Why Are People So Inured to Reality?


I have just posted/reblogged the WUWT article on how, in the 1970’s, climate “experts” were espousing serious global cooling and maybe having to eliminate democracy in order to facilitate the control of “pollution”. Of course, they wanted to control the world, but the “pollution” was, as carbon controls now are, the scapegate to fool the people that the controls were necessary.

This has set me thinking about how people so readily operate in a polarised manner.

There are many factors but the fact remains that, in just about any area of human experience, polarization occurs. Opposite ‘sides’ readily form. Liberals and Democrats, Hawthorn supporters and Collingwood supporters, Republicans and Royalists etc.

Them and us, ‘warmists’ and CO2 villain ‘deniers’ (NOT global warming ‘deniers’), etc.

The same data is available to all, yet its interpretation or conception becomes radically different. Of course, some of the data is scientifically valid, yet still misinterpreted, there seems to be two ways of looking at it. Similarly some data is not valid, yet acceptable to some people, not to others.

Another example is the global financial CRISIS.  What is seen to be the madness of bailouts and austerity programs by some, are seen by others to be, not perhaps the best, but certainly worthwhile solutions.

In both of these cases, probably all cases of this polarized behaviour, there is much deliberate decision making based on a particular agenda. In other words, a decision is made not on the data/evidence itself, but on the required end result that is preferred.

This is not quite what I am discussing – more the human thought process that without agenda and maybe even without any bias, a person decides they know enough about an issue to reach a conclusion that happens to be opposite to that of another person. Same input material, two ways of looking at it.

One can be right, the other wrong. Both could be wrong. If opposed though, they cannot both be right. (In politics and football, the right and wrong are somewhat arbitrary, so I am thinking about more substantial subjects).

One factor that seems evident is that people are reluctant to change their mind admitting they were wrong. Again, this is different to having become polarized in the first place.

Another factor is that there seems sometimes to be a filtering of input information, a sort of permeable shield that deflects certain inputs but allows through others.

Just a meandering of thoughts for the fun of it.

So it becomes easy for a lot of people to conclude, or at least think and/or say, “you are stupid”, with the reasonable inference that they (think they) are not. This is not intelligent discourse because it is immediately emotive. Emotive thought processes are inevitably biassed and unthinking. Another area not really relevant to my theme.

Name calling is a result of irrational thinking and inability to make effective argument.

So, what has rationality and intelligence got to with polarized thinking?

Probably quite a lot but one needs to be careful to not hurt others feelings if introducing that question.

If half of the debaters have say IQ’s above 100, and another group are 100 and below, are they likely to be polarised in a discussion in step with their IQ?

Obviously, an above-average IQ person can still be affected by emotional baggage and have ingrained prejudices, things that interfere with rational thinking. But are we talking about baggage and prejudice?

A person of less measured IQ might be more rational and have more commonsense.

But with technical subjects like climate science, one would imagine that the higher scale persons would have an edge on the others in reaching rational conclusions. Not to say that  such a person would not be subject, if not more so, to vested interests and make decisions not based on science.

So, I named people who advocated catastrophic cooling problems in the 1970’s, AND those who now advocate catastrophic warming or some such inconsequential name, either ignorant, charlatans or both. So there, I did one of the things I suggested here is irrelevant and otherwise negative. Just to prove that I am human too.

Anyway, that’s what set me going on this polarization theme.

Posted in Human Behaviour, Philosophy | Tagged , , , , , , | 5 Comments

The 1970′s Global Cooling Compilation – looks much like today (updated March 4th)


Cannot understand why this has not been highlighted before as it is a very important argument against the current CAGW activities. The then “CAGC” activists were also pretending that they understood climate science and even revealed the same agenda of world controls.
Same agenda now, same bad science and this overall picture shows them up for what they are – either ignorant or charlatans, or both.

