Australia’s ties with the US endangers our future.

Recently I bookmarked an SMH press release about our former Prime Minister, Malcolm Frazer, advocating independence from the US, at least in its global military ambitions. In particular with the US harassment of China to the extent that a serious conflict might result.

Continue reading

Posted in AGENDA 21, AUSTRALIA, australian, Military, New World Order, united states | Tagged , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Vaccine Product Inserts

From ‘VacTruth': vaccine2

A wonderful aid to consumers, definitely merits bookmarking for perusal for when readers are confronted by the particular issues. Here are some selected extracts from one vaccine insert, which highlight the type of useful information available and the potential dangers that are not usually readily supplied to patients.
Merck – RECOMBIVAX HB is a vaccine indicated for prevention of infection
caused by all known subtypes of hepatitis B virus.

“2.1 Dosage and Schedule RECOMBIVAX HB:
Persons from birth through 19 years of age: A series of 3 doses (0.5 mL each) given on a 0-, 1-, and 6-month schedule.”
[What do readers think about a newborn baby receiving the same dose as a 19 year old adult?]
“5.3 Infants Weighing Less Than 2000 g
Hepatitis B vaccination should be delayed until 1 month of age or hospital discharge in infants weighing <2000 g if the mother is documented to be HBsAg negative at the time of the infant’s birth.”
[What do readers think about this criteria? Firstly, less than 2000gm - delay vaccination, 2010gm - apparently ok. Secondly, if mother not HBsAg negative, apparently no minimum weight limitation]
“5.4 Prevention and Management of Allergic Vaccine Reactions
Appropriate medical treatment and supervision must be available to manage possible anaphylactic reactions following administration …” [The need for this is surely a warning to us, how often is it not complied with? My emphasis BTW.]
Do not administer RECOMBIVAX HB to individuals with a history of severe allergic or hypersensitivity
reactions (e.g., anaphylaxis) after a previous dose of any hepatitis B-containing vaccine or to any
component of RECOMBIVAX HB, including yeast [see Description (11)].” [This is obviously precautionary but surely means that severe reactions do occur (the first time and not just rarely), when there is no history to guide decision making.]

“In healthy adults, injection site reactions and systemic adverse
reactions were reported following 17% and 15% of the injections,
respectively. (6.1)” [So, 15% eh? hardly insignificant!]

All this contra-vaccinating data and still the authorities make vaccination of newborn babies mandatory or at least recommended. In this case for a disease that is only remotely likely to affect babies, unless the hospital has cases and inadequate isolation.


Below are the list of vaccines manufactured in the United States. Every effort has been made to maintain the accuracy of this list. You will notice some vaccines listed more than once. For example, if you look for the MMR vaccine you will see it listed three separate times below. This is because one vaccine contains the antigens for measles, mumps, and rubella.

For your ease of use, you can use the column headers to quickly and easily sort by vaccine, brand name, or manufacturer. Instantly download each vaccine package insert by clicking on the ‘PDF’ icon. Notice the search bar on the right side as it will automatically filter the vaccine list as you type.

The list is linked here.

Posted in drugs & medication, HEALTH, medical, vaccines | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Science Delusion – by Rupert Sheldrake

This ‘ Collective Evolution’ post by , refers to a ‘TED talk’ episode which the watchdog science people thought should be banned, apparently for “scientific heresy”.

In fact it is just an opinion piece that respectfully questions about what might be science dogma. The fact of banning directly shows the mainstream authorities to have closed minds and to not abide with healthy debate, a defensive attitude perhaps based on insecurity in their own beliefs.

[TED: Ideas worth spreading is a nonprofit devoted to Ideas Worth Spreading - through, our ... TED-Ed videos ... 10 talks that try to answer the eternal, ever-elusive question.]

Rupert Sheldrake is a fascinating member of the scientific world. The video below is of his TED talk where he covers “The Science Delusion.” This TED talk was controversially censored by the TED community after being aired. [a couple of typos cheekily fixed].

