Inconvenient: Giant Coral Reef That ‘Died’ In 2003 Teeming With Life Again


” Based on the known growing rates for the species, Mumby predicted it would take the Porites nearly 100 years to recover, not 15. “Our projections were completely wrong,” he says. “Sometimes it is really nice to be proven wrong as a scientist, and this was a perfect example of that.” “

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Arctic Ice: An Update – Evidence From the Past is Instructive


” Wonderful, fanciful environmental fairy tales are woven to spread the falsehood of AGW, but as Shakespeare wrote, “at the length the truth will out. “ “

Posted in Uncategorized | 4 Comments

False-Flag Events.


There is a wealth of internet information dealing with staged events, often called “psy-ops”.

” Psychological operations (PSYOP) are planned operations to convey selected information and indicators to audiences to influence their emotions, motives, and objective reasoning, and ultimately the behavior of governments, organizations, groups, and individuals. ”

  https://en.wikipedia.org /wiki/Psychological_Operations_(United_States)

A more common term would be “false-flags”. I don’t believe that anyone can deny the existence of such public brainwashing schemes, as they are commonly acknowledged by the responsible authorities or people definitely in the know, at some time after the event.

There is usually little doubt as to why false-flag events, including ones which trigger serious war situations, are created. The reasons are generally quite clear, if not obvious. One of the curious factors is that the public are so reluctant to believe that they have been brainwashed, even after conclusive proofs are  presented.

The main reason why the public are initially convinced of the “authenticity” of these operations is the whole-scale connivance of a corrupt media. Why they cannot later figure out the significance of inconsistencies and lack of meaningful supporting evidence, or at least be prepared to doubt the official stories, is something for psychologists to ponder.

This article published by “The Crazz Files”  ( The Crazz Files Is A Totally Independent Australian Website & Podcast Show. ) is linked here, and provides compelling evidence of the staging of a number of recent events.  The first part is copied here, the source article is very informative and analyses the procedures involved, making it clearer to readers how to understand the ‘ungodly’s actions and agendas.

13 Important Elements Found in Every Staged Shooting Event

By Bernie Suarez of Activist Post

People who don’t trust government, those who think on their own and tend to question what they hear, by now are all becoming experts at identifying false flag staged events. With so many recent staged psyop events in the news lately many of us are getting a lot of practice at this. But have you considered that the script has become more complex than you think? Have you considered that you (we) are being fooled in some way as we speak? Have you taken into account that the events happening today are all happening in a post-Jade Helm revelation AI era? Today’s events are happening in a very sophisticated world of unimaginably deep levels of political corruption actively at work and deeply focused on removing all of our rights and freedoms and cementing their new global order. This complex and deep reality alone is something many people refuse to face; and without facing this you’ll never be able to peel and dig deeper into the deep state’s structure, mind and mechanisms that are behind these chaotic staged psyop false flag events.

Notice I’m using the terms “false flag” and “staged events” interchangeably because at times it’s difficult to determine which one is actually happening. So it’s fair to say that false flags are types of staged events. We’re all familiar with the different types of events; mass shooting attacks by crazed supposed lone gunmen who are the selected patsies for the event. We also see shootings where the government conveniently retroactively tells us the shootings are courtesy “ISIS,” “ISIS inspired” or “ISIS related.” In recent events we also saw a focus on the paid-for engineered race war where the selected shooters are looking to shoot ONLY police or only “white” police (Dallas sniper, Baton Rouge shooting). Conveniently these shootings work great for fanning the flames of race and class tension and division while conveniently boosting the police state and public sympathy for police.

Whatever the type of event, notice we rarely if ever get to see any evidence whatsoever of the actual accused patsy shooter at the scene of the crime. For example, consider that it’s been weeks and still no one has any actual evidence of Omar Mateen physically entering the Pulse night club in Orlando and physically firing and killing people. Where are these videos? Yet the majority of people have him at the scene because that’s how the story goes, and apparently it’s almost too stressful to believe something no one else is saying. The same could be said of the accused truck driver “terrorist” in Nice, France or the actual sniper (supposed) lone gunman shooter in Dallas, Texas. You get the picture.