Courtesy, one of the many readers of the WUWT article, another list:

“News media blowing hot and cold for 140 years

by Kirk Myers

Arctic Ocean warming, icebergs growing scarce, Washington Post reports

Seminole County Environmental News Examiner
Kirk Myers
March 2, 9:27 PM

“The Arctic Ocean is warming up, icebergs are growing scarcer and in some places the seals are finding the water too hot,” according to a Commerce Department report published by the Washington Post.

Writes the Post: “Reports from fishermen, seal hunters and explorers… all point to a radical change in climate conditions and… unheard-of temperatures in the Arctic zone… Great masses of ice have been replaced by moraines of earth and stones… while at many points well-known glaciers have entirely disappeared.”

More evidence of human-caused global warming? Hardly.

The above report of runaway Arctic warming is from a Washington Post story published Nov. 2, 1922 and bears an uncanny resemblance to the tales of global warming splattered across the front pages of today’s newspapers. It is one of many historical accounts published during the past 140 years describing climate changes and often predicting catastrophic cooling or warming.

Here are excerpts from a few of those accounts, appearing as early as 1870:

“The climate of New-York and the contiguous Atlantic seaboard has long been a study of great interest. We have just experienced a remarkable instance of its peculiarity. The Hudson River, by a singular freak of temperature, has thrown off its icy mantle and opened its waters to navigation.” — New York Times, Jan. 2, 1870

“Is our climate changing? The succession of temperate summers and open winters through several years, culminating last winter in the almost total failure of the ice crop throughout the valley of the Hudson, makes the question pertinent. The older inhabitants tell us that the winters are not as cold now as when they were young, and we have all observed a marked diminution of the average cold even in this last decade.” New York Times, June 23, 1890

“The question is again being discussed whether recent and long-continued observations do not point to the advent of a second glacial period, when the countries now basking in the fostering warmth of a tropical sun will ultimately give way to the perennial frost and snow of the polar regions.” — New York Times, Feb. 24, 1895

Professor Gregory of Yale University stated that “another world ice-epoch is due.” He was the American representative to the Pan-Pacific Science Congress and warned that North America would disappear as far south as the Great Lakes, and huge parts of Asia and Europe would be “wiped out.” — Chicago Tribune, Aug. 9, 1923

“The discoveries of changes in the sun’s heat and southward advance of glaciers in recent years have given rise to the conjectures of the possible advent of a new ice age” — Time Magazine, Sept. 10, 1923

Headline: “America in Longest Warm Spell Since 1776; Temperature Line Records a 25-year Rise” New York Times, March 27, 1933

“America is believed by Weather Bureau scientists to be on the verge of a change of climate, with a return to increasing rains and deeper snows and the colder winters of grandfather’s day.” — Associated Press, Dec. 15, 1934

Warming Arctic Climate Melting Glaciers Faster, Raising Ocean Level, Scientist Says — “ ‘A mysterious warming of the climate is slowly manifesting itself in the Arctic, engendering a ‘serious international problem,’ Dr. Hans Ahlmann, noted Swedish geophysicist, said today.” — New York Times, May 30, 1937

“Greenland’s polar climate has moderated so consistently that communities of hunters have evolved into fishing villages. Sea mammals, vanishing from the west coast, have been replaced by codfish and other fish species in the area’s southern waters.” — New York Times, Aug. 29, 1954

“An analysis of weather records from Little America shows a steady warming of climate over the last half century. The rise in average temperature at the Antarctic outpost has been about five degrees Fahrenheit.” — New York Times, May 31, 1958

“Several thousand scientists of many nations have recently been climbing mountains, digging tunnels in glaciers, journeying to the Antarctic, camping on floating Arctic ice. Their object has been to solve a fascinating riddle: what is happening to the world’s ice?” — New York Times, Dec. 7, 1958

“After a week of discussions on the causes of climate change, an assembly of specialists from several continents seems to have reached unanimous agreement on only one point: it is getting colder.” — New York Times, Jan. 30, 1961

“Like an outrigger canoe riding before a huge comber, the earth with its inhabitants is caught on the downslope of an immense climatic wave that is plunging us toward another Ice Age.” — Los Angeles Times, Dec. 23, 1962

