CRISES IN CLIMATOLOGY


Time to revisit the “gobal warming” debate.
This WUWT article authored by Donald C Morton provides a substantial scientific overview of the failure of the IPCC “science” to convincingly support their view and insistence that we must control CO2 levels to avoid catastrophic life-changing consequences.
Many aspects are discussed, all of them deserving consideration. All of them sufficient to justify the realization that all is not well in the CAGW “world”, and that we, the people, should not be accepting the “brainwashing” of the politically motivated global agenda thrust at us by the IPCC, media and compliant organizations and governments.
Your choice – accept theories and practices that do not stand up to rigorous scientific examination, or use your abilities to make your own assessments. If that is not within your capabilities, consider the reality of there being a sound scientific basis for being doubtful and for mistrusting the advice of the global warmists.

Frequently we hear that we must accept that the earth is warming at an alarming rate due to anthropogenic CO2 because 90+% climatologists believe it. However, science is not a consensus discipline. It depends on skeptics questioning every hypothesis, every theory and every model until all rational challenges are satisfied. Any endeavor that must prove itself by appealing to consensus or demeaning skeptics is not science.

Considering that this “90%” claim is, in itself, bogus, there is much about which to be uncertain.

Watts Up With That?

Guest essay by Donald C. Morton

Herzberg Program in Astronomy and Astrophysics, National Research Council of Canada

ABSTRACT

The Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change released in September 2013 continues the pattern of previous ones raising alarm about a warming earth due to anthropogenic greenhouse gases. This paper identifies six problems with this conclusion – the mismatch of the model predictions with the temperature observations, the assumption of positive feedback, possible solar effects, the use of a global temperature, chaos in climate, and the rejection of any skepticism.

THIS IS AN ASTROPHYSICIST’S VIEW OF CURRENT CLIMATOLOGY. I WELCOME CRITICAL COMMENTS.

View original post 3,341 more words

Advertisements

About Ken McMurtrie

Retired Electronics Engineer, most recently installing and maintaining medical X-Ray equipment. A mature age "student" of Life and Nature, an advocate of Truth, Justice and Humanity, promoting awareness of the injustices in the world.
This entry was posted in AGENDA 21, AGW, carbon tax, climate change, ENVIRONMENT, World Issues and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to CRISES IN CLIMATOLOGY

  1. omanuel says:

    World leaders worked together behind the scenes after WWII to:

    1. Form the United Nations
    2. Hide the energy in cores of
    _ A. Heavy atoms like uranium
    _ B. Some planets like Jupiter
    _ C. Ordinary stars like the Sun
    _ D. Galaxies like the Milky Way

    The joke is on these wannabe world tyrants. The whole universe lives and breathes because:

    The repulsive force between neutrons causes the universe to expand, and

    The attractive gravitational force between atoms causes it to collapse.

    What a superb engineering design. Far beyond the comprehension of “consensus-scientist-for-hire !”

    So relax and enjoy the show.

    Oliver K. Manuel

    “Oh what a tangled web we weave
    When first we practiced to deceive!”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s