” 1.EPA’s greenhouse gas endangerment finding is an inappropriate starting point for project-related environmental risk assessments.
2. NEPA review of project-related GHG emissions will politicize, not improve, agency decisions.
3. Incorporating social cost of carbon (SCC) analysis will turn NEPA review into a pseudo-science. ”
I can only keep “chipping” away at the surface of ignorance with real scientific facts and reporting on the huge number of experts and their evidence which supports the fallibility of the CAGW pseudo-science.
This post is to highlight two recent high quality documents making the case against climate alarms. These are important additions to anyone’s library of climate science resources.
Jamal Munshi has published papers on atmospheric ozone, and as a professor emeritus is free to speak his mind on the UN Environmental Program. His paper is entitled The United Nations: An Unconstrained Bureaucracy
He provides the history of the UN’s self-serving growth by exploiting two false alarms, first the “ozone hole”, and then “climate change.” The story needs to be remembered and retold against the tide of alarming claims. Since this paper is posted at Tallbloke’s Talkshop, it will likely be part of the intellectual framework for the rising CLEXIT campaign.
Synopsis of The United Nations: An Unconstrained Bureaucracy
The case study takes a close look at the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) by tracing its history from its humble and noble beginnings…
View original post 842 more words