How to Discuss Global Warming with a “Climate Alarmist.” Scientific Talking Points to Win the Debate.


A long and comprehensive article, some of it quite technical, which is what this issue is all about. Decisions made on propaganda in the mainstream news is hardly adequate. Beliefs based on politicians policies similarly of no scientific value.
An opportunity to learn the truth!

CO2 is Life

Smoking Gun #1: Al Gore’s Ice Core CO2 Temperature Chart

edc_thumb

Ironically, some of the most damning evidence again the AGW or Anthropogenic Global Warming Theory comes from Al Gore himself.

This post has been updated and reformatted since being published.

Talking Points:

  1. Climate change is the norm. Never in the 800,000-year ice core record is climate not changing.
  2. Four Temperature Peaks in the last 400,000 years were all above today’s temperatures and occurred at lower CO2 levels.
  3. Every ice-age began when CO2 was at or near peak levels, in other words, high CO2 levels were not enough to prevent ice ages.
  4. The current record high level of 400 parts per million(ppm) CO2, a full 33% above any previous level on the chart, has failed to carry temperatures to a record high.
  5. For any cause and effect relationship, the cause MUST lead the effect. CO2 does not lead Temperature, it…

View original post 7,808 more words

Advertisements

About Ken McMurtrie

Retired Electronics Engineer, most recently installing and maintaining medical X-Ray equipment. A mature age "student" of Life and Nature, an advocate of Truth, Justice and Humanity, promoting awareness of the injustices in the world.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to How to Discuss Global Warming with a “Climate Alarmist.” Scientific Talking Points to Win the Debate.

  1. omanuel says:

    Did the US transfer ownership of uranium deposits to the old USSR?

    https://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-uranium-russia-deal/

    While the force of neutron repulsion was hidden from the public?

    https://principia-scientific.org/neutron-repulsion-social-costs-overlooking-power/

    • Snopes.com did not convince me that collusion between the Clintons and the Uranium industry did not take place.
      They simply put a different slant on it.
      Snopes cannot claim convincing arguments in many cases, if not all.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s