What can one say? Am I stupid for believing this to be conclusive proof of insider knowledge and therefore insider involvement in at least not attempting to prevent the disaster?
Or are the people who stick to their beliefs that a few Islamic militant amateurs planned and executed the attacks without insider collusion, stupid? Well, what do you think?
- Fed Economist Fired for Investigating Suspicious 9-11 Cash Transfers; and Steve Keen Exposes Financial Fallacies (theinternetpost.net)
- The 9/11 Fed Cash Flow Mystery (globalelite.tv)
Would you be surprised to learn that tens of billions in cold, hard cash was shuffled around just prior to 9-11 by none other than the Fed itself? Probably not. Here’s a graph, illustrating the change in USD currency production over a ten week period prior to 9-11 compared to the average over the five years prior (which, by the way, includes the Y2K money printing orgy in the year 2000 itself, which skews the average higher):
That’s right. The average increase was $8 billion over five years, but it exploded to $18 billion just prior to that fateful day. None other than a Federal Reserve economist discovered this and was promptly fired for his efforts to reveal the cause. The official story involves an Argentine currency crisis. Clearly, this required his termination.