Evidence that Food Proteins in Vaccines Cause the Development of Food Allergies and Its Implications for Vaccine Policy

Posted on December 6, 2015 by Ken McMurtrie

An extract from an interesting scientific paper.

Reference – http://www.omicsgroup.org/journals/evidence-that-food-proteins-in-vaccines-cause-the-development-of-foodallergies-and-its-implications-for-vaccine-policy-2329-6631-1000137.php?aid=60994

Evidence
Brief history of allergens in vaccines and injections inducing allergy in healthy individuals
Nobel Laureate Charles Richet demonstrated over a hundred years ago that injecting proteins into humans or animals causes immune system sensitization to that protein. Subsequent exposure to the same protein can result in anaphylaxis. Let’s call it the Richet allergy model. Wells [4] demonstrated in 1908 that injecting as little as 50 ng of ovalbumin into guinea pigs resulted in sensitization. Subsequent injections of ovalbumin resulted in an allergic reaction.
In 1940, Cooke et al. [5] describe induction of allergy by a tetanus vaccine. In 1952, Ratner et al. [6] were concerned about the possibility of sensitization to egg following the administration of influenza vaccines that are manufactured using chicken eggs. They studied a group of 319 subjects and found that 5 of them developed dermal sensitivity to egg following vaccination with vaccines containing egg proteins. All the subjects in the study were undergoing treatment for tuberculosis. The authors probably did not know that tuberculosis infection may offer protection against allergy [7]. They therefore found sensitization in 1.6% of vaccine recipients, even in a population that was protected from allergy, by tuberculosis infection. Yamane et al. [8] demonstrated a significant increase in anti-ovalbumin IgE in 36 out of 100 subjects following influenza vaccination.
Vinu Arumugham*
San Jose, CA, USA
Corresponding Author : Vinu Arumugham
San Jose, CA, USA
E-mail: vinucube@yahoo.com
Posted in drugs & medication, FOODS, HEALTH, NO safety testing for most vaccines, Vaccine Dangers, vaccines | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

More Hard Hitting Words From The Dalai Lama About The Mass Brainwashing Of Society

Posted on December 2, 2015 by Ken McMurtrie

A theme after my own heart! A fantastic precis of the world’s military motivation. This article is really on the ball! (Apologies for copying so much of it).

From ‘Collective Evolution’ by Arjun Walia:  Words of Wisdom from the Dalai Lama.

The 14th Dalai Lama of Tibet is always garnering a lot of attention, and for good reason. Most recently, he told the world that simply praying is not the answer for the incident that occurred in Paris, as well as other similiar(sic) atrocities that seem to happen all over the globe. He stated that humans have created this problem, and now we are asking God to solve it, which makes no sense. If we created this mess, we should be the ones to solve it, not God.

His comments went viral, resonating with many people around the world who realize that action on a mass scale is required at this time to change the direction in which our planet seems to be headed.

Intertwined with the Paris attacks are the realities of war, and there is a great piece written on the Dalai Lama’s website regarding the mass brainwashing of human beings. This is something we touch upon regularly on our website, especially when it comes to incidents of terrorism and war, along with the creation of these groups who are carrying out these attacks all over the world. He writes:

“Of course, war and the large military establishments are the greatest sources of violence in the world. Whether their purpose is defensive or offensive, these vast powerful organizations exist solely to kill human beings. We should think carefully about the reality of war. Most of us have been conditioned to regard military combat as exciting and glamorous – an opportunity for men to prove their competence and courage. Since armies are legal, we feel that war is acceptable; in general, nobody feels that war is criminal or that accepting it is criminal attitude. In fact, we have been brainwashed. War is neither glamorous nor attractive. It is monstrous. Its very nature is one of tragedy and suffering.” (source)

