VIP Pedophile Ring Victim Comes Forward

Posted on December 21, 2015 by Ken McMurtrie

A subject so far not included in my many injustices posts. Commonly they are reported as criminal behaviour in other countries, often reaching VERY high up the hierarchy ladder.
This report concerns Australia, {“Poor Fellow, My Country”, [acknowledgment Xavier Herbert]}, and some unexpected incredibly high officials and media personnel.
Hence the decision to post it.
Two Australian media persons at least have been convicted in the past, but that fades into insignificance (almost), given this revelation.
Mind you, we have here what is alleged and it cannot be taken as anything but hearsay, legally.
Truth or not?, hopefully that will be established in a just and impartial manner.
Hopefully Fiona Bartlett, in offering it for sharing, will accept the responsibility for the credibility of the claims and what is in this reblog.

About Ken McMurtrie

Retired Electronics Engineer, most recently installing and maintaining medical X-Ray equipment. A mature age "student" of Life and Nature, an advocate of Truth, Justice and Humanity, promoting awareness of the injustices in the world.

View all posts by Ken McMurtrie →

This entry was posted in AUSTRALIA, Corruption, Human Behaviour and tagged Australia, Fiona Bartlett, Pedophile Rings, Pedophilia, Pedophilia in high places. Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to VIP Pedophile Ring Victim Comes Forward

Ken McMurtrie says:

December 22, 2015 at 11:05

Why am I not surprised to discover that I have opened a “can of worms”?
Had I carried out more research, would I have concluded that there is too much doubt about the credibility of Fiona and her claims? Perhaps, but there is also a great deal of doubt whether any of her detractors are themselves credible.
For example “Media Watch” and this publication – http://www.abc.net.au/mediawatch/transcripts/s4343957.htm :
Many are calling out for evidence – a weak critical effort, what evidence can there possibly be? Certainly none that will be revealed in the press.
The power of influence that opposes genuine investigations into pedophilia should be recognized as a factor.
Can the public media be relied on to provide meaningful investigative journalism? Not any more, it seems! Too many examples of that being something in the past.
As usual in these issues, character assassination features regularly, pretty much irrelevant as only the facts are important and they are what require analysis.
Interesting that there are many supporters of Fiona who claim to be aware of what she reveals, and indeed experienced similar criminal and anti-social behaviour.
So, I am prepared to stand by the post until some substantive, meaningful evidence indicates otherwise.

Reply
Ken McMurtrie says:

December 22, 2015 at 13:24

Wait, there’s more!
On the other side of the fence, so to speak, is the apparent opposite to the abhorrence of child molestation.
Undoubtedly, pedophilia is not uncommon globally, more exposed (excuse the term) because of past (?) Catholic Church practices and the media coverage, more detested because of the presence of predatory molesters, but it seems that only the “tip of the iceberg” is visible.
What I am now learning is the most worrying thing of all – there are people, academics, otherwise decent human beings who have no qualms about these practices.
In fact, proposing them to be natural acceptable behaviour, and suggesting legalization is appropriate.
With such attitudes, it is easier to understand why laws exist to protect offenders, and persons willing to expose violators themselves end up in jail.
Easier to understand the probable extent of the practices exposed by Fiona and others, and the reason for such opposition to them being public knowledge, easier to understand the readiness to hide the truth and the power available to achieve the cover-ups.

It is disappointing to find such thinking is not rare. Reference
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=paedophilia&t=ffnt&ia=about
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/10948796/Paedophilia-is-natural-and-normal-for-males.html
People justify their own biasses easily – “”Paedophilic interest is natural and normal for human males,” said the presentation. “At least a sizeable minority of normal males would like to have sex with children … Normal males are aroused by children.” ”
How unreal is that? What gall to use the word ‘normal’ in that context!
Even if it is so in some cases, it is also natural to “covet thy neighbours wife” for the perhaps average, “normal” male, but to not act on such urges is what is supposed to separate us humans from the ‘lower’ animal species. Even when such urges are acted upon, should they be condoned?
In an extreme case, would they consider it should be legal and/or acceptable, “normal” behaviour to have sex in public?

Reply
Ken McMurtrie says:

December 23, 2015 at 11:26

This is the type of morally offensive material apparently acceptable to the media.
http://renegadetribune.com/new-miley-cyrus-music-video-promotes-sexualization-infants/

Reply
ggita32 says:

December 24, 2015 at 08:50

great job Ken. This subject, VIP Pedophilia, needs more exposure. I find it sickening that in most western governments and religions, the leadership condones and covers up the these actions… keep it up my friend.

Reply
- Ken McMurtrie says:
  
  December 24, 2015 at 10:20
  
  Thanks ggita, if you ever see any of David Icke’s posts you will see some amazing claims. Right to the very top.
  (I suspect that Diana became aware of the royal dark side and had to be dealt with).
  I only did this post because of the Australian connections being so startling. Won’t do my image any good, I guess, but it needs exposure. Hope its not a hoax?
  Best wishes for Christmas to all my friends at TIP!
  
  Reply
ggita32 says:

December 25, 2015 at 04:17

Thanks Ken, this for you and yours from all of us at TIP.

Reply