Merck Paid Doctors at Least $18,810,495.52


“72 Page Document Shows Merck Paid Doctors at Least $18,810,495.52”

Sometimes gems are difficult to come by. However, when we find them, just clean them up a bit and we can appreciate their ‘real value’.  The little treasure I discovered was a document located on Merck Pharmaceutical’s website. It disclosed how much Merck paid doctors as speaking fees in the third and fourth quarter of 2009 alone.

The 72-page document is titled, “Merck & Co., Inc., Disclosure of Payments to U.S. Speakers for Promotional (non-CME) Medical Education Activities conducted in 3Q and 4Q 2009.” And, according to my calculations the sum was a hefty $18,810,495.52. [1]

Keep in mind that, that amount is just for speaking fees!

You may be wondering why this information was made available.

Merck said it was because of transparency. According to one article, “[Merck] has started disclosing payments to U.S.-based medical and scientific professionals who speak on behalf of our company or our products.” [2]

It’s a good start, but apparently the reports were going to be available annually thereafter (July 1, 2009). Well, where are they?  It is now 2012.

 

Document Shows Heavy Vaccine Promotion

Have you ever wondered why some doctors may be so rabidly in favor of promoting vaccines?  Or, haven’t you considered that aspect?  Well, here’s the answer:  Pharmaceutical companies pay doctors to talk about the ‘problem.

Not only is it subtle, it’s legal and has financial rewards.

For example, Merck was pushing two new vaccines: Gardasil and Rotateq. After filtering the results in the PDF file for the terms, “HPV, Vaccine, and Rotavirus” the total amount paid came to $2,313,942.81.

Let’s do something mathematically radical. Since Merck reported numbers for only half the year, I’m going double the amount they paid to see what a year’s worth could possibly be.

This would mean Merck spent roughly $4,627,885.62 to encourage doctors to promote their solutions/products, which definitely include vaccines. After reading this, aren’t you sick to your stomach thinking about the ‘Ask Your Doctor’ commercials? I know I am.

But what does this all mean?

‘Rotten to the Core’

Think about this, parents. Who do you trust for reliable information? Maybe a better question would be, “Can you trust pharmaceutical companies?”

Outside of the money being doled out to doctors, consider other ways Big Pharma uses its money.  Here are some other examples:

  • Julie Gerberding, former head of the Centers for Disease Control, paved the way for eventual approval for Merck’s Gardasil vaccine, guaranteeing billions in profits for her future employer. After her tenure at the CDC, she became President of the Vaccine Division at Merck Pharmaceuticals.  [3]
  • Dr. Paul Offit [4] is often seen in the media promoting vaccines as being safe. As a matter of fact, he states children can safely get up to 10,000 of them. [5][6] What isn’t often discussed is the royalties he made from vaccine sales.
  • Dr. Andrew Wakefield identified the measles virus from the MMR vaccine in the intestines of autistic children. For his reward, this heroic doctor was stricken from the medical registry. Furthermore, his professional reputation was targeted to be destroyed. One website details how Merck deals with doctors who threaten vaccine profits. They say, “Court evidence now available on-line at the University of California library shows drug giant Merck systematically targetted [sic] “hit-lists” of doctors to discredit, neutralise or destroy critics of the safety and effectiveness of Merck’s drugs… One memo stated: ’we may need to seek them out and destroy them where they live….’” [7]

 

Summary

Parents want healthy children and straight answers from their pediatricians, the CDC and FDA. Do you think your doctor really believes what he or she is telling you, regarding vaccines? Or, were they paid to believe it? As it stands now, most doctors will deny vaccines have any contributory role in autism or can cause harm.

At the very least, this little document shines sunlight on what many parents of vaccine injured children have been saying all the while: Maybe it’s the cost of keeping the herd quiet.

“Diet, injections, and injunctions will combine, from a very early age, to produce the sort of character and the sort of beliefs that the authorities consider desirable, and any serious criticism of the powers that be will become psychologically impossible. . . .” -Bertrand Russell,1953

 

Sources:

[1] Merck & Co., Inc., Disclosure of Payments to U.S. Speakers for Promotional (non-CME) Medical Education Activities conducted in 3Q and 4Q 2009. http://www.merck.com/corporate-responsibility/docs/business-ethics-transparency/3Q09-Transparency-Report.pdf (Accessed 01/07/2012)

[2] Merck Statement on U.S. Speaker Fees.  http://www.fiercebiotech.com/press-releases/merck-statement-u-s-speaker-fees (Accessed 01/07/2012)

[3] Julie Gerberding. http://vactruth.com/2010/01/04/julie-gerberding-primed-big-pharmas-pump-with-flu-and-hpv-vaccines/

[4] Paul Offit. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Offit (Accessed 01/07/2012)

[5]Paul Offit says children can get 10,000 vaccines. http://www.ageofautism.com/2010/05/paul-offits-10000-vaccines-and-the-milgram-experiment.html (Accessed 01/07/2012)

[6] http://www.whale.to/vaccines/offit23.html (Accessed 01/07/2012)

[7] Memo from Merck discussing how to destroy doctors. http://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com/2009/10/12/merckdestroydoccritics/ (Accessed 01/07/2012)

Posted in drugs & medication, HEALTH, Human Behaviour, vaccines, World Issues | Tagged , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Flu Shot Causes Polio-like Guillain-Barré Syndrome: Are Rates Higher Than the Government Admits?


