How much more revelation and evidence is required to prove that the carbon control industry is perched on a false foundation.
In biblical terms, a house built on sand.
An extract: “The IAC authors warn, also on page 34, that “conclusions will likely be stated so vaguely as to make them impossible to refute, and therefore statements of ‘very high confidence’ will have little substantive value.” Yes, but that doesn’t keep the media and environmental activists from citing them over and over again as “proof” that global warming is man-made and a crisis…even if that’s not really what the reports’ authors are saying.”
Related articles
- Popular Technology: 1000+ Peer-Reviewed Papers Supporting Skeptic Arguments Against ACC/AGW Alarm (tgrule.com)
- Backing away from climate alarm? NAS Pres. Ralph Cicerone says ‘we don’t have that kind of evidence’ to claim we are ‘going to fry’ from AGW (climatedepot.com)
- AGW – Carbon Tax – Disaster for Australia (faktensucher.wordpress.com)
- ‘Climate Science’ in Shambles: Real Scientists Battle UN Agenda (climatedepot.com)
- Climate changes – oh so naturally. (tgrule.com)
The GOLDEN RULE 