Bill McKibben Goes Full Jackboot on Climate Change


Certifiable!

Posted in Uncategorized | 6 Comments

Exploitation of Environment and Climate for Political Agenda Reverses Education and Research Processes


While on the subject of the ‘climate change’ debacle, this post deserves inclusion as it deals with a most important aspect of the public brainwashing element. The corruption of the education system(s).
An extract:
” There is also general agreement that unsustainable consumption and production patterns are contributing to the unsustainable use of natural resources and environmental degradation as well as to the reinforcement of social inequities and of poverty with the above-mentioned consequences for demographic parameters.

It was a short, well orchestrated, jump from this to the textbooks and curricula of the education system in Western countries. The indoctrination of the youth was underway. Now they graduate from high school fully immersed in all the propaganda of environmental and climate science. They go to higher levels of education as the conservative, planet saving warriors, who only take courses from professors who say what they want to hear. It falls to the older classically trained, and through that, open-minded professors and academics, to fight for sanity, reason and the truth. Sadly, they are dying off as Steyn and I discovered as we try to test facts and logic in the last refuge where reason might prevail. This hope was tested and proven in the judgment of Justice Burton in the demand for balance beyond propaganda in the classroom by parent Stuart Dimmock.

The context and nub of the dispute are the statutory provisions described in their side headings as respectively relating to “political indoctrination” and to the “duty to secure balanced treatment of political issues” in schools, now contained in ss406 and 407 of the Education Act 1996, which derive from the identical provisions in ss44 and 45 of the Education (No 2) Act 1986.

Justice Burton did not ban showing Gore’s movie but did comment

” I viewed the film at the parties’ request. Although I can only express an opinion as a viewer rather than as a judge, it is plainly, as witnessed by the fact that it received an Oscar this year for best documentary film, a powerful, dramatically presented and highly professionally produced film. It is built round the charismatic presence of the ex-Vice-President, Al Gore, whose crusade it now is to persuade the world of the dangers of climate change caused by global warming. It is now common ground that it is not simply a science film – although it is clear that it is based substantially on scientific research and opinion – but that it is a political film, albeit of course not party political. “”

Posted in Uncategorized | 10 Comments

Svensmark: “global warming stopped and a cooling is beginning” – “enjoy global warming while it lasts”


A flashback to reinforce the previous post.
Scientists(?) who lay their reputations on the statement “the (climate) science is settled” have much to regret and a great responsibility for misleading governments into literally destroying the world’s economies.

Posted in AGW, climate change, ENVIRONMENT, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | 5 Comments

Inconvenient: Giant Coral Reef That ‘Died’ In 2003 Teeming With Life Again


” Based on the known growing rates for the species, Mumby predicted it would take the Porites nearly 100 years to recover, not 15. “Our projections were completely wrong,” he says. “Sometimes it is really nice to be proven wrong as a scientist, and this was a perfect example of that.” “

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Arctic Ice: An Update – Evidence From the Past is Instructive


” Wonderful, fanciful environmental fairy tales are woven to spread the falsehood of AGW, but as Shakespeare wrote, “at the length the truth will out. “ “

Posted in Uncategorized | 4 Comments

False-Flag Events.


There is a wealth of internet information dealing with staged events, often called “psy-ops”.

” Psychological operations (PSYOP) are planned operations to convey selected information and indicators to audiences to influence their emotions, motives, and objective reasoning, and ultimately the behavior of governments, organizations, groups, and individuals. ”

  https://en.wikipedia.org /wiki/Psychological_Operations_(United_States)

A more common term would be “false-flags”. I don’t believe that anyone can deny the existence of such public brainwashing schemes, as they are commonly acknowledged by the responsible authorities or people definitely in the know, at some time after the event.

There is usually little doubt as to why false-flag events, including ones which trigger serious war situations, are created. The reasons are generally quite clear, if not obvious. One of the curious factors is that the public are so reluctant to believe that they have been brainwashed, even after conclusive proofs are  presented.

The main reason why the public are initially convinced of the “authenticity” of these operations is the whole-scale connivance of a corrupt media. Why they cannot later figure out the significance of inconsistencies and lack of meaningful supporting evidence, or at least be prepared to doubt the official stories, is something for psychologists to ponder.

This article published by “The Crazz Files”  ( The Crazz Files Is A Totally Independent Australian Website & Podcast Show. ) is linked here, and provides compelling evidence of the staging of a number of recent events.  The first part is copied here, the source article is very informative and analyses the procedures involved, making it clearer to readers how to understand the ‘ungodly’s actions and agendas.