Needs to be read, right through to give a realistic picture of “collateral” damage caused by flu vaccinations.

Let the public be aware.

Posted in drugs & medication, HEALTH, vaccines | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The IPCC WGII report is out – now the screaming begins anew


Time to air my concerns over this IPCC “Headline Statements from the Summary for Policy Makers. Nearly every point categorized as “likely”, virtually certain”, “extremely likely” or whatever “statistical” probability they ignore, can be seriously challenged as unscientific and probably incorrect.
For example : “Global mean sea level will continue to rise during the 21st century. Under all RCP scenarios, the rate of sea level rise will very likely exceed that observed during 1971 to 2010 due to increased ocean warming and increased loss of mass from glaciers and ice sheets.” I suggest reading the following relevant and scientific article published by “Chiefio” and reblogged here.

Gee, siting problems and intrument error in sea level gauges
Then there is “Climate change will affect carbon cycle processes in a way that will exacerbate the increase of CO2 in the atmosphere (high confidence). Further uptake of carbon by the ocean will increase ocean acidification.” This is clearly absurd because even if CO2 reduced the salinity of the ocean it certainly cannot increase acidity that doesn’t exist. Perhaps the opposite is true?  Reference:

CO2 makes the Ocean More Alkaline

And just to show that this CAGW “circus” is politically motivated:

The report will serve as a foundation for international negotiations at events such as the U.N. Climate Leaders Summit scheduled for September. U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon has called on world leaders to make “bold” pledges at the meeting and to demonstrate they will achieve ambitious emissions cuts as part of a legal agreement to be signed in early 2015. Field remains optimistic that the report can spur policy and technology that will steer the Earth toward a more sustainable future.

Reference: ‘Behind the scenes’ of the new IPCC report with Stanford scientists

Can this be any clearer?
Technically, this report, if truly represented here, is basically a load of readily challenged, meaningless garbage.

Posted in AGENDA 21, AGW, carbon tax, climate change, ENVIRONMENT, World Issues | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Gee, siting problems and intrument error in sea level gauges


Its IPCC’s alarmist propaganda time again.
One, and one of many, parameters that are touted as “almost certainly’ or “likely” to mean the planet is undergoing “climate changes” due to mankind’s influence , (somehow linked to increasing atmospheric CO2 levels changing from 0.038% to .04%), is the claimed rising level of the ocean waters.
I offer this article of impressive scientific content and logical thinking, to give reasonable cause for doubt about the significance of the IPCC claims. A similarly sound assessment of the others, pretty well all in fact, leads open-minded scientists to similar conclusions such as this:
“It looks to me like any statements about “Sea Level Rise” based on the instrumental record are pretty darned dodgy. Personally, I think we have more useful information from things like the ancient ports all around the world that are now a ways inland.

http://chiefio.wordpress.com/2010/12/06/ostia-antica-and-sea-level/

By that measure, any “rise” now is really just a recovery from a drop during the Little Ice Age.”

Musings from the Chiefio

This is a familiar story. Gauge history, calibration, and movement / change are all contributory to unusable sea level data records. Averaging it all together doesn’t fix it, either. Sounds rather like the temperature data…

The paper is well written, an easy read, and helps get a good understanding of the issues involved with sea level measurement. The author does lead off with the obligatory “Kiss The Ring” of Global Warming, then proceeds to do some good science anyway… Looks like we can add surveyors to the list of folks prone to precision and careful work who “find issues” in how the data is handled. (Along with chemists, engineers, aviators and aviation tech, farmers, …) The paper:

http://www.fig.net/pub/monthly_articles/july_2010/july_2010_hannah.html

International Federation of Surveyors

Article of the Month
July 2010

The Difficulties in Using Tide Gauges to Monitor Long-Term Sea Level Change
John HANNAH, New Zealand

They also have a pdf available…

View original post 3,195 more words

Posted in AGENDA 21, AGW, carbon tax, climate change, ENVIRONMENT, Planet Earth, World Issues | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Seize This Moment!


Every time this post passes my view I agonize about reblogging it. This revelation is very strong, making serious claims against “Israel”, past and present.