“Col. Bernt Balchen, polar explorer and flier, is circulating a paper among polar specialists proposing that the Arctic pack ice is thinning and that the ocean at the North Pole may become an open sea within a decade or two.” — New York Times, Feb. 20, 1969

“By 1985, air pollution will have reduced the amount of sunlight reaching earth by one half… .” — Life magazine, January 1970

“In ten years all important animal life in the sea will be extinct. Large areas of coastline will have to be evacuated because of the stench of dead fish.” — Paul Ehrlich, Earth Day, 1970

“Civilization will end within 15 or 30 years unless immediate action is taken against problems facing mankind. We are in an environmental crisis which threatens the survival of this nation, and of the world as a suitable place of human habitation.” — Barry Commoner (Washington University), Earth Day, 1970

Because of increased dust, cloud cover and water vapor, “the planet will cool, the water vapor will fall and freeze, and a new Ice Age will be born.” — Newsweek magazine, Jan. 26, 1970

“The United States and the Soviet Union are mounting large-scale investigations to determine why the Arctic climate is becoming more frigid, why parts of the Arctic sea ice have recently become ominously thicker and whether the extent of that ice cover contributes to the onset of ice ages.” — New York Times, July 18, 1970

“In the next 50 years, fine dust that humans discharge into the atmosphere by burning fossil fuel will screen out so much of the sun’s rays that the Earth’s average temperature could fall by six degrees. Sustained emissions over five to 10 years, could be sufficient to trigger an ice age.” — Washington Post, July 9, 1971

“It’s already getting colder. Some midsummer day, perhaps not too far in the future, a hard, killing frost will sweep down on the wheat fields of Saskatchewan, the Dakotas and the Russian steppes…” — Los Angles Times, Oct. 24, 1971

“An international team of specialists has concluded from eight indexes of climate that there is no end in sight to the cooling trend of the last 30 years, at least in the Northern Hemisphere.” — New York Times, Jan. 5, 1978

“A poll of climate specialists in seven countries has found a consensus that there will be no catastrophic changes in the climate by the end of the century. But the specialists were almost equally divided on whether there would be a warming, a cooling or no change at all.” — New York Times, Feb. 18, 1978

“A global warming trend could bring heat waves, dust-dry farmland and disease, the experts said… Under this scenario, the resort town of Ocean City, Md., will lose 39 feet of shoreline by 2000 and a total of 85 feet within the next 25 years.” — San Jose Mercury News, June 11, 1986

“Global warming could force Americans to build 86 more power plants — at a cost of $110 billion — to keep all their air conditioners running 20 years from now, a new study says…Using computer models, researchers concluded that global warming would raise average annual temperatures nationwide two degrees by 2010, and the drain on power would require the building of 86 new midsize power plants — Associated Press, May 15, 1989

“New York will probably be like Florida 15 years from now.” — St. Louis Post-Dispatch, Sept. 17, 1989

“[By] 1995, the greenhouse effect would be desolating the heartlands of North America and Eurasia with horrific drought, causing crop failures and food riots… [By 1996] The Platte River of Nebraska would be dry, while a continent-wide black blizzard of prairie topsoil will stop traffic on interstates, strip paint from houses and shut down computers… The Mexican police will round up illegal American migrants surging into Mexico seeking work as field hands.” — “Dead Heat: The Race Against the Greenhouse Effect,” Michael Oppenheimer and Robert H. Boyle, 1990.”

“It appears that we have a very good case for suggesting that the El Ninos are going to become more frequent, and they’re going to become more intense and in a few years, or a decade or so, we’ll go into a permanent El Nino. So instead of having cool water periods for a year or two, we’ll have El Nino upon El Nino, and that will become the norm. And you’ll have an El Nino, that instead of lasting 18 months, lasts 18 years,” according to Dr. Russ Schnell, a scientist doing atmospheric research at Mauna Loa Observatory. — BBC, Nov. 7, 1997

