrogation is supposed to come out around on 25th.

If it’s not friendly enough,I might need to emigrate to North Korea by boat.

It is the safest country because there is nothing to eat. No risk of internal exposure.

My diarrhea stopped.

Ms.Noro,the organizer of Bridge to Chernobyl said adults get used to radiation. That is the problem. Huge problem will attack you later.

I mustn’t stop walking on down.

Now my turtles,who have been with me for 19 years are sleeping with white eye lids. They don’t know anything. They don’t know they’ll be left in Japan.

I hope to come back some time to see them.

Today I heard the story that they measured beyond 100,000CPM from 5 people in Minami soma shi. They were actually “unmeasurable”.(Source)

They are too radioactive so people around them are irradiated by themselves.

Minister of nuclear power ,Hosono is promoting meaningless decontamination in Fukushima. He and his funny frieds are trying to make us believe it’s become CLEAN because volunteers decontaminated the land.

However,some of the volunteers have already died after decontamination labor because of cardiac infarct. This will never be news on main street. but the spots on Hosono’s face can’t be hidden.

People who entered Horoshima after atomic bomb was dropped on Hiroshima had the spots like that. It was called “city entering exposure”.

cf,http://fukushima-diary.com/2011/11/re-one-of-the-worst-hottest-spots-is-in-front-of-japanese-diet/

Direct link to his post.

Posted in Cover-ups, ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH, Human Folly, Inhumanity, nuclear, radiation, World Issues | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Vaccines – Ingredients courtesy ‘Informed Choice’

Posted on November 18, 2011 by Ken McMurtrie

This post is highly technical and as it stands, is just a reference sheet.

A map that shows what countries have initiated...

Image via Wikipedia

This and other associated websites consider vaccinations to be potentially dangerous and even worse. So this becomes an adjunct to those other vaccine posts.

“In a compulsory inoculation program, it is the responsibility of the developers, promoters and enforcers to prove safety and efficacy”

This means that no one else takes any responsibility. Not only that but the pharma companies are given legal immunity from public litigation, by government legislation.

Any wonder us less-trusting souls promote wariness and mistrust in vaccinations. The debate rages on. Just ensure that you are aware of the potential dangers, the published side effects, the unpublished effectiveness’, the cover-ups, the lack of safety testing, the lack of responsibility and the known unhealthy vaccine ingredients.

Click here for a new page with the details.

 

[Thanks JustMeInT for prompt]

Related articles
Posted in HEALTH, Justice, vaccines, World Issues | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Health news – courtesy ‘Natural Health’

Posted on November 18, 2011 by Ken McMurtrie

Being lazy and time-constrained, hopefully is justification for this method of keeping some tabs on the health issues. The ‘Natural News’ site is always available via the side-bar link in ‘Health Issues’, well worth regular checks.

Common air fresheners are sold as a way to “clean” the air, right?

In reality, they pollute the air with synthetic fragrance chemicals that are now linked to causing asthma and allergies: http://www.naturalnews.com/034181_air_fresheners_allergies.html

Did you know about the crippling side effects of antibiotics? Some of them can cause mental disorders! http://www.naturalnews.com/034177_antibiotics_side_effects.html

New science reveals that folate can help prevent colorectal cancer: http://www.naturalnews.com/034174_folate_colorectal_cancer.html

Related articles
Posted in HEALTH, medical | Leave a comment

Obama makes Australia a nuclear target

Posted on November 18, 2011 by Ken McMurtrie

Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr.

Image via Wikipedia

Here we have an extreme viewpoint regarding the Australia’s increased involvement with the USA. One with which I agree in principle.

The arrangement to accept US bases in Australia, to me, is abhorrent. Besides the military ramifications – abetting the US aggression and war crimes and positioning ourselves as assistant warmongers, there is the political aspect of Julia Gillard, making decisions without the support of the people and, in fact the government. Where and when has this been debated and agreed to? Why is this acceptable to the Australian public?

This CEC (Citizens Electoral Council of Australia) media release provides sufficient material to adequately represent this author’s feelings, reactions and criticisms of what should be recognised as unacceptable Australian Government behaviour.

The CEC is outspoken and often rude, even crude. It, however, usually hits the nail on the head with the truth. I will accept without argument, due criticism for any disrespectful opinions or comments but will be happy to answer to the  subject matter of the warmongering and our (Australian) involvement.

Another condition is requested – in reading the article, treat the claim made by CEC of the British influence and control over the US as not relevant to this post. There are undoubtedly links, and also direct UK-Australian links. However, all the warmongering issues cannot be discussed without including considerable Israeli/Zionist influence. There are numerous proofs of this, but this post is not about the behind-the-scenes details. [This comment from ‘PressTV’ post http://www.presstv.ir/detail/210071.html,  ‘REALIST Nov 15, 2011 10:43 AM   “The unelected Zionists puppet stooge Cameron is the second worst ever British prime minister after the Zionists/USA puppet stooge war criminal Tony Blair who should be arrested and put on trial for crimes against humanity for the committed genocide in Iraq and Afghnaistan (sic)!! “‘ shows the likely relationships.]