Again I mention the need to be more specific about whether it is referring to the “country”, some of its leaders, the Zionist movement and/its secret service organization ‘Mossad’, but very unlikely its people in general.

Another aspect – why sheet the blame to Israel? Surely it is, just as is the US, part of a hierarchy financed by rich individuals, banks and organizations? Just who is/are the controller(s) is not clear. So no definitive answers here, just plenty of valid questions.

So I have weakened because the article is so relevant in the current unrest and confusion.

Hopefully, readers will not be harsh in their judgment of me for publishing this. It’s all part of connecting the dots in trying to understand where we at and who is responsible.

This adds some material for us to ponder. Draw your own conclusions.

Posted in 'WAR on(of) TERROR', 9/11 tragedy, AGENDA 21, Globalism, Israel, MIDDLE EAST, Mossad, New World Order, War Crimes, World Issues | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

BFP EyeOpener Report-The Psychology of Cognitive Dissonance


From ‘BFP’ (Boiling Frogs Post), by Sibel Edmonds, this article on a topic of much interest to me. Particularly in the instance of discussions, via internet comments, with persons on the “warmist” side of the ‘global warming’ debate. Neither side accepts that they are the victim of ‘cognitive dissonance’ but claim that the other is.

It derives down to whether a person has an uninhibited viewpoint or one tainted by bias of some type which prevents correct, logical decision-making. It is quite likely that each cannot accurately assess the reality of their own argument.

One way of dealing with this is to look carefully at the source information and assess its own credibility. Does it suffer from a potential bias? Does it stand up to logical and scientific analysis?  Sometimes the source author is clearly pushing a barrow in which his livelihood and reputation are at stake. In all cases our integrity and conscience are at issue but are they always in the forefront of our minds? Are they being given appropriate (read ‘honest’),  priority?

After all that, or in Robbie Burns words – “for A’ That ” – do I personally achieve the correct conclusions? Only time will tell, because, after all, we are usually talking about something that can only be totally proven sometime in the future. And then, only if the “result” is honestly and truthfully reported. In the case of “global warming”, when the next ice age is evident, or not!

So apart from known and recognized factors, consciously discarded because of an agenda, participants in a debate (or in life), are actually influenced by ‘below-the-surface’ blindness. “Cognitive Dissonance”.

So, to the source article, linked here.

Sibel Edmonds
Posted in Philosophy, Psychology | Tagged , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Are the Israelis Planning Another 9-11 Using the Missing Boeing 777?


There is so much confusion surrounding the missing Boeing 777 that a bit more seems justifiable.

Having previously defined a suggested difference between Obama, the US and its people, this reference to ‘Israelis’ also deserves an attempted clarification. Whoever should be blamed for the 9/11 attacks is certainly not clear, but it definitely was not Bin Laden. Plenty of evidence points to an Israeli involvement, BUT, to say it was Israel, its government or its people would be doing many an injustice. Whatever involvement there was, is better attached to the power group under the name of ‘Zionists’, encompassing the secret service unit ‘Mossad’. Otherwise it is like blaming the US for CIA atrocities, for example. Correct in substance but not in detail. An extremely tangled web of associations but, if a report is to have credibility, it should avoid confusing such associations.
So, at this stage, there is no proof of whether the plane crashed or has indeed been secretly spirited away “safely”. Until a believable, provable solution comes to light, it is not unreasonable to speculate, even “wildly”.

Posted in 9/11 tragedy, Conspiracies, Israel, Mossad, united states, World Issues | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

US sets Europe and Russia at war


This post by Finian Cunningham (PTV), on ‘msnbc‘ seems to be a realistic assessment.

Hopefully, an actual physical war will not result, but the “makings” are there and possibly/probably the intentions.

When US President Barack Obama embarked on his European tour this week there was the usual sycophantic Western media image of the American leader as a benefactor. Obama, so the story went, was coming to unite and support Europe in the face of Russian aggression in Ukraine.

Obama_Europe_USA_PTVWith tiresome florid speechifying, Obama claimed that the US and Europe have together historically built up institutions of international law and democracy and that the “allies” would now stand together against Russian “brute behavior” just as they had done during the Cold War against the Soviet Union.

The facts are the opposite. The US has sought to divide Europe from Russia and sow conflict in Eurasia ever since the end of the Second World War nearly 70 years ago. That is a continuum to the present day. The main objective for Washington is to prevent Europe developing closer relations with Russia. Central to the problem, from the US point of view, is to curb Europe and Russia becoming strategic energy partners.

The reservation I would suggest appropriate is that the evidence that the US is the instigator is not clear. More likely it is a “cabal” (perhaps is the correct word), for which Obama is the “spokesperson” and main contributor of rhetoric, and the US military power and canon fodder. In other words, a major player in the ‘New World Government’ but not the sole power.

