Here is some genuine science being used and the conclusion(s) do not support the need for concern about a warming trend, if the trend in fact exists at all.
I believe the article provides support for my general contention that however good the science is, the subject “climate and its factors” are of such complexity and variability as to make IPCC and political carbon control decisions untenable. Reference here.
Related articles
- AGW – The Mother of All Hoaxes (tgrule.com)
- AGW – Climate Science made Clear at WUWT (tgrule.com)
- Climate Science – The Abuse Of Science For A Global Political Agenda (toryaardvark.com)
- The New Definition Of Extreme Weather (stevengoddard.wordpress.com)
- Tim Ball: Climate Science Falsehoods Repeated With PR Orchestrated Counterattack (junkscience.com)
- Why a carbon tax is still a bad idea (aei-ideas.org)
- Steve Milloy: Models, Not Climate, Are Hypersensitive to Carbon Dioxide (junkscience.com)
The GOLDEN RULE 