If you have studied any area of science on your own or in school, you may have noticed or have come across the fact that there are many differing beliefs in the scientific world. While this statement seems impossible given that science is supposed to be based on evidence which produces theory, it is a delusion not to realize that much of what is strictly believed in the scientific world is only believed due to the common acceptance that is put into mainstream ideas — much like what takes place within religion. That is not to say that there aren’t amazing scientists out there coming up with profound findings and adding powerful contributions to all fields, it’s to bring light to the fact that in a mainstream sense one could say science is “stuck” or more accurately put, we have put a freeze on certain areas of science.

“How can science be stuck? You are missing the point of science! Science is not a thing it’s a method!” While I totally agree that science is a method, what I am alluding to in this article is that many of the theories we have come to believe that science has produced have been scientifically proven to be incorrect yet we continue to go along with them. The reason this happens is because in many cases we are no longer using the scientific method as it is meant to be used. The stage in the method where we are supposed to go back and a re-develop a hypothesis after evidence proves the the initial theory wrong, we instead get stuck in maintaining our belief because of the money, fear, ego and pride that get in the way.

I have been researching many areas of science, world events, health etc. over the past 5.5 years. I did not learn what I know in school as I left before completing any degrees. Something I whole-heartedly believe is that in some ways I feel my lack of formal education has been a gift. Very often we can get stuck on the idea that what we have learned in school is absolute. It’s prestigious, it can’t be wrong. Heck, we paid thousands of dollars for it so it MUST be true. Yet the more I look at the people who are making scientific discoveries in the world the more I see educated people becoming livid about the fact that these new findings must not be true. It simply can’t be. I have heard the statement “It’s pseudo-science” just about anytime a belief is challenged. A new finding requires many peer reviews for it to be taken seriously, but pre-existing mainstream beliefs require none and can be written on a cereal box yet it’s still absolute fact. We have a major challenge on our hands in that we have a very hard time keeping our emotions out of how we view and perceive our world. This is not our nature, but simply our ego’s taking hold of the situation.

Rupert Sheldrake outlines 10 dogmas he has found to exist within mainstream science today. He states that when you look at each of these scientifically, you see that they are not actually true.

1. Nature is mechanical or machine like

2. All matter is unconscious

3. The laws or constants of nature are fixed

4. The total amount of matter and energy is always the same

5. Nature is purposeless

6. Biological heredity is material

7. Memories are stored inside your brain

8. Your mind is inside your head

9. Psychic phenomena like telepathy is not possible

10. Mechanistic medicine is the only kind that works

In view of the fact that a ban has been invoked, another link to this video might not go astray.

There are a number of issues – censorship, restricting free speech; science practices not encouraging questions, not scientific in itself; science practices being held as “gospel”, also unscientific, showing lack of confidence or cognitive blindness, or maybe agenda bias.

So, it is considered to be on the side of truth and justice, to highlight this situation, to enable free speech and assessment to take place.

Here is the link to the CE post.

Posted in Conspiracies, Human Behaviour, Science | Tagged , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

12 Facts About Microwaves That Should Forever Terminate Their Use

From ‘Waking Times‘, by Marco Torres, long-awaited information about negative aspects of microwave ovens. (Many interesting posts can be found there).

We have all been well aware of the dangers to users, of microwave leakage from these ovens, but they are innocently assumed to be safe, even though testing is rarely carried out on after-sales units. Presumably each model is tested and approved by an independent authority before marketing, and each individual unit is factory tested prior to release but these not unreal risks are not the only concerns for the public health.

It seems wise to publish this article, at least to offer the information to the public. Whether it is deemed important is entirely up to the reader and their values of food safety and nutrition.

Another rarely highlighted potential danger from microwaving is not removing packaging from foods before operating. Some are labelled “microwave safe” but the validity of that judgment may be suspect. What is certain is that some, if not most, plastics are not “microwave safe” because  toxic emissions can contaminate the food.

Are microwaves a benign bastion of convenience or a sinister contributor to biological and nutritional damage? A growing percentage of people are now heeding the advice of holistic health experts and disposing of their microwaves due to the dangers of microwaved food. Regardless of where you stand, humans are the only animals on the planet who destroy the nutritional value of their food before eating it, and the use of microwaves is no exception.

Microwaves are a source of electromagnetic energy (a form of nonionizing form of radiation) electronically generated. When penetrating the aliments, they trigger an inner rotation of the water molecules inside the food. This rotation triggers a friction between the molecules and the result is a rapid growth in temperature.

Microwaves use super-fast particles to literally radiate the contents of water inside food and bring it to boil. Not only has microwave use been linked to causing infertility in men, but it also denatures many of the essential proteins in the food making them virtually indigestible.

Most animals will only consume food in its natural, unprocessed state, but humans actually go out of their way to render food nutritionally worthless before eating it. Think about all the prepackaged and processed foods we purchase and consume annually. It’s no wonder the state of our health is in dire straits.

Microwave ovens work physically, biochemically and physiologically, producing ions and various free radicals, which destroy viruses and bacteria, but not toxins and microtoxins. The experts have concluded that food cooked in microwaves loses between 60% and 90% of its vital energy and, at the same time, the structural disintegration processes accelerates. Also, the nutrient substances are altered, leading to digestive diseases. These microwaves can increase both the number of cancerous cells in blood and the number of stomach and intestinal cancerous cells.

Microwaves leaking radiation is a serious issue. Serious enough for the FDA to set legal limits on the leakage permitted by every microwave manufacturer. However, the only way to completely eliminate the radiation dangers associated with microwaves is not to use one. Microwave radiation has been known to cause cataracts, birth defects, cancer and other serious illnesses.

Because of these causes the microwave ovens were banned in the Soviet Union in 1976. Soviet scientists found that the microwave exposure decreases the ability of some vitamins to by absorbed by the human body, dramatically accelerates the structural disintegration of all foods and reduces the metabolic stress of the alkaloids, glycosides and galactoses.

In 1991, the Swiss Doctor Hans Ulrich Hertel made a study that demonstrated that cooking or heating food presents much greater risks for health than the traditionally cooked food. He found that people who ate microwave prepared food recorded losses in the hemoglobines and lymphoites.

In 2003, a Spanish governmental study elaborated in Murcia demonstrated that the vegetables and fruits cooked in a microwave lost a percentage of 97% of the substances that contribute to reducing the incidence of coronary heart diseases.

In Dr. Lita Lee’s book, Health Effects of Microwave Radiation — Microwave Ovens, and in the March and September 1991 issues of Earthletter, she stated that every microwave oven leaks electro-magnetic radiation, harms food, and converts substances cooked in it to dangerous organ-toxic and carcinogenic products.

In Comparative Study of Food Prepared Conventionally and in the Microwave Oven, published by Raum & Zelt in 1992, at 3(2): 43, it states:

“Artificially produced microwaves, including those in ovens, are produced from alternating current and force a billion or more polarity reversals per second in every food molecule they hit. Production of unnatural molecules is inevitable. Naturally occurring amino acids have been observed to undergo isomeric changes (changes in shape morphing) as well as transformation into toxic forms, under the impact of microwaves produced in ovens.”

There are no atoms, molecules or cells of any organic system able to withstand such a violent, destructive power for any extended period of time, not even in the low energy range of milliwatts. Microwaves quickly destroy the delicate molecules of vitamins and phytonutrients (plant medicines) naturally found in foods. One study showed that microwaving vegetables destroys up to 97% of the nutritional content (vitamins and other plant-based nutrients that prevent disease, boost immune function and enhance health).

Read all this valuable information here at the source post.

Posted in ENVIRONMENT, FOODS, HEALTH, health, radiation | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

WTC Building 7’s Controlled Demolition: New release by 9/11 Consensus Panel

Ken McMurtrie:

Somewhat an overload of the conspiracy themes this week, yet there is ample justification. This COTO report is pretty much in the region of a ‘smoking gun’ category. Scientific and logical conclusions from real evidence that WTC7 was in fact an intentional demolition. To not accept this claim is to fly in the face of facts and to self-incriminate the assessor as being inept or corrupt.
There will be a great deal of inertia reacting against this because that implies proof of internal US authorities and individuals knowledge, collaboration and involvement in the whole 9/11 incident(s).
What is currently going on in Ukraine, Iraq and Gaza or all more than loosely connected. The total corruption and agenda for resource and sovereign country control becomes more obvious to any lateral thinker.
So there is definite method in the “madness” of revisiting this “old” incident.
To me, the evidence is overwhelming, clear and indisputable. Also to many others who refuse to be brainwashed by the media and propaganda.
Not everyone has the time to spend learning and analyzing these issues but they are of extreme importance.

