Controlling “man-made” CO2 to save the planet from catastrophic warming is a theory unsupported by science.
Much evidence proves that a political agenda drives the financial upheavals desired by the UN. Extract from the source article:
“U.N. climate chief Christiana Figueres has called for a “centralized transformation” that is “going to make the life of everyone on the planet very different” to combat the alleged global warming threat. How many Americans are looking forward to the U.N. transforming their lives?
Another U.N. official has admitted that the U.N. seeks to “redistribute de facto the world’s wealth by climate policy.” The former head of the U.N. climate panel also recently declared that global warming “is my religion.” ”
I agree with John Coleman. In fact, we need to get politics completely out of science.
To restore humanity to sanity (contact with reality) we must show the public, honestly and humbly, that the Sun’s pulsar core is the:
1. Benevolent Creator and Sustainer of every atom, life and planet in the solar system, and
2. Powered by the same source of energy that destroyed atoms and lives in Hiroshima on 6 AUG 1945.
Click to access Solar_Energy2.pdf
What people never really comprehend is what the IPCC was really about – the Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change. Its sole purpose is to gather information on anthropogenic global warming and it only accepts papers pushing the AGW hoax – hence, so many supposedly scientific papers that promote the agenda. It’s also why the media won’t call it global warming anymore but ‘climate change’ to align it to the UN’s department and give it more credibility. It’s an assessment centre for a specific purpose – and that purpose was always to tear down the West so everyone – except the elites – would live in poverty. I knew this years ago and tried to explain it to people…. but no really cared to listen. It’s all tied in with Agenda 21, now Agenda 2030, but try to get anyone to pay attention to that… The UN is where the evil resides on Earth. It’s all so sickening.
Exactly! no disagreement whatsoever.
My first post on AGW dates back to 2010,
and since starting my own blog the topic has been hammered mercilessly. Mostly preaching to the already converted, but it gets things off my chest, so to speak.
Thanks for your comments.