Obama somehow cons the people into supporting him but it may be unfair to American citizens for us to unthinkingly connect him too strongly to the country itself. Sure, they elected him for some inexplicable reason(s), but I hope that, in this issue, he is not representing the people of the USA.

The complete source article linked here.

 

Posted in 'WAR on(of) TERROR', AGENDA 21, Globalism, New World Order, Politics, War Crimes, World Issues | Tagged , , , , , , | 3 Comments

G8 Becomes the G7 as Leaders Kick Russia Out


Self declared ‘axis’ of regime destruction group think themselves so invincible as to declare another country as rogue, when they are themselves the rogues.
” to reaffirm our support for Ukraine’s sovereignty, territorial integrity and independence.”

What a load of garbage. What hypocrisy!

Ukraine was a sovereign, independent, self-governed country and who destroyed that status? Them!  They, the US, Britain, Germany and France now have control of Ukraine and its resources.
Russia is supporting Ukraine sovereignty! How blatantly corrupt is this Western behaviour?

Trade News in Brief

 
The leaders of the remaining countries – Britain, the US, Germany, France, Italy, Canada and Japan, who are calling themselves the G7 – agreed to meet in Brussels this year and decided to give Russia the boot.
 
Check here for more.
 
 

View original post

Posted in AGENDA 21, Corruption, Politics | Tagged , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Obama Invites 80,000 Muslim Immigrants Into the United States


Can anyone fathom this? Whenever I support Muslims in general in the face of Muslim extremism, opponents of Muslim extremists usually cite Muslim opposition to Christians and other religions as being basic doctrine for the religion and say their hatred is a documented in the Quran. This is questionable anyway but here we have a case of a special “Executive Order” by Obama to ensure that the US is well populated with Muslims.

Besides the fact that there exist strong claims of Obama’s Muslim heritage, one still wonders what on earth goes on here? Why would he do this?

Certainly worth a comment. This article by Gil Guignat and Dr. Paul L. Williams | The Examiner  , posted by ‘FourWinds10.com’ therefore gets an airing here.

President Barack Hussein Obama has invited  80,000 Muslims to immigrate next year to the United States. He is doing this by executive order.  Additionally, he has promised to bring a minimum of 100,000 additional muslims per year, for the next 5 years.

In a determination letter to Congress, Obama has announced that he will allow an additional 80,000 muslim immigrants – – mostly from Islamic countries – – to resettle in the United States during fiscal year 2011, and 100,000 per year from 2012-2016

Mr. Obama says that the increase in Muslim immigrants “is justified by humanitarian concerns or is otherwise in the national interest.”

For a president who browbeats Americans about the Federal government having separation of church and state he sure is advocating one religion consistently over all the others. First it was that we had no choice but to build the mosque at Ground Zero in New York, now it is that a certain ethnic segment [NOTE: NO! Not “ethnic”! This is RELIGIOUS preference!] is getting preferential treatment over all other Americans.

Obama thinks that letting in another 80,000 Muslims on top of the already 1 million each year, half of which come in illegally, will not make any difference whatsoever.  Obama either does not understand the numbers or he has another motive.

The only thing it will do is destroy our social net: health care, unemployment, food stamps, welfare. Keep in mind that there is no budget to accept these people. Obama’s legacy to us is a collapsing economy that cannot be fixed.

There are 41 million on food stamps. In total there are 31 million unemployed. Unemployment is at 18.7%. Health care is cracking. Taxes are going up 1 trillion dollars next year. Gallup has announced that the unemployment rate for November will be far worse and on and on.

Meanwhile President Obama thinks that in order to solve these problems he should favor one ethnic [NOTE: NO, again. Note “ethnic” but religious!] class over others and Americans go to the end of the line.

Just as Obama was not too concerned about another 9-11 because it builds character, he thinks we can absorb 80,000 more Muslim immigrants because we can absorb greater unemployment.

One must wonder why Obama is doing this, when this move will do absolutely nothing but bring about the destruction of America.  He is basically further dividing up less and less benefits amongst more and more people.  After all, if according to the World Bank there are an additional 80 million people added to the crowd that makes less than $2 per day every year, how can he expect to change things?

source: http://www.examiner.com/article/obama-allows-80-000-muslim-immigrants-into-united-states

BTW, I support Muslims as I do any human who is doing the right thing – “doing unto others as you would have them do unto you” and have done so openly on this blog.

Any blame levelled at them for terrorist or any anti-social activities should be directed at extremist organizations and/or Westerners inciting or using others for their own benefit. (Or what they think is benefit, certainly, ‘ends’). Plenty of evidence of this.

Posted in 'WAR on(of) TERROR', 9/11 tragedy, Religion, united states | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments