Has Australia slyly entered the Western program of demonizing Islam?

More to the point, are we actively participating in unauthorized and unjustified warfare? Are we brainwashing the citizens of Australia? Are we generating false events in order to support unjustified security restrictions on the public? Australia in Brief

Time for some thought-provocation and assessment regarding Australia’s following in the US footsteps with potentially horrific consequences.

This event appears to closely follow that of the US false-flag events, documented quite authentically, that are intended to brainwash citizens into accepting unacceptable intrusions into other  countries and peoples personal liberties.

It would be a great pity if the Australian public cannot begin to see the reality. Hopefully they will let Tony Abbott know that he is responsible to, and for, our citizens and country.  We do not wish to be part of the UN/US warmongering and destruction of our basic civilization. No matter how lacking it is in intelligent behaviour, it basically represents a desire to be humanitarian. The proposed alternative, demonstrated by this example, is based on a complete disregard for honesty, human life and humanitarian values.

Readers can be expected to make up their own minds, at least they now have evidence of a contrary nature, offering authenticity, to balance the usual bias and manipulation. That is, manipulation of events and citizens minds.

Very interested to hear readers opinions!

Is Sydney Siege inquest covering for ASIO?

The clear intention of the Coronial Inquest into the Sydney Siege is to exclude any testimony from Mamdouh Habib about his firsthand knowledge of gunman Man Haron Monis working for ASIO at the time of the siege.

This blatant suppression of evidence coincides with Habib’s statement that an ASIO officer on 21 August directly warned him against speaking to, or even attending, the inquest.

This treatment of Habib is a clear indication that powerful forces are determined to ensure the mandatory inquest is a cover-up, specifically of ASIO’s involvement with siege perpetrator Man Haron Monis in the lead-up to the siege.

For the record, if allowed, Mamdouh Habib would testify, under oath:

That around a month before the 15 December 2015 Lindt Café siege, Monis approached Mamdouh Habib to request his help. Monis, or Sheikh Haron as he was known to Habib, explained that ASIO had asked him to do a “job” for them, and that ASIO had directed him to ask Habib to help with the job. Monis did not explain what the job was, and Habib isn’t sure Monis even knew at the time. Monis explained that ASIO had promised they would help him win back custody of his two young sons, with whom the family court had cut him off from any contact the month before. Monis claimed that ASIO had also promised to reward Habib if he assisted, by helping him win his ongoing legal case in Egypt.
That Habib turned Monis down cold, because the request was from ASIO. Habib warned Monis, forcefully, to have nothing to do with ASIO, because, he said, ASIO can’t be trusted.
That a number of days after this approach from Monis, an ASIO officer called Habib directly, to convince him to agree to assist Monis, by confirming and reiterating ASIO’s offer to help his legal case in Egypt; again Habib refused.
That in the late afternoon on the day of the siege, when Habib confirmed that the gunman in the Lindt Café was “Sheikh Haron”, and that the police and media had known for hours it was Monis, he realised that the siege was a set-up, that it was most likely the “job” for ASIO that Monis and ASIO had sought to enlist him in. Habib’s first thought was, “Monis agreed to ASIO’s deal.”
That Habib, convinced it was a set-up, attempted to intervene to avert a disaster, by calling first the office of the Commonwealth Attorney-General in Canberra, and then the NSW Police, to insist he be allowed to help negotiate with Monis. Habib guaranteed them that he would convince Monis to surrender and release the hostages. On both calls Habib was turned down. The Attorney-General’s office transferred his call to ASIO, to whom Habib repeated his offer, but cautiously, because he knew ASIO was involved; ASIO also rejected the offer. On his final call, to the NSW Police, Habib warned that ASIO intended to kill Monis, and that if anyone died in the siege it would be the fault of the Australian government. Habib says that a FOI order would prove his calls to both the Attorney-General and NSW Police.
Habib’s evidence, of Monis working with ASIO just before the Sydney Siege, is explosive, and casts the siege in a completely different light. It is already patently clear that the siege had nothing to do with ISIS, as Prime Minister Abbott claims; instead, Habib’s evidence leads to other, more sinister, possibilities as to the cause of the siege, including: that it was an orchestrated terrorist attack, arranged by ASIO for political purposes; or, that it was an ASIO operation, gone wrong. The account of one hostage that Monis had said to her that “I have to kill one of us [you]”, and an early media report that he screamed at the storming police before he was killed, “Look what you’ve made me do”, points to the more likely possibility of the former.

