Many thoughts arise from this article.
Mainly that there are numerable ways of measuring or estimating the global temperature trend, numerable ways of interpreting such measurements and numerable uncertainties and degrees of uncertainty.
However, and I re-iterate this ad nauseum because it is logically true, that the climate science is not settled, nor is it sufficiently understood or accurately assessed, to be a logical basis for political and financial restructuring throughout the world.
Related articles
- Climate changes – oh so naturally. (tgrule.com)
- Gaia Man says cool it on global warming (thebrightlibertarian.blogspot.com)
- AGW a National Security Threat? Climate Depot’s Morano responds: ‘Aside from the fact that the ‘national security’ angle rests on speculative doomsday scenarios…’ (climatedepot.com)
- Popular Technology: 1000+ Peer-Reviewed Papers Supporting Skeptic Arguments Against ACC/AGW Alarm (junkscience.com)
- Temperatures Trending Below Hansen’s Zero Emissions Scenario For 168 Months In A Row (stevengoddard.wordpress.com)
The GOLDEN RULE 