Furthermore, the claim that Obama be removed as President, although deservedly the case, is naive because surely another puppet will take his place.

Julia Gillard is helping Barack Obama paint a target on Australia by establishing a U.S. military base in Darwin in the middle of Obama’s mad drive to attack Iran and Syria and trigger a nuclear world war.

Obama is a British stooge, a carry-on from George Bush but worse, whom the British are using for their imperial strategy of “Balkanising” the Middle East to start WWIII, the way they manipulated the Balkans to spark WWI.

Obama is using drones to murder U.S. citizens; he joined the Brits and French in murdering Libyan head of state Qaddafi; he trumped even Bush’s gross triumphalism on the weekend by playing basketball on the U.S. aircraft carrier USS Carl Vinson that hurriedly buried Osama bin Laden at sea; and he is talking up the bogus threat of Iranian weapons of mass destruction from “evidence” the U.S., Brits and French planted in last week’s International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) report, to give a nod and wink to the plan of crazy Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to hit Iran and Syria with pre-emptive strikes.

Such strikes will force an Iranian counter-strike, followed by a U.S. response on Israel’s behalf, and then a showdown with Russia and China.

In the middle of this, Gillard has ratcheted up Australia’s military cooperation with Obama. She is providing a military base in Darwin, as one aspect of a huge expansion of the U.S. presence in Australia, and will sign the Australia-United States Defence Trade Cooperation Treaty, which heavily focuses on defence matters, to coincide with Obama’s address to both houses of parliament, into which Gillard has introduced the Defence Trade Controls Bill 2011, in order to enact that treaty into Australian law.

Numerous strategic analysts have observed that the decision to establish a U.S. base in Darwin is deliberately provocative to China; the insanity of Australia’s current foreign policy was underscored by the casual commentary from Brian Toohey on the ABC’s Insiders program on 13thNovember, on what would be required to militarily defeat, and then occupy, China—Australia’s largest trading partner and major source of national income! Toohey observed “we’re signing up to this change in U.S. military doctrine where they’re working out new ways to conduct a war against China … you’ll be sending your troops into the greatest human mincing machine ever seen.”

The Obama-British war drive is currently a runaway train, which is the last thing the American people expected when they voted for Obama in 2008. U.S. statesman and physical economist Lyndon LaRouche issued a statement on 14thNovember explaining that the reason why the British are using Obama to achieve the insane objective of a nuclear world war, is because the British oligarchy views war as a means to reduce the world’s population, in order to maintain control over the world in the context of the presently unfolding global financial collapse.

In his statement, “To stop World War III, Obama must be removed from office now”, LaRouche warned, “If Barack Obama is not thrown out of office soon, civilization is in mortal danger. The British Monarchy is out to destroy the United States as we know it, and Obama is their puppet instrument for accomplishing exactly that. The overall objective of this London-centered oligarchy is to reduce the world’s present population from the current official level of seven billion to less than one billion.

“That is the issue that can no longer be dodged, if mankind is to survive the coming weeks and months. The present drive for World War III, beginning with the targeting of Iran and Syria, is driven by the British commitment to wipe out more than 80 percent of the human race, just as Prince Philip has demanded on numerous public occasions. Anyone who tries to deny this reality is endangering mankind by their failure to face the truth.

“The British are controlling Obama as their puppet. They are engineering the crisis in Europe to impose dictatorships, and they are behind the wars and threats of global thermonuclear war. They know that their entire trans-Atlantic financial and monetary system is dead. They know that the leading nations of the Asia-Pacific region—Russia, China, India, Japan and the Koreas—are growing, relative to the rapid trans-Atlantic disintegration. This is totally unacceptable from the British standpoint, and so they are using their puppet Obama to prepare for the United States to use nuclear weapons in a global conflict, already set in motion in the new cockpit for war—the Persian Gulf and Eastern Mediterranean region …”

Responding to LaRouche’s statement, Citizens Electoral Council leader Craig Isherwood called for Australians to demand the Gillard government back away from its support for the Obama-British war drive, and return the U.S.-Australian alliance to the principles of national defence and respect for national sovereignty on which the alliance was forged by John Curtin and Franklin Roosevelt in WWII.

“John Curtin broke with British imperial strategy to forge the U.S.-Australia alliance seventy years ago, and save Australia from fascist aggression,” Isherwood said. “It is again time we broke with British strategy, this time to save the world from global genocide.”