The Sydney siege was part of a sequence of terrorist attacks that have occurred around the world in the last 1-2 years, in the context of the rise of ISIS, including the Canadian Parliament attack and the Charlie Hebdo massacre. In every case, the perpetrators of the attacks were “well known” to the relevant security agencies beforehand. This raises the question of how it is possible those agencies had no advance warning of the attacks. In the US, a July 2014 Human Rights Watch report entitled “Illusion of Justice: Human Rights Abuses in US Terrorism Prosecutions”, exposed how the FBI has actively orchestrated terrorist plots, claiming them to be “sting” operations, in which the FBI generated the idea, provided the equipment, and picked the target, but pinned the blame on some unsuspecting and often mentally-impaired dupe. The FBI has then publicised the arrest as another success in the War on Terror, which justifies its far-reaching police-state powers, and the US government’s continued operations in the Middle East, just as 9/11 was used to justify the illegal invasion of Iraq based on a lie. The UK’s security agencies MI5 and MI6 have their own extensive history of orchestrating terrorist attacks, as they did throughout the Irish “troubles” of the late 1960s into the 1990s, as well as through their intimate involvement with such notorious Islamic extremists as the self-admitted MI5 agent Abu Hamza. Their agents have been allowed to operate and proselytise freely in London while wanted for terrorist attacks overseas, and even to strike in Britain itself, all the better to justify police-state measures under the guise of “fighting terrorism”.

ASIO was set up at the behest of MI5 in 1949, and has functioned as merely the Australian branch of MI5 ever since. Mamdouh Habib forcefully warned Monis against working with ASIO, due to his own, firsthand experience with ASIO over many years, which included: years of harassment to pressure him to become an ASIO informer; ASIO’s involvement in his seizure in Pakistan in 2001; his rendition to Egypt to be tortured; his 2002-05 detention-without-charge in Guantanamo Bay; and ASIO’s active obstruction, under the cover of “national security”, of his legal proceedings to win redress for ASIO’s crimes against him.

The difficulties that the Sydney Siege inquest has experienced in getting a straight story out of the Director of Public Prosecutions, as to why Monis was out on bail at the time of the siege, already demonstrates active suppression of evidence. The Inquest will apparently allow ASIO to give testimony in closed session, which is seemingly routine for such an agency, but in the context of Habib’s evidence it provides enormous scope for ASIO to, as usual, use the fig leaf of national security to hide its true activities from the public.

If the NSW Coroner is to fulfil the responsibilities of his office to ascertain the truth of what caused the deaths in the Lindt Café, he must examine all of the evidence; therefore, he must take testimony from Mamdouh Habib, or else the public can only conclude his inquest is a cover-up.


Citizens Electoral Council of Australia
Media Release Tuesday, 25 August 2015
Craig Isherwood‚ National Secretary
PO Box 376‚ COBURG‚ VIC 3058
Phone: 1800 636 432
Email: cec@cecaust.com.au
Website: http://www.cecaust.com.au


Posted in 'WAR on(of) TERROR', AUSTRALIA, Civil Liberties, Conspiracies | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

Pharmaceutical Companies Have Corrupted Science and Government

A topical news item from ‘Focus For Health’:

Reference : https://www.focusforhealth.org/category/news/

This strongly associates with the American political and pharmaceutical scene but it has international applicability. What is to be learned is the degree of corruption throughout the associated organizations, including the government itself, which signifies the risks of giving uncritical credibility to pharmaceutical products, information and claims of safety and efficacy.

Have Pharmaceutical Companies Corrupted Science and Government?

In the article below, (my bold emphases), Dr. Lewis highlights how the billion dollar pharmaceutical industry’s influence extends into regulatory agencies, as well as to respected journals responsible for publishing scientific literature. Focus for Health supports positive efforts to ensure government transparency in the protection of public health.

The Oconee Enterprise, August 6, 2015:

Pharmaceutical Companies Have Corrupted Science and Government

Last week, big news media ignored Congressman Bill Posey imploring Congress to hold hearings after a leading government scientist admitted the CDC destroyed data linking MMR vaccine to autism in young black children.

Former CBS Evening News anchor Dan Rather recently commented that big media is controlled by big government working with big corporations for their mutual benefit. Pharmaceutical companies wield the most influence with Congress and the news media.

