9/11 and the Orwellian Redefinition of “Conspiracy Theory”


Paul Craig Roberts

Image via Wikipedia

I publish this because, besides giving an interesting look at the ever-increasing existence and claims for “conspiracy theories”, Paul includes a great summary of the 9/11 story. The official story, so full of ‘holes’, lies, distortions, cover-ups and claimed conspiracies, of an incident with world-wide repercussions involving thousands of deaths and unlimited injuries, mental and physical. In addition, the incident has turned the US into a country no longer of freedom, but of fear and persecution. Not the incident actually, but the government’s response to it!  It also highlights the misuse of the term ‘conspiracy theory’.

So many people have so much to account for!

Paul Craig Roberts, Global Research, posted this on ‘Sott.net.’:
 
“While we were not watching, conspiracy theory has undergone Orwellian redefinition.A “conspiracy theory” no longer means an event explained by a conspiracy. Instead, it now means any explanation, or even a fact, that is out of step with the government’s explanation and that of its media pimps.

For example, online news broadcasts of RT have been equated with conspiracy theories by the New York Times simply because RT reports news and opinions that the New York Times does not report and the US government does not endorse.

In other words, as truth becomes uncomfortable for government and its Ministry of Propaganda, truth is redefined as conspiracy theory, by which is meant an absurd and laughable explanation that we should ignore.

When piles of carefully researched books, released government documents, and testimony of eye witnesses made it clear that Oswald was not President John F. Kennedy‘s assassin, the voluminous research, government documents, and verified testimony was dismissed as “conspiracy theory.”

In other words, the truth of the event was unacceptable to the authorities and to the Ministry of Propaganda that represents the interests of authorities.

The purest example of how Americans are shielded from truth is the media’s (including many Internet sites’) response to the large number of professionals who find the official explanation of September 11, 2001, inconsistent with everything they, as experts, know about physics, chemistry, structural engineering, architecture, fires, structural damage, the piloting of airplanes, the security procedures of the United States, NORAD’s capabilities, air traffic control, airport security, and other matters. These experts, numbering in the thousands, have been shouted down by know-nothings in the media who brand the experts as “conspiracy theorists.”

This despite the fact that the official explanation endorsed by the official media is the most extravagant conspiracy theory in human history.

Let’s take a minute to re-acquaint ourselves with the official explanation, which is not regarded as a conspiracy theory despite the fact that it comprises an amazing conspiracy. The official truth is that a handful of young Muslim Arabs who could not fly airplanes, mainly Saudi Arabians who came neither from Iraq nor from Afghanistan, outwitted not only the CIA and the FBI, but also all 16 US intelligence agencies and all intelligence agencies of US allies including Israel’s Mossad, which is believed to have penetrated every terrorist organization and which carries out assassinations of those whom Mossad marks as terrorists.

In addition to outwitting every intelligence agency of the United States and its allies, the handful of young Saudi Arabians outwitted the National Security Council, the State Department, NORAD, airport security four times in the same hour on the same morning, air traffic control, caused the US Air Force to be unable to launch interceptor aircraft, and caused three well-built steel-structured buildings, including one not hit by an airplane, to fail suddenly in a few seconds as a result of limited structural damage and small, short-lived, low-temperature fires that burned on a few floors.

The Saudi terrorists were even able to confound the laws of physics and cause WTC building seven to collapse at free fall speed for several seconds, a physical impossibility in the absence of explosives used in controlled demolition.

The story that the government and the media have told us amounts to a gigantic conspiracy, really a script for a James Bond film. Yet, anyone who doubts this improbable conspiracy theory is defined into irrelevance by the obedient media.

Anyone who believes an architect, structural engineer, or demolition expert who says that the videos show that the buildings are blowing up, not falling down, anyone who believes a Ph.D. physicist who says that the official explanation is inconsistent with known laws of physics, anyone who believes expert pilots who testify that non-pilots or poorly-qualified pilots cannot fly airplanes in such maneuvers, anyone who believes the 100 or more first responders who testify that they not only heard explosions in the towers but personally experienced explosions, anyone who believes University of Copenhagen nano-chemist Niels Harrit who reports finding unreacted nano-thermite in dust samples from the WTC towers, anyone who is convinced by experts instead of by propaganda is dismissed as a kook.

In America today, and increasingly throughout the Western world, actual facts and true explanations have been relegated to the realm of kookiness. Only people who believe lies are socially approved and accepted as patriotic citizens.

Indeed, a writer or newscaster is not even permitted to report the findings of 9/11 skeptics. In other words, simply to report Professor Harrit’s findings now means that you endorse them or agree with them. Everyone in the US print and TV media knows that he/she will be instantly fired if they report Harrit’s findings, even with a laugh. Thus, although Harrit has reported his findings on European television and has lectured widely on his findings in Canadian universities, the fact that he and the international scientific research team that he led found unreacted nano-thermite in the WTC dust and have offered samples to other scientists to examine has to my knowledge never been reported in the American media.

Even Internet sites on which I am among the readers’ favorites will not allow me to report on Harrit’s findings.

As I reported earlier, I myself had experience with a Huffington Post reporter who was keen to interview a Reagan presidential appointee who was in disagreement with the Republican wars in the Middle East. After he published the interview that I provided at his request, he was terrified to learn that I had reported findings of 9/11 investigators. To protect his career, he quickly inserted on the online interview that my views on the Iraq and Afghanistan invasions could be dismissed as I had reported unacceptable findings about 9/11.

The unwillingness or inability to entertain any view of 9/11 different from the official view dooms to impotence many Internet sites that are opposed to the wars and to the rise of the domestic US police state. These sites, for whatever the reasons, accept the government’s explanation of 9/11; yet, they try to oppose the “war on terror” and the police state which are the consequences of accepting the government’s explanation. Trying to oppose the consequences of an event whose explanation you accept is an impossible task.

If you believe that America was attacked by Muslim terrorists and is susceptible to future attacks, then a “war on terror” and a domestic police state to root out terrorists become necessary to make Americans safe. The idea that a domestic police state and open-ended war might be more dangerous threats to Americans than terrorists is an impermissible thought.

A country whose population has been trained to accept the government’s word and to shun those who question it is a country without liberty in its future. ”

Source:

About Ken McMurtrie

Retired Electronics Engineer, most recently installing and maintaining medical X-Ray equipment. A mature age "student" of Life and Nature, an advocate of Truth, Justice and Humanity, promoting awareness of the injustices in the world.
This entry was posted in 'WAR on(of) TERROR', 9/11 tragedy, Civil Liberties, Conspiracies, united states and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to 9/11 and the Orwellian Redefinition of “Conspiracy Theory”

  1. ted says:

    Orwellian,indeed. However, one of the requirements for successfully debunking unofficial versions of an event is to set up a kind of strawman, i.e., putting forth information in support of an alternative explanation that has some creibility, even supported by falsely planted evidence, that “proves” the alternative incorrect. What I’m referring to is the thermite explosions that did occur, but had little to do with the collapse of the towers. THEL advanced weaponry (Northrop Grumman, Boeing) could and we believe did destroy the WTC. All forensic evidence supports this concept, and its utter unbelievability (high energy beams of such destructive power actually being used) places this explanation completely off the table. PERFECT. Well played, global power elite.

    • Fair comment.
      Unfortunately, such false information does create some support for the ‘official’ story in the eyes of the prospective conspiracy believer.
      However, perceptive conspiracy believers, the ones who know the official story is bunkum, are not , hopefully, taken in.
      In the case you cite, the WTC7 building and almost surely the two main towers, were not brought down by aircraft collision or fires.
      What the actual process was to demolish them is really irrelevant. Importantly, whatever method was used, it took months to set up.
      Of greater importance, it certainly wasn’t bin Laden or any “Al Qaeda” or Islamic terrorist group, and it wasn’t carried out without substantial internal US support and cover-up.
      Thanks for your comment.

  2. A new link on ‘conspiracies’: http://thegreenmanweblog.wordpress.com/2011/06/10/a-brand-new-conspiracy-in-theory/

    “With surprising enthusiasm, the BBC has recently warmed to the subject of the “conspiracy theory”. I first noticed it a few weeks ago, shortly after Osama Bin Laden’s liquidation by the US, when, for several days it was difficult to find a slot on the radio that didn’t find time to expound on conspiracy theories and how obviously absurd they were. Apparently, according to the esteemed Beeb, there were people out there foolish enough to distrust and even question the official explanation of what exactly had happened in that compound in Pakistan. Such people were duly pronounced to be “Conspiracy Theorists,” the same marginalized eccentrics who doubted the official version of events on 9/11, who questioned the US and European involvement in Afghanistan, and who have dared to suggest that the recent banking crisis was more than just the result of an unfortunate set of coincidences.”

    “What I do care about is being maneuvered into the role of “conspiracy theorist” by the media of the middle-ground simply for having the temerity to think for myself and form my own picture about how the material world is organised.”

    Worth a look.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s