“Scientists are warning that some of the Himalayan glaciers could vanish within ten years because of global warming. A build-up of greenhouse gases is blamed for the meltdown, which could lead to drought and flooding in the region affecting millions of people.” — The Birmingham Post in England, July 26, 1999

“This year (2007) is likely to be the warmest year on record globally, beating the current record set in 1998.” — ScienceDaily, Jan. 5, 2007

“Arctic warming has become so dramatic that the North Pole may melt this summer (2008), report scientists studying the effects of climate change in the field. ‘We’re actually projecting this year that the North Pole may be free of ice for the first time [in history],’ David Barber, of the University of Manitoba, told National Geographic News aboard the C.C.G.S. Amundsen, a Canadian research icebreaker.” — National Geographic News, June 20, 2008

“So the climate will continue to change, even if we make maximum effort to slow the growth of carbon dioxide. Arctic sea ice will melt away in the summer season within the next few decades. Mountain glaciers, providing fresh water for rivers that supply hundreds of millions of people, will disappear – practically all of the glaciers could be gone within 50 years… Clearly, if we burn all fossil fuels, we will destroy the planet we know… We would set the planet on a course to the ice-free state, with sea level 75 metres higher. Climatic disasters would occur continually.” Dr. James Hansen (NASA GISS), The Observer, Feb. 15, 2009.

* * *

Climate change? Yes, there has been plenty of that during the past 140 years. Despite warnings by “experts of the day” of approaching climate disasters, mankind somehow managed to survive. A decade or so from now, after earth’s climate changes once again, those who are old enough will recall with amusement the time, early in the 21st century, when the world went crazy over an imaginary threat called “global warming.”

Kirk Myers’ columns appear several times weekly. To receive e-mail alerts when new articles are published, click on the “subscribe” button. For a comprehensive look at global warming, please see the list of links to the right.

And to those warmists who are in denial of facts and evidence, and who say that these are just newspaper reports – “hello!” – they are quoting scientists. Just as the present day media is. The scientists clearly do not have enough knowledge and understanding about the climate to make the sort of political decisions they are.. Not then, not now!

To those who ask “where is the peer review?” – Peer review has been clearly shown to be a farce, just as the “97% scientists cannot be wrong” is a false claim and meaningless.

Sorry, but you are wrong about CO2 causing warming enough to be a problem and you have been taken for a ride. Easy to see how this has happened, but you should have been a bit less accepting of the propaganda and a bit more questioning of the evidence and claims.

Posted in AGENDA 21, AGW, carbon tax, climate change, ENVIRONMENT, New World Order, Politics | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Austerity USA Begins March 1st; The Bipartisan Poverty Program


The start of the “endgame”.  Now will citizens wake up?  Will it be too late anyway?  How come there is money for warmongering?  You voted him in! How could you be so inept? Plenty of questions, few answers. At least it has been accomplished without blood in the streets, as happens overseas. Maybe that is still to come, which would be the reason for, (or  because of),  arming civil authorities, perhaps!

Cannot remember who said “the people get the government they deserve”, but it seems to be apt.  The most powerful nation in the modern world – reduced to a spent civilization. All because of greed  for money and power, and resources of course, but not for the people’s use.

The end of taxpayer funds. From now on just more printed paper or computer records, until the US dollar is hyper-inflated until worthless.  I sincerely hope I am wrong.

This post from from ‘nsnbc’, by Shamus Cooke:

Robert Taft Memorial. Photo, Cliff10666

Robert Taft Memorial. Photo, Cliff10666

Shamus Cooke – U.S. politicians have cried wolf over austerity long enough for the public to ignore them. A perfect time, then, for politicians to actually unleash the wolves. Barring an unlikely last minute deal, here’s a short list of some of the massive, national bi-partisan-created austerity cuts, according to the New York Times

  • 600,000 food stamp recipients will be cut from the program
  • Massive education cuts. According to President Obama: Once these cuts take effect thousands of teachers and educators will be laid off and tens of thousands of parents will have to scramble to find child care for their kids. “
  • $12 billion in Medicare cuts (more to come after 2013)
  • Federal funds to state governments will be cut, creating even more deficits for states and municipalities, and thus more localized cuts (the states have already made austerity cuts of $337 billion!)
  • Also, 700,000 jobs are expected to be loss, while 70,000 kids are also expected to be kicked off of Head Start.