Unfortunately, the scientific literature has also been bought out. In 2011, Fiona Godlee, Editor-in-Chief of the British Medical Journal, testified before Parliament that the peer reviewed scientific literature has become the marketing arm of the pharmaceutical industry.

If Congress gets its way, things will only get worse. The U.S. House of Representatives recently passed the 21st Century Cures Act, which would create a corporation to accelerate the development of new drugs and vaccines. It provides over $9 billion for the NIH and the FDA to fast-track them to market.

This federally-created corporation would, no doubt, be run by highly paid executives passing through the revolving door between government and industry. Instead of relying on case-controlled clinical trials, the new approval process for drugs and vaccines will incorporate anecdotal evidence from patients, parents, advocacy organizations, research sponsors and unnamed “others.” Blindly supporting the pharmaceutical industry appears to be one thing Republicans and Democrats alike have no problem agreeing upon.

Dr. Lewis’ article posted in The Oconee Enterprise:

2015_8_12 David Lewis Article

This summer, I was one of nine visitors invited to a meeting of the Royal Society of London to discuss growing public skepticism over key areas of science, including climate change and vaccine safety. Much of our discussion centered on the negative impact that pharmaceutical companies and certain federal agencies subject to corporate influence are having on scientific integrity. A recent survey of 1,756 parents in the United States, for example, found 82 percent believe vaccination can benefit public health; but only 32 percent trust information the CDC puts out.

To bolster compliance with CDC vaccine policies, the White House is funding faith-based organizations to promote vaccination. HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius noted that religious groups play an important role in keeping communities healthy. It’s shameful that corporate influence has eroded public confidence to the point that religious organizations are being paid to vouch for CDC policies.

After buying out the news media, pharmaceutical companies are focused on controlling scientific journals and lobbying Congress to lower the standards for data used by the FDA and CDC to approve and recommend their products. Congress has shielded pharmaceutical companies from lawsuits over vaccine-related injuries; and its moving toward mandating all CDC-recommended vaccines. Drugs and vaccines are vital to public health. But once Congress and the scientific literature are controlled by pharmaceutical companies, how can the public trust these products? Congress must clean up the corruption.

The source article is linked here.

The author’s credentials:

David Lewis, Ph.D.

Former U.S. EPA Research Microbiologist

David Lewis is an internationally recognized research microbiologist whose work on public health and environmental issues, as a senior-level Research Microbiologist in EPA’s Office of Research & Development and member of the Graduate Faculty of the University of Georgia, has been reported in numerous news articles and documentaries from TIME magazine and Reader’s Digest to National Geographic.



Posted in Corruption, drugs & medication, HEALTH, Human Behaviour, medical, Science, World Issues | Tagged , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Economics and Banking – a Sensible Approach

A worthy outline and suggestion that would almost certainly benefit the world.

Citizens Electoral Council of Australia
Media Release Monday, 17 August 2015

“People’s Quantitative Easing”: 

The principles behind it

The reality that sovereign national governments can create public credit and expend it for the Common Good, has now erupted as the central issue of MP Jeremy Corbyn’s bid to become the next leader of the Labour Party in the UK. Corbyn’s policy for the government creation of such credit—dubbed by some a “People’s Quantitative Easing”—has terrified and enraged the City of London bankers whose crimes will be stopped under “Corbynomics”. This, indeed, is the rub: will the City of London and Wall Street mafia continue to create credit for their own private usurious and speculative ends, for which the public ultimately pays through bloody austerity, or will national governments seize that power back from them?

That sovereign power of credit has actually been wielded from time to time by sovereign governments, precisely as Corbyn proposes, if all too rarely. Under its first Treasury Secretary Alexander Hamilton, it was the bedrock upon which the bankrupt new nation of the United States was consolidated after the Revolutionary War of 1776–1783; it was reasserted through President Abraham Lincoln’s “greenback” policy which enabled the United States to survive the insurgency by Southern slave owners and their Wall Street backers and, even as the Civil War raged, to build the great Transcontinental Railroad which finally unified the nation; and it was instituted once again by President Franklin Roosevelt in the 1930s and 1940s, to pull the United States out of the Great Depression and create the “Arsenal of Democracy” to help win World War II.

Public credit for the Common Good was also the rock upon which Australia’s own National Bank, the Commonwealth Bank, was established in 1912 by Australian Labor Party MP King O’Malley, who proclaimed on 30 September 1909 in Parliament, “I am the [Alexander] Hamilton of Australia.” Prime Minister John Curtin and Treasurer Ben Chifley reasserted it to finance the Allied victory in the Pacific during World War II (including building a world-class machine tool industry from scratch), and it was to be the pivot upon which they intended a great postwar industrial and agricultural expansion of Australia, before the British-directed local financial oligarchy and the Privy Council in London overthrew those plans. (Both the Hamilton and O’Malley/Curtin/Chifley policies were presented in depth at the CEC’s March 2015 international conference, “The World Land-Bridge: Peace on Earth, Good Will towards All Men”.)

Such public credit for the Common Good has even taken place in the UK itself, as under the 1945–51 Labour government of Prime Minister Clement Attlee. Attlee nationalised the Bank of England for that purpose, and in the second reading of the Bank of England Bill on 29 October 1945 which accomplished that, his Chancellor of the Exchequer Hugh Dalton cited Australia’s successful government-owned Commonwealth Bank as a key precedent.

With the assistance of a nationalised central bank, Attlee’s government achieved: near-full employment; a 20 per cent increase in farm output between 1947 and 1952; nationalisation of 20 per cent of the economy, including (in addition to the Bank of England) civil aviation, coal mining, the railways, canals, communications, electricity and gas utilities, and the steel industry; the construction of a million new homes between 1945 and 1951; a comprehensive welfare system which alleviated the conditions of abject poverty suffered in the 1930s and drove significant improvements in public health, infant mortality and life expectancy; and the National Health Service, a publicly funded health care system which offered treatment free of charge for all, and treated 8.5 million people in 1948, its first year of operation (between 1948 and 1951 the government’s spending on health almost doubled from £6 billion to £11 billion).

Now, Jeremy Corbyn has put the issue of the deployment of public credit for the Common Good once again squarely on the agenda, and the bankers and their whores in the mass media and political parties are screaming bloody murder, the Blairites in the Labour Party as shrilly as the most rabid Tories. Why? Because “It won’t work”? No, precisely because it has worked in the past and will work again. But it will mean a tectonic shift in power away from the City of London, whose financial oligarchy managed the British Empire in its 19th-century heyday. Now assisted by its junior partner Wall Street and the IMF and World Bank, that British “informal financial empire” (in the words of its own apologists) still rules much of the world today.

From his own experience as Britain’s Chancellor of the Exchequer beginning in 1852, William Gladstone explained the ruling principle: “The hinge of the whole situation was this: the government itself was not to be a substantive power in matters of finance, but was to leave the Money Power supreme and unquestioned.” Now, however, with the aid of the Corbyn campaign, as ordinary people are beginning to question the Money Power and how credit creation actually works, or should work, the private bankers are suffering their worst nightmare.

The simple facts of the matter

Continue reading

Posted in AUSTRALIA, Financial Crisis, World Issues | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

The two sides of science – RF Radiation Dangers

Ken McMurtrie:

The theme of this post:
“It is estimated that 70 million couples are affected by infertility worldwide, and according to a 2014 study by the University of Exeter there is a strong link between exposure to electromagnetic radiation and a lower sperm count.”
Not the only danger though!

Originally posted on Stop Smart Meters Australia:

Before we lead into the article that appeared in the Herald Sun about wireless armour underwear, the question we need to all ask ourselves is which side of science do we trust.

On one hand we are assured by industry and government departments that there are no dangers associated with exposure to wireless radiation from devices such as mobile phones, smart meters, tablets, laptops and other devices, some of which we carry close to our bodies everyday.

On the other hand we are cautioned about the dangers of wireless devices, with many scientists now linking the effects of microwave radiation to blood cell mutation when exposed to radio frequency emitting devices, as shown here and here.

So which side has a vested interest and is fully funded by industry?  You decide.

As you will read in the Herald Sun article reprinted below, there is now a strong link between fertility…

View original 264 more words

Posted in ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH, radiation | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Global Warming? Climate Change? “A Rose by any other Name Smells the Same”

Weird title? Weird times! Weird science! (Perhaps I mean a “skunk by any other name”?)

A selection of current WUWT posts, piling on the evidence of science being more important and stronger than rhetoric and propaganda.

Throwback Thursday: another failed “end of snow” climate prediction
Another proof of alarmist prediction being WRONG!