Originally posted on COTO Report:

bbc wtc7 180World Trade Center Building 7’s Controlled Demolition: 9/11 Consensus Panel Releases New Evidence from Witness Testimonies and Architectural Drawings

June 2, 2014 –The 24-member 9/11 Consensus Panel – which includes physicists, chemists, engineers, commercial pilots, attorneys and lawyers – today announced three new studies confirming the controlled demolition of World Trade Center 7.

The studies scientifically refutes the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) claim that, for the first time in history, fire caused the sudden and complete collapse of a large, fire-protected, steel-framed building on 9/11.

View original 400 more words

Posted in 'WAR on(of) TERROR', 9/11 tragedy, Conspiracies, Inhumanity, New World Order, united states, War Crimes | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Malaysian Airlines MH370 and MH17. A Criminologist Questions: What are the Probabilities? Is it a Mere Coincidence?

Ken McMurtrie:

Something to think about.

Absolutely nothing straightforward about this.
Certainly much to be explained. Nobody to trust to provide any truth. A great deal of reason to be suspicious of the US motivations.
This seems a good opportunity to introduce the topic to the “Golden Rule”.
Another conspiracy theory coming up!

Originally posted on THE INTERNET POST:

Four months after the vanishing of Malaysia Airlines flight 370, Malaysian Airlines flight 17 was brought down by a surface-to-air missile.

Western Mainstream Media (MSM) hastened–on the basis of very thin evidence joined with the refusal to even mention other evidence–to attribute blame to the “appropriate” party, which in the case of flight 17 happens to be Vladimir Putin.

 Careful observers of the mainstream media processes are well aware that this sort of thing is what we are to expect, and undoubtedly helps explain the very low level of trust people place in MSM institutions.

 Here, of course with the leave of figures such as Anderson Cooper and Barack Obama, we are going to do some of our own thinking about, and analysis of, certain key pieces of evidence.  In so doing, we should not be surprised if we arrive at conclusions different from that which our Ruling Class masters…

View original 1,213 more words

Posted in 'WAR on(of) TERROR', Conspiracies, New World Order, War Crimes | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Which Water Should I Drink?

What an amazing question! A seemingly unlikely priority in your life, it actually is much higher than you would hope it to be.

Different levels of health concerns apply to where you live, but to know the risks is worthwhile. Australia is fourth highest on the list of country population percentage drinking fluoridated water. Although fluoride is designated as a serious health risk, there are many other potential contaminants to worry about.

The importance of adequate hydration in your body is discussed in related articles.

Water being our most staple survival element, the title question becomes relevant to us all.

This article from ‘CLN’ (Conscious Life News), from Trinity | Trinityskitchen deserves a mention.

Water is a bountiful gift of nature. We see it all around us in the falling rain, lakes, rivers, the ocean,  early morning dew, waterfalls, taps, swimming pools, showers and even plastic bottles. Until the recent industrial era we drank water freely from streams and rivers, not giving a second thought to whether it was safe – it just was. So where did things go so wrong? With our bodies composed of somewhere upwards of 60% water, it is an important element for human life; a basic human right. When did water become a controlled commodity? One of the biggest problems that we face today, is that there is so much conflicting information about which water we should drink, that it is difficult to make a conscious choice…

‘Which’ water to drink has been a challenging dilemma for me, my whole adult life. It seems almost every which way I turn, there is something to compromise. Once I start pulling at a lose thread, the whole garment rapidly falls apart. This article is going to explore our realistic options, so that we can at least begin to make more informed decisions about the water we drink.

Tap Water

Tap water varies in quality from region to region; it has frequently been proven to be laden with contaminants in the form of fluoride, chlorine, drugs, arsenic, heavy metals, pesticides and pathogens.