This (above) statement really hits home. If you think about it, these vast and powerful organizations, and the military in general, “exist solely to kill human beings.” As the Dalai Lama touches upon, we are conditioned and made to believe that military service is something to be proud of. Sure, these men and women may be entering into the service in order to serve their country, with a tremendous amount of bravery and good hearted intentions going into that decision, but what they do not know is that this global war on terrorism is a complete fabrication. The enemy they are made to believe they’re defending their country from is actually a product of their own country. As Dr. Michel Choissudovsky, University of Ottawa’s Emeritus Professor of Economics, tells us, the global war on terrorism is completely fake and based on fake premises. Soldiers have been brainwashed into thinking that they are going after an enemy and defending their own country when that same enemy is fully supported and financed by the Western military alliance. As the Dalai Lama argues, this is exactly why “we feel that war is acceptable,” because we are made to believe it’s a necessary course of action.

He then goes on to state that:

“Modern warfare waged primarily with different forms of fire, but we are so conditioned to see it as thrilling that we talk about this or that marvelous weapon as a remarkable piece of technology without remembering that, if it is actually used, it will burn living people. War also strongly resembles a fire in the way it spreads. If one area gets weak, the commanding officer sends in reinforcements. This is throwing live people onto a fire. But because we have been brainwashed to think this way, we do not consider the suffering of individual soldiers. No soldiers want to be wounded or die. None of his loved ones wants any harm to come to him. If one soldier is killed, or maimed for life, at least another five or ten people – his relatives and friends – suffer as well. We should all be horrified by the extent of this tragedy, but we are too confused.” (source)

The extent of this brainwashing is quite massive, and if we are going to stop the murder of other human beings and war in general, it is that ‘brainwashed’ soldier that needs to wake up. It is a human being pulling the trigger, it is a human being giving the orders to do os, and it is a human being thinking that they are doing something good. We are the reason war exists in the first place; we created it, we participate in it, and we prolong it. Just imagine what would happen if every human being on the planet refused to participate in war? This is why we say change needs to come from within, and as more soldiers wake up to what’s really happening here, more of them will simply refuse to go to war.

“No matter how malevolent or evil are the many murderous dictators who can currently oppress their nations and cause international problems, it is obvious that they cannot harm others or destroy countless human lives if they don’t have a military organisation accepted and condoned by society.” (source)

Some of these soldiers that are used by their corporate/big bank puppetmasters are starting to wake up and speak out. Linked below is an article that provides two excellent examples, with some shocking information that many people are still waking up to (graphic footage warning).

“Horrible & Numbing”: Chilling testimony from U.S. Air Force Drone Operator On His First Kill”

As far as this manufactured global war on terrorism, you can check out this article, among others:

Professors & Politicians Gather To Warn Us About The New World Order

The Dalai Lama then goes on to speak about how expensive war is. This is something many people think about – the fact that the money pumped into the military and the Department of Defense in the United States (including the black budget) could completely alleviate  poverty and hunger on our planet. That being said, money is made out of thin air, typed up on a computer screen and printed at will by the controlling elite.

We are talking about, as ex Canadian Defense Minister Paul Hellyer points out, “trillions, and I mean thousands of billions of dollars” that “have been spent on projects which both Congress and the Commander in Chief know nothing about.” Welcome to what president Eisenhower called the military industrial complex where, as he warned us, the rise for misplaced power exists and will persist. What would he say about what’s happened today?

The point is, if we are going to use money as a tool, why not take that many and allocate it to provide food, shelter and clothing for everybody on the planet? The defense expenditures of a couple of countries alone could do this no problem.

“We should feel fed up with the violence and killing going on around us. If a human being is killed by an animal, it’s sad, but if a human being is killed by another human being it’s unthinkable. We have to make a special effort to think of each other as fellow human beings, as our brothers and sisters.” – Dalai Lama (source)

Thank you Dalai Lama for having the courage to share such an important message with the world.  You can read his full Article here.

And thank you Arjun, for your insights, research, and your bringing it to our attention.  You can read his full article here.

Collective Evolution home.

Collective Evolution FaceBook.