The Pause draws blood – A new record Pause length: no warming for 18 years 7 months

Highlights the manipulation of data to suit the agenda of the alarmists.


NOAA: Increased likelihood of below-normal Atlantic hurricane season

Proves that claims of serious weather pattern changes due to “warming” are not occurring at all!


Pocket-calculator climate model outperforms billion-dollar brains

Shows likelihood of alarmist computer models to be next to useless, not that we didn’t know that already.


HadCRUT4 joins the terrestrial temperature tamperers

More proof of “cooking the books”, hardly a scientific process!


‘Global warming the greatest scam in history’ claims founder of Weather Channel

John Coleman, who co-founded the Weather Channel, shocked academics by insisting the theory of man-made climate change was no longer scientifically credible.



Posted in AGW, climate change, ENVIRONMENT, Human Behaviour, World Issues | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

MSM To Pro-Vaxxers: Don’t Argue The Facts, Show Scary Pictures!

An ‘Activist Post’ article that deals with the human parameters, the attempts made to change the opinions of others, and the problems of people not understanding what they are being told. In other words “spin”, “cognitive dissonance” and perception.

Firstly, there are facts which most people can accept as such, then there is propaganda masquerading as fact, pushed by the MSM (Mainstream media), powered by the hugely powerful, “resourcefull” and generous pharmaceutical industry. [deliberate misspelling of ‘resourcefull’ to highlight the ‘fullness’ of the actual resouces].

When the propaganda is recognized for what it is, extreme efforts are apparently in order.

A pertinent extract:Kloger does make an important point though. Most “anti-vaxxers” are unconvinced when confronted with the typical pro-vaccine argument. But that is not because they are necessarily rigid of belief, it is mostly because the typical pro-vaccine argument tends to be baseless propaganda, rooted in rhetoric instead of science.” [My bold emphasis].

An example of this is born out in this extract:That’s a very noble goal, but it’s also one of the things that makes it so bloody hard to change their minds on the topic of vaccines. Public service campaigns don’t work; nor do one-on-one explanations of why the rumors about a vaccine-autism link are wrong. In some cases, there is even a backfire effect: the greater the effort expended to persuade the anti-vaxxers, the more convinced they become that they’re right.

Note his  – “why the rumors about a vaccine-autism link are wrong“. This is a great example showing their own errors and twisted logic, and why the so-called “antivaxxers” refuse to respond. In fact, his so-called “rumours” are actually scientific evidence to which he and the industry have shut their minds. Why should we not think we are right, when we are actually right?

A good place to reiterate the other misleading mistake ‘they’ make, is the inaccurate and derogatory “anti-vaxxer”. Very few of the criticizers seriously oppose all vaccinations, all the time. Only a large number of aspects are considered as dangerous and unnecessary.

Some, if not many, of the criticizers are medical professionals, doctors and nurses. Does that not say something important?

MSM To Pro-Vaxxers: Don’t Argue The Facts, Show Scary Pictures!

By Brandon TurbevilleThe Vaccine industry, Big Pharma, and the mainstream media have some advice for vaccine zealots attempting to bully parents questioning the safety or effectiveness of vaccines into changing their minds – Don’t argue the facts! Show scary pictures!

In what can only be described as an instruction manual as to how to shame, bully, and shout a person down who simply has a different take on the best and safest way to raise their children, it is clear that the religion of vaccines and “scientism” now has the hallmark of any faith determined to spread itself – the presence of evangelicals.

The new vaccine evangelical movement is being provided with a script sheet of what to say and what to avoid when attempting to convert others to their belief system. Like most religions, the goal among the leaders and the zealots is a world where differing modes of thought no longer exist and where other opinions no longer force them to question the way they view that world.

Articles like “How To Change An Anti-Vaxxer’s Mind” by Jeffrey Kloger of TIME, are a perfect example of the recent propaganda blitz coming from the mainstream media. Kloger’s article is being quickly copied and rewritten in mainstream media outlets all across the country with the real vitriol being found in the more trendy hipster markets.

The recent propaganda push is being based upon a study by researchers at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign and published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. It’s not certain exactly how much time and effort was put into the study to discover what most undergraduate marketing students and any remotely successful politician, salesman, or sociopath already knows – that scary pictures are more effective at convincing hordes of people of an idea (true or false) than facts, reasoning, or logic.

