[Edited 14th October 2020]
A theme shift, sorely needed, but yet another threat to our welfare. Will they ever end? Another debatable issue, but we start with the conclusion that 5G represents a threat to our health and now go on to support the conclusion.
As usual, authorities are hedging and lying about safety testing and getting away with it!
5G
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/5G
In telecommunications, 5G is the fifth generation technology standard for broadband cellular networks, which cellular phone companies began deploying worldwide in 2019, and is the planned successor to the 4G networks which provide connectivity to most current cellphones.[1] Like its predecessors, 5G networks are cellular networks, in which the service area is divided into small geographical areas called cells. All 5G wireless devices in a cell are connected to the Internet and telephone network by radio waves through a local antenna in the cell. The main advantage of the new networks is that they will have greater bandwidth, giving higher download speeds,[1] eventually up to 10 gigabits per second (Gbit/s).[2] Due to the increased bandwidth, it is expected that the new networks will not just serve cellphones like existing cellular networks, but also be used as general internet service providers for laptops and desktop computers, competing with existing ISPs such as cable internet, and also will make possible new applications in internet of things (IoT) and machine to machine areas. Current 4G cellphones will not be able to use the new networks, which will require new 5G enabled wireless devices.
The concern is for radiation poisoning from towers and personal devices using these higher frequencies, at very least potentially harmful, at worst seriously harmful.
One relevant aspect is that the respiratory and blood diseases currently blamed on the Covid-19 virus, may be due to another, or other causes. Whereby cases being counted as Covid cases to justify draconian personal restrictions and freedom losses become extremely questionable!
So, looking at published information, we learn:
From Reference”1″ –
What is the evidence of the harm caused by radiofrequency radiation?
There are thousands of archival biomedical research papers, published in peer-reviewed journals, that have shown that radiofrequency radiation is harmful to the body in one way or another. These have been collected and reviewed in a number of summary documents. Here are just two examples: (1) BioInitiative 2012, draws on about 1800 publications (https://bioinitiative.org/); (2) EUROPAEM EMF Guideline 2016 for the Prevention, Diagnosis and Treatment of EMF-Related Health Problems and Illnesses, draws on 308 references (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27454111). (“EMF” stands for electromagnetic fields, a term inclusive of radiofrequency radiation.)
In 2011, the International Agency for Research on Cancer of the World Health Organization classified radiofrequency radiation as a Group 2B Human Carcinogen (“possibly carcinogenic”), naming explicitly “wireless phone” radiation (cellular radiation), based on the increased risk for glioma. Glioma is a malignant type of brain cancer that is usually fatal. It most recently took the life of Senator John McCain and Beau Biden, the son of Vice President Joe Biden. (https://www.iarc.fr/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/pr208_E.pdf)
In 2018, a massive study by the National Toxicology Program at the National Institutes of Health linked cellular radiofrequency radiation (RFR) to cancer of the nerves of the heart (schwannomas), to cancer of the brain (glioma), and to multiple other health effects in test animals. (https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/results/areas/cellphones/index.html).
From Reference “2”:
5G, on the other hand, promises a technological revolution where exponentially expanding wireless transmission speeds would connect billions of devices into an internet-of-things, that would span the world over. This is presented as a huge consumer win (e.g. faster streaming) but ignores other uses for this network which include relentless real-time surveillance of all human behavior and even potential weaponization. The fact that there are zero independent safety studies showing the 5G network’s intended use of milimeter wave frequencies is overlooked, much like the fact that the CDC immunization schedule contains not a single vaccine that has been tested for safety and efficacy in a double-blind, randomized, trial using a true saline placebo; much less the entire schedule, which contains literally thousands of antigens, in a toxicological cocktail of complexity it would be technically near impossible to assess accurately for safety, both for acute and especially chronic adverse outcomes, such as autoimmunity disease, which in the case of the adverse effects of vaccine is far more common than most suspect.
In 2018, a massive study by the National Toxicology Program at the National Institutes of Health linked cellular radiofrequency radiation (RFR) to cancer of the nerves of the heart (schwannomas), to cancer of the brain (glioma), and to multiple other health effects in test animals. (https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/results/areas/cellphones/index.html)
In 2015 and continuing, 247 scientists from 42 nations signed an appeal to the United Nations, described below. These scientists have “published peer-reviewed papers on the biological or health effects of non-ionizing electromagnetic fields” (which are inclusive of radiofrequency radiation).