 

Posted in 'WAR on(of) TERROR', Corruption, Globalism, Human Behaviour, MIDDLE EAST, Military, NATO, United Nations, War Crimes, World Issues | Tagged , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Shocking! Adults Now Fall Under No Jab, No Pay Vaccine Law

Posted on December 2, 2015 by Ken McMurtrie

To continue on this mandatory vaccination path is a sad, undemocratic, authoritarian and unjustified act.
Genuine health risks have not been taken into account!

Posted in AGENDA 21, AUSTRALIA, Civil Liberties, drugs & medication, HEALTH, vaccines | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

AP’s Seth Borenstein gets something right (but only the date)

Posted on November 30, 2015 by Ken McMurtrie

An overview, directly relevant to the Paris “climate change” meeting, which destroys the substance of all of the IPCC and associated claims demanding immediate political and financial sacrifices intended to prevent catastrophic global environmental changes.
No such changes are occurring, there are no proven scientifically valid supporting facts, lies have been exposed, a political agenda is clear.
It is past time that leaders and the people woke up to reality.

Posted in AGENDA 21, AGW, climate change, ENVIRONMENT, United Nations, World Issues | Tagged , , , , , , | 7 Comments

ECONOMIC SLAVERY FOR ALL:

Posted on November 30, 2015 by Ken McMurtrie

This is what one well-known truth activist in America thinks about the ramifications of the TPP on America.

Without doing a lot of homework, I would hazard a guess that Australia would not be a great deal differently affected.

This post is offered to thought-provoke Australians into the area of questioning what our government is intending, or allowing, ?encouraging, for our country.

{As an aside, to provoke even greater criticism (probably), but hopefully greater depth of thought – whatever his intent, the action by our PM in committing Australia to carbon emission cuts which we cannot afford and do not need, requires scientific analysis.

To facilitate the eventual phasing out of fossil fuel energy generation is indeed essential for our planet, but ruining our economy is not justified. Other plans are needed.}

From Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, on “Natural News”, this article:

ECONOMIC SLAVERY FOR ALL: While we were distracted with the Confederate flag flap, Congress quietly forfeited our entire economic future via fast-track trade authority

(NaturalNews) While America was distracted by a contrived, pre-planned Confederate flag distraction, the U.S. Congress forfeited the entire economic future of the country by quietly passing so-called “fast-track authority” which will allow President Obama to approve the TPP “free trade” agreement.

The TPP, as you may have heard, outright surrenders U.S. sovereignty to multinational corporations, handing them total global monopolies over labor practices, immigration, Big Pharma drug pricing, GMO food labeling, criminalization of garden seeds and much more. In all, the TPP hands over control of 80% of the U.S. economy to global monopolists, and the TPP is set up to enable those corporations to engage in virtually unlimited toxic chemical pollution, medical monopolization, the gutting of labor safety laws and much more.

Plus, did I mention the TPP will displace millions of American works as corporations outsource jobs to foreign workers? While corporations rake in the profits from new global powers, everyday American workers will lose their livelihoods and their jobs (not to mention their pensions).

Political sleight of hand: It was SOOOO easy to distract the American people with a flag flap!

Essentially, America just got sold out by people like Marco Rubio. And it was incredibly easy to pull off, too. First, America was distracted by a contrived, pre-planned mass hysteria / outrage event now known as the Confederate flag flap. Hilariously, this literal false flag controversy doesn’t even involve the actual Confederate flag. It involves a battle flag that people mistakenly think is the Confederate flag. (But who needs historical accuracy when there’s hysteria to spread?)

While Amazon.com was frantically deleting Confederate flag products from its website and everybody was going bat-crap insane over the 1970’s comedy TV series Dukes of Hazzard and its use of the so-called Confederate flag on a hot rod car, Republicans and the President were busy committing outright treason at the highest levels: surrendering American sovereignty and economically enslaving all of America’s future children.

And that’s the tragic irony of all this: While the political left falsely believed it was denouncing slavery by pressuring every online retailer and government entity to ban the Confederate flag, the U.S. Congress was busy enacting a whole new level of total economic enslavement for everyone, regardless of their skin color.

While ignorant “activists” ran around in mass hysteria, thinking they were banishing a symbol of enslavement to the history books, they were actually providing the necessary public distraction for quiet passage of the TPP’s fast-track authority.

In other words, they played right into the hands of the real slave masters: the globalist, monopolist corporations and their fascist government puppets who betray the People at every opportunity.

Believe me: These corporations don’t care about the skin color of their slave workers. They gladly enslave everyone, including you and me, if we’re stupid enough to allow our own elected representatives to forfeit America’s future (which they just did).

Screw the Confederate flag issue, folks: All Americans are now the “property” of multinational monopolist corporations that have turned national governments against their own people. The Confederate flag flap was merely a useful distraction to trick the population using political sleight of hand to fool everyone about the real agenda being pursued in Washington.America is now officially a nation of slave workers beholden to multinational corporate interests. How does your silly flag outrage feel now?

 

See the complete article, with videos, here.

Meanwhile, back in Australia, what similarities do we see?

Here are two opinions –

TPP secretly trading away your rights – Consumer rights and …

https://www.choice.com.au/…/tpp-secretly-trading-away-your-rights

Mar 2, 2015 – In this report, we investigate the TPP and the impact it will have on your … “The Trans-Pacific Partnership undermines Australian efforts to take …

The TPP has the potential for real harm – The Drum … – ABC

Mar 15, 2015 – The Trans-Pacific Partnership expected to be signed in the coming … And this could cost Australians dearly if our negotiators fail to protect our rights. … Ian, no mention of the implications to the environment in your piece.

 

Attempting to ascertain where we currently stand as to “signing up”, it appears an agreement has been reached but not ready for final signing until some time in the future. (Ref http://trademinister.gov.au/releases/Pages/2015/ar_mr_151105.aspx)

 

As for distractions – besides the Paris “climate change” meeting, we could include the Paris “terrorist” incident, which for some strange reason is seen as a reason for extra government concern and action, action more likely to promote disharmony in Australia than to create a peaceful outcome. (http://nsnbc.me/2015/11/24/turnbull-warns-of-increased-terrorism-threat-in-the-region-ignores-state-sponsorship/)

There appears much to be learned and think about.

 

Posted in AGENDA 21, AUSTRALIA, Globalism, New World Order, Politics, World Issues | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

“Conversations: Climate change is happening” Part 5.

Posted on November 29, 2015 by Ken McMurtrie

This post is directed at the ABC News (Aus), ‘Drum Opinion’ post of the same name! Ref: http://www.abc.net.au/unleashed/2761976.html

The foregoing comments in previous parts apply to funding and other influences.   It is also appropriate to iterate that addressing one side of an issue is not “clearing up the debate “, which is why this blog is attempting to address the “other side”.

CLEARING UP THE CLIMATE DEBATE: Director of the Global Change Institute, Ove Hoegh-Guldberg submits some climate “sceptics” to peer-review and finds them wanting.

Looking at the fundamental aspect of ‘peer review’, where, as Ove points in his paper:

Peer review is the basis of modern scientific endeavour. It underpins research and validates findings, theories and data.

Submitting scientists’ claims to peer review is a straightforward way to assess their credibility.

It stands to reason that the peer reviewing, in order for it to be meaningful, would be done by other qualified scientists, preferably in the same science field, who would thoroughly understand the work, and who would critically examine it, consider it’s accuracy, agree that the methods, experiments and conclusions were scientifically sound, and who would ask questions and get feedback from the author where appropriate.

Selecting a peer reviewer who is associated with the project, or the author, or has some other connection or vested interest, or known pre-disposition to agree with the work would lessen the credibility of the review, or even negate it.

The Climate Commission was established by the Australian government to help build consensus around climate change.

Comment; admitted agenda to build consensus “around ? “climate change””.  No study, no debate, no consensus, no science, no impartiality, funded by the government!

Peer-reviewed by internationally respected scientists, the report summarises key evidence and conclusions regarding climate change for Australia and the world.

May have been peer-reviewed, but no acknowledgement of same, either the reviewers or any reviewing notes.

Rising temperatures, changing rainfall, threats to human health and agriculture, and deteriorating ecosystems are carefully documented from the scientific literature. The report makes compelling reading and a solid case for rapid action on greenhouse gases such as CO2.

This is Olave’s comment, an assessment that I venture to query in respect of his agreement with “rapid action on greenhouse gases such as CO2”. From a technical point of view, the implied justification for a carbon tax which relates to CO2 but not to other, perhaps more important, GHG’s, is not supported.

Now we come to a rejection of critical  comments by some experts, who are criticised for not having peer-reviewed papers.

But is there really so much scientific dispute over the facts of climate change?

One way to resolve this is to ask a simple question. If Carter and company hold different views to those expressed in the majority of the peer-reviewed, scientific literature, then have they submitted their ideas to independent and objective peer-review?

This is a critical process that sorts opinion and rhetoric from scientific knowledge and consensus.

If the answer is “yes”, there are legitimate grounds for concern over the report’s conclusion.

If the answer is “no”, the arguments against the Climate Commission’s report fall away as unsubstantiated opinion.

Three comments:  Carter and company have a great deal of expertise and published material but not in journal format. Without researching this, I believe attempts to do so have been met with prejudicial denial, at least in some cases.

Such acceptance is normally taken as a sorting of “rhetoric from scientific knowledge and consensus” but it is not necessarily the case. In fact the lack of such ‘sorting’ is a claim against many AGW published papers, including the IPCC reports where peer-reviewing is, in the outside world, termed ‘pal-reviewed’.

Thirdly, the credentials of the person making criticisms are not as relevant as are the statements, which may actually be true. True peer-reviewed statements may have a better chance of being correct, one’s with agenda bias less likely so. The persons critical of AGW alarmism are not being given a chance to openly debate their case, not that an impartial arbiter could be easily found. Climate science is far from cut and dried.

Monumental, world-changing decisions are being based on this and other such documents. Governments relying on agenda-driven documents and proposals are responsible to their public and they are letting us down by being a party to unsure and possibly false science.

Carbon trading has yet to be proved necessary and the motivation has yet to be made clear to the public.

[This post is obviously not a complete, scientific treatise on the subject. It is however, a guide to the reader to indicate that the ‘warmist’ papers are not to be taken at face value. They need to be analysed and proven to be above question before acceptance, because they are agenda-driven and might cost you your lifestyle and maybe even your freedom.]

The other series articles will be addressed, in turn.

Comments on “open letter” are Part 1: “Conversations: Climate change is happening” Part 1.

Comments on “greenhouse effect” are Part 2: “Conversations: Climate change is happening” Part 2.

Comments on “alarmist AGW views justified” are Part 3:   “Conversations: Climate change is happening” Part 3.

Comments on ” the staggering ways we influence the shape of the globe” are Part 4: “Conversations: Climate change is happening” Part 4.

Related articles
Posted in climate change, ENVIRONMENT, Human Behaviour, Justice, Media, Nature, New World Order, Politics | Leave a comment

Japanese & British Data Show Vaccines Cause Autism

Posted on November 21, 2015 by Ken McMurtrie

Sorry, I did say I would rest from the vaccine issues, BUT, this cannot be left any longer than necessary.
I would welcome any rebuttal of this proffered proof that there is a definite association between vaccines and autism.
Unless the research studies presented here can be reasonably refuted, I will continue to believe, and publish, that vaccines are much more dangerous than claimed and generally accepted.

____________________Child Health Safety_________________

add to del.icio.us ::Add to Blinkslist::add to furl ::Digg it::add to ma.gnolia::Stumble It! ::add to simpy ::seed the vine:: ::::TailRank

Just months following the US Court of Federal Claims rejection of the claim that the MMR vaccine causes autism, here you will see data from formal peer refereed medical papers showing that vaccines caused autism in British and in Japanese children and will be doing the same to children around the world. The number of Japanese children developing autism rose and fell in direct proportion to the number of children vaccinated each year:-

[click image for larger graph in new window]

080603_terada_graph

Click here on Contents for full details of the Japanese data [after our short section below on “British Data Show Vaccines Cause Autism”].