 In other words, the study and the mainstream media have determined that it is best to go after the emotional vulnerabilities of those who are either under-researched, on the fence, or who have been subjected to bullying and social pressure since hipsters and the cool kids realized it was the “in” thing this year to attack “anti-vaxxers.”

Consider the passage by Jeffrey Kloger of TIME who writes,

That’s a very noble goal, but it’s also one of the things that makes it so bloody hard to change their minds on the topic of vaccines. Public service campaigns don’t work; nor do one-on-one explanations of why the rumors about a vaccine-autism link are wrong. In some cases, there is even a backfire effect: the greater the effort expended to persuade the anti-vaxxers, the more convinced they become that they’re right.

So it’s extremely good news that researchers at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign may at last have come up with a way to cut through the misinformation and get the truth across: Don’t just tell parents to vaccinate their children, show them what happens if they don’t.

In other words: Don’t argue with them! Just show scary pictures! The hope is to catch someone unaware, in a weakened state, or someone who is unfortunately not as well-versed on the subject.

Of course, if you can’t convince someone by providing facts, logic, and reasoning there is always the chance that the person is irrational. But there is also the very real chance that they are quite lucid and that you, in fact, armed with all your talking points, media-induced outrage, and perceived intellectual superiority, are simply wrong.

Kloger does make an important point though. Most “anti-vaxxers” are unconvinced when confronted with the typical pro-vaccine argument. But that is not because they are necessarily rigid of belief, it is mostly because the typical pro-vaccine argument tends to be baseless propaganda, rooted in rhetoric instead of science. As for the social aspect, if “anti-vaxxers” didn’t abandon their beliefs when the first few waves of obnoxious Big-Pharma propaganda came blasting through the airwaves, they are generally not impressed when their friends, family, or even complete strangers take it upon themselves to give them a regurgitation of the talking points they heard about vaccines on NPR, CNN, or read in TIME magazine.

After all, social shaming and bullying – if one’s opinions are strong enough – tend to produce the opposite of the desired effect.

This idea of showing scary pictures, however, is not just a rudimentarily effective propaganda method, it can also be quite dangerous, particularly when the scary pictures are being broadcast over every outlet in the mainstream media.

Take the spate of articles posted in the New York Times, for example. Propaganda narratives like “My Patient Doesn’t ‘Do’ Vaccines,” “The Dangers Of Vaccine Denial,” “A Discredited Vaccine Study’s Continuing Impact On Public Health,” are all aimed at painting the science surrounding the numerous demonstrations of vaccine dangers as pseudo-science and parents who question the safety of vaccines as delusional, obsessive, Luddites. They are designed to produce a false consensus within society that vaccines are safe and effective. Basically, they are designed to create a self-fulfilling prophecy – if enough people read the propaganda and believe it, particularly if they think the majority of others believe it, the victim population will come to believe the propaganda.

Now, apparently, the New York Times and its ilk will be sharing scary pictures to go along with their tripe.

Of course, we all know what happened the last time the New York Times posted scary pictures and emotional words. Maybe one day we will finally leave Iraq….

Image credit: farsight 3

Recently from Brandon Turbeville:

Brandon Turbeville is an author out of Florence, South Carolina. He has a Bachelor’s Degree from Francis Marion University and is the author of six books, Codex Alimentarius — The End of Health Freedom, 7 Real ConspiraciesFive Sense Solutions and Dispatches From a Dissident, volume 1 and volume 2, and The Road to Damascus: The Anglo-American Assault on Syria. Turbeville has published over 500 articles dealing on a wide variety of subjects including health, economics, government corruption, and civil liberties. Brandon Turbeville’s podcast Truth on The Tracks can be found every Monday night 9 pm EST at UCYTV.  He is available for radio and TV interviews. Please contact activistpost (at) gmail.com. 

This article may be re-posted in full with attribution

Posted in drugs & medication, HEALTH, Vaccinations, vaccines, World Issues | Tagged , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Massive strike hits Aussie airports as Abbott plans pay cuts for customs and immigration staff

Ken McMurtrie:

Unrest at the airports points to extreme government attacks on wages and conditions for these workers.
Each day Tony Abbott’s actions seem to move closer to dictatorship and lack of respect and obligation to Australian citizens.
Will the people remember these things come the next election?

Originally posted on THE INTERNET POST:

‘Passengers at all international airports across Australia are in for major disruptions and delays in the busy Monday morning peak period as customs and immigration staff strike against the Abbott government’s plans to cut A$8,000 from workers’ pay.

