In the early days of conservation awareness, I had respect for David Suzuki. Now I realize that he is another specialist fixated on “the cause”.
He has no understanding of the science and is certainly showing his ignorance and agenda orientation.Related articles
- Australia’s Q&A reveals David Suzuki as a complete know-nothing by very first question (mothersagainstturbines.com)
- Q and A Checklist : The Alarmist Claims of Eco-Extremist David Suzuki (climatism.wordpress.com)
An extreme environmental ideologue, who advocates action on global warming and saving the planet, David Suzuki flies around the world on carbon-fuelled speaking tours and charges thousands of dollars per appearance, whilst exhorting the rest of us to cut back on our excessive lifestyles.
The ABC therefore thinks he’s Gaia incarnate and offered him a full Q&A to himself to spout his propaganda.
Bill Koutalianos, of the Climate Sceptics Party, hit him with the first question on temperature flatlining since 1998. When Suzuki asked how he got to that conclusion, Bill rattled off the acronyms for the four main global temperature sets, GISS, HadCRUT, UAH, RSS. Suzuki was baffled. Ideology and ignorance combined.
David Suzuki’s Video is very nice.He explained about ignorance.I can understand about this Clearly.Thanks for Your Sharing.Climate change effects
Hi. I retrieved your comment from the spam queue because it is relevant to to the topic and has something to say.
However, My reblogging of the post presenting David Suzuki’s video was to to show him up as a person misleading the public.
So we have opposing views on the “climate change” scene.
I have no issues with sensible information and comments applying to this debate, but must suggest to you that blaming CO2 for anything other than a minor influence on climate and the weather can not be validated scientifically or by the evidence.
Hence carbon trading, control and taxes are irrelevant to the planet’s well-being and are not justified.
David Suzuki is following a political path, either knowingly or not, and is exhibiting a great deal of ignorance himself.
Thanks for your comment.