If a practical exercise at school, it would be called cheating.
In a responsible, honest science environment, it would be called surprising dishonesty.
In the warmist, agenda-driven, political fraternity it is still deemed to be settled science, peer -reviewed and meaningful.The “Emperor” is now devoid of clothing, as is the IPCC statement of global warming due to CO2 increases, devoid of any credibility.
The rest of the world that accepts this IPCC garbage should be ashamed of their own gullibility, or collusion, whichever applies.
Related articles
- The IPCC Exposed (disclose.tv)
- No Warming For 70% Of The IPCC’s History (climatism.wordpress.com)
- Top Scientists Slam and Ridicule UN IPCC Climate Report (thenewamerican.com)
- MIT’s Lindzen: IPCC Report “Hilariously Flawed” (minx.cc)
Figure 1.4 of the Second Order Draft clearly showed the discrepancy between models and observations, though IPCC’s covering text reported otherwise. I discussed this in a post leading up to the IPCC Report, citing Ross McKitrick’s article in National Post and Reiner Grundmann’s post at Klimazweiberl. Needless to say, this diagram did not survive. Instead, IPCC replaced the damning (but accurate) diagram with a new diagram in which the inconsistency has been disappeared.
View original post 804 more words
The GOLDEN RULE 