Gross Scientific Negligence – IPCC Ignored Huge Body Of Peer-Reviewed Literature Showing Sun’s Clear Impact


This impressive post by P Gosselin on ‘NoTricksZone’.

The IPCC have a choice, they can look at all relevant information and draw scientific and logical conclusions, but their agenda prohibits such an approach to this global issue of gigantic ramifications. They therefore run the risk of eventually being caught out.

Readers have the same choice, and can be satisfied that they have eliminated any bias and misguided trust in partial authorities. They otherwise run the risk of discovering that basing their faith in a pseudo science has cost them considerable money and freedom.

Proven by thousands of temperature datasets, the earth’s climate fluctuated cyclically in the past, and there’s an overwhelming body of evidence showing a close correlation with solar activity and other powerful natural factors. If the IPCC had truly examined past temperature developments and compared them to solar data, they’d have seen there is something remarkable there.
Yet in the IPCC AR5, Working Group 1 takes only a cursory look at solar activity and its possible impacts on climate in IPCC AR5 before simply dismissing the sun altogether. The Earth’s sole supplier of energy, the sun, and all its dynamism, in fact gets only a couple of pages in a 2200-page report, about 0.1%. That alone is a monumental scandal. It’s incompetence and negligence on the grandest of scales.

This will certainly go down in the books as one of the greatest scientific debacles of human history.

If the IPCC had directed the same energy and resources to make the sun and natural factors the culprit for climate change as it has with CO2, they’d certainly have a far more convincing case today,and many of the questions it claims are still open would be closed. But obviously the IPCC’s sole intent is to frame mankind and its CO2 emissions as the culprit for something that stopped happening 16 years ago. This is fraud, not science.
The IPCC took the same negligent approach with sea levels: dismissing non-alarmist science in favor of nutty, doomsday scenarios.
I spent half a day searching for papers that provide evidence of a significant impact on climate by the sun and natural factors, and another full day sorting through them. I limited the scope of the search to 2008 – 2012, i.e. papers since the last IPCC report. There are many more papers of course prior to 2008.

What follows is a list of papers I found in just a few hours that the IPCC should have taken a much closer look at instead of just dismissing. The list of course is not complete.

Read this complete, informative article here.

By P Gosselin
By P Gosselin
By P Gosselin
Advertisements

About Ken McMurtrie

Retired Electronics Engineer, most recently installing and maintaining medical X-Ray equipment. A mature age "student" of Life and Nature, an advocate of Truth, Justice and Humanity, promoting awareness of the injustices in the world.
This entry was posted in AGENDA 21, AGW, carbon tax, climate change, ENVIRONMENT, Human Behaviour, New World Order, World Issues and tagged , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

12 Responses to Gross Scientific Negligence – IPCC Ignored Huge Body Of Peer-Reviewed Literature Showing Sun’s Clear Impact

  1. hirundine608 says:

    Yes, but how does a government divert tax money to combat the sun?

    • Yes, that is the question!
      They had to find something else and picked on a trace quantity gas that clearly does not significantly affect our climate.
      One has to hand it to them for the courage of their convictions.
      The power of the pen is mightier than the validity of science.
      The collective comprehension of the populace is driven by spin and not the science. Not to mention the power of the “Dollar” in recruiting advocates.

  2. omanuel says:

    If deception about the Sun has been government policy since 1945 to save the world from nuclear annihilation by ignition of its atmosphere, they had to keep attention focused away from the Sun.

    • ” nuclear annihilation by ignition of its atmosphere”
      Oliver, can you please expand on this theory?

      • omanuel says:

        I will look up the quote from Aston and post it here later tonight.

        That fear may have been exacerbated by the absence of reliable information on Japan’s atomic bomb facility that USSR troops captured, with Japanese scientists and engineers, shortly after they supposedly exploded their first bomb on the morning of 12 July 1945.

        It is unclear how fear of another nuclear weapon – that might ignite the atmosphere – may have been manipulated in negotiations to form the United Nations on 24 October 1945.

  3. omanuel says:

    Ken,

    1. On 12 Dec 1922 the last sentence of Dr. Francis W. Aston’s Nobel Prize Lecture mentioned the possibly disastrous consequence of releasing nuclear energy:

    “In this event the whole of the hydrogen on the earth might be transformed at once and the success of the experiment published at large to the Universe as a new star.”

    http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/chemistry/laureates/1922/aston-lecture.pdf

    2. As the atomic bomb was developed at Los Alamos, scientists seriously considered that Earth’s atmosphere might be ignited. See “What didn’t happen,” Science Musings

    http://www.sciencemusings.com/2005/10/what-didnt-happen.html

    3. On 12 Aug 1945, Japan apparently exploded an atomic bomb off the east coast of Konan, Korea. Troops from the USSR invaded had Manchuria on 9 Aug 1945. They managed to seize the atomic bomb facility and capture Japanese scientists and technicians at Konan, Korea soon after that explosion. [David Snell, “Japan developed atomic bomb; Russians grabbed scientists,” The Atlanta Constitution (Headlines, page 1, 3 October 1946)]

    http://www.my-jia.com/The_Flight_of_the_Hog_Wild/Atlanta_Constitution_David_Snell_atomic_bomb_Korea.htm

    4. On 29 Aug 1945, an American B-29 flew to Konan. It was shot down by Russian Yak fighter aircraft. The US crew was captured by Russians. US/USSR negotiations eventually won release of the Americans.

    5. On 24 Oct 1945 the United Nations was established. We do not know if negotiators might have believed the USSR then had atomic bombs capable of igniting Earth’s atmosphere.

  4. omanuel says:

    Thanks to information received today from author, Mr. Bill Streifer, his Russian co-author, reporter Irek Sabitov, and Stanford physicist Kenneth N. Ricci, it appears the destruction of western economies may not be a mere coincidence.

    USSR troops found a facility to produce deuterium (H-2) in the Japanese nuclear bomb production site that they captured at Konan, Korea in Aug 1945. Since H-fusion bombs use atomic bomb triggers to ignite fusion of deuterium (H-2), . . .

    USSR possessed information to build the first H-bomb and could negotiate for unconditional surrender of Allied countries when they met to form the United Nations on 24 Oct 1945.

    That explanation for Climategate and the collapse of Allied constitutional governments will be in the autobiography currently being written, “A Journey to the Core of the Sun.”

    A summary has already been posted here:

    http://chiefio.wordpress.com/2013/10/13/fuddites/#comment-55802

  5. omanuel says:

    Since Japan had facilities to produce deuterium (H-2) at Konan, Korea and the H-bomb uses an atomic bomb to fuse H-2, USSR had access to H-bomb technology when USSR troops captured the Konan site in Aug 1945.

    Thus, USSR had the strongest hand at the negotiating table when the UN was formed in Oct 1945 and seems to control most of the globe today.

    Despite Ronald Reagan’s assurance the Evil Empire died !

    Oliver K. Manuel

    • hirundine608 says:

      I often wonder why the H-bomb or similar is such an attraction? When it is obvious to most of us. That to use these weapons would make the globe uninhabitable for people? Sure, there are likely other weapons produced since then? Ones that kill people but leave property unharmed. Yet the focus remains on these extremely destructive weapons.

      My personal notion is that they become a wonderful way to use up taxes. For the benefit of those in power. A substance like uranium, has little other use. Especially once it becomes waste material. The infrastructure for the bombs and the delivery systems. Then become a perfect foil, to extract taxation. At the expense of, other, more social programs. Funding university research and weapons makers, through corporate interest and then funnelled back to the politicians in various manner.

      Countries like USSR or Russia. European Americas and Asia. All under the Central Banks, of the Rothschild empire. Use the same methods. Pretending enmity, providing perfect cover for the ongoing arms races.

      Empires are inherently evil. That is their nature. USSR or USA. British, French, Babylon or Roman.

      I doubt many took Reagan at face value? In the 1980’s myself and the others, ordinary people. were not reassured. Statements like that, from Reagan. Were about providing sound-bites for the media that is part of the propaganda machine. They are not the psyche of a nation, or people. Most people are too interested in putting food on the table and a retirement fund when older. Most people do not concern themselves with their own freedom, or that of their fellows. They just accept and go about their day with those selfish priorities.

      Now, just what does HAARP do?

    • omanuel says:

      Those who decided to take control of the world in 1945 are not to blame.

      Anybody would want to avoid the possibility of instant death from nuclear annihilation.

      That is why Conservatives and Liberals, Democrats and Republicans work together to deceive:

      http://theinternetpost.net/2013/10/20/the-us-plantation-of-amerika/

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s