[See end of page for the above graph by annual % of children receiving MMR vaccination – still showing the same correspondence.]

For confirmation of four ways autistic conditions are caused see evidence in statements from pharmaceutical…

View original post 5,881 more words

Posted in drugs & medication, HEALTH, Public Health, Vaccine Dangers, vaccines | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Vaccinations – No Unchallenged Justification for Mandatory Enforcement.

Posted on November 20, 2015 by Ken McMurtrie

One more post on this topic and I will give it a rest. Basically an offering of my own viewpoints and conclusions.

An issue of immense ramifications, an endless number of information sources and interested parties, of major health consequences, of enormous financial outcomes and of much political significance.
There are many reasons to question many aspects of the vaccine industry and associated authorities and practices. Reasons provided by medical experts whose qualifications and experience validate their opinions. Persons without financial or political agendas, who are capable of clear thinking and logical reasoning.

A situation of “reasonable doubt” exists. Ignoring this fact is contrary to commonsense; acting in ignorance of, or in conflict with this fact, is unscientific, uncivilized and potentially dangerous to humanity.

It is suggested that there is sufficient evidence to seriously question and also to oppose the global program of enforced mandatory vaccinations, in particular the removal of logical exemptions.

From the website of CDC, ‘Centers of Disease Control and Prevention’:

Additional Facts:

Additives used in the production of vaccines may include suspending fluid (e.g. sterile water, saline, or fluids containing protein); preservatives and stabilizers to help the vaccine remain unchanged (e.g. albumin, phenols, and glycine); and adjuvants or enhancers to help the vaccine to be more effective.

Common substances found in vaccines include:

Aluminum gels or salts of aluminum which are added as adjuvants to help the vaccine stimulate a better response. Adjuvants help promote an earlier, more potent response, and more persistent immune response to the vaccine.
Antibiotics which are added to some vaccines to prevent the growth of germs (bacteria) during production and storage of the vaccine. No vaccine produced in the United States contains penicillin.
Egg protein is found in influenza and yellow fever vaccines, which are prepared using chicken eggs. Ordinarily, persons who are able to eat eggs or egg products safely can receive these vaccines.
Formaldehyde is used to inactivate bacterial products for toxoid vaccines, (these are vaccines that use an inactive bacterial toxin to produce immunity.) It is also used to kill unwanted viruses and bacteria that might contaminate the vaccine during production. Most formaldehyde is removed from the vaccine before it is packaged.
Monosodium glutamate (MSG) and 2-phenoxy-ethanol which are used as stabilizers in a few vaccines to help the vaccine remain unchanged when the vaccine is exposed to heat, light, acidity, or humidity.
Thimerosal is a mercury-containing preservative that is added to vials of vaccine that contain more than one dose to prevent contamination and growth of potentially harmful bacteria.

For children with a prior history of allergic reactions to any of these substances in vaccines, parents should consult their child’s healthcare provider before vaccination.

Bold emphases are mine and highlight the items that should particularly concern parents.  Even ‘antibiotics’ are questionable considering that we are trying to minimize their use because antibiotics resistance is becoming a real problem. Adding multiple doses to babies and children’s bodies has potential negative ramifications.

Insufficient or inadequate testing precludes a statistically valid basis for the industry to claim “vaccines are safe and effective”. Perhaps they may be “safe”? most of the time, “effective” most of the time, but therefore can only be correctly termed relatively “safe and effective”.

But there are genuine reasons for asking if the ‘price’ paid by some, is morally and ethically acceptable in order to achieve the “greater good”?

The claim of known recognized toxic elements contained in vaccines being only a small and insignificant risk to babies and children because they are “trace amounts” is unproven. In fact, there are substantial proofs that they are causing harm.
Harm admitted by the manufacturers and overseeing authorities, harm officially recognized in legal court dealings, harm experienced by a small but important number of families. Harm which is readily seen in the case of the HPV vaccines, harm which is scientifically challengable in both multi-vaccine doses, and administering more than one vaccine in a session.