Recently the Scientific American reported that: ’18 unregulated chemicals were found in drinking water from more than one-third of U.S. water utilities’. They went on to say; ‘the perfluorinated compounds, known as PFOA, have been linked to a variety of health problems, including cancer, among people in communities where water is contaminated by a chemical plant in West Virginia’.

The Natural Resources Defense Council (USA)  also reported this:

    Tap water can contain a vast array of contaminants, but a handful showed up repeatedly in the water of the cities we studied:
  • Lead, which enters drinking water supplies from the corrosion of pipes and plumbing fixtures and can cause brain damage in infants and children
  • Pathogens (germs) that can make people sick, especially those with weakened immune systems, the frail elderly and the very young
  • By-products of chlorine treatment such as trihalomethanes and haloacetic acids, which may cause cancer and reproductive problems
  • Arsenic, which may cause cancer, serious skin problems, birth defects and reproductive problems
  • Radon, the rocket fuel perchlorate and other carcinogens or otherwise toxic chemicals

The Fluoride in drinking water controversy

It may come as a surprise to learn that fluoride is a well known rat poison and insecticide. This compound has been shown to cause crippling bone disease in people who’ve been drinking from water with high levels of this chemical. It has also been shown to affect bone health and effect other tissues in the body. A great source of information for studies on this is

Studies show shocking fluoride links to lowered IQ levels:

Over the last several several decades an astonishing 24 studies have established a statistical link between fluoride exposure and low IQ’s in children. One study conducted by the Center for Endemic Disease Control in China, found that each additional milligram of fluoride detected in every litre of a child’s urine was associated with a 0.59 decrease in their IQ score. Another study found that fluoride exposure slashed the number of children receiving ‘high IQ’s by more than 70%.’ [My emphasis]

Which nations fluoridate?

Whilst many countries in the world do not consume fluoridated water, the following countries are the main culprits. These statistics are from the British Fluoridation Society in 2012 (with the percentage of people who drink artificially fluoridated water in brackets):

USA (64%)
UK (11%)
Australia (80%)
Hong Kong (100%)
New Zealand (61%)
Ireland (73%)
Malaysia (75.5%)
Spain (11%)
Brazil (41%)
Chile (70%)
Brunei (95%)
Fiji (36%)
Singapore (100%)
Canada (44%)
Argentina (19%)

For more info on country specific fluoridation check out this great file here:
Extent of Fluoridation around the world document

Mass fluoride medication

Fluoridation of the water supply is essentially mass human medication, without informed consent from the people, (who generally have no idea that it is happening).

Watch this short and informative animated movie about The Fluoride Deception. It exposes the facts about water fluoridation and the phosphate mining industry. Rather eye opening!

Click here for the complete article and its videos.

Related Articles:

 Fighting fatigue – top foods, herbs, supplements and tips  (

The importance of pure drinking water and recommendations to optimize hydration (

Posted in HEALTH, ENVIRONMENT, Civil Liberties, World Issues, AUSTRALIA, health | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

WiFi — An invisible but ubiquitous threat to the future of the species

This information looks authentic enough to ring alarm bells in everyone’s thought processes. Choosing to ignore it, just as do the authorities, like the Australian government who proclaim smart meters, amongst all the other wi-fi devices, to be  “safe”, would seem to at our own peril.

by  Jim Fetzer

“Of the microwave-exposed women, 47.7% had miscarriages prior to the 7th week of pregnancy….”–Professor John R. Goldsmith, International Consultant / Advisor for Radio-Frequency Communication, Epidemiology and Communications Sciences Advisor to the WHO


Barrie TrowerToday I conducted one of the most disturbing radio interviews of my life as host of “The Real Deal”, with a British physicist and electronic warfare expert, Barrie Trower.

By the time he had finished his service in the military, Barrie had acquired a great deal of expertise in the microwave field and he extended his research to common electronic systems, including cell phones, iPods, computer games and microwave ovens.