The CEC is victimized and criticised by Australian authorities, not because it is overly rude and disrespectful to world leaders (a habit that disappoints me, even though I am not altogether above more-restrained criticisms myself), but because it reveals truths. Apparently the truth hurts! And why not? One thing governments hate is the truth about their motivations and short-comings.

As an aside, Lyndon La Rouche’s assessment of the world financial crisis, its beginning, its causes, its only solutions, are assuredly worth consideration.

So, as usual, I stress that the article be treated with an open mind, that the facts are the important thing, not the messenger, not even the method of conveying the facts. Ask yourself – is this really true? Only you can decide what you think and believe, but give yourself a chance by considering all the possibilities.

You might enjoy ‘s post, the last of the ‘Related Articles’.

Related articles
Posted in 'WAR on(of) TERROR', Atrocities, australian, Civil Liberties, Human Behaviour, Human Folly, Inhumanity, Justice, Military, Politics, united states, World Issues | 1 Comment

9/11 – Chipping away at the Wall of Lies

Posted on November 17, 2011 by Ken McMurtrie

George Washington Bridge, spanning the Hudson ...

Image via Wikipedia

This ‘Kirwan Articles’ post recalls a story, not entirely new, which is damning and does not deserve to be hidden from the public.

 This is part of the proof that the official 9/11 story is obviously corrupt.

An alert from TIP, thanks.

The Story That Was Never Told!

Late in the day on 9-11-01, this story should have appeared on the front pages of every American Newspaper, and should have been running non-stop on CNN and every other network media outlet on the planet. But it was buried and has been totally forgotten by the so-called media at every possible turn. (*)

The story is this:

‘Did Israeli’s execute 911? On September 11, 2001 NYPD arrested two Israelis fleeing in a truck filled with explosives. They took two to three people in custody. Why did the truck the Israelis were driving, filled with explosives, have a mural painted on the side of the truck depicting the first plane hitting the first tower? The truck was loaded with thousands of pounds of explosives and was headed for the George Washington Bridge. The FBI said that there were tons of explosives inside the van that could have done great damage to the George Washington Bridge. The FBI arrested the two suspects. (CNN tape of this is included in the video). NJ State Police pulled the van over and began to question them. Under questioning the Israelis said that their purpose was to document the event (no explanation was ever given about the tons of explosives, in their van or about why the mural depicting the first plane hitting the first tower was painted (professionally) on their van (which had to have been completed long before the day of the attacks).

The bomb squad was called, to deal with the truck, between 6th and 7th on King Street. The two occupants had fled, and were arrested after the truck exploded. Five men total were detained 8 hours after the attack on the towers, according to the New Jersey News (on screen). All the Israeli’s arrested worked for Urban Moving Systems, a Mossad front company. After 71 days the 5 Israeli’s were taken out of jail, put on a plane and deported back to Israel.’

If these five had been Americans they would have made front page news, and this incident would have been all over the news. But because they were Israelis, and therefore (protected suspects), no stories appeared, and no photographs of the truck with that damning mural on its side were ever published: At the time. Because if that had happened it would have been clear who killed all those people on 911, and it wasn’t a crew operating from a cave in Afghanistan!

Had this story been given the coverage it deserved; there would have been no ATTACK on Afghanistan, because the events of 911 would have been seen for the crime of mass murder which it was; and not as the Governments of Israel, Britain and the US wanted this to be seen. Mossad and the FBI as well as the CIA were all complicit in this coverup, along with those terrorist cells in Washington D.C., more commonly known as the legislative, executive and judicial branches, of this government.

Just as the demonstrators inside OCCUPY need to stop just-watching and start acting; the American public must begin to DEMAND ANSWERS to this and other events that have gone on now for over ten years without ANSWERS. What this means is that all those people that we killed after 911 were murdered for yet another lie; and that this massively important lie changed the history of the United States forever. Because without this false-flag story of 911, there could never have been a PATRIOT ACT or TSA, never mind the invasion and slaughter of millions of people in both Afghanistan and Iraq; not to mention all the additional millions that have come after those two more lies that must be added to the events of 911.

The FBI was the agency that released these Mossad operatives back to Israel – we need to find and arrest the FBI officials that let them go;

ALONG WITH THE HIGHER-UPS THAT ORDERED THEIR RELEASE – and we need to do this BEFORE THE END OF THIS WEEK!

If this story does not become the front-page news that it did not become on 911; then it will be clear that the mainstream media here is also complicit in the events behind this extremely revealing story of the van with the mural of the first tower being struck—before the day even arrived for that to have happened.

Jim Kirwan

The source post here.

Related articles
Posted in 'WAR on(of) TERROR', 9/11 tragedy, Al Qaeda, Atrocities, Conspiracies, Cover-ups, Justice, osama Bin Laden | Leave a comment