Are the numbers of harmed individuals relatively small? Even 1 in a million is too many for that 1 case to feel justice. But there are in fact many! Many more than the official statistics take into account. It is reasonably estimated that non-recognition and non-reporting of cases make the official figures less than 10% (at best) of real cases.

Regarding the “greater good”, numerous compelling arguments dispute the necessity for vaccines in many cases, the effectiveness of the vaccines in several cases and the justification for mandatory application of vaccines in general.

Regarding the “trace amount” argument, as mentioned above, there are no authentic trial results to prove a “safe” conclusion. For some inexplicable reason(s), doses of vaccines are not regulated for babies and children in step with their body weight and they in fact receive the same as young adults. Yet doses of any oral medicines are regulated for children. Why is that so?

Also re “trace amounts”, besides being basically untested and therefore an unknown risk, scientists (some), authorities and people in general are quite happy to accept a strong “scientific” conclusion that 400 parts per million, a 0.04% trace amount, of CO2 in our atmosphere, regulates our planetary global temperature.

There is no justification for the public to be coerced into a compulsory health program without due consideration for adverse reactions, allergies, state of health or personal or religious beliefs. Any considerations of such matters are to unjustly ignore the significance of the criticisms and to discard them.

If the medical justifications are not sufficiently compelling for the vast majority of members of the public to voluntarily accept vaccinations, the reasons for the doubts must be dealt with.
Not by denial, but by data and authentic scientific studies which are above criticism. Such proofs do not exist to the degree that ethically and morally justify mandatory vaccinations.

Without any guarantee of safety (there is none!), should we accept authoritarian laws that take away parent’s rights to care for their own children?

It is mooted that adults may soon be targeted with similar mandatory vaccination requirements. That would be even greater extraordinary authoritarian behaviour from our leaders. Even less justification and even more invasive of our civil liberties!

There you have my opinions.  (Substantially supported by industry whistle-blowers and recognized professionals).

References:
CDC http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vac-gen/additives.htm
Vaccine Truth http://vactruth.com/
Vaccine xchange http://vaccinexchange.org/
Natural News: http://www.naturalnews.com/
Natural Society http://naturalsociety.com/search_gcse/?q=vaccines
Australian Vaccination-skeptics Network (AVN) https://avn.org.au/
Silent Epidemic; The Untold Story of Vaccines https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K1m3TjokVU4

Posted in AGENDA 21, AUSTRALIA, drugs & medication, HEALTH, vaccines | Tagged , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Study: Vaccinated Children Have 2 to 5 Times More Diseases and Disorders Than Unvaccinated Children

Posted on November 18, 2015 by Ken McMurtrie

Genuine expert information to give cause to open-minded consideration.

Mandatory vaccinations are far from fair, safe, necessary, ethical or justified.

by David Michael Augenstein
Journal of Natural Food and Health

A German study released in September 2011 of about 8000 UNVACCINATED children, newborn to 19 years, show vaccinated children have at least 2 to 5 times more diseases and disorders than unvaccinated children.

The results are presented in the bar chart below; the complete data and study results are here. The data is compared to the national German KIGGS health study of the children in the general population. Most of the respondents to the survey were from the U.S.

The data was collected from parents with vaccine-free children via an internet questionnaire by vaccineinjury.info and Andreas Bachmair, a German classical homeopathic practitioner. The website is not a pretty one (including Google ads for vaccines) but the actual data is what counts. The independent study is self-funded and is not sponsored by a large “credible” non-profit or government health organization with political and financial conflicts of interest. Each one of the 8000 cases are actual cases with medical documentation. Three other studies had similar results according to Bachmair and are reported below.