He was appalled to discover that microwave radiation is ubiquitous and extremely hazardous, especially to pregnant women and young children.  The risks are so great that the use of WiFi, which is enormously popular, can lead to permanent genetic damage to your children and your children’s children. Here is his personal warning in his own words:

“In the very early 1960’s I trained with the government microwave warfare establishment. I looked at all aspects of microwave warfare and when I finished my time in the military, because I had a lot of expertise in the microwave field, I was asked if I would carry on with this research. We are in a new Cold War and this is why countries are developing this. And this is why all the microwave transmitters are going up everywhere because somebody, if they wanted to, could use them for other effects. The system is up and running.

Years ago our government said to our scientists when it comes to microwaves you will only talk about things to do with heat, and that is it. So they won’t even discuss anything else. They will deny anything that doesn’t have anything to do with heat. They even deny all their 40 years of research leading up to this, although they’ve said that this can cause cancer and all the damage, they say no it can’t. We’re only looking at heat and heat is all that matters. So for the last 40 years the English government has been lying to the people. And the American, the Canadian, the Australian, they have been lying. They have been lying to protect industry, to protect their profits, to protect themselves from lawsuits.

So they are really just liars and it is provable, sanctioned by the World Health Organization, without a shadow of a doubt. It is the same people that sit on the ICNAP certificate, sit on our government health protection agencies, sit on the World Health Organization . . . . it is the same people. There are probably no more than 20 of them. But, yes, they are going to, in my opinion, commit the worst genocide this planet has ever known, not just people, but animals and plants. They are probably going to cause more destruction than a global war, and in several hundred years time, people will look back, whoever survives, and look at what we tried to do to stop them.”

Wi-Fi, microwaves and the consequences for our health

Those most powerfully affected are pregnant women, children, women generally, the elderly, men and (least of all) the physically fit. Some persons appear to be invulnerable to exposure, but a significant percentage–from 47.7% to 57.7%–appear to be especially vulnerable, even from most of us might have regarded as low doses that represent minimal risk. The situation, however, turns out to be quite the opposite.

Read the complete article here.

Posted in AGENDA 21, Corruption, ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH, radiation, World Issues | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

How The Global Elite Rule The World

World Bank Whistleblower Karen Hudes Reveals How The Global Elite Rule The World

by Michael Snyder

Karen Hudes is a graduate of Yale Law School and she worked in the legal department of the World Bank for more than 20 years.  In fact, when she was fired for blowing the whistle on corruption inside the World Bank, she held the position of Senior Counsel.  She was in a unique position to see exactly how the global elite rule the world, and the information that she is now revealing to the public is absolutely stunning.  According to Hudes, the elite use a very tight core of financial institutions and mega-corporations to dominate the planet.  The goal is control.  They want all of us enslaved to debt, they want all of our governments enslaved to debt, and they want all of our politicians addicted to the huge financial contributions that they funnel into their campaigns.  Since the elite also own all of the big media companies, the mainstream media never lets us in on the secret that there is something fundamentally wrong with the way that our system works.


We have a system of “neo-feudalism” in which all of us and our national governments are enslaved to debt.  This system is governed by the central banks and by the Bank for International Settlements, and it systematically transfers the wealth of the world out of our hands and into the hands of the global elite.

But most people have no idea that any of this is happening because the global elite also control what we see, hear and think about.  Today, there are just six giant media corporations that control more than 90 percent of the news and entertainment that you watch on your television in the United States.

This is the insidious system that Karen Hudes is seeking to expose.

This provides the general gist of the article, which, complete with video tells us a great deal of very important information, and is linked here.

Posted in AGENDA 21, Financial Crisis, Globalism, Media, New World Order, World Issues | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Big-Pharma Vaccines Deemed “Safe” by Big-Pharma Funded “Study”

From ‘nsnbc‘ by Tony Cartalucci (LD).

RT’s article, “​Vaccines don’t cause autism, complications extremely rare – study,” states that:MRM_Vaccine Vile_Vaccines_Vaccine Safety

There is no evidence that immunizing vaccinations cause autism while any complications arising from their administration to children are extremely rare, new analysis comprised of 67 research studies has discovered.

First, a few personal comments. [Post updated 6th July.]

Here we have a number of issues. all serious. They encompass public health, corporate greed, corporate lies, journalistic responsibility, professional organization integrity, public health ‘watchdog’ authority integrity, bribery and corruption and, the question of ulterior motives. Also important is the element of personal rights – the right of the patient or parent to choose.

No question that the well-being of the public is the dominating feature of this presentation, and should rightfully be so in all aspects of the vaccination “debate”. To vaccinate or not vaccinate, that is the question. Many separate factors apply just to this one, basic area. The answer is outside the scope of this article, but the question can be discussed.

It is clear that health risks do exist for both the vaccinated, from the actual vaccine and its constituent ingredients, and for the unvaccinated, from a higher risk of catching a disease.

The analysis, conclusions and reporting on these relative risks, however, are subject to a great deal of conjecture. Hence, the source article, this post and hundreds of other posts and scientific papers,  all driven by various incentives, usually conflicting in content and often in interest.

Undoubtedly,  some vaccinations are advisable some of the time. For example, a person travelling overseas into an area of known disease risk is a clear example of logical benefits of vaccinating. This still carries with it risks of health impairment and possible lack of effectiveness but it is easy to agree that the risks are substantially outweighed by the benefits. Possibly not always the case, but clearly the best justification for vaccinating is contained in this group.

At the other end of the scale, there are examples of the risk balance being almost certainly reversed, raising the valid question of the agenda and associated ramifications.

The vaccinating of a new-born baby against Hepatitis B is seriously questioned“Hepatitis B is a primarily blood-transmitted disease associated with lifestyle choices such as unprotected sex with multiple partners and intravenous drug use involving sharing needles – it is NOT primarily a “children’s disease” or that of newborn babies!” (Warning to Parents: This Vaccine Linked to Sudden Infant Death…)

Similarly the application of the HPV vaccination applied extensively to young people, a practice so obviously suspect that several countries have banned its use.   “Dr. Dalbergue stated: “I predict that Gardasil will become the greatest medical scandal of all times because at some point in time, the evidence will add up to prove that this vaccine has absolutely no effect on cervical cancer and that all the very many adverse effects which destroy lives and even kill, serve no other purpose than to generate profit for the manufacturers.”” (Gardasil: Are you paying for your own bullet?).

In between, there are many ‘grey area’ cases where it is virtually impossible to resolve the conjecture but it is possible to highlight the important facts, reasons for doubt and failures to firmly justify conclusions.

We move on to ‘corporate greed and lies’ Reference: “Top 5 Vaccine Companies by Revenue – 2012

  • Sanofi $5.54 billion
  • Merck $5.27 billion
  • GlaxoSmithKline $5.26 billion
  • Pfizer $4.11 billion
  • Novartis $1.38 billion

There are later figures but these give the picture. Big companies, huge running costs but nevertheless, huge profits. (This suggestion of huge profits does not go undisputed but is a reasonable assumption if we include government grants, purchases and protections). Huge potential for spending on marketing, evident in several ventures including “influencing” the consumer-watch and approval organizations, consumers, overseas governments and the medical practitioners. Huge incentive for maintaining the ‘status quo’ to further develop their business and attract and satisfy share-holders. Huge incentive for corruption if these profits are threatened. Huge incentive to place profit above public health in their priorities.

An example: “Documents Show Merck Paid This Popular Website $3.5 Million Dollars for Promoting Vaccines

In any case, the facts speak for themselves – the unethical behaviour does exist, regardless of incentives.

Regarding the specific issue of autism and the industry denial of a causal link to vaccines, the offered “proof” of no link by producing questionable papers finding “no evidence” of a link, is really pushing credibility boundaries.

These ‘researchers’ choose to ignore many peer-reviewed papers that provide adequate evidence of the likelihood of a direct connection. This is supported by the exhibited, convenient neglect by the vaccine manufacturers to acknowledge that autism is closely related to encephalitis, encephalitis is an adverse reaction they do openly admit. (Ref. The Autism Epidemic – The Vaccine Link):

Vaccines CAN CAUSE brain damage. This basic fact has never been in question. All doctors and scientists are in agreement that brain swelling leading to brain dysfunction can and does happen after vaccination. Over 2 billion dollars has been paid out in vaccine court to families of children whose bodies were damaged after receiving vaccines. Almost every vaccine insert includes both encephalopathy and encephalitis as possible side effects of immunization. Both are brain disorders as described below:

ENCEPHALOPATHY: a disease in which the functioning of the brain is adversely affected by some agent or condition.