This anomaly only scratches the surface on what this article is about. The fact is we are all now getting used to these events, for better or for worse, and there are many elements being shown to us that most of us are not paying attention to.

The events themselves are huge to us only because the mainstream media puts them in our faces 24/7. They are important because the government and their mass media says they are. They (the government and their media) say this because the events are always part of a greater agenda. The agenda and the event itself are inseparable in a world today where the masses are conditioned into reacting to a presented problem whose solution is later sold to them. This process of “problem, reaction, solution” is undeniable and obvious to all today.

The mechanisms of the script are openly available for all to see; but, as mentioned earlier, have you considered how deep this “staged event” mechanism goes? Hopefully the following 13 elements we’re about to point out will bring more awareness to these additional possibilities, agendas and factors which are quietly hidden in these events but as you will see are actually hidden in plain view.

Read on.

 

Posted in 'WAR on(of) TERROR', Conspiracies, Corruption, Media, World Issues | Tagged , , , | 5 Comments

The Rise of Scientific Fundamentalism


A brilliant article published by ‘Green Med Info‘, posted by  Larry Malerba, DO

Contrary to the beliefs of some, science is not an impenetrable body of settled fact that must be defended at all costs in the name of truth. When science becomes a worldview—a philosophy of life, a metaphysical framework that explains existence—it is no longer science; it is scientism. 

Anti-Holistic Conspiracy or Reality?

Contrary to the beliefs of some, science is not an impenetrable body of settled fact that must be defended at all costs in the name of truth. It is not a means by which to determine truth or to achieve absolute certainty. Neither is science a worldview. When science becomes a worldview—a philosophy of life, a metaphysical framework that explains existence—it is no longer science; it is scientism.

A series of recent events have something peculiar in common. There was a call for Dr Oz to be removed from his academic post at Columbia University. Measles hype triggered a spate of legislative efforts across the country designed to restrict freedom of vaccine choice. The FDA decided to conduct a regulatory review of the status of homeopathic medicines. And most recently, a rather odd series of articles appeared in the press downplaying the significance of Chipotle’s move towards a GMO-free (genetically-modified organisms) menu.

The common thread is that these events were fueled by extremist elements within the scientific world whose intent is to control the narrative of what is and what is not considered to be acceptable or “real” science. These fundamentalist and corporate agitators, who act ostensibly in the name of science, can be likened to religious zealots who seek to impose their version of sacred scientific dogma upon the general public while at the same time prohibiting what they believe to be new heretical ideas from receiving a fair hearing.

On the surface, the culture wars appear to break down along partisan political lines, however, the field of holistic health can make for some strange bedfellows. Holistic therapies are generally embraced by more educated, liberal leaning persons who distrust Big Medicine on the grounds that medical treatment can be accompanied by a lot of side effects that place one’s health at risk. On the other hand, some on the right have also defended holistic medicine as a symbol of self-determination, especially libertarians who distrust Big Medicine as a threat to their personal freedoms.

Reflecting a similarly unusual mix, some vaccine critics are holistically oriented liberals, some are right-wingers who mistrust government interference, and not a small number represent those who have seen first-hand the dangers of vaccines. It is also true that vaccine critics are often lambasted by liberal elites who place their faith in what they perceive to be the science that supposedly supports vaccines, a position that runs contrary to their general suspicion regarding the motives of PhRMA and Big Medicine. In other words, there is no bright line that divides holistic supporters and detractors.

In contrast to Galileo’s era when Church authority had the final say on matters of “fact,” the modern culture wars often break down into shouting matches over who is on the side of science and who is not—as if to say that science is always on the side of truth while all others base their views on unreliable and/or superstitious sources of information. Galileo was sentenced to house arrest for the last years of his life on the grounds of religious heresy. One gets the distinct feeling that some in the scientific establishment would like to charge vaccine critics and holistic medicine supporters with scientific heresy.