No study of health outcomes of vaccinated people versus unvaccinated has ever been conducted in the U.S. by CDC or any other agency in the 50 years or more of an accelerating schedule of vaccinations (now over 50 doses of 14 vaccines given before kindergarten, 26 doses in the first year). Most data collected by CDC is contained in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) database. The VAERS is generally thought to contain only 3 to 5 percent of reportable incidents. This is simply because only some immediate reactions are reported by doctors; but many are not admitted to be reactions to the vaccine. Most importantly, the VAERS numbers are only immediate reactions, which I would place with a few hours to a few weeks. Long-term vaccine-induced diseases and disorders are not recognized by parents or doctors when these conditions develop perhaps a few months to five years or more and would never be realized to come from multiple vaccinations. In other words, many children and adults have diseases and disorders that are vaccine induced and they never suspect they are from the vaccines, as this study indicates.

– See more at: http://healthimpactnews.com/2011/new-study-vaccinated-children-have-2-to-5-times-more-diseases-and-disorders-than-unvaccinated-children/#sthash.qi07guUh.dpuf

Posted in drugs & medication, HEALTH, Public Health, Vaccination Dangers | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Parliament of Australia – Mandatory Vaccinations – Democrazy!

Posted on November 16, 2015 by Ken McMurtrie

A post concerning mandatory vaccinations becoming law in Australia.
This is the way our Australian democracy works – A committee is advised what the government wants and then hold an inquiry that confirms and upholds the desired end result.
Evidence of serious issues are ignored:

NO consideration of the health status of the recipients.
NO consideration for the basic rights of parents.
No consideration for the rights of the child.
NO consideration for the absence of proven safety of individual vaccines and especially that of multiple applications.
NO consideration for establishing the need for particular vaccines in different situations.
NO regard for information provided in the public submissions which were, in the committee’s own words “The majority of the correspondence received was from individuals who oppose the bill.”
So far removed from logic, science and commonsense that it points to a hidden agenda being enacted.
“Democrazy” is a more appropriate interpretation.
Not only a mockery of justice, but an insult to Australians.
How does this sound? “As part of this measure, the Government announced it would provide a $26 million boost to the Immunise Australia program ‘to encourage doctors and immunisation providers to identify and vaccinate children in their practice who are overdue’.[6]”
I am interested to see how spending on enforced vaccinations can be offset by “1.21 The Explanatory Memorandum notes that the Bill is expected to produce savings of $508.3 million over the forward estimates.[21]” If this is calculated to be savings from healthier children and less work sickies, perhaps they have forgotten the health costs of dealing with adverse reaction issues which may even exceed any known-to-be-fallible and non-guaranteed benefits of vaccinating.
The committee judgment does not go unchallenged, even by its peers! “ 1.22 The Parliamentary Joint Committee on Human Rights (PJCHR) found the Bill engages and places limits on the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion as set out in article 18 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and sought advice from the Minister on whether the measures were justifiable.[22] The PJCHR had not published the Minister’s response prior to the tabling of this report.”

Conduct of the inquiry
1.2 Details of the inquiry, including a link to the Bill and associated documents, were placed on the committee’s website. The committee also wrote to 31 organisations and individuals, inviting submissions by 16 October 2015.
1.3 The committee received over 2000 pieces of correspondence related to the inquiry, which included submissions, form letters and short general statements. The majority of the correspondence received was from individuals who oppose the bill.
1.4 On 28 October 2015 the committee determined to publish the following statement on the inquiry page:
The committee has received a large volume of submissions in relation to this inquiry and wishes to assure submitters that each piece of correspondence to the inquiry is being read and considered. The committee has decided to publish all submissions from organisations and a representative sample of the submissions received from individuals. Owing to the sensitive and personal nature of many submissions, the committee has decided that the representative sample will be drawn from those for which it has received clear advice from the submitter supporting publication. The committee has decided not to publish submissions comprising short or general statements, form/campaign letters and petitions, but has noted the concerns raised in them.
1.5 The committee published 550 submissions, including 25 submissions received from organisations. The committee also published two samples of form letters. The committee considered and noted all other unpublished correspondence.[2]
1.6 The committee held a public hearing in Brisbane on 2 November 2015.

Posted in AUSTRALIA, Politics, Vaccination Dangers | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment