Disturbing New Chemical Found in Fetuses

Seemingly not of scary significance in itself, but definitely something that should be seen as a warning sign.
Our environment and, as seen here, our bodies, are awash with unnatural chemical substances.
A common factor in this scenario is that harmful effects only appear after some time, after damage is done and evident. Sometimes minor, sometimes major, especially if we take into account pharmaceutical drugs. Most people are not old enough to remember Thalidomide, a drug prescribed for pregnant women that caused devastating birth defects. Currently, justifiable questions are being asked about excessive vaccinating.
Two things are relevant – inadequate safety testing is surely a huge factor, and industry and authority attitude and lack of responsibility, sometimes ethics and honesty, in placing profit-making as a higher priority than public safety.
Together with environmental radiation (nuclear, Electromotive Field and atmospheric {chem-trails}) we seriously threaten our physical and genetic health future.
What is sad is that this is already known to a lot of people who should know better and who should be taking greater action to protect our futures.
What is unnacceptable is that some of these responsible people are justifiably suspected of deliberately ignoring the risks and, in the extreme, deliberately instigating them.
The public needs to be aware and more vocal.


A recent study has found a disturbing exposure of the germ-killing chemical triclosan to the fetuses of pregnant women in Brooklyn.

Triclosan has been linked to reproductive and development issues in animal testing. It is often used as the active ingredient in antibacterial soaps and appears in more than 2,000 consumer products including toothpastes, body washes, school supplies and toys.

In the study, scientists tested 181 pregnant Brooklyn women, most of them black. Half tested positive for triclosan in their umbilical cord blood samples, signifying triclosan was being transferred to fetuses.

Scientists also  discovered that 100 percent of the mothers contained triclosan in their urine, while 86 percent tested positive for another antibacterial chemical, triclocarban, said co-author Benny Pycke.  The levels are higher than the national U.S. average and are also the first to present “body burden” data for the ways triclosan and triclocarban can remain in the body during…

View original post 189 more words


About Ken McMurtrie

Retired Electronics Engineer, most recently installing and maintaining medical X-Ray equipment. A mature age "student" of Life and Nature, an advocate of Truth, Justice and Humanity, promoting awareness of the injustices in the world.
This entry was posted in additives, drugs & medication, ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH, radiation and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s