“Address the global public health concerns related to exposure to cell phones, power lines, electrical appliances, wireless devices, wireless utility meters and wireless infrastructure in residential homes, schools, communities and businesses.” (https://www.emfscientist.org/)
For more information on the health effects of radiofrequency radiation, please see the website of the Environmental Health Trust, especially the Science tab. (https://ehtrust.org/)
What scientific studies, from impartial sources, can the providers of 5G identify that prove that 5G has NO adverse health effects on humans? The burden of proof is on the providers.
When questioned by U.S. Senator Richard Blumenthal in a hearing before the Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee (February, 7, 2019), the representatives of industry could name no existing studies and none in progress. (Story: https://www.blumenthal.senate.gov/newsroom/press/release/at-senate-commerce-hearing-blumenthal-raises-concerns-on-5g-wireless-technologys-potential-health-risks; Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hsil3VQE5K4)
From Reference “3”:
5G trials have already commenced in Australia, with each telecommunications carrier working with mobile equipment suppliers in testing the application and limits of the technology.
From Reference “4”:
DESPITE their admitted lack of the required scientific expertise, Mornington Peninsula Shire officers have been ordered to investigate alleged health issues surrounding the 5G telecommunications network.
The councillors’ decision to investigate what is essentially a federal government responsibility was made in response to 700-signature petition expressing concerns that the introduction of the 5G technology could endanger health.
Fears of health risks from 5G have sparked street protests in Australia, including Melbourne, where marches have often been combined with those opposing vaccines.
Overseas, demonstrators have set fire to 5G telecommunications towers.
The petition was received in January and at that stage councillors instructed officers to arrange a meeting in February between councillors and the petition’s organisers.
However, the meeting did not happen, councillors were not updated and then came the state of emergency caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.
Cr Antonella Celi told The News that the government needed to ensure that information used in its 5G campaign was “not based on antiquated information from [the World Health Organisation] and ARPANSA who have not yet undertaken the research into the higher frequency of the 5G network required for the ‘internet of things’ and the potential impacts on human health and the environment”.
From reference “5”:
In 2019, telecom executives gave U.S. congressional testimony that they have NO scientific evidence that 5G is safe. The majority of scientists worldwide are opposed to deployment until studies show that it’s safe.
Cities AND entire countries have taken action to ban, delay, halt, and limit installation as well as issue moratoriums (see 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12. 13, 14). Legislators in Hawaii County recently introduced a resolution to stop 5G deployment until studies show it’s safe. Now a bill has been introduced at the state level to do the same!
American opposition to 5G technology is not limited to biological and environmental risks (see 1, 2). Federal agencies warn that it can threaten national security, public safety, and weather forecasting accuracy. Engineers have also warned that 5G can overheat base stations. 5G base stations also use 2-3X more energy to operate than 4G base stations.
Activist Post reports regularly about 5G and other unsafe technology. For more information visit our archives and the following websites.
From Reference “6”:
“The USSR experimented on humans and animals with 5G in 1977, 1972 and 1997. A proper military experiment. The humans suffered metabolic problems, ie everything started to fall apart, blood problems, immune system dysfunction, severe medical and neurological problems. With animals, since they were able to dissect them, they found the bone marrow was suffering (which produces the immune system), respiration damaged, enzyme activity damaged, nuclear dna damaged, and the total exposure time was only 15 hours over 60 days. Roughly 15 minutes a day and the levels were not high. Not as high as you are going to get in a classroom.” …. Dr Barrie Trower
Lastly Dr Trower has many other interviews on Youtube that will give you insight into how wi-fi is affecting us already. Particularly our children. 5G he illustrates is a military grade weapon they used for crowd control. Fact. (Here is a 14 minute clip with the essentials from him). EWR
From Reference “7”:
The “5G Strategy,” approved on May 2, 2020, stated that
“the Defense Department must develop and employ new concepts of operation that use the ubiquitous connectivity that 5G capabilities offer to increase the effectiveness, resilience, speed, and lethality of our Forces.“
The Pentagon is already experimenting military applications of this technology in five air, naval and land forces bases: Hill (Utah), Nellis (Nevada), San Diego (California), Albany (Georgia), Lewis-McChord (Washington), Dr. Joseph Evans, technical director for 5G at the Department of Defense, in a press conference on June 3 confirmed.
He then announced that 5G military applications will soon be tested in seven other bases: Norfolk (Virginia), Pearl Harbor-Hickam (Hawaii), San Antonio (Texas), Fort Irwin (California), Fort Hood (Texas), Camp Pendleton (California) and Tinker (Oklahoma).