Public internet forums are often dominated by partisan extremists who have little tolerance for opposing views. Self-appointed defenders of science, for example, paint GMO critics as anti-science, regardless of the fact that there is growing evidence that GMOs are creating a number of problems for the environment, the food chain, and the health of the populace. Defenders of science tend to get away with their partisan rhetoric largely because we live in a highly scientific age. Most people who haven’t stopped to give serious consideration to these issues tend to passively assimilate the general cultural zeitgeist, which is the belief that science is correct simply by virtue of the fact that it is science. All one has to do is make a statement, then claim that it is supported by science, and most people will tend to believe it. It’s a perk that comes with acquiescence to conventional cultural consensus.

Continue reading

Posted in GreenMedInfo, Human Behaviour, Philosophy, Pseudo-science, Science | Tagged , , , , , , | 12 Comments

Making the Climate Case


” 1.EPA’s greenhouse gas endangerment finding is an inappropriate starting point for project-related environmental risk assessments.

2. NEPA review of project-related GHG emissions will politicize, not improve, agency decisions.

3. Incorporating social cost of carbon (SCC) analysis will turn NEPA review into a pseudo-science. ”

I can only keep “chipping” away at the surface of ignorance with real scientific facts and reporting on the huge number of experts and their evidence which supports the fallibility of the CAGW pseudo-science.

Science Matters

This post is to highlight two recent high quality documents making the case against climate alarms. These are important additions to anyone’s library of climate science resources.

Jamal Munshi has published papers on atmospheric ozone, and as a professor emeritus is free to speak his mind on the UN Environmental Program. His paper is entitled The United Nations: An Unconstrained Bureaucracy 

He provides the history of the UN’s self-serving growth by exploiting two false alarms, first the “ozone hole”, and then “climate change.” The story needs to be remembered and retold against the tide of alarming claims. Since this paper is posted at Tallbloke’s Talkshop, it will likely be part of the intellectual framework for the rising CLEXIT campaign.

Synopsis of The United Nations: An Unconstrained Bureaucracy

The case study takes a close look at the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) by tracing its history from its humble and noble beginnings…

View original post 842 more words

Posted in AGW, climate change, Conspiracies, ENVIRONMENT, Pseudo-science, Science, World Issues | Tagged , , , , , | 4 Comments

Aussie School Answering Machine…


A blast from the past.
Too good to ignore!

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Cancer Was Cured By This Brilliant Man In 1934, Then He Was Killed


Drawing attention to an article which asks meaningful questions. Answers from the medical industry are not impressive.

From the ‘The Usual Routine‘, an extract:

Within two months in 1934, he was able to cure 14 out of 16 terminally ill cancer patients, while the other two were cured after subsequent six weeks. Despite his 100% cure rate, he was deprived of any acknowledgment for his accomplishment.

In 1934 Dr. Milbank Johnson who was to declare the results of Rife’s cancer therapy was lethally poisoned and his documents vanished.  Rife’s laboratories were set on fire and ruined. Dr.Nemes who had replicated a part of Rife’s work died in a inexplicable fire along with the destruction of all his research papers. Royal Rife was murdered by fatal combination of Valium and alcohol in 1971 at the Grossmont Hospital.

In 1980s author Barry Lynes published a book The cancer cure that worked  thus renewing the interest in the work of Rife. The author claimed that Rife’s beam ray device could cure cancer, but American Medical Association withheld it. The American Cancer Society stated that the claims were improbable and a product of a typical theory of conspiracy. They also stated that idea behind the marketing of Rife machines was that conspiracy against the cure for cancer was sabotaging it. What remains unanswered is the reason why Rife machines were mocked and withheld by the medical industry.

The article is linked here.

An internet search revealed a great many articles relating to Rife’s equipment, theories and life. Surprisingly, to me, was the lack of  “Snopes” type trolling and rubbishing genuine scientific breakthroughs and claims.

There seems little doubt that the medical industry contributed to the unsuccessful implementation of Rife’s cures. Redeeming this technology is still a continuing force.

One of the many search hits was this informative report.

By Paul Fassa, NaturalNews – September 26, 2011

 

 

Posted in Cancer, drugs & medication, HEALTH, Public Health, Science | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

Global Warming – Catastrophic or Catatonic*


* I have slightly stretched the meaning of catatonic [  Catatonia is a state of apparent unresponsiveness to external stimuli in a person who is apparently awake. ], in this case, to include what might be better called ‘cognitive dissonance’, anyway, it’s all about acquiring knowledge and the degree of  its validity.