Airports have urged travelers heading overseas on Monday to “come in as early as they can.”

The strike will hit international airports in Melbourne, Sydney, Brisbane, Gold Coast, Cairns, Adelaide, Perth and Darwin. At the Melbourne airport, the strike kicked off at 7 a.m. and will continue until 11 a.m., with further action set to continue from 9 p.m. on Monday until 1 a.m. on Tuesday.’

Read more: Massive strike hits Aussie airports as Abbott plans pay cuts for customs and immigration staff

View original

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Vaccines – The Good, Bad and the Very Ugly!

This issue, as I said recently, needs to be highlighted as a global threat, one which people can understand, if they want to, and act on. Again, if they want to.

(Other global threats such as “terrorism” and “climate change” are beyond our personal abilities to fully understand and certainly to individually tackle).

The vaccination issue, however, presents ample opportunity for both individual understanding and participation. That works both ways – if, after reasonable attempts at educating oneself, a decision to support (or not), you and your kids being vaccinated, is in your control. Well, in a sensible world, that would be the case.

To remove parental choice is a very serious action, to do so when valid doubts, to say the least, are evident, flies in the face of commonsense, decency and humanity.

Many laws which are restrictive in some way, for example, for vehicle seat belts and against excessive road speeds, can be accepted as a mandatory on the basis that much good is a valid expectation and any inconveniences are minor.

These criteria are not met in the mandatory vaccination case, as clearly exampled here. The ‘good’ is conditional, damage is being done!

From ‘VacTruth‘, two information sources that tell us that all is not well in the vaccine industry or the political agenda area.crying-child

  1. Difficult to fault Robert F. Kennedy Jnr, as an information source. (Article by Christina England).

Profit over Safety – Centers for Disease Control Names 271 New Vaccinations

In a recent article published by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., titled Children at Risk – Vaccines, Government & Big Pharma’s Dirty Money, [1] he highlighted the fact that every vaccine introduced to the vaccine schedule guarantees its manufacturer millions of customers, increasing vaccine revenue by billions of dollars. However, it appears that a minimum of 56 doses of 14 vaccinations before the age of eighteen is not quite lucrative enough for the pharmaceutical industry, as according to Mr. Kennedy’s research, the CDC has 271 new vaccinations under development in the hopes that vaccine revenues will reach a staggering $100 billion by 2025.

Kennedy called the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) “a cesspool of corruption, mismanagement and dysfunction,” making it crystal clear to readers that financial gain fueled their decision making.

Read the complete article, where he convincingly supports his accusations, (here).

2. Another compelling article, from the ‘Vactruth’ Facebook page. https://www.facebook.com/vaccinetruth/posts/10153152459157989:0

Update! *Pertussis Vaccine is Causing Pertusses*

Date: Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 9:00 AM
To: Melissa_Fett@roberts.senate.gov

Hi Melissa,
We met in Washington on June 4 of this year to discuss the potential to get a Senate hearing on the falsified case definition of Lyme disease, which is likely causing thousands of Kansans to go undiagnosed and untreated. Today I have an even more urgent issue.

The current pertussis outbreak in Kansas caught my eye, as it has been reported that 100% of the pertussis cases occurred in previously vaccinated individuals.This is a clear indication that something may be wrong with the vaccine, and I find it particularly curious that this outbreak is happening during the time of year when kids are getting their back-to-school vaccines.

Here is the article that caught my eye:

“Reno County health officials are looking into over 70 cases of suspected whooping cough and have urged every single resident who has been coughing for more than two weeks to get checked by their doctor. Reno County, Kansas is not the only area of the country dealing with a surge in pertussis lately; cases have been climbing in recent years. On July 27, KWCH reported that the health department reported that all of the confirmed cases were people who were fully vaccinated, mirroring the initial outbreak that occurred at a high school in Falmouth, Cape Cod, Massachusetts last fall and other pockets of outbreaks around the country.”

Now, you may recall what we said about the Lyme vaccine having had a component that is immunosuppressive. In technical terms, it is a TLR2 agonist, or a fungal-type antigen. What these antigens do is cause an initial cytokine storm, which is then down-regulated by the immune system to prevent death from sepsis. Here is a published research article http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25353353 I found yesterday which says that,

“Filamentous hemagglutinin (FHA) is a major adhesion and virulence factor of Bordetella pertussis and also a main component of acellular pertussis vaccines.”


