A balancing of the ‘consensus ledger’.
The claim of 97% consensus on man-made warming being a danger is totally unsupportable scientifically.
There are hundreds of scientists qualified to make valid judgments who are highly critical of the ‘war’ on CO2.
Here are some of them.
Open Letter – Climate Change (translated from German)
Bundeskanzleramt
Frau Bundeskanzerlin Dr. Angela Merkel
Willy-Brandt-Strabe 1
10557 Berlin
Vizerprasident
Dipl. Ing. Michael Limburg
14476 Grob Glienicke
Richard-Wagner-Str. 5a
E-mail: limburg@grafik-system.de
Grob Glienicke 26.07.09
To the attention of the Honorable Madam Angela Merkel, Chancellor of Germany
When one studies history, one learns that the development of societies is often determined by a zeitgeist, which at times had detrimental or even horrific results for humanity. History tells us time and again that political leaders often have made poor decisions because they followed the advice of advisors who were incompetent or ideologues and failed to recognize it in time. Moreover evolution also shows that natural development took a wide variety of paths with most of them leading to dead ends. No era is immune from repeating the mistakes of the past.
Politicians often launch their careers using a topic that allows them…
View original post 1,654 more words
The GOLDEN RULE 
Thank you for this post and thank God that these German have the courage to question the blind dogma that grips society living in unfounded fear.
This open letter by the 130 German scientists,
https://tgrule.com/2017/05/29/130-german-scientists-skeptical-of-un-ipcc-and-the-global-warming-agenda/
is most appropriate in timing and in content because a simple logical error by the German scientist, Dr. Carl F. von Weizsacker, in 1935 is reason the scientific community does not know there is no difference between
1. The powerful, destructive force of neutron repulsion in the cores of U-235 atoms, and
2. The powerful, benevolent force of neutron repulsion in the core of the Sun, the creator and the sustainer of every atom, life and planet in the solar system.
Can you get any of these scientists to step up and publicly discuss the logical error Dr. Carl F. von Weizsacker made in calculating atomic nuclear energy in July 1935 and Dr. James Chadwick endorsed on 12 Dec 1935.
Click to access Nuclear_Energy_Error7.pdf
Six months later, the late Professor Paul Kazuo Kuroda recognized the error on 13 June 1936 that was not corrected and isolated humanity from Reality/Truth/God for the next eighty-one years (1936-2017):
Click to access HIGHER-POWERZ.pdf
True, but perhaps now remote from current political agendas for world government?
By the way, the list of signers is now up to 338 German scientists and engineers, since that original letter with 130 signers was posted in 2009. Here is a link to the letter in German and the full list of signers. https://www.eike-klima-energie.eu/2009/07/26/klimawandel-offener-brief-an-kanzlerin-merkel-temperaturmessungen-ab-1701-widerlegen-anthropogen-verursachte-temperaturschwankungen/
Logic and truth ‘washes’ over the unaware in a grey mist.
Yes. “In war, truth is the first casualty.”
Aeschylus, about 500 BC
That analogy is not far from being literally accurate.
The alarmist agenda is tantamount to being a war against civilization as we know it.
The current warfare programs of regime changing, terrorist creation and false-flag operations are producing almost complete elimination or contamination of the truth available to the general public.
Amazing how smart some of the “old guys” were.
Thanks for following and commenting.