And this is just for 2013. The current plan for the austerity “sequester” cuts is $100 billion of federal cuts every year for ten years, equaling massive cuts to jobs, Medicare, education, and completely destroying federally funded social programs.

Will it actually happen this time? The New York Times reports:

In private, Capitol Hill staff members and members of Congress have admitted that there are no viable plans on the horizon to delay or offset the cuts.

The finger pointing in Washington, D.C. has already reached a crescendo, with the perverted logic being that, if both parties are to blame, it’s really no one’s fault. In reality Democrats and Republicans created these “sequester” cuts, and they can just as easily undo them with a snap of the finger.

Both parties are choosing not to delete the cuts. They just don’t want political responsibility for the fallout, which many economists have predicted will push the U.S. economy over the edge into official recession.  

Obama has predictably blamed the Republicans for this mess, even though he personally began this process by creating the “deficit reduction commission” that helped shape the cuts (keep in mind there is zero debt crisis that calls for such drastic measures).

Obama could also just as easily appeal to the American public — over the heads of congressmen — to demand that the cuts be shelved forever. Instead, he’s proposing a “grand bargain” deal that he knows the Republicans won’t go for.

What’s in Obama’s grand bargain deal? According to the White House website:

  • $130 billion in “savings” [cuts] to Social Security, by implementing a “superlative CPI”
  • $35 billion in “savings” [cuts] to the retirement of federal employees
  • $400 billion in health care “savings” [cuts], much of it Medicare cuts.

Obama cynically fails to mention the words Social Security or Medicare in the above plan, choosing instead to write in code (“superlative Consumer Price Index”). Obama’s plan to avoid the March 1st cuts still assumes that $500 billion in cuts will be implemented over the next ten years, as opposed to $1trillion.

But his plan is just a distraction. Obama knows his plan has no chance of being passed by March 1st. He’s falsely portraying his plan as the only alternative to the March 1st cuts, even though a far better idea — the one preferred by a vast majority of Americans — is to simply to shelve the sequester cuts forever. To not put forth this option makes Obama complicit in the cuts.

Many pundits have speculated that Congress will allow the cuts to go into effect for three weeks, since March 27th marks a fiscal deadline that will pressure Congress to maneuver anew.  This might trigger a new round of haggling over a new “grand bargain” that again targets “entitlement programs” and re-packages the massive cuts into a prettier box. The party that does the most effective finger pointing after the March 1st cuts will be in the best position to dictate matters post-March 27th, so say the pundits.

Whatever the actual result, the Democrats and Republicans share similar enough visions that massive cuts to cherished social programs appear to be inevitable. Much of the made-for-TV bickering is pure political posturing, meant to fool the working people most affected by these cuts into believing it’s “the other party” that’s responsible.

Politicians have been able to get away with this disgusting behavior because there are very few independent voices telling the truth about what’s happening. Many labor and progressive groups are consciously lying about the dynamic, placing blame squarely on the Republicans, thus allowing the Democrats not to be held accountable for their pandering to the corporate elite’s demand to use austerity to attack the social safety net. In reality both parties are jointly attacking working and poor people via austerity, on a city, state, and national level.

If Labor and community groups united in a demand of ‘No Cuts, Tax the Rich’ and organized massive mobilizations, there would be a very different public debate happening right now. It’s not too late for these groups to tear themselves from the jaws of their attackers.

Read the source article here.

Shamus Cooke is a social worker and trade unionist and activist in the Occupy movement. He is a writer for Workers Action.

Posted in Civil Liberties, Family, Human Behaviour, Human Folly, Politics, united states | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Australian Authorities Authoritarian Attack on Natural Health Industry


This letter from Fran Sheffield speaks for itself, so to speak.

Why is there a need or justification for applying the long arm of the law to genuine, truthful natural health services?