Experts predict that 5G will play a decisive role in the development of hypersonic weapons, including nuclear warheads: huge amounts of data must be collected, processed and transmitted very quickly to guide them on variable trajectories, escaping interceptor missiles. The same data collection is necessary to activate the defenses in the event of an attack with such weapons, relying on automatic systems.
A selection of a number of relevant links:
- https://whatis5g.info/5g/2019/02/5g-and-its-small-cell-towers-threaten-public-health-implications-for-hb654-sb937-and-hb1020-sp713-before-the-maryland-general-assembly/
- https://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/what-mandatory-vaccination-and-5g-rollout-have-common-12?
- https://tottnews.com/2019/05/16/5g-tower-locations-australia/
- http://www.mpnews.com.au/2020/06/22/fears-over-5g-spark-shire-investigation/
- https://www.activistpost.com/2020/07/legislators-in-hawaii-introduce-bill-to-ban-5g-and-related-technology-until-studies-show-its-safe.html?
- https://envirowatchrangitikei.wordpress.com/5g/
- https://www.globalresearch.ca/dark-side-5g-military-use/5724231
The GOLDEN RULE 
The links contained within Reference “6” are extensive and tend to “mind-blowing”!
Governments Investigating the Safety of 5G
In the United States the state of New Hampshire has a 5G Bill HB 522 that asks, “Why have 1,000s of peer-reviewed studies, including the recently published U.S. Toxicology Program 16-year $30 million study, that are showing a wide range of statistically significant DNA damage, brain and heart tumors, infertility, and so many other ailments, being ignored by the Federal Communication Commission (FCC)?” and, “Why have more than 220 of the worlds leading scientists signed an appeal to the WHO and the United Nations to protect public health from wireless radiation and nothing has been done?”
One might think the answer is that dollars trump health for the FCC and the telecom industry it serves.
Naturally!
Readers might be interested in the site: Between a rock and a Hard Place by Dariusz Leszczynski, PhD, a science blog on mobile phone radiation and health. https://betweenrockandhardplace.wordpress.com/
Thanks Dana, shared to FB.
The amount of energy carried by a photon is proportional to its frequency, and inversely proportional to its wavelength. For radiation to cause DNA damage, tumors, etc., it is necessary for individual photons to be sufficiently energetic to cause ionization, when the photons are absorbed by molecules of matter.
That is the case for mid-UV and above. It is not the case for visible light, and below. That’s why “sunscreen” is designed to protect you from UV (but not from visible and IR).
In general, radiation below UV is harmless, unless it is so intense that it significantly heats your body.
5G uses several different microwave bands, from 850 MHz to 39 GHz. The highest is only 39 GHz, which has a wavelength of about 7.7 mm.
For comparison, the human body emits in the Infrared, around 32,000 GHz (9300 nm). That’s more than 800 times higher then the highest frequency 5G.
That means the photons of electromagnetic energy emitted by your own body are, on average, more than 800 times more energetic than the most energetic photons from 5G radios.
That’s why there is no such thing as “radiation poisoning” from microwave radiation.
Sorry Dave, you are on a wrong track. Please read and understand the scientific articles referenced and linked.
The radiation is an electromagnetic wave that can and does affect living cells. Damage can be done without excess heating or ionization. An EM wave affects the cells’ own EM fields.
Georgia Guidestones. They want to kill most of us and leave only 500,000,000.
Or maybe they think they can come up with a vaccine that will protect against the negative effects of 5G.
They didn’t allow us to opt-out of SMART meters so we already know they’ll do everything in their power to kill us.
The ‘IOT’ is the perfect surveillance state. That’s the prize they’re after.
I don’t use Wi-Fi and I don’t have a mobile phone and I don’t have ‘smart’ appliances and have no intentions of ever getting any… what makes them think we really want that garbage? Where’s the referendum? I want my say.
What would be really great is having people who are just as concerned as we are actually running for office and getting seats in Parliament. Though that probably wouldn’t work, either. It’s like politicians are given the evil vax upon swearing in and they forget all about who elected them and the attention is turned on those who will line their pockets.
All joking aside (not that I’m really joking but I can’t help but laugh at this Clown World we find ourselves in) if the government thinks the health services are stressed under this covid hoax, wait till they see what a real 5G does to it. The sad thing is that the people in government is so ignorant they will never be able to see it.
Do you think they’ve all fattened their investment portfolios by investing in 5G companies? I would love to know what’s in them.
Pingback: 5G IS DESIGNED TO DESTROY – MONADNOCK REPORT
Pingback: 5G – Countries that are Investigating or Banning 5G Networks | The GOLDEN RULE