ENCEPHALITIS: inflammation of the brain, caused by infection or a reaction to some toxin or agent crossing the blood brain barrier.”

Here is a vaccine info insert that may have since been retracted, (or in ‘new-speak’), redacted, that also proves the subject industry claims to simply be blatant lies. (Ref )

There are many court cases awarding vaccine related damages. (Note, 1,322 families).

“CBS News has found that since 1988, the vaccine court has awarded money judgments, often in the millions of dollars, to thirteen hundred and twenty two families whose children suffered brain damage from vaccines. In many … cases, the government paid out awards following a judicial finding that vaccine injury lead to the child’s autism spectrum disorder.”

“In what many parents are referring to as Orwellian doublespeak, the government determined that the vaccines Hannah received triggered an undiagnosed mitochondrial disorder that didn’t “cause” the onset of autism but “resulted” in it. “These word games fool no one,” according to NAA board chair and parent Lori McIlwain. “It’s time for the government to admit that vaccines can and do cause autism in some children. We need to learn from children like Hannah Poling and develop strategies for the prevention of further needless injuries.”

It seems that a “few comments” is becoming something more than intended. It might be prudent to now go back to the post title subject and article. If readers wish to comment or dispute the other above-mentioned issues please do. Another post might develop from them. These aspects of integrity, corruption, funding, conflicts of interest and the possibility (probability) of an underlying agenda are convincingly dealt with in the source article which also says:

The report’s conclusions are hardly convincing. But what’s more troubling, is the immense conflict of interest from which the report itself was written. The authors include Margaret A. Maglione, Lopamudra Das, Laura Raaen, Alexandria Smith, Ramya Chari, Sydne Newberry, Roberta Shanman, Tanja Perry, and

Courtney Gidengil, all of the corporate-funded think tank, RAND Corporation.

While the report itself was funded by the US government, [see note below], the RAND Corporation from which its authors were drawn is funded by the very corporations (.PDF page 70) that manufacture various vaccines, including the MMR vaccine which was the primary focus of the report. Big-pharma sponsors of RAND include GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) and Merck – that latter of which is listed by the US Center for Disease Control (CDC) specifically as the manufacturer of the MMR vaccine.

and concludes:

“If commentators want to assign blame upon anyone for creating public distrust in vaccines, it should be upon big-pharma itself.”

And is linked here.

Even the funding by the US government is suspect because it is probably part of the alleged agenda scene.

Related Article: If you want to read some serious scientific damning claims which genuinely support the theme of this post check this link.,-13,848

Posted in Corruption, drugs & medication, HEALTH, vaccines, World Issues | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Victorian Parliament passes Energy Legislation Amendment (Customer Metering Protections and Other Matters) Bill 2014

Ken McMurtrie:

Whatever has happened about a democratic country having a government FOR the PEOPLE?
Democracy is DEAD!

Originally posted on Stop Smart Meters Australia:

This bill includes the power to make Orders in Council to provide for setting fees to manually read meters, and the recovery of these fees by retailers. These charges are yet to be set, with the AER (Australian Energy Regulator) having final approval. This is expected to occur in November, with manual reading fees due to commence in March 2015.

Not surprisingly, members from both sides of the House wholeheartedly support the continued rollout of smart meters. After all, it was Labor who commenced the rollout, and the Coalition who decided it made sense to continue with the rollout. The bill also had the support of the Greens, in the Legislative Council’s second reading on the 6th May. As such, debate, in the Legislative Assembly’s second reading of the bill on the 25th June, remained shallow, with both sides appearing to be more intent on scoring political kicks regarding…

View original 612 more words

Posted in AGENDA 21, AUSTRALIA, Civil Liberties, ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH, radiation | Leave a comment