New Study: Two Thousand Years of Northern European Summer Temperatures Show a Downward Trend


So where is the evidence that Carbon is a significant factor in global temperature trends?Featured Image -- 16859
Air pollution needs controlling, but what has that to do with carbon controls and costs?
So where is the justification for the political and financial controls?
Perhaps world government agenda is the real reason!

Watts Up With That?

In a paper published in the Journal of Quaternary Science, Esper et al. (2014) write that tree-ring chronologies of maximum latewood density (MXD) “are most suitable to reconstruct annually resolved summer temperature variations of the late Holocene.” And working with what they call “the world’s two longest MXD-based climate reconstructions” – those of Melvin et al. (2013) and Esper et al. (2012) – they combined portions of each to produce a new-and-improved summer temperature history for northern Europe that stretches all the way “from 17 BC to the present.” And what did they thereby learn?

As the international team of researchers from the Czech Republic, Finland, Germany, Greece, Sweden and Switzerland describes it, this history depicts “a long-term cooling trend of -0.30°C per 1,000 years over the Common Era in northern Europe” (see figure below). Most important of all, however, they note that their temperature reconstruction…

View original post 211 more words

Advertisements

About Ken McMurtrie

Retired Electronics Engineer, most recently installing and maintaining medical X-Ray equipment. A mature age "student" of Life and Nature, an advocate of Truth, Justice and Humanity, promoting awareness of the injustices in the world.
This entry was posted in AGENDA 21, AGW, ENVIRONMENT, New World Order and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to New Study: Two Thousand Years of Northern European Summer Temperatures Show a Downward Trend

  1. hirundine608 says:

    Thanks for opening my eyes to this fallacy. As pointed out, pollution whether it be of air or one of several things like radiation. Needs to be addressed over these concerns. Strangely, the oil producers and consumers seem to be the ones more actively calling for change? Reminds one of that mote in the eye?

    • If I remember correctly, the IPCC team “scientists” used tree ring proxies for some periods of time but abandoned either all of them or maybe just the portion that didn’t support the “hockey stick” uptick.
      Again, IIRC, something similar with ice core proxies.
      Whatever, the “science” is absolutely not settled, which of course is the way it should be with “true” science.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s