13 Important Elements Found in Every Staged Shooting Event

By Bernie Suarez of Activist Post

People who don’t trust government, those who think on their own and tend to question what they hear, by now are all becoming experts at identifying false flag staged events. With so many recent staged psyop events in the news lately many of us are getting a lot of practice at this. But have you considered that the script has become more complex than you think? Have you considered that you (we) are being fooled in some way as we speak? Have you taken into account that the events happening today are all happening in a post-Jade Helm revelation AI era? Today’s events are happening in a very sophisticated world of unimaginably deep levels of political corruption actively at work and deeply focused on removing all of our rights and freedoms and cementing their new global order. This complex and deep reality alone is something many people refuse to face; and without facing this you’ll never be able to peel and dig deeper into the deep state’s structure, mind and mechanisms that are behind these chaotic staged psyop false flag events.

Notice I’m using the terms “false flag” and “staged events” interchangeably because at times it’s difficult to determine which one is actually happening. So it’s fair to say that false flags are types of staged events. We’re all familiar with the different types of events; mass shooting attacks by crazed supposed lone gunmen who are the selected patsies for the event. We also see shootings where the government conveniently retroactively tells us the shootings are courtesy “ISIS,” “ISIS inspired” or “ISIS related.” In recent events we also saw a focus on the paid-for engineered race war where the selected shooters are looking to shoot ONLY police or only “white” police (Dallas sniper, Baton Rouge shooting). Conveniently these shootings work great for fanning the flames of race and class tension and division while conveniently boosting the police state and public sympathy for police.

Whatever the type of event, notice we rarely if ever get to see any evidence whatsoever of the actual accused patsy shooter at the scene of the crime. For example, consider that it’s been weeks and still no one has any actual evidence of Omar Mateen physically entering the Pulse night club in Orlando and physically firing and killing people. Where are these videos? Yet the majority of people have him at the scene because that’s how the story goes, and apparently it’s almost too stressful to believe something no one else is saying. The same could be said of the accused truck driver “terrorist” in Nice, France or the actual sniper (supposed) lone gunman shooter in Dallas, Texas. You get the picture.

This anomaly only scratches the surface on what this article is about. The fact is we are all now getting used to these events, for better or for worse, and there are many elements being shown to us that most of us are not paying attention to.

The events themselves are huge to us only because the mainstream media puts them in our faces 24/7. They are important because the government and their mass media says they are. They (the government and their media) say this because the events are always part of a greater agenda. The agenda and the event itself are inseparable in a world today where the masses are conditioned into reacting to a presented problem whose solution is later sold to them. This process of “problem, reaction, solution” is undeniable and obvious to all today.

The mechanisms of the script are openly available for all to see; but, as mentioned earlier, have you considered how deep this “staged event” mechanism goes? Hopefully the following 13 elements we’re about to point out will bring more awareness to these additional possibilities, agendas and factors which are quietly hidden in these events but as you will see are actually hidden in plain view.

Read on.

 

Posted in 'WAR on(of) TERROR', Conspiracies, Corruption, Media, World Issues | Tagged , , , | 5 Comments

The Rise of Scientific Fundamentalism


A brilliant article published by ‘Green Med Info‘, posted by  Larry Malerba, DO

Contrary to the beliefs of some, science is not an impenetrable body of settled fact that must be defended at all costs in the name of truth. When science becomes a worldview—a philosophy of life, a metaphysical framework that explains existence—it is no longer science; it is scientism. 

Anti-Holistic Conspiracy or Reality?

Contrary to the beliefs of some, science is not an impenetrable body of settled fact that must be defended at all costs in the name of truth. It is not a means by which to determine truth or to achieve absolute certainty. Neither is science a worldview. When science becomes a worldview—a philosophy of life, a metaphysical framework that explains existence—it is no longer science; it is scientism.

A series of recent events have something peculiar in common. There was a call for Dr Oz to be removed from his academic post at Columbia University. Measles hype triggered a spate of legislative efforts across the country designed to restrict freedom of vaccine choice. The FDA decided to conduct a regulatory review of the status of homeopathic medicines. And most recently, a rather odd series of articles appeared in the press downplaying the significance of Chipotle’s move towards a GMO-free (genetically-modified organisms) menu.

The common thread is that these events were fueled by extremist elements within the scientific world whose intent is to control the narrative of what is and what is not considered to be acceptable or “real” science. These fundamentalist and corporate agitators, who act ostensibly in the name of science, can be likened to religious zealots who seek to impose their version of sacred scientific dogma upon the general public while at the same time prohibiting what they believe to be new heretical ideas from receiving a fair hearing.

On the surface, the culture wars appear to break down along partisan political lines, however, the field of holistic health can make for some strange bedfellows. Holistic therapies are generally embraced by more educated, liberal leaning persons who distrust Big Medicine on the grounds that medical treatment can be accompanied by a lot of side effects that place one’s health at risk. On the other hand, some on the right have also defended holistic medicine as a symbol of self-determination, especially libertarians who distrust Big Medicine as a threat to their personal freedoms.