Specifically, the difference between truth and propaganda.

What follows is a blatant copy of an article published by ‘The Federalist‘, By :

James Cameron’s Climate Change Lies At The DNC

The DNC featured a video from James Cameron touting the devastation already happening because of ‘climate change.’ It’s propaganda through and through. {My emphasis}.

Among the various previews of the Democratic agenda at their convention this week was a video by James Cameron touting the horrific devastation already happening because of global warming.

It was heralded by a snippy little introduction from its narrator, Sigourney Weaver, who came across as so sanctimonious that she made me long for the laid-back open-mindedness of Pat Buchanan. That’s just a warm-up for the video itself.

It’s a perfect combination: all of the sappy, over-the-top melodrama you would expect from the director of “Titanic,” and all the pompous self-importance you would expect from the guy who gave the Oscar acceptance speech for “Titanic.” Plus all of the realism you would expect from a guy who launched his career with wildly inventive stories about fictional catastrophes.

The key opening line of the video is: “We all know it’s happening. It’s real, it’s happening now.” What is it that we’re supposed to “all know”? A bunch of stuff that isn’t real and isn’t happening. Global warming is supposed to be causing droughts, floods, forest fires, hurricanes, rising sea levels, and crop failure. Here’s a little fact check on those claims.

The clip focuses briefly on droughts in Texas and Kansas, because those are nice, heartland states, and because apparently farmers have never suffered through drought before. But it really focuses on claims that global warming is causing a big drought in California.

The problem is that drought is normal in California. It’s normal on a year-to-year basis: Most years are dry, and the state has always relied on the occasional wet year to refill its reservoirs. It’s even more normal on a historical time scale. Estimates of rainfall going back thousands of years show recurring multi-century megadroughts. It’s the relatively wet twentieth century that is abnormal.

megadry90

It’s telling that environmentalists describe themselves as being in fear of “climate change,” because they are actually believers in climate stasis: the conviction that all aspects of the natural world ought to remain exactly as they were in 1970, forever. But the climate has always been changing, and viewing drought in California as abnormal or unnatural is itself an example of “climate change denial.”

What about outside of California? Certainly, all of those ranchers and farmers in Texas and Kansas are doomed, right? Actually, there is no global trend toward increasing drought.

Source: Nature

To say “Hey, there was a drought last year in Kansas” is not scientific. Measuring drought trends around the globe over a period of years is science, and it doesn’t support Cameron’s claims. But if there aren’t droughts, surely there are lots more floods, right? Nope.

What about forest fires? The video touts an unspecified year (I presume it is last year) as having record-setting forest fires. But we just established that one year doesn’t make a trend, because other years might be different. In fact, if you go to the year before last, it was one of the quietest years for forest fires, and there is no clear trend.

Global warming alarmists are always telling us weather is not the same thing as climate — that weather varies, but climate is the larger, long-term trend. They tell us this every time there’s a nasty cold snap in January, and we start cracking jokes about global warming. But when the current weather of the moment fits their theory, suddenly weather is totally the same thing as climate.

We also see this when it comes to hurricanes. Why does this video make such a big deal out of hurricanes? Because Al Gore flogged hurricanes as proof of global warming after Hurricane Katrina in 2005. He even put a hurricane on the posters for his movie. Then hurricane activity in the Atlantic promptly dropped off, and the United States had a nine-year hurricane drought.

Ah, but what about Hurricane Sandy in 2012, which features prominently and tragically in the James Cameron video? The problem for the warmist narrative is that Sandy was not a hurricane at landfall. It had already weakened before it reached the coast and fell below official hurricane strength. That’s little consolation to those who lost their property or loved ones in the storm, but it’s relevant here because the claim in this video is that global warming is leading to more intense storms. Yet the damage from Sandy was not due to its intensity but to its breadth and the heavily populated area where it hit.