There is abundant evidence of conventional medical practices causing harm and even death to patients, plenty of references on this blog, thousands on the internet as a whole. Pharmaceutical companies and government instrumentalities who are blatantly corrupt. Agricultural companies creating dangerous products, again with official support.

Patients/users of natural health procedures have the normal recourse to litigation IF they are harmed by a practitioner product or recommendation. Is there any evidence of the need to protect people from themselves in the natural health services arena?

It is clear to me and I hope, most people, that what we see here is, in itself, criminal behaviour by the authorities. This is not justice, it is not scientifically valid, not medically logical, it is not fair, necessary or even sensible.

It can only be construed as an attack on the public without valid justification. It can be seen as underhanded protection of the medical industry who have themselves to blame if they are not providing responsible health services.

It makes no sense! The likely outcome of these attacks, and certain outcome if health practitioners are penalized, is that the public will become more aware that they are being shafted by the medical industry and the government. The chances of heavy-handedness  of officious authorities back-firing against them, are real and will create a greater disrespect for the authorities and greater support for the natural health processes.

How pathetic of the authorities to lower themselves to such almost childish attacks. Have they no conceptual reality? For such persons to have such power to waste and misuse is an indictment on our justice system. What are they scared of? The truth? Are they protecting the public, or themselves?

“What do you think? Are these paragraphs misleading and deceptive? Do they warrant fast-tracking in the Federal Court? What does it mean when a government body breaches the terms and conditions of a private members’ area? How does material, no longer on a website, mislead and deceive people today? Should people have the right to freely access alternative health information?”

I think this summing up is exactly appropriate and I offer my support.

Her letter is published here  [BTW. Fran is not the “Nanny” who married Mr Sheffield 🙂 ]

A Letter From Fran Sheffield

Today I will be in court – the Federal Court of Australia.

By the end of today I may no longer be allowed to speak or write on the homeopathic treatment and prevention of whooping cough. Why would this be?

Continue reading

Posted in drugs & medication, HEALTH, Justice, vaccines | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

How Hemp Oil Cures Cancer And Why No One Knows


“Here are just a few conditions that science has proven cannabinoids are therapeutically active against:

– Arthritis
– Cancer
– Crohn’s
– Diabetes
– Fibromyalgia
– Multiple sclerosis
– Parkinson’s -“
Posted in HEALTH, natural | Tagged , , | 8 Comments

Bombshell: Sandy Hook shooter died day before shootings


“The real problem though is that literally none of what the media initially reported about the shootings was accurate and, unfortunately, almost nothing they’ve reported since has been verifiable either.

The mainstream media’s version of the events is contradicted by the evidence on almost every level and so many conflicting stories have been reported by different news outlets around the country, little of which has turned out to be true, they can all no longer be seen as worthy of relaying reliable news. Except for a rare, select few. “
Posted in Conspiracies, Media | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

Mysterious new disease striking young women, symptoms mimic demonic possession


“Evidence points to vaccines, lack of proper nutrients as cause of Anti-NMDA Receptor Encephalitis”

Reference  – See more at: http://www.riseearth.com/2013/02/mysterious-new-disease-striking-young.html#more

Posted in drugs & medication, HEALTH, vaccines | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Attack of the Drones – and other Sott.net posts of Interest concerning World Domination


Just trying a couple of ways of increasing information accessibility. As seen in the previous two posts. I am finding however that there is just too much that I wish to point out to readers and am now trying another method:

If you  connect to Sott.net ‘Puppet Masters’ section, this week, you will learn much of interest. World Domination is in Full Swing!

Puppet Masters

Posted in 'WAR on(of) TERROR' | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Media fakes war propaganda all day, every day


“Read all about it!”

Posted in 'WAR on(of) TERROR', Media | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Media fakes war propaganda all day, every day

Salinity levels in Atlantic Ocean are off the chart, according to NASA instrument


What does this say about the B.S. about CO2 “acidifying” the ocean ????

Posted in ENVIRONMENT | Tagged , , | Leave a comment