Reflecting a similarly unusual mix, some vaccine critics are holistically oriented liberals, some are right-wingers who mistrust government interference, and not a small number represent those who have seen first-hand the dangers of vaccines. It is also true that vaccine critics are often lambasted by liberal elites who place their faith in what they perceive to be the science that supposedly supports vaccines, a position that runs contrary to their general suspicion regarding the motives of PhRMA and Big Medicine. In other words, there is no bright line that divides holistic supporters and detractors.

In contrast to Galileo’s era when Church authority had the final say on matters of “fact,” the modern culture wars often break down into shouting matches over who is on the side of science and who is not—as if to say that science is always on the side of truth while all others base their views on unreliable and/or superstitious sources of information. Galileo was sentenced to house arrest for the last years of his life on the grounds of religious heresy. One gets the distinct feeling that some in the scientific establishment would like to charge vaccine critics and holistic medicine supporters with scientific heresy.

Public internet forums are often dominated by partisan extremists who have little tolerance for opposing views. Self-appointed defenders of science, for example, paint GMO critics as anti-science, regardless of the fact that there is growing evidence that GMOs are creating a number of problems for the environment, the food chain, and the health of the populace. Defenders of science tend to get away with their partisan rhetoric largely because we live in a highly scientific age. Most people who haven’t stopped to give serious consideration to these issues tend to passively assimilate the general cultural zeitgeist, which is the belief that science is correct simply by virtue of the fact that it is science. All one has to do is make a statement, then claim that it is supported by science, and most people will tend to believe it. It’s a perk that comes with acquiescence to conventional cultural consensus.

Continue reading

Posted in GreenMedInfo, Human Behaviour, Philosophy, Pseudo-science, Science | Tagged , , , , , , | 12 Comments

Making the Climate Case


” 1.EPA’s greenhouse gas endangerment finding is an inappropriate starting point for project-related environmental risk assessments.

2. NEPA review of project-related GHG emissions will politicize, not improve, agency decisions.

3. Incorporating social cost of carbon (SCC) analysis will turn NEPA review into a pseudo-science. ”

I can only keep “chipping” away at the surface of ignorance with real scientific facts and reporting on the huge number of experts and their evidence which supports the fallibility of the CAGW pseudo-science.

Science Matters

This post is to highlight two recent high quality documents making the case against climate alarms. These are important additions to anyone’s library of climate science resources.

Jamal Munshi has published papers on atmospheric ozone, and as a professor emeritus is free to speak his mind on the UN Environmental Program. His paper is entitled The United Nations: An Unconstrained Bureaucracy 

He provides the history of the UN’s self-serving growth by exploiting two false alarms, first the “ozone hole”, and then “climate change.” The story needs to be remembered and retold against the tide of alarming claims. Since this paper is posted at Tallbloke’s Talkshop, it will likely be part of the intellectual framework for the rising CLEXIT campaign.

Synopsis of The United Nations: An Unconstrained Bureaucracy

The case study takes a close look at the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) by tracing its history from its humble and noble beginnings…

View original post 842 more words

Posted in AGW, climate change, Conspiracies, ENVIRONMENT, Pseudo-science, Science, World Issues | Tagged , , , , , | 4 Comments

Aussie School Answering Machine…


A blast from the past.
Too good to ignore!

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Cancer Was Cured By This Brilliant Man In 1934, Then He Was Killed


Drawing attention to an article which asks meaningful questions. Answers from the medical industry are not impressive.

From the ‘The Usual Routine‘, an extract:

Within two months in 1934, he was able to cure 14 out of 16 terminally ill cancer patients, while the other two were cured after subsequent six weeks. Despite his 100% cure rate, he was deprived of any acknowledgment for his accomplishment.

In 1934 Dr. Milbank Johnson who was to declare the results of Rife’s cancer therapy was lethally poisoned and his documents vanished.  Rife’s laboratories were set on fire and ruined. Dr.Nemes who had replicated a part of Rife’s work died in a inexplicable fire along with the destruction of all his research papers. Royal Rife was murdered by fatal combination of Valium and alcohol in 1971 at the Grossmont Hospital.

In 1980s author Barry Lynes published a book The cancer cure that worked  thus renewing the interest in the work of Rife. The author claimed that Rife’s beam ray device could cure cancer, but American Medical Association withheld it. The American Cancer Society stated that the claims were improbable and a product of a typical theory of conspiracy. They also stated that idea behind the marketing of Rife machines was that conspiracy against the cure for cancer was sabotaging it. What remains unanswered is the reason why Rife machines were mocked and withheld by the medical industry.

The article is linked here.

An internet search revealed a great many articles relating to Rife’s equipment, theories and life. Surprisingly, to me, was the lack of  “Snopes” type trolling and rubbishing genuine scientific breakthroughs and claims.

There seems little doubt that the medical industry contributed to the unsuccessful implementation of Rife’s cures. Redeeming this technology is still a continuing force.

One of the many search hits was this informative report.

By Paul Fassa, NaturalNews – September 26, 2011

 

 

Posted in Cancer, drugs & medication, HEALTH, Public Health, Science | Tagged , , | 2 Comments