How about those rising sea levels? The video touts a rise in sea levels of one foot over the last century. But that’s controversial. At least one distinguished scientist argues that the sea level hasn’t risen in 50 years. Certainly, if a one-foot rise in sea levels — which is about all that is predicted for the next century — is so devastating, we haven’t seen any evidence. And even if the one-foot rise in sea levels of the past century is true, it happened pretty steadily over that time period. Yet man-made global warming could only have caused it during the past 30 years or so. That’s the only period in which significantly increased atmospheric carbon dioxide has coincided with rising global temperatures — roughly since the mid-1970s and mostly in the 1990s. So a gradual rise in sea level over the entire century is independent of and irrelevant to any man-made global warming.

As for the crops failing — well, I think we would have heard about that if it were actually happening. There have been some very recent declines or plateaus in agricultural production, but within the context of large increases throughout the alleged period of warming.

There is certainly no evidence for the kind of warming-induced agricultural apocalypse this video implies. Of course, against all of these scientific facts, Cameron offers us the assurances of such scientific luminaries as Jack Black, George H.W. Bush, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Andrew Cuomo, and the pope.

That, plus the assurances of Hillary Clinton herself, whose voice we hear at the end of the video making vague and extravagant claims about how we won’t have to give up any prosperity because we can supply all our power needs from wind turbines and solar panels — a scientific fantasy I have debunked elsewhere.

I certainly hope it is no surprise to you that a video produced by a Hollywood director and broadcast at a political convention is propaganda through and through. The problem is that it is largely exempt from any skepticism by all of the so-called watchdogs and fact-checkers who have been corrupted by their own commitment to the same political cause.

While searching for stories about Hurricane Sandy, for example, I came across a column from Cecil Adams of “The Straight Dope,” who made a name for himself a number of years ago as a kind of debunker of urban legends. He takes on the claims about Hurricane Sandy and global warming and concedes that the connection is bogus. But then notice the U-turn he makes at the end.

Hurricane Sandy, by scaring the daylights out of the New York media people who set the national agenda, has at last gotten the climate change conversation off the dime. Can we legitimately blame that disaster on global warming? No, but I’m not going to object if a lot of people do.

So it’s okay to mislead everyone, as long as it’s for a good cause. That’s the mentality behind James Cameron and the Democrats’ climate crusade. And you wonder why we treat environmentalist claims with such skepticism.

As for “So it’s okay to mislead everyone, as long as it’s for a good cause.“, I suggest that this is extremely debatable, as the cause for all this propaganda-based alarmism is anything but “good”. That is another story.

BTW, it’s significant that Donald Trump, whatever his shortcomings may be, actually is unique among politicians in his awareness of the ‘global warming’ scam.

My apologies for the probable copyright infringements, full acknowledgments and respective links are included. The effectiveness of revealing important truths is enhanced by copying it all and is hopefully justified by the extra exposure offered by this post.

 

 

Posted in AGW, climate change, ENVIRONMENT, World Issues | Tagged , , , , | 13 Comments

Mann-Made Warming In The Arctic


Cooking the books again/still!

Posted in Uncategorized | 4 Comments

Sorry, in the Vaccine Debate, the ‘Experts’ are the Historians


Time for some thought generating, widen your horizons, read more information, open your minds.

iDSENT

Do you want to know who are the real experts in the debate on vaccine safety and efficacy? No, it’s not the scientists. Nope, it’s not the medical researchers. Nah, not the doctors. It’s the historians — those who know history and understand the lessons of history, and argue passionately against mindlessly repeating the mistakes of the past — those who do not have financial interests, conflicts of interest, or personal agendas.

Those who understand the human toll of the DDT (Dichloro-diphenyl-trichloroethane) fumigations during 1946-1972. Those who understand the human tragedy of DES (Diethylstilbestrol) given to pregnant women during 1938-1971. Those who understand the human horror of using Thalidomide to alleviate morning sickness in pregnant women beginning in 1957. Those who understand the countless and ongoing recalls of prescription drugs such as Vioxx that kill or maim hundreds of thousands of patients.

And finally, those who understand that the so-called…

View original post 1,192 more words

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment