Time to revisit the “gobal warming” debate.
This WUWT article authored by Donald C Morton provides a substantial scientific overview of the failure of the IPCC “science” to convincingly support their view and insistence that we must control CO2 levels to avoid catastrophic life-changing consequences.
Many aspects are discussed, all of them deserving consideration. All of them sufficient to justify the realization that all is not well in the CAGW “world”, and that we, the people, should not be accepting the “brainwashing” of the politically motivated global agenda thrust at us by the IPCC, media and compliant organizations and governments.
Your choice – accept theories and practices that do not stand up to rigorous scientific examination, or use your abilities to make your own assessments. If that is not within your capabilities, consider the reality of there being a sound scientific basis for being doubtful and for mistrusting the advice of the global warmists.
“Frequently we hear that we must accept that the earth is warming at an alarming rate due to anthropogenic CO2 because 90+% climatologists believe it. However, science is not a consensus discipline. It depends on skeptics questioning every hypothesis, every theory and every model until all rational challenges are satisfied. Any endeavor that must prove itself by appealing to consensus or demeaning skeptics is not science.“
Considering that this “90%” claim is, in itself, bogus, there is much about which to be uncertain.
Herzberg Program in Astronomy and Astrophysics, National Research Council of Canada
The Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change released in September 2013 continues the pattern of previous ones raising alarm about a warming earth due to anthropogenic greenhouse gases. This paper identifies six problems with this conclusion – the mismatch of the model predictions with the temperature observations, the assumption of positive feedback, possible solar effects, the use of a global temperature, chaos in climate, and the rejection of any skepticism.
THIS IS AN ASTROPHYSICIST’S VIEW OF CURRENT CLIMATOLOGY. I WELCOME CRITICAL COMMENTS.
View original post 3,341 more words