“Native FHA was found to strongly stimulate TLR2, but not TLR4 or TLR5 transfected cells. Among recombinant FHA fragments only the fragment spanning amino acid residues 1544-1917 was able to exhibit the TLR2 stimulating property of FHA. Interaction of FHA with TLR2 suggests its involvement in induction of the innate immune system against Bordetella pertussis.”

So, you can imagine my alarm at realizing that the current pertussis vaccines are exhibiting the exact same mechanism as the LYMErix vaccine which was pulled from the market in 2001. Substantial research exists to support this mechanism, and is available to the general public. What this means to us right now is that the Tdap and Dtap vaccines do not prevent illness, and are actually causing more illness, as well as permanent immunosuppression.

Since people are so passionate on both sides of the vaccine debate, I can understand how the Senator may be reluctant to appear to take sides. However, these particular vaccines containing acellular pertussis can be conclusively shown to cause harm. I ask that immediate action be taken to stop administration of these vaccines before more children are made ill.

Thank you,
Jennifer Lyme

vactruth.com's photo.

One more thing, and there are so many. To throw in one of my favourite questions, to which no-one has yet commented, what I consider is one of the most damning indictments on the high risk issues, that is recommended by the pharmaceutical industry, approved by the “watch-dog’ authorities, not questioned by doctors and apparently ignored by nursing staff etc.,

“Why, if in the case of all ingested medicines, recommended doses are regulated by either age or body weight, but in the case of vaccines, dosages are the same from prem babies, [2kg] (subject to some criteria), right through to fully grown adolescents, say 70Kg? Why? I ask.

Reference http://tgrule.com/2014/07/27/vaccine-product-inserts/

Merck – RECOMBIVAX HB is a vaccine indicated for prevention of infection
caused by all known subtypes of hepatitis B virus.

“2.1 Dosage and Schedule RECOMBIVAX HB:
Persons from birth through 19 years of age: A series of 3 doses (0.5 mL each) given on a 0-, 1-, and 6-month schedule.”
[What do readers think about a newborn baby receiving the same dose as a 19 year old adult?]
“5.3 Infants Weighing Less Than 2000 g
Hepatitis B vaccination should be delayed until 1 month of age or hospital discharge in infants weighing <2000 g if the mother is documented to be HBsAg negative at the time of the infant’s birth.”
[What do readers think about this criteria? Firstly, less than 2000gm – delay vaccination, 2010gm – apparently ok. Secondly, if mother not HBsAg negative, apparently no minimum weight limitation]


Posted in AUSTRALIA, Civil Liberties, drugs & medication, HEALTH, Vaccinations, vaccines | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments

The Economic Hitmen

Ken McMurtrie:

Really Good! Simple, Clear, Concise and absolutely Spot On!

Originally posted on THE INTERNET POST:

A great illustration on how corporations take control of countries, and how capitalism drives the expansion of the Military Industrial Complex.

View original

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Opinion: How Australian government and media benefits from the Sydney Siege

Ken McMurtrie:

Having just become aware of the ‘Tott News’ blog per the last post, I discover this article providing detail coverage of the background aspects of the Lindt Cafe siege incident.
The incident was always open to critical thinking and suspicion. For all the reasons presented in the article, it is appropriate for this to have greater exposure and critical consideration by the general public.
It is a matter of “connecting the dots”, to begin to understand the bigger picture surrounding all individual events.
This opinion piece makes good sense and provides a useful basis for Australian public awareness.

Originally posted on TOTT News:

Tony Abbott and his wife Margie at the memorial service. Photo: Malaysian Insider

In the early hours of Tuesday morning, the nation was stopped as a reported 16 hour siege in the heart of Sydney’s CBD by Muslim Cleric, Man Haron Monis came to an end with police fatally engaging the suspect holding 17 hostages in Lindt Cafe. The aftermath has left a country in shock, and left most in disbelief at the startling narrative that has unfolded right before our eyes.

Indeed, to the credit of the Australian public, an unbreakable show of unity has prevailed through this shocking event; through the fear and through the attempted division – reminding us all of the strength we have when we are united as one.

However, as Ethan Nash examines in the following opinion piece, the mainstream media and government establishments are once again using fear-mongering, sensationalism, bias reporting and emotional…

View original 2,898 more words

Posted in 'WAR on(of) TERROR', AUSTRALIA, Civil Liberties | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment